Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (86 loc) · 10.1 KB

File metadata and controls

102 lines (86 loc) · 10.1 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for migueldeicaza/gui.cs

Objective: Gain Unauthorized Control of Application UI (via gui.cs)

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Gain Unauthorized Control of Application UI (via gui.cs)
├── 1.  Input Validation Bypass / Manipulation
│   └── 1.1  Text Input Fields (TextField, TextView)
│       └── 1.1.4  -> HIGH RISK -> Script Injection (If rendering HTML/JS): [CRITICAL]
├── 2.  -> HIGH RISK -> Clipboard Interactions
│   ├── 2.4.1  -> HIGH RISK -> Data Exfiltration via Clipboard: [CRITICAL]
│   └── 2.4.2  -> HIGH RISK -> Malicious Clipboard Data: [CRITICAL]
└── 3.  Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities
    ├── 3.1  Terminal.Gui Dependencies
    │   ├── 3.1.1  -> HIGH RISK -> Vulnerabilities in Underlying Libraries: [CRITICAL]
    │   └── 3.1.2  -> HIGH RISK -> Supply Chain Attacks: [CRITICAL]
    └── 3.2  .NET Runtime Vulnerabilities
        └── 3.2.1  -> HIGH RISK -> Exploiting Runtime Bugs: [CRITICAL]
  • Description: This attack vector focuses on injecting malicious scripts (typically JavaScript) into the application through text input fields (like TextField or TextView in gui.cs). The vulnerability exists if the application, at any point, renders user-provided input as HTML or JavaScript without proper sanitization or encoding. This includes seemingly innocuous scenarios like displaying a username or a chat message.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. The attacker identifies a text input field that is rendered as HTML or JavaScript.
    2. The attacker crafts a malicious script (e.g., <script>alert('XSS')</script>). More sophisticated payloads can steal cookies, redirect the user, or modify the page content.
    3. The attacker enters the malicious script into the input field.
    4. The application processes the input and, due to the lack of sanitization, renders the script as part of the UI.
    5. The attacker's script executes in the context of the application, potentially giving the attacker control over the user's session or allowing them to exfiltrate data.
  • Mitigation:
    • Strict Input Validation: Validate the input to ensure it conforms to the expected format and doesn't contain any potentially dangerous characters or sequences.
    • Output Encoding/Sanitization: Crucially, before rendering any user input as HTML or JavaScript, encode or sanitize it to prevent script execution. Use a well-vetted HTML sanitization library. Context-aware encoding is essential (e.g., encoding differently for HTML attributes vs. HTML text content).
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): If the application is web-based (even if using gui.cs within a web context), implement a strong CSP to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded.
    • Avoid Rendering User Input as HTML/JS: If possible, avoid rendering user input as HTML or JavaScript altogether. Use plain text rendering whenever feasible.
  • Description: This attack vector exploits the application's use of the system clipboard. If the application copies sensitive data (passwords, API keys, personal information, etc.) to the clipboard, an attacker with access to the system (either directly or through another malicious application) can retrieve this data.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. The application, as part of its normal operation, copies sensitive data to the clipboard.
    2. The attacker, using a separate application or script, monitors the clipboard contents.
    3. The attacker retrieves the sensitive data from the clipboard.
  • Mitigation:
    • Avoid Copying Sensitive Data: The best mitigation is to avoid copying sensitive data to the clipboard whenever possible.
    • Short-Lived Clipboard Entries: If copying is unavoidable, consider using techniques to make the clipboard entry short-lived (e.g., clearing the clipboard after a short timeout).
    • User Notification: Inform the user when sensitive data is copied to the clipboard.
    • Clipboard Encryption (Advanced): In some environments, it might be possible to encrypt the clipboard contents, but this is complex and platform-dependent.
  • Description: This attack vector targets the application's handling of data pasted from the clipboard. If the application pastes data into a context where it's treated as input (e.g., a text field, a command interpreter) without proper sanitization, it's vulnerable to the same types of attacks as direct input fields.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. The attacker copies malicious data (e.g., a script, a command, specially crafted text) to the clipboard.
    2. The attacker triggers the application to paste data from the clipboard (e.g., by pressing Ctrl+V or using a paste button).
    3. The application pastes the malicious data without sanitization.
    4. The malicious data is processed by the application, potentially leading to script execution, command injection, or other vulnerabilities.
  • Mitigation:
    • Treat Clipboard Data as Untrusted: Always treat data pasted from the clipboard as untrusted input.
    • Sanitize Pasted Data: Apply the same rigorous input validation and sanitization techniques to pasted data as you would to data entered directly into input fields.
    • Context-Aware Sanitization: Sanitize the data based on the context where it will be used (e.g., different sanitization for HTML, JavaScript, or command-line input).
  • Description: This attack vector exploits known vulnerabilities in the libraries that Terminal.Gui depends on. Attackers often scan for applications using outdated libraries with published exploits.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. The attacker identifies the version of Terminal.Gui and its dependencies used by the application.
    2. The attacker searches for known vulnerabilities in those specific versions.
    3. If a known vulnerability exists, the attacker uses a publicly available exploit or develops their own exploit to target the vulnerability.
    4. The attacker successfully exploits the vulnerability, potentially gaining control of the application or the underlying system.
  • Mitigation:
    • Regular Updates: Keep Terminal.Gui and all its dependencies updated to the latest versions.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Use a software composition analysis (SCA) tool or a dependency vulnerability scanner to automatically identify known vulnerabilities in your project's dependencies.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Subscribe to security advisories for Terminal.Gui, its dependencies, and the .NET runtime.
  • Description: This attack vector involves compromising the build process or distribution channels of a library. If a compromised library is included in the application, the attacker gains control.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. The attacker compromises a library that Terminal.Gui depends on (e.g., by injecting malicious code into the library's source code repository or by compromising the package manager).
    2. The compromised library is distributed through the normal channels (e.g., NuGet).
    3. The application developer, unaware of the compromise, includes the compromised library in their application.
    4. The attacker's malicious code is executed when the application runs.
  • Mitigation:
    • Code Signing: Use signed packages to verify the authenticity and integrity of the libraries you use.
    • Dependency Pinning: Pin the versions of your dependencies to specific, known-good versions.
    • Source Code Review (for critical dependencies): For highly critical dependencies, consider reviewing the source code yourself.
    • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM): Maintain an SBOM to track all the components in your application and their origins.
  • Description: This attack vector targets vulnerabilities in the .NET runtime itself. These vulnerabilities can be extremely dangerous, potentially allowing attackers to bypass all application-level security measures.
  • Attack Steps:
    1. The attacker identifies a known, unpatched vulnerability in the .NET runtime version used by the application.
    2. The attacker develops or obtains an exploit for the vulnerability.
    3. The attacker uses the exploit to gain control of the application or the underlying system.
  • Mitigation:
    • Keep the .NET Runtime Updated: Install the latest security updates for the .NET runtime as soon as they are released.
    • Use Supported .NET Versions: Use a supported version of the .NET runtime that receives regular security updates.
    • Security Hardening: Configure the .NET runtime securely, following best practices for your environment.