Mitigation Strategy: Image Dimension Limits (within ImageSharp processing)
Description:
- Define
MAX_WIDTH
andMAX_HEIGHT
constants (or configuration settings). - Use
Image.Identify(stream)
to obtain image dimensions without fully loading the image. This is crucial for efficiency. - Compare the obtained width and height against
MAX_WIDTH
andMAX_HEIGHT
. - If either exceeds the limits, immediately throw a custom exception (e.g.,
ImageTooLargeException
) or return an error. Do not proceed with further ImageSharp processing. - Log the rejection.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Prevents processing of extremely large images that consume excessive memory/CPU.
- Decompression Bomb (variant of DoS) (High Severity): Mitigates images that are small on disk but expand to huge sizes in memory.
- Performance Degradation (Medium Severity): Reduces processing time.
-
Impact:
- DoS - Resource Exhaustion: Risk significantly reduced.
- Decompression Bomb: Risk significantly reduced.
- Performance Degradation: Noticeable performance improvement.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in
ImageUploadService.cs
,ProcessUploadedImage
method. ConstantsMAX_WIDTH = 2048
,MAX_HEIGHT = 2048
.Image.Identify
used.ImageTooLargeException
thrown.
- Implemented in
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in
ThumbnailService.cs
.
- Missing in
Mitigation Strategy: Pixel Format Restrictions
Description:
- Identify the required pixel formats (e.g., Rgba32, Bgr24).
- Create a custom
Configuration
instance for ImageSharp. - Within the
Configuration
, register only theIImageDecoder
implementations for the allowed formats. Do not use the default configuration. - Use this custom
Configuration
when loading/processing images.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Code Execution Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Reduces the attack surface by limiting executed code paths within ImageSharp.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents exploiting computationally expensive formats.
- Information Disclosure (Low Severity): Mitigates vulnerabilities in obscure format handling.
-
Impact:
- Code Execution Vulnerabilities: Attack surface significantly reduced.
- DoS: Some improvement in DoS resilience.
- Information Disclosure: Minor risk reduction.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. Default ImageSharp configuration is used.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Needs global implementation. Establish a central location for ImageSharp configuration.
Mitigation Strategy: Frame Count Limits (Animated Formats)
Description:
- Define a
MAX_FRAMES
constant (or configuration setting). - After loading an image, check
image.Frames.Count
. - If
image.Frames.Count
exceedsMAX_FRAMES
, reject the image (throw exception/return error). - Log the rejection.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Prevents processing of animated images with excessive frame counts.
-
Impact:
- DoS - Resource Exhaustion: Risk significantly reduced for animated formats.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented in
GifProcessingService.cs
. Limit hardcoded and too high (MAX_FRAMES = 1000
).
- Partially implemented in
-
Missing Implementation:
- Limit should be configurable.
- Missing for animated WebP images (
WebPService.cs
).
Mitigation Strategy: Metadata Handling (Strip or Whitelist)
Description:
- Option A (Strip Metadata): Use
image.Mutate(x => x.RemoveMetadata())
to remove all metadata. - Option B (Whitelist Metadata):
- Define a list of
AllowedMetadataKeys
. - Iterate through metadata entries.
- If a key is not in
AllowedMetadataKeys
, remove the entry. - If a key is allowed, sanitize the value before use.
- Define a list of
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Prevents leakage of sensitive information in metadata.
- Code Execution Vulnerabilities (Low Severity): Reduces attack surface by limiting metadata processing.
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced.
- Code Execution Vulnerabilities: Minor risk reduction.
-
Currently Implemented:
- No metadata handling implemented. Metadata is preserved.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Needs implementation where images are processed and metadata is accessed. Decide between stripping or whitelisting.
Mitigation Strategy: Disable Unnecessary Features
Description:
- Review ImageSharp's documentation and identify unused features (encoders, decoders, processing operations).
- Use ImageSharp's configuration options (custom
Configuration
instance) to disable these features.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Code Execution Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Reduces the attack surface.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): May improve performance.
-
Impact:
- Code Execution Vulnerabilities: Attack surface reduced.
- DoS: Potential for minor performance improvements.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. Default ImageSharp configuration is used.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Requires review of ImageSharp features and application requirements. Implement during ImageSharp setup.