Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
121 lines (108 loc) · 14.6 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

121 lines (108 loc) · 14.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for identityserver/identityserver4

Objective: Compromise Application using IdentityServer4

Attack Tree Visualization

High-Risk Sub-Tree:

  • 1. Exploit Configuration Flaws in IdentityServer4 Setup (HIGH RISK PATH)
    • 1.3.1. Weak or Default Signing Keys (CRITICAL NODE)
      • 1.3.1.1. Gain access to IdentityServer4 configuration or key store
      • 1.3.1.2. Identify usage of weak or default signing keys
    • 1.3.2. Insecure CORS Configuration (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 1.3.2.1. Identify overly permissive CORS policy on IdentityServer4 endpoints (CRITICAL NODE)
      • 1.3.2.2. Exploit CORS misconfiguration via client-side attack (e.g., XSS on client app)
    • 1.3.3. Exposed Sensitive Endpoints without proper Authentication/Authorization (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 1.3.3.1. Identify sensitive IdentityServer4 endpoints (e.g., configuration, key material) (CRITICAL NODE)
      • 1.3.3.2. Access these endpoints due to misconfigured authorization policies (CRITICAL NODE)
    • 1.3.4. Logging Sensitive Information (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 1.3.4.1. Gain access to IdentityServer4 logs (e.g., server access, log injection)
      • 1.3.4.2. Extract sensitive information from logs (e.g., secrets, tokens, user data) (CRITICAL NODE)
  • 2. Exploit Client Application Misconfigurations/Vulnerabilities Related to IdentityServer4 Integration (HIGH RISK PATH)
    • 2.1. Insecure Redirect URI Handling (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 2.1.1. Open Redirect Vulnerability in Client Application
      • 2.1.2. Redirect URI Manipulation (HIGH RISK PATH)
        • 2.1.2.1. Identify weakly validated redirect URIs in IdentityServer4 client configuration (CRITICAL NODE)
        • 2.1.2.2. Manipulate redirect URI during authorization flow to redirect to attacker-controlled site
    • 2.2. Client-Side Vulnerabilities in Client Application (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 2.2.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (CRITICAL NODE)
        • 2.2.1.1. Identify XSS vulnerability in client application
        • 2.2.1.2. Inject malicious script to steal tokens, session cookies, or manipulate application state (CRITICAL NODE)
    • 2.3. Insecure Storage of Tokens or Secrets in Client Application (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 2.3.1. Insecure Local Storage/Session Storage (CRITICAL NODE)
        • 2.3.1.1. Client application stores tokens or secrets in browser's local/session storage (CRITICAL NODE)
        • 2.3.1.2. Attacker gains access to local/session storage (e.g., via XSS, compromised device)
      • 2.3.2. Hardcoded Secrets in Client-Side Code (CRITICAL NODE)
        • 2.3.2.1. Client application contains hardcoded secrets (e.g., client secrets, API keys) in JavaScript code (CRITICAL NODE)
        • 2.3.2.2. Attacker gains access to client-side code (e.g., decompiling, source code access)
  • 3. Token Manipulation and Theft (HIGH RISK PATH)
    • 3.2. Token Theft via Client-Side Exploits (Refer to 2.2.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (CRITICAL NODE))
  • 4. Social Engineering and Credential Compromise (HIGH RISK PATH)
    • 4.1. Phishing Attacks Targeting User Credentials (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 4.1.1. Create convincing phishing page mimicking IdentityServer4 login page
      • 4.1.2. Lure users to phishing page to steal credentials (CRITICAL NODE)
    • 4.2. Credential Stuffing/Brute-Force Attacks (HIGH RISK PATH)
      • 4.2.1. Users utilize weak or reused passwords
      • 4.2.2. IdentityServer4 lacks sufficient rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms
      • 4.2.3. Perform credential stuffing or brute-force attack to guess user credentials (CRITICAL NODE)

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Configuration Flaws in IdentityServer4 Setup (HIGH RISK PATH)

  • Description: This high-risk path focuses on exploiting weaknesses arising from improper configuration of IdentityServer4 itself. Misconfigurations are common and can have a wide range of impacts.
  • Critical Nodes:
    • 1.3.1. Weak or Default Signing Keys (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: If IdentityServer4 uses weak or default signing keys for JWTs (JSON Web Tokens), an attacker can forge tokens.
      • Impact: Token forgery allows the attacker to impersonate any user, bypass authentication, and gain full access to the application. This is a critical vulnerability.
      • Mitigation: Generate strong, unique signing keys and securely store and manage them. Regularly rotate keys.
    • 1.3.2.1. Identify overly permissive CORS policy on IdentityServer4 endpoints (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: If IdentityServer4's CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) policy is too permissive, it might allow malicious websites to make requests to sensitive IdentityServer4 endpoints.
      • Impact: An overly permissive CORS policy can be exploited via client-side attacks (like XSS in the client application) to steal tokens or sensitive information from IdentityServer4.
      • Mitigation: Configure CORS policies to be restrictive, only allowing trusted origins. Validate and sanitize Origin headers.
    • 1.3.3.1. Identify sensitive IdentityServer4 endpoints (e.g., configuration, key material) (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Sensitive IdentityServer4 endpoints (like those exposing configuration details, key material, or internal status) might be unintentionally exposed without proper authentication or authorization.
      • Impact: Exposure of these endpoints can leak critical security information, potentially leading to complete system compromise if secrets or keys are revealed.
      • Mitigation: Implement robust authentication and authorization for all IdentityServer4 endpoints, especially sensitive ones. Regularly audit endpoint access controls.
    • 1.3.3.2. Access these endpoints due to misconfigured authorization policies (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Even if authentication is in place, authorization policies might be misconfigured, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive IdentityServer4 endpoints.
      • Impact: Similar to 1.3.3.1, unauthorized access can lead to information leakage and potential system compromise.
      • Mitigation: Implement and enforce least privilege authorization policies. Regularly review and test authorization configurations.
    • 1.3.4.2. Extract sensitive information from logs (e.g., secrets, tokens, user data) (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: If IdentityServer4 logs sensitive information (like secrets, tokens, or user credentials), and these logs are accessible to attackers (e.g., due to server compromise or log injection vulnerabilities), the sensitive data can be extracted.
      • Impact: Exposure of sensitive information in logs can lead to credential theft, data breaches, and further system compromise.
      • Mitigation: Avoid logging sensitive information. Redact or mask sensitive data in logs. Securely store and manage logs with proper access controls and encryption.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Client Application Misconfigurations/Vulnerabilities Related to IdentityServer4 Integration (HIGH RISK PATH)

  • Description: This high-risk path targets vulnerabilities and misconfigurations within the client application that interacts with IdentityServer4. Client-side security is often a weaker point than server-side.
  • Critical Nodes:
    • 2.1.2.1. Identify weakly validated redirect URIs in IdentityServer4 client configuration (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: If IdentityServer4 client configurations allow weakly validated or overly broad redirect URIs (e.g., using wildcards or not properly validating against a whitelist), attackers can manipulate the redirect URI in the authorization flow.
      • Impact: Redirect URI manipulation can be used to perform OAuth 2.0 authorization code interception attacks, where the attacker steals the authorization code and exchanges it for tokens, gaining unauthorized access.
      • Mitigation: Strictly validate and sanitize redirect URIs in IdentityServer4 client configurations. Use allowlists of valid redirect URIs. Avoid dynamic or overly permissive redirect URI configurations.
    • 2.2.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the client application allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into the user's browser when they interact with the application.
      • Impact: XSS can be used to steal tokens stored in the browser, hijack user sessions, perform actions on behalf of the user, or manipulate the application state. This is a highly impactful client-side vulnerability.
      • Mitigation: Implement robust input validation and output encoding in the client application to prevent XSS. Use Content Security Policy (CSP) to further mitigate XSS risks. Regularly scan for and remediate XSS vulnerabilities.
    • 2.2.1.2. Inject malicious script to steal tokens, session cookies, or manipulate application state (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Once an XSS vulnerability (as in 2.2.1) is identified, attackers can inject malicious JavaScript code.
      • Impact: This injected script can be used to steal access tokens, refresh tokens, session cookies, or any other sensitive data accessible in the browser's context. It can also be used to manipulate the client application's behavior or redirect the user to malicious sites.
      • Mitigation: Focus on preventing XSS vulnerabilities (see 2.2.1 mitigation). Implement client-side security monitoring and anomaly detection to detect and respond to XSS exploitation attempts.
    • 2.3.1.1. Client application stores tokens or secrets in browser's local/session storage (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Storing sensitive information like access tokens, refresh tokens, or client secrets in browser's local storage or session storage is inherently insecure. JavaScript in the client application and potentially malicious scripts (via XSS) can access this storage.
      • Impact: If tokens or secrets are stored in local/session storage, they become easily accessible to attackers, especially if XSS vulnerabilities exist or if the user's device is compromised. This can lead to immediate token theft and account takeover.
      • Mitigation: Avoid storing sensitive information in browser's local storage or session storage. Use secure cookies with HttpOnly and Secure flags for session management when necessary. Consider using more secure storage mechanisms if absolutely required and available in the browser environment.
    • 2.3.2.1. Client application contains hardcoded secrets (e.g., client secrets, API keys) in JavaScript code (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Hardcoding secrets (like client secrets or API keys) directly in client-side JavaScript code is a severe security flaw. Client-side code is easily accessible and inspectable.
      • Impact: Hardcoded secrets in client-side code are trivially exposed to anyone who can access the application's JavaScript. This can lead to complete compromise of the client application and potentially backend systems if API keys are exposed.
      • Mitigation: Never hardcode secrets in client-side code. Secrets should be managed securely on the server-side and accessed through secure channels.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Token Manipulation and Theft (HIGH RISK PATH)

  • Description: This path focuses on attacks aimed at directly stealing or manipulating tokens issued by IdentityServer4. Token compromise is a direct route to unauthorized access.
  • Critical Nodes:
    • 3.2. Token Theft via Client-Side Exploits (Refer to 2.2.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (CRITICAL NODE))
      • Attack Vector: As described in 2.2.1.2, XSS vulnerabilities in the client application are a primary method for attackers to steal tokens.
      • Impact: Token theft allows the attacker to impersonate the user and gain unauthorized access to protected resources.
      • Mitigation: Focus on preventing and mitigating XSS vulnerabilities in the client application (see mitigations for 2.2.1).

Attack Tree Path: 4. Social Engineering and Credential Compromise (HIGH RISK PATH)

  • Description: This high-risk path exploits human factors through social engineering and targets user credentials directly. These attacks often bypass technical security controls.
  • Critical Nodes:
    • 4.1.2. Lure users to phishing page to steal credentials (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Phishing attacks involve creating fake login pages that mimic the legitimate IdentityServer4 login page and tricking users into entering their credentials.
      • Impact: Successful phishing attacks result in credential theft, allowing attackers to directly log in as the compromised user and gain full account access.
      • Mitigation: User education and awareness training about phishing attacks are crucial. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) to add an extra layer of security even if credentials are phished. Use phishing detection tools and domain monitoring.
    • 4.2.3. Perform credential stuffing or brute-force attack to guess user credentials (CRITICAL NODE)
      • Attack Vector: Credential stuffing and brute-force attacks involve attempting to log in using lists of known usernames and passwords (often from previous data breaches) or by systematically guessing passwords.
      • Impact: If users use weak or reused passwords, and IdentityServer4 lacks sufficient rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms, these attacks can be successful in guessing user credentials and compromising accounts.
      • Mitigation: Enforce strong password policies. Implement rate limiting and account lockout mechanisms to prevent brute-force and credential stuffing attacks. Encourage users to use unique and strong passwords and consider using password managers. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) as a strong defense against credential-based attacks.