Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
79 lines (67 loc) · 5.42 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

79 lines (67 loc) · 5.42 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dart-lang/shelf

Objective: Gain Unauthorized Access/Disrupt Service (via Shelf-Specific Vulnerabilities) [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Visualization

                                 Attacker's Goal:
                                 Gain Unauthorized Access/Disrupt Service
                                 (via Shelf-Specific Vulnerabilities) [CRITICAL]
                                            |
      =================================================================
      ||
  1. Exploit Middleware Misconfiguration [CRITICAL] || ===================== || 1.1 Bypass Authentication Middleware [CRITICAL] | ------------------------------------ |
  2. Leverage Handler Vulnerabilities (partially) | ------------------------------------ | 2.1 Input Validation Bypass in Handlers [CRITICAL] (e.g., SQLi, XSS)

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Middleware Misconfiguration [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This represents a broad category of attacks where the attacker takes advantage of incorrectly configured or implemented middleware within the shelf application. Middleware, in shelf, are components that can intercept and process HTTP requests and responses before they reach the main application handler. Misconfigurations can lead to a variety of security issues.
  • Why Critical: Successful exploitation of middleware misconfigurations can give an attacker significant control over the application's request/response flow, potentially bypassing security mechanisms entirely.
  • Sub-Attack Vectors (High-Risk):

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 Bypass Authentication Middleware [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is a specific, high-impact instance of middleware misconfiguration. The attacker exploits flaws in the authentication middleware to gain access to protected resources without valid credentials. This could be due to:
    • Logic errors in the middleware's code.
    • Incorrect handling of authentication tokens (e.g., accepting expired tokens, weak signature verification).
    • Improper path matching (e.g., the middleware doesn't protect all intended routes).
    • Incorrect order of middleware execution (e.g., authentication happens after authorization).
    • Use of weak cryptographic primitives.
  • Why Critical: Bypassing authentication is a direct path to unauthorized access, often granting the attacker the same privileges as a legitimate user.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: High to Very High
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thorough code review of the authentication middleware.
    • Comprehensive unit and integration testing, including negative test cases.
    • Fuzz testing to send unexpected inputs.
    • Use of well-established authentication libraries within the middleware.
    • Ensure correct middleware ordering.
    • Regular security audits.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Leverage Handler Vulnerabilities (partially - focusing on Input Validation)

  • Sub-Attack Vectors (High-Risk):

Attack Tree Path: 2.1 Input Validation Bypass in Handlers [CRITICAL] (e.g., SQLi, XSS)

  • Description: This attack focuses on vulnerabilities within the application's handlers (the functions that process requests and generate responses) that arise from insufficient or incorrect input validation. shelf itself doesn't handle input validation; it's the developer's responsibility. The attacker sends crafted input that exploits these weaknesses. The most critical types of input validation bypass are:
    • SQL Injection (SQLi): The attacker injects malicious SQL code into input fields, allowing them to manipulate database queries, potentially reading, modifying, or deleting data.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): The attacker injects malicious JavaScript code into input fields, which is then executed in the browsers of other users, potentially stealing cookies, redirecting users, or defacing the website.
  • Why Critical (in the context of SQLi and XSS): These specific types of input validation bypass can lead to severe consequences, including data breaches (SQLi) and compromise of user accounts (XSS).
  • Likelihood: Medium to High
  • Impact: Medium to High (specifically High for SQLi and XSS)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust input validation in all handlers. Validate data types, lengths, formats, and allowed characters. Use a whitelist approach whenever possible.
    • Use parameterized queries or an ORM to prevent SQL injection. Never construct SQL queries by concatenating user input.
    • Properly encode output to prevent XSS. Use context-aware encoding (e.g., HTML encoding for HTML output, JavaScript encoding for JavaScript output).
    • Use Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate the impact of XSS.
    • Regular security audits and penetration testing.