Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
203 lines (156 loc) · 12.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

203 lines (156 loc) · 12.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for stackexchange/stackexchange.redis

Mitigation Strategy: Require Authentication (Client-Side)

  • Description:

    1. Client-Side Configuration (C#): Update the StackExchange.Redis connection string in your application to include the password. This is done within the ConfigurationOptions object. Crucially, obtain the password from a secure source (environment variable, key vault), not hardcoded. 
      ConfigurationOptions config = ConfigurationOptions.Parse("yourserver:6379,password=" + GetRedisPassword()); // GetRedisPassword() retrieves from secure source
ConnectionMultiplexer redis = ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(config);
    2. Error Handling: Implement robust error handling to gracefully handle connection failures due to incorrect passwords. Avoid exposing the password in error messages.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access (Critical): Ensures the client cannot connect to the Redis server without providing the correct password. This is a client-side enforcement of the server-side requirepass setting.
    • Accidental Exposure (High): If the connection string is accidentally exposed (e.g., in logs), it will include the password, but only if the password retrieval mechanism is secure.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access: Risk reduced from critical to low (assuming a strong password and secure password retrieval).
    • Accidental Exposure: Risk depends on the security of the password retrieval mechanism.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes, in RedisConnectionFactory.cs. The password is read from the application's configuration settings (which should be sourced securely).

  • Missing Implementation: Password rotation is not automated. The client-side code needs to be updated to handle password changes gracefully.

Mitigation Strategy: Use TLS/SSL for Connection Encryption (Client-Side)

  • Description:

    1. Client-Side Configuration (C#):
      • Update the StackExchange.Redis connection string to enable SSL and specify the SSL protocols: 
        ConfigurationOptions config = ConfigurationOptions.Parse("yourserver:6379,ssl=true,password=" + GetRedisPassword());
config.SslProtocols = System.Security.Authentication.SslProtocols.Tls12 | System.Security.Authentication.SslProtocols.Tls13;
      • Certificate Validation (Critical): Implement proper certificate validation. This is the most important part of client-side TLS. The following is a placeholder and must be replaced with real validation: 
        config.CertificateValidation += (sender, certificate, chain, errors) => {
    // *** IMPLEMENT ROBUST CERTIFICATE VALIDATION HERE ***
    // 1. Check the certificate's issuer against a trusted CA list.
    // 2. Verify the certificate's validity period.
    // 3. Check for revocation (using OCSP or CRLs).
    // 4. Validate the hostname against the certificate's subject or SAN.
    // 5. Return true only if ALL checks pass.
    return false; // *** REPLACE THIS WITH ACTUAL VALIDATION ***
};
      • Consider using the CertificateSelection callback for more advanced scenarios (e.g., selecting a specific client certificate).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Eavesdropping (High): Ensures that the data transmitted between the client and server is encrypted.
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High): With proper certificate validation, prevents attackers from impersonating the Redis server.

  • Impact:

    • Eavesdropping: Risk reduced from high to low.
    • MitM Attacks: Risk reduced from high to low (only with correct certificate validation).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. ssl=true and SslProtocols are set.

  • Missing Implementation: Robust certificate validation is completely missing. The current code likely has a placeholder that accepts all certificates, which is a critical security vulnerability. This is the highest priority item to fix.

Mitigation Strategy: Connection Pooling (Proper Use of ConnectionMultiplexer)

  • Description:

    1. Singleton Pattern: Ensure that you create only one instance of the ConnectionMultiplexer for your entire application's lifetime. Use a static, lazy-initialized instance or a dependency injection container.
    2. C# Example (Static Lazy): 
      private static readonly Lazy<ConnectionMultiplexer> LazyConnection = new Lazy<ConnectionMultiplexer>(() =>
{
    ConfigurationOptions config = ConfigurationOptions.Parse("yourserver:6379,password=" + GetRedisPassword());
    // ... other configuration ...
    return ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(config);
});

public static ConnectionMultiplexer Connection => LazyConnection.Value;

// Usage:
IDatabase db = Connection.GetDatabase();
    3. Avoid Per-Request Connections: Never create a new ConnectionMultiplexer for each Redis operation.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Connection Exhaustion (DoS) (High): Prevents the client from creating excessive connections, which could lead to a denial-of-service condition on the server.
    • Performance Degradation (Medium): Reusing connections is significantly more efficient.

  • Impact:

    • Connection Exhaustion: Risk reduced from high to low.
    • Performance: Significant performance improvement.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes, in RedisConnectionFactory.cs, we use the static lazy initialization pattern.

  • Missing Implementation: None. This is correctly implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Command Timeouts

  • Description:

    1. Set Timeouts: When calling Redis commands, use the timeout parameter or CommandFlags to set a maximum execution time.
    2. C# Example: 
      IDatabase db = Connection.GetDatabase();
// Using timeout parameter:
string value1 = db.StringGet("mykey", flags: CommandFlags.None, timeout: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));

// Using CommandFlags:
bool success = await db.StringSetAsync("mykey", "myvalue", TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10), When.Always, CommandFlags.FireAndForget); // FireAndForget with expiry
    3. Consistent Policy: Establish a consistent timeout policy across all Redis operations.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Application Unresponsiveness (Medium): Prevents the client application from hanging indefinitely if the Redis server is slow or unresponsive.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Low): Limits the time client resources are tied up waiting for a response.

  • Impact:

    • Unresponsiveness: Risk reduced from medium to low.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Risk reduced from low to very low.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. Some operations have timeouts, but not all.

  • Missing Implementation: We need a comprehensive review of all Redis calls to ensure consistent timeout usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid EVAL with Untrusted Input / Parameterize Redis Commands

  • Description:

    1. Avoid EVAL if Possible: Prefer standard Redis commands over EVAL whenever possible.
    2. Parameterized EVAL (If Necessary): If you must use EVAL, always use parameterized scripts. Pass user input as arguments, not as part of the script string. 
      // UNSAFE (vulnerable to injection):
string script = $"return redis.call('SET', '{userInputKey}', '{userInputValue}')";
db.ScriptEvaluate(script);

// SAFE (parameterized):
string script = "return redis.call('SET', KEYS[1], ARGV[1])";
db.ScriptEvaluate(script, new RedisKey[] { userInputKey }, new RedisValue[] { userInputValue });
    3. Input Validation (Always): Regardless of EVAL usage, always validate and sanitize all user-supplied data before using it in any Redis command. This applies to key names, values, and any other parameters. Use whitelists and regular expressions. 
      // Example (simplified):
if (!IsValidRedisKey(userInputKey)) {
    // Handle invalid key
}
db.StringSet(userInputKey, SanitizeRedisValue(userInputValue));

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Code Injection (Critical): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious Lua code into the Redis server via the client.
    • Data Corruption (High): Reduces the risk of unexpected data corruption due to malformed input.

  • Impact:

    • Code Injection: Risk reduced from critical to low (with parameterization and validation).
    • Data Corruption: Risk reduced from high to low.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. We avoid EVAL in most cases, but a review is needed. Input validation is inconsistent.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Complete code review for any EVAL usage, ensuring parameterization.
    • Comprehensive and consistent input validation for all Redis commands.

Mitigation Strategy: Use Redis ACLs (Client-Side)

  • Description:

    1. Client-Side Configuration (C#): After the ACLs are configured on the Redis server (as described in previous responses), update the StackExchange.Redis connection string to include the username and password of the specific Redis user: 
      ConfigurationOptions config = ConfigurationOptions.Parse("yourserver:6379,user=youruser,password=youruserpassword");
ConnectionMultiplexer redis = ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(config);
    2. Multiple Connections (If Needed): If your application needs different levels of access (e.g., read-only and read-write), create separate ConnectionMultiplexer instances, each configured with the appropriate user credentials.

  • Threats Mitigated: * Privilege Escalation (High): Limits damage if connection string is compromised. * Accidental Data Modification (Medium): Reduces risk of accidental changes.

  • Impact:

    • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced from high to low.
    • Accidental Modification: Risk reduced from medium to low.

  • Currently Implemented: No.

  • Missing Implementation: This is entirely missing. We need to update application code to use correct usernames and passwords.

Mitigation Strategy: Review and Validate ConfigurationOptions

  • Description:

    1. Centralized Configuration: Manage all StackExchange.Redis configuration settings in a centralized location.
    2. Secure Storage: Use environment variables or a secure configuration store for sensitive settings.
    3. Review and Validate: Carefully review all properties set in the ConfigurationOptions object. Ensure values like ConnectTimeout, SyncTimeout, AbortOnConnectFail, and connection string parameters are appropriate.
    4. Documentation: Document the purpose and recommended values.
    5. Regular Audits: Periodically audit the configuration.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Connection Failures (Medium): Incorrect settings can lead to failures.
    • Performance Bottlenecks (Medium): Inappropriate settings can cause issues.
    • Security Weaknesses (High): Incorrect security settings can expose the application.

  • Impact:

    • Connection Failures: Risk reduced from medium to low.
    • Performance Bottlenecks: Risk reduced from medium to low.
    • Security Weaknesses: Risk reduced from high to low.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. We use a centralized configuration class, and some settings are from environment variables.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Move all sensitive settings to a secure store.
    • Document all configuration options.
    • Implement regular configuration audits.