Threat: Middleware Authentication Bypass
-
Threat: Middleware Authentication Bypass
- Description: An attacker crafts a malicious request that bypasses authentication checks implemented in custom middleware. This exploits incorrect middleware ordering, logic flaws, or vulnerabilities in how the middleware interacts with
shelf.Request
andshelf.Response
objects. The attacker might manipulate headers, cookies, or exploit timing issues specific to the middleware's interaction with the Shelf pipeline. - Impact: Unauthorized access to protected resources, data breaches, impersonation of legitimate users, and potential for further attacks.
- Affected Shelf Component: Custom
Middleware
implementations, specifically those handling authentication. Theshelf.Pipeline
is directly involved due to the ordering and execution of middleware. - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Ensure middleware is ordered correctly within the
shelf.Pipeline
, with authentication before authorization or data access. - Thoroughly test authentication middleware with various attack vectors, focusing on how it handles
shelf.Request
properties and generatesshelf.Response
objects. - Use secure session management techniques, validating that the middleware correctly handles session tokens within
shelf.Request
andshelf.Response
.
- Ensure middleware is ordered correctly within the
- Description: An attacker crafts a malicious request that bypasses authentication checks implemented in custom middleware. This exploits incorrect middleware ordering, logic flaws, or vulnerabilities in how the middleware interacts with
Threat: Handler Hijacking via Routing
-
Threat: Handler Hijacking via Routing
- Description: An attacker crafts a request URL that, due to overly permissive routing rules defined using
shelf.Router
, matches an unintended handler. The attacker exploits howshelf.Router
matches paths and extracts parameters, potentially leading to unexpected handler execution. - Impact: Access to unintended functionality, exposure of sensitive data, triggering of unauthorized actions.
- Affected Shelf Component: The
shelf.Router
component and its routing logic. This directly involves howshelf.Router
processesshelf.Request
objects to determine the appropriate handler. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use precise and restrictive routing rules within
shelf.Router
. Avoid overly broad regular expressions or wildcard matches. - Prefer specific path matching over regular expressions when feasible.
- Thoroughly test all routing paths defined in
shelf.Router
, including edge cases and unexpected inputs, to ensure correct handler mapping.
- Use precise and restrictive routing rules within
- Description: An attacker crafts a request URL that, due to overly permissive routing rules defined using
-
Threat: Malicious Middleware Data Tampering
- Description: A malicious or compromised third-party middleware modifies
shelf.Request
orshelf.Response
data in an unauthorized way. This could involve injecting malicious content, altering data values, or corrupting data integrity by manipulating the request/response objects passed through theshelf.Pipeline
. - Impact: Data corruption, execution of malicious code (XSS if response data is tampered with), unauthorized data modification.
- Affected Shelf Component: Any
Middleware
in theshelf.Pipeline
, particularly third-party middleware. The core issue is the ability of middleware to modifyshelf.Request
andshelf.Response
objects. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Thoroughly vet any third-party middleware used, examining its interaction with
shelf.Request
andshelf.Response
. - Implement strict input validation and output encoding after all middleware in the
shelf.Pipeline
has processed the request/response. - Regularly update all middleware dependencies.
- Thoroughly vet any third-party middleware used, examining its interaction with
- Description: A malicious or compromised third-party middleware modifies
-
Threat: Information Disclosure via Error Handling
- Description: An attacker triggers an error within a
shelf.Handler
orMiddleware
that results in the application exposing sensitive information in theshelf.Response
. This is due to inadequate custom error handling, causing Shelf's default error handling (which may expose details) to be used. - Impact: Exposure of sensitive information that can aid attackers, revealing implementation details.
- Affected Shelf Component: Error handling logic within
Handler
functions and any custom error handlingMiddleware
. Shelf's default error handling (if not overridden) is a primary concern, specifically how it constructs theshelf.Response
in error cases. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement custom error handling middleware that intercepts exceptions and generates generic
shelf.Response
objects without sensitive details. - Never expose raw exception details or stack traces in the
shelf.Response
sent to the client in a production environment. - Configure a default error handler to catch any unhandled exceptions and return a safe
shelf.Response
.
- Implement custom error handling middleware that intercepts exceptions and generates generic
- Description: An attacker triggers an error within a
-
Threat: Denial of Service via Request Flooding
- Description: An attacker sends a large number of requests to the
shelf.Server
, overwhelming server resources. Shelf itself does not provide built-in mechanisms to limit request rates, making the application vulnerable. - Impact: Application unavailability, service disruption.
- Affected Shelf Component: The
shelf.Server
and allHandler
andMiddleware
components, as they are all involved in processing requests. The lack of built-in rate limiting inshelf.Server
is the direct vulnerability. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement rate limiting middleware to restrict the number of requests processed by
shelf.Server
from a single IP address or user. - Use a reverse proxy or load balancer in front of the
shelf.Server
to provide additional DoS protection.
- Implement rate limiting middleware to restrict the number of requests processed by
- Description: An attacker sends a large number of requests to the
-
Threat: Denial of Service via Large Request Bodies
- Description: An attacker sends requests with excessively large request bodies to a
shelf.Handler
, consuming server resources. Shelf does not provide built-in request body size limits, making handlers vulnerable if they don't implement their own checks. - Impact: Application unavailability, service disruption.
- Affected Shelf Component:
Handler
functions that processshelf.Request
bodies, and anyMiddleware
that interacts with the request body. The lack of built-in limits onshelf.Request
body size is the direct vulnerability. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement middleware to limit the maximum size of the
shelf.Request
body. - Use streaming techniques to process large request bodies in chunks, rather than loading the entire
shelf.Request.read()
result into memory at once.
- Implement middleware to limit the maximum size of the
- Description: An attacker sends requests with excessively large request bodies to a