Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (45 loc) · 8.28 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (45 loc) · 8.28 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for identityserver/identityserver4

Attack Surface: Redirect URI Validation Bypass

  • Description: Attackers can manipulate the redirect_uri parameter in authorization requests to redirect users to malicious sites after successful authentication.
  • IdentityServer4 Contribution: IdentityServer4 relies on configured and validated Redirect URIs for clients. Weak validation or misconfiguration within IdentityServer4's client configuration allows bypassing this check.
  • Example: An attacker crafts an authorization request with a malicious redirect_uri like https://evil.example.com. If IdentityServer4's client configuration has a wildcard or overly broad redirect URI pattern, or if the validation logic in IdentityServer4 is flawed, it might accept this URI. After successful authentication, the user is redirected to the attacker's site, potentially exposing authorization codes or user credentials through phishing.
  • Impact: Account compromise, data theft, phishing attacks, malware distribution.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Redirect URI Whitelisting in IdentityServer4 Client Configuration: Implement strict whitelisting of allowed Redirect URIs for each client directly within IdentityServer4's client configuration.
    • Exact URI Matching in IdentityServer4: Configure IdentityServer4 to prefer exact URI matching over wildcard matching for Redirect URIs.
    • Avoid URL Parameter Based Redirects (Guidance for Client Developers): Discourage or carefully validate Redirect URIs that include URL parameters in client applications, as these are easier to manipulate.
    • Regularly Review and Audit IdentityServer4 Client Configurations: Periodically review and audit configured Redirect URIs in IdentityServer4 client configurations to ensure they are legitimate and up-to-date.

Attack Surface: Client Secret Exposure

  • Description: Client secrets, used for confidential client authentication, are compromised due to insecure storage or transmission.
  • IdentityServer4 Contribution: IdentityServer4 directly relies on client secrets for confidential clients to securely authenticate with the token endpoint. Compromising these secrets directly undermines IdentityServer4's security model.
  • Example: A developer hardcodes a client secret in the client-side JavaScript code or commits it to a public code repository. An attacker finds this exposed secret and can impersonate the configured client in IdentityServer4, potentially gaining unauthorized access to resources or data protected by IdentityServer4.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to resources protected by IdentityServer4, data breaches, privilege escalation, account takeover.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Secret Storage (Best Practices for Deploying Applications Using IdentityServer4): Store client secrets securely using environment variables, secrets management systems (like HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault), or secure configuration stores outside of the application code and version control.
    • Avoid Hardcoding Secrets in Applications Using IdentityServer4: Never hardcode client secrets in application code, especially client-side code or version control systems.
    • Secret Rotation (Best Practices for IdentityServer4 and Client Applications): Implement regular rotation of client secrets to limit the window of opportunity if a secret is compromised.
    • Confidential Client Usage (Correctly Configuring Clients in IdentityServer4): Use confidential clients in IdentityServer4 configuration only when the client can actually securely store a secret. For public clients (e.g., SPAs), configure them as public clients in IdentityServer4 and use PKCE, avoiding client secrets.

Attack Surface: Parameter Injection Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious code or manipulate parameters in IdentityServer4 endpoints (e.g., /authorize, /token) to bypass security checks or execute arbitrary code.
  • IdentityServer4 Contribution: Like any web application, IdentityServer4's own endpoints are susceptible to parameter injection if input validation and sanitization within IdentityServer4's code are insufficient.
  • Example: An attacker injects malicious SQL code into a parameter in the /authorize endpoint, hoping to exploit a SQL injection vulnerability in IdentityServer4's backend database interactions if input is not properly sanitized before database queries. Or, an attacker injects script into a parameter expecting it to be reflected in an error message generated by IdentityServer4, leading to reflected XSS in IdentityServer4's UI.
  • Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized access to IdentityServer4's data, code execution on the IdentityServer4 server, denial of service of IdentityServer4.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the type and severity of injection)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization within IdentityServer4 Codebase: Ensure robust input validation and sanitization are implemented for all parameters in IdentityServer4's endpoint handlers. (This is primarily the responsibility of the IdentityServer4 development and security team, but users should ensure they are using patched and up-to-date versions).
    • Parameterized Queries/ORMs within IdentityServer4 Codebase: Use parameterized queries or Object-Relational Mappers (ORMs) to prevent SQL injection when IdentityServer4 interacts with databases. (Again, primarily IdentityServer4's responsibility).
    • Output Encoding in IdentityServer4 UI: Properly encode output to prevent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if user-provided input is displayed in IdentityServer4's UI components or error messages.
    • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing of IdentityServer4 Deployments: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of IdentityServer4 deployments to identify and remediate injection vulnerabilities. Ensure IdentityServer4 itself is regularly updated to patched versions.

Attack Surface: Insecure CORS Configuration

  • Description: Overly permissive Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) policies allow requests from untrusted origins, potentially leading to cross-site scripting or data leakage.
  • IdentityServer4 Contribution: IdentityServer4's CORS configuration directly determines which origins are allowed to make requests to its endpoints. Misconfiguration in IdentityServer4's CORS settings can widen the attack surface.
  • Example: IdentityServer4 is configured with a very permissive CORS policy like AllowAnyOrigin in its configuration. This allows any website, including malicious ones, to make requests to IdentityServer4's endpoints, potentially enabling cross-site scripting attacks or unauthorized access to APIs if combined with other vulnerabilities in applications relying on IdentityServer4.
  • Impact: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) against applications using IdentityServer4, data leakage from applications using IdentityServer4, unauthorized API access to IdentityServer4 endpoints, session hijacking of IdentityServer4 sessions.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Restrictive CORS Policy in IdentityServer4 Configuration: Configure CORS policies in IdentityServer4's settings to only allow requests from explicitly trusted origins.
    • Origin Whitelisting in IdentityServer4 Configuration: Use a whitelist of allowed origins in IdentityServer4's CORS configuration instead of wildcard (*) or overly broad patterns.
    • Regularly Review IdentityServer4 CORS Configuration: Periodically review and update CORS configuration in IdentityServer4 to ensure it remains restrictive and aligned with application needs.
    • Understand CORS Implications (Guidance for IdentityServer4 Administrators): Ensure administrators deploying and configuring IdentityServer4 understand the security implications of CORS and configure it correctly.