Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
82 lines (71 loc) · 8.48 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

82 lines (71 loc) · 8.48 KB

Threat Model Analysis for flame-engine/flame

Threat: Asset Tampering (Pre-Packaging)

  • Threat: Malicious Asset Replacement
  • Description: An attacker with access to the development environment or build pipeline replaces legitimate game assets (images, audio, Tiled maps loaded by Flame) with malicious versions. This could involve replacing a sprite with an offensive image, inserting malicious code into a Tiled map (if custom properties are misused with Flame's TiledComponent), or modifying audio files. The attack leverages Flame's asset loading system.
  • Impact:
    • Game displays offensive/inappropriate content.
    • Potential for code execution if Tiled map custom properties are misused to trigger unexpected behavior through Flame's handling of those properties.
    • Game crashes or instability.
    • Reputational damage.
  • Flame Component Affected: Flame.assets (the core asset loading mechanism), TiledComponent (specifically, how it handles custom properties), and any component that uses loaded assets (e.g., SpriteComponent, SpriteAnimationComponent, AudioPlayer).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Development (Crucial):
      • Strict access control to the development environment and build servers.
      • Implement a secure build pipeline with automated integrity checks (hashing) of assets before inclusion in the build. This verifies assets haven't been tampered with before Flame even touches them.
      • Version control (e.g., Git) for asset tracking and rollbacks.
      • Regular security audits of the build pipeline.
    • Runtime (Additional Layer, Performance Consideration):
      • If performance allows, implement runtime asset integrity checks (hashing) within Flame, before loading. This adds a layer of defense specific to Flame's asset loading, even if the build process is compromised.

Threat: Game State Manipulation (In-Memory) - Focusing on Flame's Role

  • Threat: Cheat Engine / Memory Editor Targeting Flame Components
  • Description: An attacker uses a memory editor to modify game state variables managed by Flame components. While memory editing is a general threat, this focuses on the attacker targeting data structures and variables within Flame's component system. They're exploiting the fact that Flame organizes and manages game state in a predictable way.
  • Impact:
    • Unfair gameplay advantage (cheating).
    • Disruption of game balance.
    • Negative impact on other players (multiplayer).
  • Flame Component Affected: Any component that stores or manages game state, particularly those inheriting from PositionComponent, HasGameRef, or custom components holding game logic data. The core game loop (FlameGame.update) is indirectly affected.
  • Risk Severity: High (especially for competitive games)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Obfuscation: Obfuscate the game code, making it harder to reverse engineer Flame's component structure and identify memory locations.
    • Redundancy and Validation (Flame-Specific): Store critical game state outside of standard Flame components (e.g., in a separate data manager) and cross-check with the component's state. This makes it harder to manipulate the game by only targeting Flame components.
    • Anti-Cheat (Flame-Aware): Implement anti-cheat logic that understands Flame's component system and can detect inconsistencies (e.g., a PositionComponent reporting an impossible position).

Threat: Denial of Service (Rendering/Update Loop)

  • Threat: Resource Exhaustion via Flame Components
  • Description: An attacker exploits game logic or vulnerabilities to cause Flame to create an excessive number of game objects (sprites, particles), trigger complex animations handled by Flame, or force excessive collision checks within Flame's collision detection system. This directly targets Flame's rendering and update pipeline.
  • Impact:
    • Game lag, unplayability.
    • Device freeze/crash.
    • Battery drain.
  • Flame Component Affected: FlameGame.update, FlameGame.render, SpriteComponent, SpriteAnimationComponent, ParticleComponent, and the CollisionDetection system (including HasHitboxes and Collidable).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Performance Profiling (Flame-Focused): Use Flame's debugging tools and profiling features to identify performance bottlenecks within Flame's components.
    • Object Pooling (Flame-Specific): Reuse Flame components (e.g., SpriteComponent, ParticleComponent) instead of creating new ones. Flame provides mechanisms for this.
    • Limits and Throttling (Flame-Aware): Implement limits on the number of active Flame components (especially resource-intensive ones). Use Flame's component lifecycle methods (onLoad, onRemove) to manage these limits.
    • Efficient Collision Detection (Flame's System): Utilize Flame's optimized collision detection algorithms (e.g., spatial partitioning using QuadTreeCollisionDetection) and configure them appropriately.
    • Input Validation (Feeding into Flame): Sanitize and validate user input before it interacts with Flame components, preventing malicious input from triggering excessive resource use within Flame.

Threat: Component Lifecycle Manipulation

  • Threat: Injection/Modification of Flame Component Logic
  • Description: An attacker injects code or modifies existing code to disrupt the normal execution of Flame's component lifecycle methods (onLoad, update, render, onRemove). This directly targets the core functionality of Flame's component system.
  • Impact:
    • Game crashes or instability.
    • Unpredictable game behavior.
    • Potential for further exploitation.
  • Flame Component Affected: Any component derived from Component, and FlameGame itself (the core game loop).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Code Obfuscation: Make it significantly harder to reverse engineer and modify the game code, including Flame's component interactions.
    • Anti-Tampering (Advanced, Flame-Specific): Implement runtime integrity checks (if feasible) that specifically target Flame components and their lifecycle methods. This is a very advanced technique.
    • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices to prevent vulnerabilities that could allow code injection in the first place. This is a general mitigation, but it's crucial to prevent attackers from gaining the initial foothold needed to manipulate Flame components.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities (Direct Flame Impact)

  • Threat: Exploitation of a Flame Engine Vulnerability
  • Description: A vulnerability within the Flame engine itself is exploited. This is distinct from vulnerabilities in Flutter or other general libraries; this is a flaw in Flame's code.
  • Impact: Varies depending on the vulnerability, but could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution within the context of the game.
  • Flame Component Affected: Potentially any Flame component, depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if a vulnerability exists)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates (Crucial): Keep the Flame engine updated to the latest stable version. This is the primary defense against known vulnerabilities.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Actively monitor security advisories and announcements specifically for the Flame engine.
    • Pin Dependencies (Carefully): Pin the Flame engine to a specific, known-good version to prevent accidental updates to a potentially vulnerable version. However, balance this with the need to apply security patches promptly. A good strategy is to pin to a minor version (e.g., 1.x.y) and allow patch updates (1.x.z), but manually review and test major or minor version upgrades.
    • Dependency Scanning (Flame Focus): While general dependency scanners are useful, prioritize tools or methods that can specifically analyze the Flame engine's codebase for potential vulnerabilities (if such tools exist or become available).