Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
48 lines (39 loc) · 7.6 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

48 lines (39 loc) · 7.6 KB

Threat Model Analysis for migueldeicaza/gui.cs

Threat: Visual Spoofing of UI Elements

  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious terminal sequences that are not properly handled by gui.cs's rendering logic, allowing them to manipulate the visual appearance of UI elements. This goes beyond simply providing bad input to the application; it exploits how gui.cs itself renders content to the terminal. The attacker might inject control characters that gui.cs doesn't properly sanitize, leading to cursor manipulation and overwriting of existing UI elements.
  • Impact: User deception, leading to unintended actions (e.g., deleting files, submitting incorrect data, granting unauthorized access). The user believes they are interacting with one element but are actually interacting with another, due to gui.cs's failure to prevent the visual manipulation.
  • Affected Component: Any View that renders text, especially Label, TextField, TextView, Button, Dialog. The vulnerability lies in gui.cs's rendering engine and its handling of terminal control sequences.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Input Sanitization (within gui.cs): gui.cs itself must thoroughly sanitize all input it receives, even internally, before rendering it to the terminal. This includes removing or escaping any control characters or terminal sequences that could be used for visual spoofing. This is a core responsibility of the library.
    • Output Encoding (within gui.cs): gui.cs should employ output encoding techniques to prevent the injection of malicious terminal sequences.
    • Internal Auditing of Rendering Code: The gui.cs library maintainers should conduct regular security audits of the rendering code to identify and fix any potential vulnerabilities related to terminal sequence handling.

Threat: Input Injection into Text Fields (Exploiting gui.cs Handling)

  • Description: This focuses on vulnerabilities within gui.cs's handling of text input, not just the application's use of that input. An attacker might exploit a buffer overflow or other memory corruption vulnerability within the TextField or TextView components themselves by providing excessively long or specially crafted input. This is distinct from the application misusing the input; it's about breaking gui.cs's internal mechanisms.
  • Impact: Potentially crashes gui.cs (denial of service) or, in a worst-case scenario, could lead to arbitrary code execution within the context of the application if the vulnerability allows for overwriting function pointers or other critical data structures within gui.cs.
  • Affected Component: TextField, TextView. The vulnerability is within the internal implementation of these components.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if it leads to code execution) or High (if it leads to a crash).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Bounds Checking (within gui.cs): gui.cs must rigorously enforce bounds checking on all input to TextField and TextView to prevent buffer overflows. This is a fundamental security requirement for these components.
    • Safe String Handling (within gui.cs): gui.cs should use safe string handling techniques (e.g., avoiding strcpy, strcat without proper length checks) in its internal implementation.
    • Fuzz Testing: The gui.cs library should be subjected to extensive fuzz testing to identify and fix any potential vulnerabilities related to input handling.
    • Memory Safe Language Features: If possible, leverage features of the programming language (C#) that help prevent memory corruption, such as bounds checking on arrays and strings.

Threat: Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Targeting gui.cs)

  • Description: An attacker exploits weaknesses in gui.cs's resource management to cause a denial of service. This is not about the application's logic being inefficient, but about gui.cs itself failing to handle large numbers of UI elements, rapid updates, or other resource-intensive operations gracefully. For example, rapidly creating and destroying thousands of Views might expose a memory leak or performance bottleneck within gui.cs.
  • Impact: The application becomes unresponsive or crashes due to gui.cs's inability to handle the resource demands, preventing legitimate users from accessing it.
  • Affected Component: Potentially any View, but particularly those involved in handling large amounts of data or complex layouts (e.g., TextView, ListView, TableView, deeply nested Views). The vulnerability lies in gui.cs's resource management and rendering efficiency.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Limits (within gui.cs): gui.cs should have internal mechanisms to limit the resources it consumes. This might involve limiting the number of nested views, the size of text buffers, or the frequency of UI updates.
    • Efficient Rendering (within gui.cs): gui.cs's rendering engine should be optimized to minimize CPU and memory usage. This includes techniques like damage region tracking (only redrawing the parts of the screen that have changed) and efficient data structures.
    • Profiling and Optimization: The gui.cs library maintainers should regularly profile the library's performance to identify and address any bottlenecks.
    • Asynchronous Operations (Consideration within gui.cs): While primarily an application-level concern, gui.cs could explore providing asynchronous APIs for certain operations to help applications avoid blocking the UI thread.

Threat: Information Disclosure via Terminal History (Due to gui.cs Behavior)

  • Description: While terminal history is generally an external factor, if gui.cs has features that directly output sensitive data to the terminal without providing mechanisms to control or mitigate this, it becomes a gui.cs-specific threat. For example, if gui.cs had a debugging mode that printed sensitive internal state to the console without a way to disable it, that would be a direct vulnerability. Or, if gui.cs incorrectly handled the Secret property of TextField, failing to mask the input, that would be a direct gui.cs issue.
  • Impact: Exposure of sensitive data (e.g., passwords, API keys, internal application state) to unauthorized individuals through the terminal's scrollback buffer.
  • Affected Component: Any View that displays sensitive information, particularly TextField (if Secret is not handled correctly), TextView, Label. The vulnerability lies in gui.cs's handling of sensitive data and its interaction with the terminal.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Correct Secret Implementation (within gui.cs): gui.cs must correctly implement the Secret property of TextField to ensure that password input is masked and not stored in plain text in any internal buffers.
    • Controlled Debug Output (within gui.cs): If gui.cs has any debugging features that output sensitive information to the terminal, these features must be disabled by default and require explicit, documented steps to enable.
    • Avoid Unnecessary Output: gui.cs should avoid printing any unnecessary information to the terminal, especially anything that could be considered sensitive.