Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
72 lines (59 loc) · 7.04 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

72 lines (59 loc) · 7.04 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for migueldeicaza/gui.cs

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Whitelisting and Sanitization (Direct gui.cs Interaction)

  • Description:

    1. Identify gui.cs Input Controls: Create a comprehensive list of all gui.cs controls used in the application that accept user input. This includes, but is not limited to: TextField, TextView, Autocomplete, input fields within Dialog instances, and any custom controls built on top of gui.cs that handle input.
    2. Define Per-Control Whitelists: For each identified gui.cs input control, define a specific whitelist of allowed characters. This whitelist should be based on the intended purpose of that specific control instance. Avoid a "one-size-fits-all" approach.
    3. Pre-Filtering Logic: Implement pre-filtering logic before any user-provided input is passed to the gui.cs control's properties (e.g., Text, SelectedText). This logic should:
      • Receive the raw input string.
      • Retrieve the appropriate whitelist for the target gui.cs control.
      • Iterate through the input string, character by character.
      • Compare each character against the whitelist.
      • Remove, replace, or (less preferably) escape any character not in the whitelist.
      • Return the sanitized string.
    4. gui.cs Control-Specific Length Limits: Utilize the built-in length limit properties of gui.cs controls where available. For example, TextField has a MaxLength property. Set this property appropriately for each instance.
    5. Escape Sequence Filtering (Pre-gui.cs): Implement a dedicated filter before input reaches gui.cs. This filter should:
      • Identify known, safe escape sequences used by gui.cs or your application.
      • Remove or heavily sanitize any other escape sequence.
      • Validate parameters of allowed escape sequences.
    6. Regular Expression Validation (with Extreme Caution, Pre-gui.cs): If regular expressions are used for input validation before data reaches gui.cs, ensure they are:
      • Simple, specific, and anchored (^ and $).
      • Tested for ReDoS vulnerabilities.
    7. Context-Aware Validation (Control-Specific): The validation logic must be aware of the specific gui.cs control type. A TextField used for a filename needs different validation than a TextView used for multi-line text input. This might involve checking the control's type using is or similar mechanisms.
    8. Event Handling Validation: If you are using event handlers like KeyPress or TextChanged to process input as it's being entered, apply the same whitelisting and sanitization logic within these event handlers. Do not rely solely on validation after the input has been fully entered.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Display Corruption: (Severity: Medium) - Malformed input disrupting gui.cs's rendering.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): (Severity: Medium to High) - Crashing the application via malformed input or ReDoS targeting gui.cs's processing.
    • Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE): (Severity: Very High, but Extremely Unlikely) - A hypothetical vulnerability in gui.cs's escape sequence handling or rendering logic.

  • Impact:

    • Display Corruption: Risk significantly reduced by preventing unexpected characters from reaching gui.cs's rendering engine.
    • DoS: Risk significantly reduced. Length limits, ReDoS-safe regexes, and escape sequence filtering prevent many DoS vectors that could target gui.cs.
    • ACE: Risk dramatically reduced. The comprehensive input sanitization makes exploiting a hypothetical ACE vulnerability in gui.cs extremely difficult.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic length limits are set on some TextField controls using the MaxLength property.
    • A rudimentary, blacklist-based character filter exists, but it's not applied consistently to all gui.cs input controls.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive, per-control whitelisting is missing.
    • Escape sequence filtering is completely absent.
    • ReDoS checks for regular expressions are not performed.
    • Context-aware validation (differentiating between gui.cs control types) is not implemented.
    • Validation within event handlers (KeyPress, TextChanged) is inconsistent or missing.
    • No validation is performed on input within Dialog instances.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure gui.cs Error Handling

  • Description:

    1. try-catch Around gui.cs Calls: Wrap all interactions with gui.cs API calls (control creation, property setting, event handling) within try-catch blocks. This is crucial to prevent unhandled exceptions originating from within gui.cs from crashing the application.
    2. Custom gui.cs Exception Handling: Within the catch blocks, specifically check for exceptions that might be thrown by gui.cs. While gui.cs might not have a highly specific exception hierarchy, you can often check the exception type or message to determine if it originated from within the library.
    3. Generic Error Display (Using gui.cs): If a gui.cs-related error occurs, display a generic error message to the user using gui.cs itself. For example, use a MessageBox to show a message like "An error occurred while processing your input." Do not expose internal error details.
    4. Avoid gui.cs in Sensitive Operations: If possible, avoid using gui.cs controls directly for displaying or handling highly sensitive data. If you must, ensure that any sensitive data is cleared from the gui.cs controls (e.g., setting the Text property to an empty string) as soon as it's no longer needed.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure: (Severity: Medium) - Prevents gui.cs-specific error messages or stack traces from being displayed to the user, which could reveal information about the application's internal workings or vulnerabilities within gui.cs.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): (Severity: Medium) - Prevents unhandled exceptions within gui.cs from crashing the entire application.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Significantly reduces the risk of leaking information through gui.cs-related error messages.
    • DoS: Improves application stability by gracefully handling errors that might occur within gui.cs.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Some try-catch blocks are present around parts of the gui.cs interaction code, but not comprehensively.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive try-catch coverage for all gui.cs API calls is missing.
    • Specific handling of potential gui.cs exceptions is not implemented.
    • Generic error messages using gui.cs are not consistently used.
    • No special handling of sensitive data within gui.cs controls.