Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
106 lines (94 loc) · 7.64 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

106 lines (94 loc) · 7.64 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for mahapps/mahapps.metro

Objective: To gain unauthorized control over the application's UI, potentially leading to data exfiltration, privilege escalation, or denial of service, by exploiting vulnerabilities within the MahApps.Metro library or its interaction with the underlying application.

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Compromise Application via MahApps.Metro ├── 1. UI Manipulation / Redirection │ ├── 1.1 Exploit Custom Control Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 1.1.1 Input Validation Bypass in Custom Controls (e.g., NumericUpDown, TextBox) [HIGH RISK] │ │ │ ├── 1.1.1.1 Inject unexpected data types (e.g., strings into numeric fields). [HIGH RISK] │ │ │ ├── 1.1.1.2 Overflow/Underflow numeric limits. [HIGH RISK] │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.3 Bypass length restrictions. │ ├── 1.2 Theme/Style Manipulation │ │ ├── 1.2.1 Inject Malicious XAML via Theme Resources [CRITICAL] │ │ │ ├── 1.2.1.1 Override default styles with malicious code (e.g., event handlers). [CRITICAL] │ │ │ └── 1.2.1.2 Load external XAML resources containing malicious code. [CRITICAL] ├── 2. Denial of Service (DoS) [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 2.1 Resource Exhaustion via UI Elements [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 2.1.1 Trigger excessive rendering of complex controls (e.g., nested Flyouts). [HIGH RISK] └── 3. Code Execution (Less Likely, but Possible) [CRITICAL] ├── 3.1 XAML Injection Leading to Code Execution [CRITICAL] │ └── 3.1.1 If custom controls or theme resources allow for the injection of XAML that contains code-behind or event handlers... [CRITICAL] └── 3.2 Exploit Vulnerabilities in Underlying .NET Framework via MahApps.Metro [CRITICAL] └── 3.2.1 If MahApps.Metro interacts with .NET Framework components in an insecure way... [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1. UI Manipulation / Redirection

  • 1.1 Exploit Custom Control Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]

    • Description: Attackers exploit weaknesses in how MahApps.Metro custom controls (like NumericUpDown, TextBox, ComboBox, etc.) handle user input. This is a high-risk area because custom controls often have complex internal logic and may not have been as thoroughly vetted for security vulnerabilities as standard .NET controls.
    • 1.1.1 Input Validation Bypass in Custom Controls [HIGH RISK]
      • Description: Attackers attempt to provide input that violates the expected format, type, or range of the control.
      • 1.1.1.1 Inject unexpected data types:
        • Example: Trying to enter text into a NumericUpDown control, or injecting special characters into a field that expects only alphanumeric input.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium to High (depending on how the application uses the input)
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • 1.1.1.2 Overflow/Underflow numeric limits:
        • Example: Entering a number larger than the maximum allowed value or smaller than the minimum allowed value in a NumericUpDown control.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium to High (could cause crashes or unexpected behavior)
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Intermediate
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • 1.1.1.3 Bypass length restrictions:
        • Example: Entering a string longer than the maximum allowed length in a TextBox control.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium (could lead to data truncation or, rarely, buffer overflows)
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium

  • 1.2 Theme/Style Manipulation

    • 1.2.1 Inject Malicious XAML via Theme Resources [CRITICAL]
      • Description: Attackers attempt to inject malicious XAML code into the application's theme resources. This is a critical vulnerability because successful XAML injection can often lead to arbitrary code execution.
      • 1.2.1.1 Override default styles with malicious code:
        • Example: Modifying a XAML resource dictionary to include an event handler that executes arbitrary code when a control is rendered.
        • Likelihood: Low (requires the ability to modify theme resources)
        • Impact: High to Very High (potential for code execution)
        • Effort: Medium to High
        • Skill Level: Advanced
        • Detection Difficulty: Hard
      • 1.2.1.2 Load external XAML resources containing malicious code:
        • Example: Tricking the application into loading a XAML file from an untrusted source (e.g., a network share or a website) that contains malicious code.
        • Likelihood: Low (requires the application to load external XAML)
        • Impact: High to Very High (potential for code execution)
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Advanced
        • Detection Difficulty: Hard

Attack Tree Path: 2. Denial of Service (DoS) [HIGH RISK]

  • 2.1 Resource Exhaustion via UI Elements [HIGH RISK]
    • Description: Attackers attempt to make the application unresponsive by consuming excessive system resources (CPU, memory) through the UI.
    • 2.1.1 Trigger excessive rendering of complex controls:
      • Example: Rapidly opening and closing nested Flyouts, or creating a large number of complex controls dynamically.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium (application becomes unresponsive)
      • Effort: Low to Medium
      • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy

Attack Tree Path: 3. Code Execution (Less Likely, but Possible) [CRITICAL]

  • 3.1 XAML Injection Leading to Code Execution [CRITICAL]

    • Description: This is the most severe type of vulnerability. If an attacker can inject arbitrary XAML, they can often execute arbitrary code within the application's context.
    • 3.1.1 If custom controls or theme resources allow for the injection of XAML...
      • Example: Exploiting a vulnerability in a custom control that allows the attacker to inject XAML containing a Button with a Click event handler that executes a malicious script.
      • Likelihood: Very Low
      • Impact: Very High (complete system compromise)
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard

  • 3.2 Exploit Vulnerabilities in Underlying .NET Framework via MahApps.Metro [CRITICAL]

    • Description: MahApps.Metro, being built on the .NET Framework, might inadvertently expose or trigger vulnerabilities within the framework itself.
    • 3.2.1 If MahApps.Metro interacts with .NET Framework components in an insecure way...
      • Example: MahApps.Metro might use a .NET Framework API in a way that is vulnerable to a known exploit, even if MahApps.Metro itself is not directly vulnerable.
      • Likelihood: Very Low
      • Impact: Very High (potential for system compromise)
      • Effort: Very High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard