Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
241 lines (199 loc) · 23.5 KB

File metadata and controls

241 lines (199 loc) · 23.5 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for bitwarden/mobile

Objective: Gain unauthorized access to a user's Bitwarden vault and sensitive data through the mobile application.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Bitwarden Mobile App Security
├───[1.0] Exploit Mobile Application Vulnerabilities
│   └───[1.2] Logic Flaws & Business Logic Vulnerabilities
│       ├───[1.2.2] Insecure Data Handling [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       │   └───[1.2.2.1] Sensitive data in logs (e.g., API keys, partial vault data in debug logs) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[1.2.3] Vulnerable Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│           └───[1.2.3.1] Exploit known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used in the mobile app (e.g., crypto libraries, networking libraries)
│   └───[1.3] Insecure Communication [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[1.3.1] Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks
│           └───[1.3.1.1] Intercept communication on public Wi-Fi (if TLS/SSL is improperly implemented or bypassed) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
├───[2.0] Compromise Mobile Device Security [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[2.1] Malware Infection [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[2.1.1] Install malware on the device (e.g., via phishing, malicious app stores, drive-by downloads) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       ├───[2.1.1.1] Keylogger to capture master password or unlock PIN/Biometric [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       ├───[2.1.1.2] Screen recorder to capture vault data displayed in the app [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       └───[2.1.1.3] Data exfiltration malware to steal Bitwarden app data [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └───[2.2] Physical Access to Device [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[2.2.1] Unlocked Device [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│           └───[2.2.1.1] Access Bitwarden app directly if device is unlocked and app is not locked [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
├───[3.0] Social Engineering Attacks Targeting Mobile Users [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[3.1] Phishing Attacks [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[3.1.1] SMS Phishing (Smishing) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[3.1.1.1] Send SMS with malicious link to fake Bitwarden login page or malware download [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[3.1.2] Email Phishing (if user uses email on mobile) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       └───[3.1.2.1] Send email with malicious link to fake Bitwarden login page or malware download [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └───[3.2] Fake/Malicious Bitwarden Apps [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[3.2.1] Distribute fake Bitwarden app on unofficial app stores or websites [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│           └───[3.2.1.1] User downloads and installs fake app, entering master password which is then stolen [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
├───[4.0] Insecure Data Storage on Mobile [CRITICAL NODE]
│   └───[4.1] Insecure Local Storage [CRITICAL NODE]
│       ├───[4.1.1] Unencrypted Vault Data on Disk (Highly unlikely for Bitwarden, but check for vulnerabilities) [CRITICAL NODE]
│       │   └───[4.1.1.1] If encryption is flawed or not properly implemented, attacker might access vault data directly from storage [CRITICAL NODE]
│       ├───[4.1.2] Insecure Key Storage [CRITICAL NODE]
│       │   └───[4.1.2.1] Master key or encryption keys stored insecurely, allowing decryption of vault data [CRITICAL NODE]
│       └───[4.1.4] Clipboard Snooping [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│           └───[4.1.4.1] Sensitive data (passwords, TOTP codes) copied to clipboard and intercepted by other apps or malware [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • Attack Vector: Insecure Data Handling - Sensitive Data in Logs
  • Description: Developers might unintentionally log sensitive information like API keys, partial vault data, or other secrets during development or in production logs. If an attacker gains access to these logs (e.g., through server compromise, misconfigured logging systems, or even local device logs in debug builds), they can extract this sensitive data.
  • Why High-Risk: Relatively easy to introduce during development, often missed in testing, and can lead to information disclosure that facilitates further attacks or direct data compromise.
  • Mitigations:
    • Implement strict logging policies, especially for production environments.
    • Regularly review logs for sensitive data and sanitize or remove it.
    • Use secure logging frameworks that prevent accidental logging of sensitive information.
    • Avoid logging sensitive data in debug builds that might be accessible on user devices.
  • Attack Vector: Exploit Vulnerable Dependencies
  • Description: Mobile applications rely on numerous third-party libraries and dependencies. If these dependencies have known vulnerabilities, attackers can exploit them to compromise the application. This could range from code execution vulnerabilities to data breaches, depending on the nature of the vulnerability and the affected library.
  • Why High-Risk: Dependencies are a common attack vector because they are often numerous and may not be actively monitored for vulnerabilities by the application developers. Public exploits are often available for known vulnerabilities, making exploitation easier.
  • Mitigations:
    • Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track all dependencies.
    • Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities using automated tools.
    • Promptly update vulnerable dependencies to patched versions.
    • Implement dependency management practices to ensure only necessary and trusted libraries are used.
  • Attack Vector: Insecure Communication
  • Description: If communication between the mobile app and backend servers is not properly secured, attackers can intercept and potentially manipulate this traffic. This can lead to credential theft, data interception, and compromise of the vault data being transmitted.
  • Why High-Risk: Communication is a fundamental aspect of the application, and vulnerabilities here can have broad and severe consequences. MITM attacks are a well-established threat, especially on mobile devices often connected to untrusted networks.
  • Mitigations:
    • Enforce HTTPS for all communication between the mobile app and backend servers.
    • Implement certificate pinning to prevent MITM attacks by rogue certificates.
    • Use strong cipher suites and disable weak or outdated TLS/SSL protocols.
    • Educate users about the risks of using public Wi-Fi and encourage VPN usage.
  • Attack Vector: Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attack on Public Wi-Fi
  • Description: When a user connects to public Wi-Fi, their network traffic can be intercepted by attackers on the same network. If the Bitwarden app's communication is not properly secured with TLS/SSL or if there are vulnerabilities in its implementation, an attacker can perform a MITM attack to eavesdrop on or modify the data being transmitted, potentially including login credentials and vault data.
  • Why High-Risk: Public Wi-Fi is commonly used, and MITM attacks are relatively easy to execute with readily available tools. Even if TLS/SSL is used, misconfigurations or vulnerabilities in implementation can be exploited.
  • Mitigations:
    • Robust TLS/SSL implementation with certificate pinning.
    • Strict transport security policies.
    • User education about risks of public Wi-Fi.
    • Consider features to detect or warn about potential MITM attacks.
  • Attack Vector: Compromise of Mobile Device Security
  • Description: If the mobile device itself is compromised, the security of the Bitwarden application running on it is also at risk. Device compromise can occur through malware infection, physical access, or exploitation of device vulnerabilities.
  • Why High-Risk: Device security is often outside the direct control of the application developer, but a compromised device can bypass many application-level security measures. Malware and physical access are significant threats in the mobile context.
  • Mitigations:
    • Encourage users to maintain device security (strong passwords, OS updates, avoid unofficial app stores).
    • Implement app-level security measures that are resilient even on potentially compromised devices (e.g., app lock, root/jailbreak detection).
    • Provide user guidance on device security best practices.
  • Attack Vector: Malware Infection
  • Description: Malware installed on the user's mobile device can perform various malicious actions, including keylogging to steal master passwords or unlock PINs/biometrics, screen recording to capture vault data displayed in the app, and data exfiltration to steal Bitwarden app data directly.
  • Why High-Risk: Malware is a prevalent mobile threat, and successful infection can completely bypass application security. Malware can operate in the background, making detection difficult for average users.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education about avoiding malware (phishing, unofficial app stores, suspicious links).
    • Encourage users to use mobile security software (antivirus).
    • Implement app-level defenses that might mitigate some malware actions (e.g., root/jailbreak detection, clipboard monitoring warnings).
  • Attack Vector: Malware Keylogging
  • Description: Malware with keylogging capabilities can record user input, including the master password or unlock PIN/biometric used to access Bitwarden. This captured information can then be exfiltrated to the attacker, granting them access to the user's vault.
  • Why High-Risk: Keylogging is a direct and effective way to steal credentials. Mobile malware often includes keylogging functionality.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education about malware prevention.
    • Strong device security practices.
    • App-level defenses are limited against keyloggers on a compromised device, but strong device security is the primary defense.
  • Attack Vector: Malware Screen Recording
  • Description: Malware with screen recording capabilities can capture screenshots or video recordings of the device screen while the user is using the Bitwarden app. This can expose vault data, passwords, and other sensitive information displayed within the app.
  • Why High-Risk: Screen recording can capture sensitive data even if other security measures are in place. Malware can often gain accessibility permissions needed for screen recording.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education about malware prevention.
    • Strong device security practices.
    • App-level defenses are limited, but consider UI design that minimizes sensitive data exposure on screen for extended periods.
  • Attack Vector: Malware Data Exfiltration
  • Description: Malware can attempt to directly access and exfiltrate Bitwarden app data stored on the device. This might involve accessing local storage, databases, or other files used by the app to store vault data.
  • Why High-Risk: Direct data theft can bypass application-level security if the device is compromised and malware gains sufficient permissions.
  • Mitigations:
    • Robust encryption of local data storage.
    • Secure key management to protect encryption keys from malware access.
    • Root/jailbreak detection to warn users about increased risk.
    • Principle of least privilege for app permissions to limit malware access.
  • Attack Vector: Physical Access to Device
  • Description: An attacker who gains physical access to a user's mobile device can attempt to compromise the Bitwarden application. This is especially risky if the device is unlocked or has weak security measures.
  • Why High-Risk: Physical access bypasses many remote security measures. Opportunistic attacks are possible if devices are left unattended and unlocked.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education about device security and not leaving devices unattended.
    • Encourage strong device passwords/PINs and biometric authentication.
    • Implement app lock feature within Bitwarden to require PIN/biometric even if the device is unlocked.
  • Attack Vector: Direct Access via Unlocked Device
  • Description: If a user leaves their device unlocked and unattended, an attacker with physical access can simply open the Bitwarden app and access the vault directly if the app itself is not locked.
  • Why High-Risk: Extremely easy to exploit if the opportunity arises. Relies on user behavior and app lock configuration.
  • Mitigations:
    • Strongly encourage users to enable and configure the app lock feature within Bitwarden.
    • Default app lock to be enabled after a short period of inactivity.
    • User education about device security and app lock importance.
  • Attack Vector: Social Engineering
  • Description: Attackers use psychological manipulation to trick users into performing actions that compromise their security. In the context of Bitwarden mobile, this primarily involves phishing attacks and distributing fake applications.
  • Why High-Risk: Social engineering exploits human vulnerabilities and can bypass technical security measures. Phishing and fake apps are common and effective attack vectors.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education and security awareness training to recognize and avoid phishing and fake apps.
    • Implement features within the app to help users identify legitimate communications and apps (e.g., clear branding, official app store links).
  • Attack Vector: SMS Phishing (Smishing)
  • Description: Attackers send deceptive SMS messages (smishing) to users, often impersonating Bitwarden or related services. These messages contain malicious links that lead to fake login pages designed to steal master passwords or to websites that distribute malware disguised as Bitwarden apps or updates.
  • Why High-Risk: Smishing is increasingly common and effective, especially on mobile devices where users are often less vigilant about link verification.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education about smishing and how to identify fake SMS messages.
    • Clear communication channels from Bitwarden to users about official communication methods.
    • Consider features to warn users about suspicious links or SMS messages.
  • Attack Vector: Email Phishing
  • Description: Similar to smishing, but using email. Attackers send phishing emails impersonating Bitwarden, containing malicious links to fake login pages or malware.
  • Why High-Risk: Email phishing is a very common and well-established attack vector.
  • Mitigations:
    • User education about email phishing.
    • Email spam filters and security software.
    • Clear communication channels from Bitwarden about official email communication.
  • Attack Vector: Fake/Malicious Bitwarden App Distribution
  • Description: Attackers create fake mobile applications that mimic the legitimate Bitwarden app. They distribute these fake apps through unofficial app stores, websites, or social media. Users who are tricked into downloading and installing these fake apps may enter their master password into the fake app, which is then stolen by the attacker.
  • Why High-Risk: Users might be deceived by visually similar fake apps, especially if they are not careful about app sources. Master password theft leads to complete vault compromise.
  • Mitigations:
    • Strongly advise users to only download Bitwarden apps from official app stores (Google Play Store, Apple App Store).
    • Clear branding and communication about official app sources.
    • Monitor for and take down fake apps found in unofficial channels.
  • Attack Vector: Insecure Local Data Storage
  • Description: If Bitwarden's mobile app does not securely store vault data locally on the device, attackers who gain access to the device's file system (e.g., through malware, physical access, or device vulnerabilities) could potentially access and decrypt the vault data.
  • Why High-Risk: Local storage is a critical security component. If broken, it can lead to direct and complete data compromise.
  • Mitigations:
    • Robust encryption of vault data at rest using strong encryption algorithms (e.g., AES-256).
    • Secure key management using device keystore/keychain or similar secure storage mechanisms.
    • Regular security audits of local data storage implementation.
  • Attack Vector: Flawed Encryption Implementation
  • Description: Even if encryption is intended, vulnerabilities in the encryption algorithm, key management, or implementation can render the encryption ineffective. Attackers might be able to bypass or break the encryption to access the vault data in plaintext.
  • Why High-Risk: Encryption is the core security mechanism for protecting vault data at rest. Flaws here are critical and can lead to catastrophic data breaches.
  • Mitigations:
    • Use well-vetted and industry-standard encryption algorithms.
    • Implement encryption correctly and securely, following best practices.
    • Regularly audit and test encryption implementation for vulnerabilities.
    • Consider third-party security reviews of crypto implementation.
  • Attack Vector: Insecure Key Storage
  • Description: If the master key or encryption keys used to protect the vault data are stored insecurely on the device, attackers who gain access to the device's file system or memory might be able to extract these keys. With the keys, they can then decrypt the vault data, even if the encryption algorithm itself is strong.
  • Why High-Risk: Key security is paramount for encryption. Insecure key storage negates the benefits of strong encryption.
  • Mitigations:
    • Utilize secure key storage mechanisms provided by the mobile OS (e.g., Android Keystore, iOS Keychain).
    • Avoid storing keys in easily accessible locations or in plaintext.
    • Implement key derivation and protection techniques to further secure keys.
  • Attack Vector: Clipboard Snooping
  • Description: Users often copy passwords or TOTP codes from Bitwarden to the clipboard for pasting into other applications. The clipboard is a shared system resource, and other apps or malware running on the device can potentially snoop on the clipboard contents and intercept this sensitive data.
  • Why High-Risk: Clipboard is inherently insecure, and clipboard snooping is a relatively easy attack. User behavior of copying passwords to clipboard is common.
  • Mitigations:
    • Warn users about the security risks of copying sensitive data to the clipboard.
    • Minimize the need for clipboard usage by providing features like auto-fill or direct integration with browsers and apps.
    • Consider implementing features to clear the clipboard automatically after a short period when sensitive data is copied.
    • Educate users to use auto-fill features instead of copy-paste whenever possible.