Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
63 lines (54 loc) · 6.15 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

63 lines (54 loc) · 6.15 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for lucasg/dependencies

Objective: Compromise Application via Dependencies (RCE or Data Breach)

Attack Tree Visualization

  • 2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Dependencies of lucasg/dependencies [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

    • (OR)
      • 2.1. Known Vulnerabilities (CVEs) in Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • (AND)
          • 2.1.1. Identify Outdated/Vulnerable Dependencies
            • Attack Vector: Use automated tools or manual checks to identify dependencies of lucasg/dependencies that have publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs). Sources include vulnerability databases, pip audit, and security advisories.
          • 2.1.2. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities
            • Attack Vector: Leverage publicly available exploits or techniques associated with the identified CVEs. Adapt these exploits to the specific context of the target application using lucasg/dependencies.
      • 2.2. Transitive Dependencies Vulnerabilities [MEDIUM-HIGH RISK PATH]
        • (AND)
          • 2.2.1. Deep Dependency Tree Analysis
            • Attack Vector: Analyze the complete dependency tree of lucasg/dependencies, including dependencies of dependencies (transitive dependencies). Tools for dependency tree visualization and analysis can be used.
          • 2.2.2. Vulnerabilities in Transitive Dependencies
            • Attack Vector: Identify vulnerabilities within these transitive dependencies. Vulnerability scanners that perform deep dependency analysis are needed to detect these less obvious vulnerabilities.

  • 4. Misconfiguration or Misuse of lucasg/dependencies by the Application [CRITICAL NODE, MEDIUM-HIGH RISK PATH]

    • (OR)
      • 4.1. Running dependencies with Elevated Privileges [CRITICAL NODE, MEDIUM-HIGH RISK PATH]
        • (AND)
          • 4.1.1. Application Runs as Root/Admin
            • Attack Vector: Exploit the common misconfiguration where the application or the part executing dependencies runs with elevated privileges (e.g., root or Administrator). This is often due to poor container configurations, development practices leaking into production, or lack of least privilege principles.
          • 4.1.2. Exploit Any Vulnerability in dependencies or its Dependencies
            • Attack Vector: Leverage any vulnerability, even seemingly minor ones (like file write issues or path traversal in dependencies), within lucasg/dependencies or its dependencies. Running with elevated privileges escalates the impact of these vulnerabilities to full system compromise.
      • 4.3. Using Outdated Version of lucasg/dependencies [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • (AND)
          • 4.3.1. Failure to Update dependencies
            • Attack Vector: Target applications that fail to regularly update lucasg/dependencies. This is a common maintenance oversight, leaving applications vulnerable to known issues in older versions.
          • 4.3.2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Outdated Version
            • Attack Vector: Exploit publicly known vulnerabilities that exist in the outdated version of lucasg/dependencies being used by the application. Public exploit databases and security advisories are key resources for this attack.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Dependencies of lucasg/dependencies (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)

Attack Vector Category: Exploiting known security flaws in third-party libraries that lucasg/dependencies relies upon.

  • Breakdown:
    • Known CVEs in Dependencies (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):
      • Attackers target publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in direct dependencies of lucasg/dependencies.
      • Tools like pip audit and vulnerability databases are used to identify vulnerable dependencies.
      • Publicly available exploits or exploit techniques are then used to compromise the application.
      • This is a common and effective attack vector due to the prevalence of vulnerabilities in software dependencies and the availability of exploit information.
    • Transitive Dependencies Vulnerabilities (Medium-High Risk Path):
      • Attackers target vulnerabilities in dependencies of dependencies (transitive dependencies), which are often overlooked in security assessments.
      • Deep dependency tree analysis is required to identify these vulnerabilities.
      • Exploitation is similar to CVE exploitation, but requires identifying vulnerabilities in a potentially larger and less scrutinized set of libraries.

Attack Tree Path: Misconfiguration or Misuse of lucasg/dependencies by the Application (Critical Node, Medium-High Risk Path)

Attack Vector Category: Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from how the application is configured to use lucasg/dependencies or from misconfigurations in the application's environment.

  • Breakdown:
    • Running dependencies with Elevated Privileges (Critical Node, Medium-High Risk Path):
      • Attackers rely on the application running with excessive permissions (e.g., root/Administrator).
      • This misconfiguration amplifies the impact of any vulnerability in lucasg/dependencies or its dependencies.
      • Even minor vulnerabilities can lead to full system compromise due to the elevated privileges.
    • Using Outdated Version of lucasg/dependencies (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):
      • Attackers target applications using outdated versions of lucasg/dependencies that contain known vulnerabilities.
      • This is a result of poor patch management and failure to keep dependencies updated.
      • Exploitation involves leveraging publicly known vulnerabilities in the specific outdated version of lucasg/dependencies being used.