Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (127 loc) · 19.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

164 lines (127 loc) · 19.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for jstedfast/mailkit

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation and Sanitization for User-Provided Email Data Processed by MailKit

  • Description:

    1. Validate Email Addresses Before MailKit Usage: Implement server-side validation using a robust library or regular expression to ensure user-provided email addresses are valid before passing them to MailKit methods like message.To.Add(), message.Cc.Add(), message.Bcc.Add(), or when constructing MailboxAddress objects.
    2. Sanitize User-Provided Content Before Setting MailKit Body: If users provide content that will be used as the email body, especially for HTML emails, sanitize this content using an HTML sanitization library before setting it as the message.Body property in MailKit. This prevents malicious HTML from being embedded in emails sent via MailKit.
    3. Validate Search Queries Before MailKit IMAP/POP3 Operations: If your application allows users to construct search queries for IMAP or POP3 servers, validate and sanitize these queries before using them in MailKit's ImapClient.Search() or Pop3Client.GetMessages() methods. This helps prevent injection attacks that could manipulate server-side search operations performed by MailKit.
    4. Limit Input Lengths for MailKit Properties: Enforce reasonable limits on the length of user-provided data that will be assigned to MailKit properties like message.Subject, message.Body.Text, or header values to prevent potential buffer overflow issues or denial-of-service when MailKit processes this data.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Email Header Injection (High Severity): Malicious users could inject extra headers into emails by manipulating email address fields or other header-related inputs processed by MailKit, potentially leading to spam, phishing, or bypassing security filters.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Emails (Medium to High Severity): If HTML email content is not sanitized and later rendered, malicious scripts could be executed if the email is sent via MailKit and viewed in a vulnerable client.
      • IMAP/POP3 Search Query Injection (Medium Severity): Attackers could manipulate search queries used by MailKit to access emails they shouldn't have access to or cause denial-of-service by crafting complex queries executed by MailKit.
      • Buffer Overflow/Denial of Service (Low to Medium Severity): Extremely long inputs passed to MailKit properties could potentially trigger buffer overflows or cause denial-of-service during MailKit processing.

    • Impact:

      • Email Header Injection: High Risk Reduction. Effectively prevents header injection attacks by ensuring data passed to MailKit for header construction is validated.
      • XSS in Emails: High Risk Reduction. Significantly reduces the risk of XSS by sanitizing content before MailKit includes it in email bodies.
      • IMAP/POP3 Search Query Injection: Medium Risk Reduction. Reduces the risk by limiting injection possibilities in queries used by MailKit for server-side searches.
      • Buffer Overflow/Denial of Service: Low to Medium Risk Reduction. Mitigates some DoS risks associated with overly long inputs handled by MailKit.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Email Address Validation: Partially implemented in user registration forms using client-side JavaScript. Server-side validation before MailKit usage is missing.
      • Content Sanitization: Not implemented for user-generated email content before setting MailKit body.
      • Search Query Validation/Parameterization: Not applicable as the application doesn't currently expose email search functionality using MailKit.
      • Input Length Limits: Implemented on some UI fields, but not consistently enforced server-side before data is passed to MailKit.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Server-side email address validation before MailKit: Needs to be implemented in backend API endpoints before using email addresses with MailKit.
      • HTML content sanitization before setting MailKit body: Crucially missing if HTML emails with user-provided content are used. Needs to be implemented before setting the MailKit message body.
      • Server-side enforcement of input length limits before MailKit: Needs to be implemented in backend validation logic before passing data to MailKit properties.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Secure Connection Protocols (TLS/SSL) in MailKit

  • Description:

    1. Explicitly Set SecureSocketOptions in MailKit: In your MailKit connection code (e.g., when creating ImapClient, Pop3Client, SmtpClient), always explicitly set the SecureSocketOptions property to SslOnConnect for implicit TLS or StartTlsWhenAvailable for explicit TLS. Avoid using SecureSocketOptions.None in production when using MailKit.
    2. Verify Connection Upgrade (StartTLS) with MailKit: If using StartTlsWhenAvailable with MailKit, add code to verify that the connection has successfully upgraded to TLS after the initial connection using MailKit's connection state or events.
    3. Certificate Validation via MailKit: Ensure MailKit's default certificate validation is enabled. For stricter control or specific environments, implement custom certificate validation logic using the ServerCertificateValidationCallback event provided by MailKit. Consider certificate pinning for enhanced security in specific scenarios within MailKit's certificate handling.
    4. Disable Insecure Fallback in MailKit: Do not allow fallback to insecure connections if TLS negotiation fails when using MailKit. Handle connection failures gracefully and inform the user or log the error.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Without TLS/SSL configured in MailKit, attackers can intercept network traffic between your application and the email server, potentially stealing credentials, email content, and other sensitive data transmitted via MailKit.
      • Passive Eavesdropping (Medium Severity): Even without active manipulation, unencrypted connections established by MailKit allow passive eavesdropping on email communications, compromising confidentiality.

    • Impact:

      • MITM Attacks: High Risk Reduction. TLS/SSL encryption enforced through MailKit effectively prevents MITM attacks by encrypting communication channels.
      • Passive Eavesdropping: High Risk Reduction. Encryption configured in MailKit renders passively intercepted data unreadable.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • SecureSocketOptions in MailKit: SslOnConnect is used for SMTP connections in the email sending service using MailKit. For IMAP/POP3, StartTlsWhenAvailable is used, but without explicit verification of TLS upgrade within MailKit connection handling.
      • Certificate Validation via MailKit: Default MailKit certificate validation is enabled.
      • Insecure Fallback in MailKit: No explicit fallback to insecure connections is implemented in the current code using MailKit.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Explicit TLS Upgrade Verification in MailKit: Verification of TLS upgrade after StartTlsWhenAvailable needs to be added to the IMAP/POP3 connection logic within the MailKit connection process.
      • Custom Certificate Validation/Pinning (Optional) in MailKit: Consider implementing custom certificate validation or certificate pinning using MailKit's features for higher security environments.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Authentication Mechanisms Supported by MailKit

  • Description:

    1. Utilize OAuth 2.0 with MailKit: If the email provider supports OAuth 2.0 (e.g., Gmail, Outlook.com), implement OAuth 2.0 authentication flow using MailKit's built-in OAuth support instead of username/password authentication. This reduces reliance on storing passwords and enhances security when authenticating with MailKit.
    2. Secure Credential Handling for MailKit Authentication: When using username/password authentication with MailKit, ensure credentials are not hardcoded and are securely retrieved from environment variables, secure configuration files, or dedicated secret management services before being used with MailKit.
    3. Least Privilege Accounts for MailKit Operations: Create dedicated email accounts for application use with the minimum necessary permissions. For example, use SMTP-only accounts for sending emails and accounts with restricted folder access for reading emails when configuring MailKit connections.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Credential Theft/Exposure (High Severity): Insecurely handled credentials used for MailKit authentication can be compromised, leading to unauthorized access to email accounts.
      • Unauthorized Email Access/Sending (High Severity): Compromised credentials used with MailKit can allow attackers to read, delete, or send emails without authorization.

    • Impact:

      • Credential Theft/Exposure: High Risk Reduction. Secure credential handling for MailKit authentication reduces the risk of credential exposure.
      • Unauthorized Email Access/Sending: High Risk Reduction. OAuth 2.0 and least privilege accounts limit the scope of potential damage even if authentication is compromised.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • OAuth 2.0 with MailKit: Not implemented. Username/password authentication is used for all email accounts with MailKit.
      • Secure Credential Handling for MailKit Authentication: Email credentials are currently stored in environment variables on the deployment server and used for MailKit authentication.
      • Least Privilege Accounts for MailKit Operations: A dedicated application email account is used, but permissions are not strictly limited in the context of MailKit access.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • OAuth 2.0 Implementation with MailKit: Should be prioritized for email providers that support it to enhance authentication security when using MailKit.
      • Least Privilege Account Restriction for MailKit: Permissions for the application email account should be reviewed and restricted to the minimum necessary for MailKit's required operations.

Mitigation Strategy: Carefully Handle Email Attachments Processed by MailKit

  • Description:

    1. Attachment Scanning Before MailKit Processing/Download: Integrate with an antivirus/malware scanning service to scan all downloaded attachments received via MailKit before allowing users to access or download them or before further processing by the application.
    2. Restrict Attachment Types Handled by MailKit: Implement a whitelist of allowed attachment file types and reject or warn users about attachments with disallowed types received or processed by MailKit. Blacklist known dangerous file types.
    3. Attachment Size Limits for MailKit Processing: Enforce reasonable size limits for attachments handled by MailKit to prevent denial-of-service attacks or the delivery of extremely large malicious files.
    4. Sandboxed Processing of Attachments Received via MailKit (If Needed): If attachments received via MailKit need to be processed, perform this processing in a sandboxed environment to isolate the main application from potential malware execution.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malware/Virus Infection (High Severity): Malicious attachments received and potentially processed via MailKit can infect the application server or user devices.
      • Phishing Attacks via Attachments (Medium to High Severity): Malicious attachments received via MailKit can be used in phishing attacks.
      • Denial of Service via Large Attachments (Medium Severity): Extremely large attachments handled by MailKit can consume excessive resources.

    • Impact:

      • Malware/Virus Infection: High Risk Reduction. Attachment scanning and type restrictions for MailKit attachments significantly reduce malware risk.
      • Phishing Attacks via Attachments: Medium Risk Reduction. Attachment type restrictions and user awareness for MailKit attachments can help avoid phishing.
      • Denial of Service via Large Attachments: Medium Risk Reduction. Size limits for MailKit attachments prevent DoS attacks based on oversized files.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Attachment Scanning: Not implemented for attachments received or processed by MailKit.
      • Restrict Attachment Types: No restrictions on attachment types are currently enforced for MailKit operations.
      • Attachment Size Limits: A general file upload size limit exists, but not specifically for email attachments handled by MailKit.
      • Sandboxed Processing: Not applicable as attachments received via MailKit are not processed currently.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Attachment Scanning for MailKit Attachments: Needs to be implemented for attachments received via MailKit.
      • Attachment Type Restrictions for MailKit: A blacklist of dangerous file types should be implemented for attachments handled by MailKit.
      • Attachment Size Limits (Specific to Emails in MailKit): Implement size limits specifically for email attachments processed by MailKit.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update MailKit and Dependencies

  • Description:

    1. Dependency Management for MailKit: Use a dependency management tool (e.g., NuGet for .NET) to manage MailKit and its dependencies.
    2. Regular MailKit Updates: Establish a schedule for regularly checking for and applying updates to MailKit and all its dependencies. Monitor security advisories and release notes from the MailKit project.
    3. Automated Dependency Scanning for MailKit: Integrate automated dependency scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically detect known vulnerabilities in MailKit and its dependencies.
    4. Patching Process for MailKit Vulnerabilities: Establish a process for promptly applying security patches and updates when vulnerabilities are identified in MailKit or its dependencies.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Exploitation of Known MailKit Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated MailKit versions may contain known security vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit.

    • Impact:

      • Exploitation of Known MailKit Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction. Regularly updating MailKit ensures that known vulnerabilities are patched.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Dependency Management for MailKit: NuGet is used for dependency management.
      • Regular MailKit Updates: Updates are applied occasionally, but no regular schedule is in place for MailKit specifically.
      • Automated Dependency Scanning for MailKit: Not implemented.
      • Patching Process for MailKit Vulnerabilities: No formal patching process is defined for MailKit vulnerabilities.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Regular MailKit Update Schedule: Establish a defined schedule for checking and applying MailKit updates (e.g., monthly).
      • Automated Dependency Scanning for MailKit: Integrate dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline for continuous vulnerability monitoring of MailKit.
      • Formal Patching Process for MailKit: Define a process for quickly applying security patches when MailKit vulnerabilities are identified.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Logging and Monitoring for MailKit Operations

  • Description:

    1. Comprehensive Logging of MailKit Operations: Log relevant MailKit operations, including connection attempts (success/failure), authentication events within MailKit, email sending/receiving actions performed by MailKit, errors, and exceptions raised by MailKit.
    2. Centralized Logging for MailKit Logs: Include MailKit operation logs in the centralized logging system to collect and aggregate logs from all application instances.
    3. Security Monitoring and Alerting for MailKit Events: Set up monitoring and alerting rules to detect suspicious activity in MailKit logs, such as repeated login failures reported by MailKit, unusual email sending patterns detected in MailKit operations, or errors related to security within MailKit.
    4. Log Review and Analysis of MailKit Logs: Regularly review MailKit logs to identify potential security incidents, track trends, and improve security posture related to email processing with MailKit.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Delayed Incident Detection (Medium to High Severity): Without proper logging and monitoring of MailKit operations, security incidents related to email processing might go unnoticed.
      • Insufficient Forensic Information (Medium Severity): Lack of detailed logs of MailKit operations can hinder incident response and forensic analysis.

    • Impact:

      • Delayed Incident Detection: High Risk Reduction. Logging and monitoring of MailKit operations enable faster detection of email-related security incidents.
      • Insufficient Forensic Information: High Risk Reduction. Detailed logs of MailKit operations provide valuable information for incident response and forensic analysis.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Comprehensive Logging of MailKit Operations: Basic logging is implemented for some MailKit operations (e.g., connection errors), but it's not comprehensive for all relevant MailKit activities. Logs are written to local files.
      • Centralized Logging for MailKit Logs: Not implemented. Logs are stored locally on each server.
      • Security Monitoring and Alerting for MailKit Events: No security monitoring or alerting is set up for MailKit-related logs.
      • Log Review and Analysis of MailKit Logs: Logs are reviewed infrequently and not systematically analyzed for security events related to MailKit.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Comprehensive Logging of MailKit Operations: Expand logging to cover all critical MailKit operations with sufficient detail.
      • Centralized Logging for MailKit Logs: Implement a centralized logging solution to aggregate MailKit logs from all application instances.
      • Security Monitoring and Alerting for MailKit Events: Set up monitoring rules and alerts for key security events in MailKit logs.
      • Regular Log Review and Analysis of MailKit Logs: Establish a schedule for regular log review and analysis to proactively identify and address security issues related to MailKit usage.