Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
31 lines (24 loc) · 3.67 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

31 lines (24 loc) · 3.67 KB

Threat Model Analysis for materialdesigninxaml/materialdesigninxamltoolkit

Threat: Resource Dictionary Tampering Affecting Dialogs

  • Threat: Resource Dictionary Tampering Affecting Dialogs

    • Description: An attacker gains access to the application's resource files and modifies the Resource Dictionaries used by MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit's DialogHost. They alter the appearance and behavior of dialogs, potentially hiding crucial warnings, adding misleading information, or changing button actions. This directly exploits how the library handles dialog presentation.
    • Impact: Users could be misled into making incorrect decisions, granting unintended permissions, or disclosing sensitive information. The attacker could bypass security checks presented in dialogs.
    • Affected Component: DialogHost and its associated ResourceDictionary entries, particularly those defining the styles and templates for dialog content and buttons. The library's mechanism for loading and applying these resources is the direct attack vector.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • File System Security: Strongly protect the application's resource files from unauthorized access and modification.
      • Resource Integrity Checks: Implement checksums or digital signatures to verify the integrity of the Resource Dictionaries used by DialogHost.
      • Embedded Resources: Embed the relevant Resource Dictionaries directly into the application assembly.
      • Code Review: Carefully review any code that dynamically loads or modifies Resource Dictionaries at runtime.

Threat: Dependency Hijacking of a MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit Dependency

  • Threat: Dependency Hijacking of a MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit Dependency

    • Description: An attacker compromises a library that MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit depends on (either directly or transitively). They inject malicious code into the compromised dependency. Because MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit directly uses this dependency, the malicious code is executed when the application using the toolkit runs. This is a direct threat because the vulnerability exists within the library's dependency chain.
    • Impact: Wide-ranging, potentially including arbitrary code execution, data theft, system compromise, and UI manipulation. The attacker gains control over aspects of the application's behavior, leveraging the compromised dependency through MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit.
    • Affected Component: Any component within MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit that relies on the compromised dependency. This is difficult to pinpoint without knowing the specific compromised dependency, but the attack surface is the entire library.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Dependency Management: Use a package manager (like NuGet) with dependency verification features (e.g., signed packages, checksum verification).
      • Regular Updates: Keep all dependencies, including those of MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit, updated to their latest secure versions.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Use software composition analysis (SCA) tools to scan for known vulnerabilities in dependencies.
      • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM): Maintain an SBOM to track all dependencies and their versions, making it easier to identify and address vulnerabilities.
      • Vendor Security Alerts: Subscribe to security alerts from the vendors of all dependencies.