Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
45 lines (38 loc) · 4.59 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

45 lines (38 loc) · 4.59 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for sixlabors/imagesharp

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion (Memory)

  • Description: Attackers exploit ImageSharp's image decoding and processing to consume excessive server memory, leading to application crashes or unavailability.
  • How ImageSharp Contributes: ImageSharp allocates memory to decode and process images. Malformed or excessively large images can cause it to allocate more memory than available.
  • Example: An attacker uploads a 1x1 pixel PNG image that is compressed but claims to be 10,000,000 x 10,000,000 pixels. ImageSharp attempts to allocate a massive buffer for the decoded image.
  • Impact: Application crashes, denial of service for legitimate users.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Image Dimension Limits: Enforce maximum width and height limits on uploaded images (e.g., 8192x8192). This is the primary defense.
    • File Size Limits: Enforce a reasonable maximum file size (e.g., 10MB).
    • Memory Limits: Configure the application environment (e.g., using Docker, Kubernetes, or server settings) to limit the total memory available to the image processing component.
    • Input Validation: Before passing the image to ImageSharp, validate the image metadata (if accessible) to check for suspicious dimensions or other indicators of a malicious image.

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion (CPU)

  • Description: Attackers craft images or processing requests that consume excessive CPU cycles, slowing down or halting the application.
  • How ImageSharp Contributes: Image decoding, especially for complex formats or with transformations, requires CPU processing. Maliciously crafted images or requests can maximize this processing time.
  • Example: An attacker uploads an animated GIF with 10,000 frames, each with a very short delay, and requests a complex resizing operation on each frame.
  • Impact: Application slowdown, denial of service for legitimate users.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Frame Count Limits (Animated Images): Strictly limit the number of frames allowed in animated images (e.g., 100 frames).
    • Frame Delay Limits: Enforce a minimum frame delay (e.g., 100ms) for animated images.
    • Transformation Restrictions: Limit the complexity of image transformations allowed. For example, disallow extremely large resizes or complex filters.
    • CPU Timeouts: Set timeouts for image processing operations. If an operation takes longer than the timeout, terminate it.
    • Rate Limiting: Limit the number of image processing requests per user or IP address within a given time period.
    • Caching: Cache the results of image processing operations to avoid re-processing the same image multiple times.

Attack Surface: Code Execution via Image Parsing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in ImageSharp's image format parsers to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server.
  • How ImageSharp Contributes: ImageSharp contains parsers for various image formats. Bugs in these parsers (e.g., buffer overflows) could be exploited.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a malformed JPEG image that triggers a buffer overflow in ImageSharp's JPEG decoder, allowing the attacker to inject and execute malicious code.
  • Impact: Complete server compromise, data theft, malware installation.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep ImageSharp Updated: This is the most important mitigation. Regularly update to the latest version of ImageSharp to get security patches.
    • Disable Unnecessary Formats: If the application doesn't need to support all image formats, disable support for less common or potentially more vulnerable formats (e.g., older or less-used formats).
    • Fuzzing: Regularly fuzz ImageSharp's image parsers to proactively identify vulnerabilities.
    • Sandboxing: Run image processing in a sandboxed environment (e.g., a separate container or process with limited privileges) to contain any potential exploits.
    • Code Reviews: Conduct thorough code reviews of any custom code that interacts with ImageSharp, focusing on input validation and error handling.
    • Input validation: Validate image metadata before processing.