Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
108 lines (76 loc) · 12.1 KB

File metadata and controls

108 lines (76 loc) · 12.1 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dart-lang/shelf

Objective: Compromise Application using Shelf

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Root: Compromise Application using Shelf
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1. Exploit Request Handling Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
      • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Malicious Request Injection
        • [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1.3. Request Body Manipulation (e.g., JSON/Form data injection)
          • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.3.1. Unvalidated Input leading to application logic flaws (e.g., SQLi, XSS - indirectly related to Shelf but facilitated by request handling)
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.2. Inadequate Request Validation/Sanitization in Handlers [CRITICAL NODE]
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.2.1. Missing or Weak Input Validation in Handlers (leading to application-level vulnerabilities) [CRITICAL NODE]
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2. Exploit Response Generation Vulnerabilities
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.1.4. Caching Sensitive Data in Responses (if Shelf's caching mechanisms are misused or default caching is too aggressive)
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.2. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Response Body (Indirectly related to Shelf, but Shelf facilitates response generation) [CRITICAL NODE]
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 2.2.1. Unescaped User Input in HTML Responses (if application generates HTML using Shelf's response capabilities) [CRITICAL NODE]
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3. Exploit Middleware Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1. Vulnerabilities in Custom Middleware [CRITICAL NODE]
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.1. Authentication Bypass in Custom Authentication Middleware [CRITICAL NODE]
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.2. Authorization Flaws in Custom Authorization Middleware [CRITICAL NODE]

Why High-Risk: Request handling is the primary interface between the application and the outside world. Vulnerabilities here are easily accessible and can have a wide range of impacts.

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Malicious Request Injection [CRITICAL NODE]:
  • Malicious Request Injection [CRITICAL NODE]: * Request Body Manipulation (e.g., JSON/Form data injection) [CRITICAL NODE]:
  • Request Body Manipulation (e.g., JSON/Form data injection) [CRITICAL NODE]: * Unvalidated Input leading to application logic flaws (e.g., SQLi, XSS - indirectly related to Shelf but facilitated by request handling) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
  • Unvalidated Input leading to application logic flaws (e.g., SQLi, XSS - indirectly related to Shelf but facilitated by request handling) [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * SQL Injection (SQLi): If the application uses user-provided data from the request body to construct SQL queries without proper sanitization, an attacker can inject malicious SQL code. This can lead to data breaches, data manipulation, or even complete database compromise. Shelf itself doesn't cause SQLi, but it handles the requests that carry the malicious input. * Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If the application processes user input from the request body and reflects it in HTML responses without proper encoding, an attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code. This code will then execute in the victim's browser, potentially stealing cookies, session tokens, or performing actions on behalf of the user. Again, Shelf facilitates the request/response cycle where this vulnerability manifests. * Why High-Risk: These are classic, highly prevalent, and often lead to severe consequences like data breaches and account takeover. They are often easy to exploit for attackers with basic web security knowledge.
  • Inadequate Request Validation/Sanitization in Handlers [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
  • Missing or Weak Input Validation in Handlers (leading to application-level vulnerabilities) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * Generic Input Validation Failures: If request handlers do not thoroughly validate and sanitize all user inputs (headers, parameters, body), various application-level vulnerabilities can arise. This includes logic flaws, business logic bypasses, and vulnerabilities specific to the application's functionality. For example, insufficient validation in an e-commerce application could allow an attacker to manipulate prices or quantities. * Why High-Risk: Input validation is a fundamental security control. Its absence or weakness is a common root cause for many vulnerabilities. It's high-risk because it's often overlooked and can have broad consequences depending on the application's functionality.

Why High-Risk: Vulnerabilities in response generation can lead to information disclosure or client-side attacks like XSS.

  • Attack Vectors:
  • Caching Sensitive Data in Responses (if Shelf's caching mechanisms are misused or default caching is too aggressive) [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * Accidental Caching of Sensitive Information: If the application or middleware incorrectly configures caching headers or uses default caching behavior without considering sensitive data, responses containing confidential information (e.g., personal data, API keys, session tokens) might be cached by browsers, proxies, or CDNs. This cached data could then be accessed by unauthorized users or remain exposed for longer than intended. * Why High-Risk: Information disclosure can have serious privacy and security implications. While the likelihood might be lower if developers are aware of caching, misconfiguration is common, and the impact of exposing sensitive data can be significant.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Response Body (Indirectly related to Shelf, but Shelf facilitates response generation) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Unescaped User Input in HTML Responses (if application generates HTML using Shelf's response capabilities) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
  • Unescaped User Input in HTML Responses (if application generates HTML using Shelf's response capabilities) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * Reflected XSS: If the application takes user input (even from request headers or parameters) and directly embeds it into HTML responses without proper escaping or encoding, an attacker can craft malicious URLs containing JavaScript code. When a user clicks on such a link, the attacker's script will be executed in their browser within the context of the application's domain. * Why High-Risk: XSS is a persistent threat that can lead to account hijacking, data theft, and website defacement. It's high-risk because it's often easy to exploit and can have a significant impact on users.

Why High-Risk: Middleware sits in the request/response pipeline and often handles critical security functions like authentication and authorization. Vulnerabilities in middleware can bypass these controls, leading to widespread compromise.

  • Attack Vectors:
  • Vulnerabilities in Custom Middleware [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Authentication Bypass in Custom Authentication Middleware [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * Logic Errors in Authentication: Custom authentication middleware might contain flaws in its logic, allowing attackers to bypass authentication checks. This could be due to incorrect implementation of authentication protocols, flawed session management, or vulnerabilities in password verification. * Why High-Risk: Authentication is the gatekeeper to the application. Bypassing it grants attackers full access to protected resources and functionalities. This is a critical vulnerability with maximum impact.
  • Authentication Bypass in Custom Authentication Middleware [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * Logic Errors in Authentication: Custom authentication middleware might contain flaws in its logic, allowing attackers to bypass authentication checks. This could be due to incorrect implementation of authentication protocols, flawed session management, or vulnerabilities in password verification. * Why High-Risk: Authentication is the gatekeeper to the application. Bypassing it grants attackers full access to protected resources and functionalities. This is a critical vulnerability with maximum impact.
  • Authorization Flaws in Custom Authorization Middleware [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: * Attack Vector Breakdown: * Logic Errors in Authorization: Custom authorization middleware might have flaws in its logic, allowing users to access resources or perform actions they are not authorized to. This could be due to incorrect role-based access control implementation, flawed permission checks, or vulnerabilities in attribute-based access control. * Why High-Risk: Authorization flaws lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data and functionalities. This can result in data breaches, data manipulation, and privilege escalation. It's a critical vulnerability that can severely compromise application security.