Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
108 lines (88 loc) · 6.81 KB

File metadata and controls

108 lines (88 loc) · 6.81 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for sixlabors/imagesharp

Objective: To achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) or Denial of Service (DoS) on the application server by exploiting vulnerabilities in ImageSharp's image processing capabilities.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                 Compromise Application via ImageSharp
                                              |
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      |																										 |
  1. Achieve RCE [HR]																							 2. Achieve DoS
      |																										 |

| | 1.1 Exploit [CN] 2.1 Resource Exhaustion [HR] Decoder Vulnerability [HR] (CPU/Memory) [CN] | |


| | | 1.1.1 [CN] 2.1.1 [CN] Buffer Overflow/ Image Bomb Over-read in (Decompression Bomb) Specific Decoder [HR] |

| | 1.1.1.a [HR] Malicious BMP | 1.1.1.b [HR] Malicious GIF | 1.1.1.c [HR] Malicious TIFF | 1.1.1.d [HR] Malicious PNG | 1.1.1.e [HR] Malicious JPEG | 1.1.1.f [HR] Malicious WebP | 1.1.4 [CN] Dependency Vulnerabilities [HR]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Achieve RCE [HR]

  • Description: The attacker aims to gain complete control of the application server by executing arbitrary code.
  • Impact: Very High - Complete system compromise.
  • Description: The attacker exploits a vulnerability in one of ImageSharp's image format decoders.
  • Impact: Very High - Leads to RCE.
  • Likelihood: Low-Medium - Depends on the existence of vulnerabilities and the frequency of updates.
  • Effort: Medium-High - Requires finding a vulnerability and crafting an exploit.
  • Skill Level: Advanced-Expert - Requires deep understanding of image formats and exploit development.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard - May be detected by IDS/EDR, but a well-crafted exploit can evade detection.
  • Description: The attacker crafts a malicious image file (BMP, GIF, TIFF, PNG, JPEG, or WebP) that triggers a buffer overflow or over-read when ImageSharp attempts to decode it. This allows the attacker to overwrite memory and potentially execute arbitrary code.
  • Impact: Very High - Leads to RCE.
  • Likelihood: Low-Medium - Depends on the specific decoder and the presence of vulnerabilities.
  • Effort: Medium-High - Requires understanding the specific image format and crafting a precise exploit.
  • Skill Level: Advanced-Expert - Requires in-depth knowledge of memory corruption vulnerabilities.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard - May be detected by IDS/EDR or memory analysis tools.
  • Each of these represents a specific image format. The attacker would tailor the exploit to the specific vulnerabilities of the chosen format's decoder. The details of each exploit would vary significantly.
  • Description: The attacker exploits a vulnerability in a library that ImageSharp depends on for image decoding.
  • Impact: Very High - Leads to RCE.
  • Likelihood: Low-Medium - Depends on the existence of vulnerabilities in dependencies.
  • Effort: Medium-High - Requires finding a vulnerability in a dependency and crafting an exploit.
  • Skill Level: Advanced-Expert - Requires deep understanding of image formats and exploit development.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium-Hard - May be detected by IDS/EDR, but a well-crafted exploit can evade detection.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Achieve DoS

  • Description: The attacker aims to make the application unavailable to legitimate users.
  • Impact: Medium-High - Service disruption.
  • Description: The attacker sends requests designed to consume excessive server resources (CPU or memory), leading to a denial of service.
  • Impact: Medium-High - Application becomes unresponsive or crashes.
  • Likelihood: Medium-High - Relatively easy to trigger if input validation and resource limits are weak.
  • Effort: Low - Can be achieved with readily available tools.
  • Skill Level: Novice-Intermediate - Requires minimal technical skill for basic attacks.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium - Easily detected by monitoring resource usage.
  • Description: The attacker uploads a small, highly compressed image file that expands to a massive size when decoded, consuming a large amount of memory and potentially crashing the application.
  • Impact: Medium-High - Can cause the application to become unresponsive or crash.
  • Likelihood: Medium-High - Easy to create and deploy if input validation is lacking.
  • Effort: Low - Requires minimal technical skill and readily available tools.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Can be performed by attackers with limited knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium - Easily detected by monitoring resource usage and implementing input validation.