- Description: An attacker crafts a malicious JSON payload that specifies a different Dart type than the one expected by the application. The attacker leverages
json_serializable
's reliance on type information within the JSON (e.g., a hypothetical"$type"
field) to instantiate an arbitrary class. If this attacker-controlled class has side effects in its constructor orfromJson
factory, those side effects are executed.- Impact: This can lead to arbitrary code execution if the attacker-chosen class has methods that perform sensitive actions (e.g., file system access, network connections, command execution) that are triggered during object creation or deserialization. This is a complete system compromise.
- Affected Component: The
fromJson
factory method generated byjson_serializable
. Specifically, the code that uses type information from the JSON to determine which class to instantiate. This is the core of the vulnerability. - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- a. Strict Type Whitelisting (Essential): Within the
fromJson
factory, hardcode a whitelist of allowed types. Do not trust any type information provided in the JSON. Reject any JSON that doesn't match an allowed type. This is the primary defense. - b. Avoid Polymorphism with Untrusted Input: If possible, do not use polymorphic deserialization (where the JSON determines the concrete type) with data from untrusted sources. If polymorphism is absolutely necessary, the whitelist is non-negotiable.
- c.
checked: true
(Secondary Defense): While not sufficient on its own,checked: true
in@JsonSerializable
adds a layer of runtime type checking that can help detect some mismatches after the object has been (potentially incorrectly) instantiated.
- a. Strict Type Whitelisting (Essential): Within the
- Description: An attacker sends a JSON payload with excessively deep nesting.
json_serializable
's generatedfromJson
methods recursively deserialize this structure.- Impact: This can consume excessive stack space and CPU cycles, leading to a stack overflow error or general resource exhaustion, causing the application to crash or become unresponsive (Denial of Service). This directly exploits the recursive nature of the generated code.
- Affected Component: The recursive deserialization logic within the generated
fromJson
methods. This is inherent to howjson_serializable
handles nested objects. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- a. Depth Limiting (Custom Deserializer/
fromJson
Modification): The most direct mitigation is to modify the generatedfromJson
factory (or use a customJsonConverter
) to track the nesting depth during deserialization. If the depth exceeds a predefined limit, throw an exception or reject the input. This directly addresses the recursive nature of the problem. - b. Input Size Limits (Less Direct, but Important): Enforce limits on the overall JSON size before it reaches
json_serializable
. While this doesn't directly address the nesting issue, it provides a general defense against excessively large inputs.
- a. Depth Limiting (Custom Deserializer/
- Description: An attacker sends JSON with extremely large strings, arrays, or maps within fields.
json_serializable
will attempt to allocate memory for these large fields during deserialization.- Impact: This can lead to excessive memory allocation, potentially causing an out-of-memory error and a denial-of-service condition. This exploits how
json_serializable
handles the creation of these data structures. - Affected Component: The generated
fromJson
methods, specifically the parts that handle the assignment of values to string, array, and map fields. The code generated byjson_serializable
is directly responsible for allocating memory for these fields. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- a. Field-Specific Size Limits (Custom
fromJson
/JsonConverter
): Within customfromJson
factories orJsonConverter
implementations, add checks to limit the length of strings and the size of arrays and maps. This directly addresses the problem within thejson_serializable
-generated code.
- a. Field-Specific Size Limits (Custom
- Impact: This can lead to excessive memory allocation, potentially causing an out-of-memory error and a denial-of-service condition. This exploits how
- Description: A developer implements a custom
JsonConverter
and introduces a vulnerability within thefromJson
ortoJson
methods of the converter itself. This could be due to incorrect type handling, insufficient validation, or other logic errors within the custom code.- Impact: The impact depends on the specific vulnerability within the
JsonConverter
. It could range from data corruption to arbitrary code execution (if the converter handles sensitive data or operations). This is a high risk because custom converters often handle complex or security-sensitive logic. - Affected Component: The custom
JsonConverter
implementation. This is directly related tojson_serializable
because the vulnerability exists within a component specifically designed to integrate with it. - Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical, depending on the converter's purpose)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- a. Thorough Testing: Extensively test the
JsonConverter
with a wide range of valid and invalid inputs, including edge cases and boundary conditions. - b. Security-Focused Code Review: Have another developer with security expertise review the
JsonConverter
implementation, paying close attention to potential vulnerabilities. - c. Follow Best Practices: Adhere to secure coding principles when implementing the
JsonConverter
, including input validation, error handling, and avoiding potentially dangerous operations.
- a. Thorough Testing: Extensively test the
- Impact: The impact depends on the specific vulnerability within the