Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
75 lines (62 loc) · 7.35 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

75 lines (62 loc) · 7.35 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for netchx/netch

Objective: To compromise application that use given project by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within the project itself. This could lead to data breaches, service disruption, or lateral movement within the network.

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using Netch [CRITICAL NODE]
    • [AND] Exploit Netch Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
      • [OR] Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Resource Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Sending a large number of connection requests or malformed packets to overwhelm netch
        • Panic/Crash Exploits [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Sending specific input that causes netch to panic or crash, disrupting service
      • [OR] Misconfiguration of Netch in Application [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Insecure Default Configuration [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Netch configured with overly permissive settings (e.g., allowing connections from any IP)
        • Insufficient Input Validation/Sanitization [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Application passes unsanitized user input directly to netch functions, leading to exploits (if applicable - check netch API usage)
        • Lack of Rate Limiting/Throttling [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Application doesn't limit the rate of requests to netch, making it vulnerable to DoS
    • [AND] Exploit Network Exposure via Netch [CRITICAL NODE]
      • [OR] Unauthorized Access via Port Mapping [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
        • Lack of Access Control on Mapped Ports [HIGH RISK PATH]
          • Mapped ports are not properly secured by the application, allowing unauthorized access to services behind NAT

Attack Tree Path: 1. Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using Netch [CRITICAL NODE]

  • This is the overarching objective. Success at any of the sub-nodes contributes to achieving this goal.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Netch Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

This node represents attacks that directly target weaknesses within the netch library's code or design. * Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]: * Resource Exhaustion [HIGH RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector: Sending a large volume of connection requests or malformed network packets specifically crafted to overwhelm netch's resources (CPU, memory, network bandwidth). * Impact: Service disruption, application unavailability, potential infrastructure instability. * Likelihood: Medium (Relatively easy to execute). * Mitigation: Implement rate limiting, input validation, resource management within netch and the application using it. * Panic/Crash Exploits [HIGH RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector: Sending specific, crafted input (e.g., malformed STUN/TURN/ICE messages, unexpected data in network protocols) that triggers a panic or crash within the netch library. * Impact: Service disruption, application crash, potential data corruption if crashes occur during critical operations. * Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on code robustness and error handling in netch). * Mitigation: Robust error handling in netch, input validation, fuzz testing to identify crash-inducing inputs.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Misconfiguration of Netch in Application [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]

This node focuses on vulnerabilities arising from how developers configure and integrate netch into their applications. * Insecure Default Configuration [HIGH RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector: netch or the application using it is configured with overly permissive default settings. For example, allowing connections from any IP address without proper authentication or authorization. * Impact: Unauthorized access, increased attack surface, potential for further exploitation of the application. * Likelihood: Medium (Default configurations are often overlooked or assumed to be secure). * Mitigation: Provide secure default configurations for netch, clearly document secure configuration practices, enforce principle of least privilege in configuration. * Insufficient Input Validation/Sanitization [HIGH RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector: The application using netch fails to properly validate or sanitize user-supplied input before passing it to netch functions. This could lead to various vulnerabilities depending on how netch processes this input (e.g., if netch API allows for potentially unsafe operations based on input). * Impact: Depends on the specific vulnerability exposed by unsanitized input. Could range from information disclosure to code execution if netch API is misused. * Likelihood: Medium (Common application vulnerability). * Mitigation: Rigorous input validation and sanitization in the application before interacting with netch API. Follow secure coding practices. * Lack of Rate Limiting/Throttling [HIGH RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector: The application does not implement rate limiting or throttling on requests made to netch. This makes the application vulnerable to DoS attacks targeting netch's resources. * Impact: Service disruption, application unavailability due to resource exhaustion in netch. * Likelihood: Medium (DoS protection is often overlooked). * Mitigation: Implement rate limiting and throttling mechanisms in the application to control the rate of requests to netch.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Network Exposure via Netch [CRITICAL NODE]

This node addresses risks associated with netch's core functionality of enabling network exposure and NAT traversal. * Unauthorized Access via Port Mapping [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]: * Lack of Access Control on Mapped Ports [HIGH RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector: When netch creates port mappings to allow external access to services behind NAT, the application fails to implement proper access controls on these newly exposed ports. This allows unauthorized users to directly access internal services. * Impact: Direct access to internal services, data breaches, potential for lateral movement within the network. * Likelihood: Medium (Developers might rely on NAT for security instead of application-level access controls). * Mitigation: Implement strong authentication and authorization mechanisms for services exposed through netch port mappings. Follow principle of least privilege for port exposure.

By focusing on mitigating these high-risk paths and securing these critical nodes, the development team can significantly improve the security of applications using netch. Remember to continuously monitor, test, and update security measures as the application and netch library evolve.