Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
92 lines (67 loc) · 10.2 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

92 lines (67 loc) · 10.2 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for quantconnect/lean

Mitigation Strategy: Algorithm Sandboxing and Resource Limits (LEAN Specific)

Description:

  • Step 1: Leverage LEAN's Configuration for Sandboxing: Utilize LEAN's built-in configuration options (e.g., within config.json or programmatically via API if available) to enable and configure algorithm sandboxing. This isolates algorithm execution processes from the core LEAN engine and the underlying system.
  • Step 2: Define Algorithm Resource Quotas in LEAN: Within LEAN's configuration or algorithm settings, explicitly define resource limits for each algorithm. Focus on parameters LEAN exposes, such as maximum memory allocation, CPU time slices, and potentially network access restrictions if LEAN provides such granular control.
  • Step 3: Monitor LEAN's Resource Management: Utilize LEAN's monitoring capabilities (if available through logs or APIs) to track resource consumption of individual algorithms. Set up alerts if algorithms exceed defined quotas within LEAN's environment.
  • Step 4: Regularly Review and Adjust LEAN Resource Limits: Periodically review the resource limits configured within LEAN for algorithms. Adjust these limits based on algorithm performance needs and security considerations, ensuring they are as restrictive as possible without hindering legitimate trading operations within LEAN.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Resource Exhaustion (Denial of Service) within LEAN by a rogue algorithm - Severity: High
  • Malicious Algorithm Behavior (Intentional or Accidental) impacting LEAN engine stability - Severity: High
  • Lateral Movement from a compromised algorithm to other algorithms within LEAN's environment - Severity: Medium

Impact:

  • Resource Exhaustion (Denial of Service) within LEAN: High reduction
  • Malicious Algorithm Behavior impacting LEAN engine stability: High reduction
  • Lateral Movement within LEAN's algorithm environment: Medium reduction

Currently Implemented: Partial - LEAN provides some sandboxing capabilities and resource limits can be configured in config.json and potentially programmatically. The extent of granular control and monitoring within LEAN itself needs verification.

Missing Implementation: More fine-grained resource control within LEAN's algorithm manager, dynamic resource limit adjustments based on algorithm behavior as monitored by LEAN, and potentially better visibility into algorithm resource usage through LEAN's logging or monitoring.

Mitigation Strategy: Algorithm Code Review and Static Analysis (LEAN Algorithm Specific)

Description:

  • Step 1: Establish a LEAN Algorithm Specific Code Review Process: Mandate code reviews specifically tailored for LEAN algorithms before deployment. Reviewers should be familiar with LEAN's API, trading logic paradigms within LEAN, and common security pitfalls in algorithmic trading within the LEAN context.
  • Step 2: Develop LEAN Secure Coding Guidelines: Create and enforce secure coding guidelines specifically for LEAN algorithms, addressing common vulnerabilities relevant to LEAN's environment and the C# and Python languages typically used. Focus on areas like data handling within LEAN's data structures, API usage, and event handling.
  • Step 3: Integrate Static Analysis Tools for LEAN Languages: Incorporate static analysis tools that are effective for C# and Python (the languages used in LEAN algorithms). Configure these tools to detect vulnerabilities relevant to algorithmic trading logic and LEAN's specific API usage patterns.
  • Step 4: Automate Code Review Workflow for LEAN Algorithms: Use code review platforms and automation to manage the review process for LEAN algorithms, ensuring all algorithms are reviewed and approved before being integrated into the LEAN engine.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Logic Errors in LEAN Algorithms Leading to Financial Loss - Severity: High
  • Vulnerabilities in LEAN Algorithm Code (e.g., Injection Flaws within LEAN algorithm logic) - Severity: High
  • Accidental or Intentional Backdoors in LEAN Algorithms - Severity: High

Impact:

  • Logic Errors in LEAN Algorithms Leading to Financial Loss: High reduction
  • Vulnerabilities in LEAN Algorithm Code: High reduction
  • Accidental or Intentional Backdoors in LEAN Algorithms: High reduction

Currently Implemented: Partial - Manual code reviews might be performed, but a formal process specifically for LEAN algorithms and automated static analysis tailored to LEAN are likely missing.

Missing Implementation: Formalized LEAN algorithm code review process with checklists, integration of static analysis tools specifically for C# and Python LEAN algorithms into CI/CD, and automated enforcement of LEAN secure coding guidelines.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for Algorithm Parameters (LEAN Algorithm Parameters)

Description:

  • Step 1: Identify LEAN Algorithm Inputs: Document all inputs that LEAN algorithms receive, focusing on parameters defined within the algorithm's Initialize() method, data requested via LEAN's data API (SymbolData), and any user-configurable settings exposed through LEAN's configuration mechanisms.
  • Step 2: Define Validation Rules for LEAN Inputs: For each LEAN algorithm input, define strict validation rules based on expected data types, formats, ranges, and allowed values as relevant to LEAN's data structures and API.
  • Step 3: Implement Input Validation Logic within LEAN Algorithms: Incorporate input validation logic directly within the LEAN algorithm code, specifically in the Initialize() method and wherever algorithm parameters are used. Utilize LEAN's data handling and error reporting mechanisms to manage invalid inputs.
  • Step 4: Sanitize Inputs within LEAN Algorithms: Sanitize inputs within the LEAN algorithm code to remove or escape potentially harmful characters or code before using them in LEAN API calls or internal algorithm logic.
  • Step 5: Error Handling for Invalid Inputs in LEAN Algorithms: Implement robust error handling within LEAN algorithms to gracefully manage invalid inputs. Use LEAN's logging capabilities to record invalid input attempts for security monitoring within the LEAN context.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Data Injection Attacks targeting LEAN algorithm logic or LEAN API usage - Severity: High
  • Algorithm Errors due to Unexpected Input Data within LEAN algorithms - Severity: Medium
  • Denial of Service through Malformed Inputs passed to LEAN algorithms - Severity: Medium

Impact:

  • Data Injection Attacks targeting LEAN algorithm logic or LEAN API usage: High reduction
  • Algorithm Errors due to Unexpected Input Data within LEAN algorithms: Medium reduction
  • Denial of Service through Malformed Inputs passed to LEAN algorithms: Medium reduction

Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic input validation might be present in some algorithms, but a systematic and comprehensive approach across all LEAN algorithm inputs is likely missing.

Missing Implementation: Centralized input validation framework specifically for LEAN algorithm inputs, automated input validation checks within the LEAN algorithm development/deployment process, and consistent sanitization practices across all LEAN algorithms.

Mitigation Strategy: Algorithm Backtesting and Simulation in Isolated LEAN Environments

Description:

  • Step 1: Set up Isolated LEAN Backtesting Environment: Create a dedicated, isolated LEAN environment specifically for backtesting and simulating algorithms. This environment should be a separate instance of LEAN, disconnected from the production LEAN engine and live trading systems.
  • Step 2: Use Sanitized or Synthetic Data within LEAN Backtesting: Utilize sanitized or synthetic market data within the LEAN backtesting environment to protect real market data and prevent accidental exposure of sensitive information during LEAN testing.
  • Step 3: Simulate Production LEAN Conditions: Configure the backtesting LEAN environment to closely resemble the production LEAN environment, including relevant LEAN configurations, resource constraints, and simulated network conditions as they would affect LEAN.
  • Step 4: Security Testing within LEAN Backtesting: Conduct security testing within the isolated LEAN backtesting environment, focusing on algorithm behavior under various conditions, including potentially malicious inputs or unexpected market scenarios simulated within LEAN.
  • Step 5: Thoroughly Review LEAN Backtesting Results for Security Implications: Analyze LEAN backtesting results not only for trading performance but also for security implications within the LEAN algorithm execution context, such as unexpected resource consumption, error conditions, and potential vulnerabilities revealed during LEAN simulation.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Deployment of Flawed LEAN Algorithms to Production - Severity: High
  • Unforeseen Security Vulnerabilities in LEAN Algorithms exposed during LEAN execution - Severity: High
  • Accidental Exposure of Sensitive Data within the LEAN backtesting environment - Severity: Medium

Impact:

  • Deployment of Flawed LEAN Algorithms to Production: High reduction
  • Unforeseen Security Vulnerabilities in LEAN Algorithms: High reduction
  • Accidental Exposure of Sensitive Data within LEAN backtesting: Medium reduction

Currently Implemented: Yes - Backtesting is a core feature of LEAN and is likely used, but the security focus and isolation of the LEAN backtesting environment itself might be less emphasized.

Missing Implementation: Formalized security testing within LEAN backtesting, dedicated isolated LEAN backtesting environment with strict access controls at the LEAN instance level, and systematic review of LEAN backtesting results specifically for security implications related to LEAN algorithm behavior.