Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
62 lines (43 loc) · 5.95 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

62 lines (43 loc) · 5.95 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for spectreconsole/spectre.console

Mitigation Strategy: Careful Use of Markup and Escape Sequences

Description:

  1. Escape User Input: Always escape user-provided data that is included within spectre.console's Markup strings. Use [[ and ]] to escape the literal [ and ] characters, respectively. This prevents the user from injecting their own styling tags, which could be used to alter the appearance of the console output in misleading ways.
  2. Whitelist Allowed Tags (If Applicable): If, and only if, you allow users to control any aspect of the Markup (e.g., through configuration files or a very specific, controlled input), strictly whitelist the allowed tags and attributes. Do not allow arbitrary tags. This is a very specific use case; in most scenarios, users should not be able to directly control Markup tags.
  3. Limit Complexity: Avoid excessively complex or deeply nested Markup, even if it's not user-controlled. While unlikely to be a direct security vulnerability, it can lead to performance issues or unexpected rendering behavior. spectre.console is designed for rich output, but extreme cases should be avoided.
  4. Sanitize Before Escaping: If you are accepting input that might contain markup intended for later display (a very specific and potentially risky scenario), sanitize it before escaping the brackets. This prevents an attacker from injecting malicious markup that bypasses your escaping by, for example, closing a tag you opened, or injecting attributes.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Display Manipulation (Severity: Medium): Prevents attackers from altering the appearance of the console output to mislead the user (e.g., making error messages look like success messages, hiding important information, or mimicking legitimate UI elements).
  • Potential Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Low): Reduces the risk (though it's small) of performance issues or rendering errors caused by excessively complex or maliciously crafted Markup.

Impact:

  • Display Manipulation: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
  • DoS: Risk reduced from Low to Very Low.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partial escaping of Markup characters is done in some modules, but it's inconsistent and not always applied to user-provided data. There's no clear policy.

Missing Implementation:

  • Consistent and comprehensive escaping of Markup characters in all modules that display user-provided data using AnsiConsole.Markup or similar methods. A centralized function or helper class should be used to ensure consistency.
  • Whitelisting of allowed Markup tags is not currently implemented (because users don't directly control Markup in the current design). If this changes, whitelisting must be implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Prompt Handling (Spectre.Console Specifics)

Description:

  1. Use SecretPrompt for Sensitive Input: For any prompt that requires the user to enter sensitive information, such as passwords, API keys, or other secrets, always use spectre.console's SecretPrompt. This prevents the input from being echoed to the console and provides basic protection against shoulder surfing.
  2. Avoid Displaying Secrets: Never use AnsiConsole.Write or similar methods to display sensitive data directly to the console. If you need to show a confirmation, display a masked version (e.g., *****) or a hash.
  3. Consider Prompt Design: The design of your prompts can influence security. Avoid prompts that might trick users into revealing information or performing unintended actions.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (Severity: High): Prevents accidental exposure of sensitive data entered through prompts. Specifically addresses shoulder surfing and the risk of secrets appearing in console history.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure: Risk reduced from High to Low (when SecretPrompt is used correctly and secrets are never displayed).

Currently Implemented:

  • SecretPrompt is used for password input in the user authentication module.

Missing Implementation:

  • Review all other prompts to ensure that no sensitive information is inadvertently displayed or echoed to the console. There might be other places where SecretPrompt or a similar approach should be used.

Mitigation Strategy: Denial of Service (DoS) Considerations (Spectre.Console Specifics)

Description:

  1. Limit Output Size: While spectre.console is generally efficient, extremely large or deeply nested output could potentially lead to performance issues or, in extreme cases, a denial-of-service condition. Set reasonable limits on the size and complexity of data displayed, especially if it's based on user input or external data. This is more about resource management than a direct vulnerability in spectre.console.
  2. Avoid Excessive Rendering: Be mindful of how frequently you're updating the console. Rapid, continuous updates, especially with complex layouts, can consume significant resources. Use techniques like buffering or throttling if necessary.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Low): Reduces the (already low) risk of resource exhaustion caused by excessive or overly complex console output.

Impact:

  • DoS: Risk reduced from Low to Very Low.

Currently Implemented:

  • No specific limits on output size are currently implemented. The application generally doesn't display extremely large datasets.

Missing Implementation:

  • Consider adding limits on the size and complexity of data displayed, especially for any features that might be exposed to user-controlled input in the future. This is a preventative measure.