Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (47 loc) · 9.12 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (47 loc) · 9.12 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for flutter/packages

Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Flutter packages and their transitive dependencies can contain critical or high severity security vulnerabilities. Exploiting these vulnerabilities can lead to significant application compromise.
  • How Packages Contribute to Attack Surface: Introducing external packages inherently brings in their potential vulnerabilities. A vulnerability in a package directly exposes the application if that package is used in a vulnerable way or if the vulnerability is exploitable by external inputs the application processes.
  • Example: A widely used networking package contains a critical vulnerability allowing remote code execution by sending a specially crafted network request. If the application uses this networking package to handle external API calls without proper input validation, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain full control of the application server or user device.
  • Impact: Critical. Remote Code Execution (RCE), full system compromise, complete data breach, denial of service, and significant operational disruption.
  • Risk Severity: Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Dependency Scanning: Implement automated dependency scanning in CI/CD pipelines to detect known vulnerabilities in packages before deployment. Fail builds on detection of critical or high severity vulnerabilities.
    • Proactive Vulnerability Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases (CVE, NVD, OSV) to receive alerts about newly discovered vulnerabilities in used packages.
    • Rapid Patching Process: Establish a process for quickly updating vulnerable packages upon vulnerability disclosure and patch availability. Prioritize critical and high severity vulnerabilities.
    • Automated Dependency Updates (with caution): Consider using automated dependency update tools, but implement thorough testing and review processes before deploying updates, especially for critical packages.

Attack Surface: Malicious Packages (Supply Chain Attacks)

  • Description: Attackers can compromise the software supply chain by injecting malicious code into Flutter packages. This can occur through compromised package registries, typosquatting, or compromised maintainer accounts, leading to the distribution of malicious packages.
  • How Packages Contribute to Attack Surface: Flutter applications rely on external package registries. If a malicious package is introduced into the registry and unknowingly used by developers, the application becomes a vector for distributing malware or performing malicious actions.
  • Example: A malicious actor uploads a package disguised as a popular utility package (typosquatting) or compromises a legitimate package maintainer account and pushes a malicious update. Developers unknowingly include this malicious package in their application. This package could contain code to steal user credentials, inject advertisements, or perform other malicious activities on user devices or application servers.
  • Impact: Critical. Widespread malware distribution, massive data theft, complete compromise of user devices and application infrastructure, severe reputational damage, and legal repercussions.
  • Risk Severity: Critical.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Package Vetting Process: Implement a rigorous package vetting process before using any new package. Evaluate package reputation, maintainer trustworthiness, community activity, and perform static code analysis on the package source code.
    • Dependency Pinning and Lock Files: Utilize pubspec.lock to strictly control dependency versions and prevent automatic updates to potentially malicious versions. Review and approve dependency updates manually.
    • Source Code Review for Critical Packages: For packages handling sensitive data or core application functionalities, conduct thorough source code reviews to identify any suspicious or malicious code.
    • Package Integrity Verification: Explore tools or processes to verify the integrity and authenticity of downloaded packages, ensuring they haven't been tampered with.
    • Registry Security Awareness: Stay informed about security best practices for package registries and potential supply chain attack vectors.

Attack Surface: Package Code Quality and Insecure Practices Leading to High Impact Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Even without known CVEs, packages can contain insecure coding practices that introduce high severity vulnerabilities. This includes flaws like insecure data handling, authentication bypasses, or authorization errors within the package code itself.
  • How Packages Contribute to Attack Surface: By using packages, the application inherits the code quality and security practices of the package developers. Insecure code within a package directly becomes part of the application's attack surface, potentially leading to exploitable vulnerabilities.
  • Example: An authentication package, despite not having a CVE, contains a logic flaw in its password reset functionality. This flaw allows an attacker to bypass the intended password reset process and gain unauthorized access to user accounts. If the application relies on this flawed authentication package, it becomes vulnerable to account takeover attacks.
  • Impact: High to Critical. Unauthorized access to sensitive data, account takeover, privilege escalation, data breaches, and potential for further exploitation depending on the nature of the insecure practice.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Security-Focused Code Review of Packages: Prioritize security-focused code reviews for packages, especially those handling sensitive data, authentication, or authorization. Look for common insecure coding patterns.
    • Static and Dynamic Analysis of Package Code: Utilize static analysis tools to identify potential vulnerabilities in package code. Consider dynamic analysis (fuzzing, penetration testing) for critical packages to uncover runtime vulnerabilities.
    • Choose Packages with Security Audits: Favor packages that have undergone independent security audits and have publicly available audit reports.
    • Report and Contribute to Package Security: If you identify security issues in package code, report them responsibly to maintainers and consider contributing fixes to improve package security for the wider community.

Attack Surface: Misuse and Misconfiguration of Packages Leading to High Impact Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Incorrect usage or insecure configuration of packages can create high severity vulnerabilities in the application. This includes misconfiguring security settings, ignoring security warnings in package documentation, or misunderstanding package security implications.
  • How Packages Contribute to Attack Surface: Packages often offer complex functionalities and security-related configuration options. Misunderstanding or misconfiguring these options can inadvertently introduce significant security vulnerabilities, even if the package itself is secure when used correctly.
  • Example: A database package offers options for secure and insecure connection modes. A developer, misunderstanding the security implications, configures the application to use an insecure connection mode for database access. This misconfiguration exposes sensitive database data to network interception and unauthorized access, leading to a potential data breach.
  • Impact: High to Critical. Data breaches, unauthorized access to sensitive systems, insecure communication channels, authentication bypasses, and other high-impact security flaws arising from misconfiguration.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Security Training on Package Usage: Provide developers with security training specifically focused on secure package integration and configuration best practices.
    • Security-Focused Documentation Review: Thoroughly review package documentation, paying close attention to security-related sections, configuration guidelines, and warnings.
    • Secure Configuration Templates and Best Practices: Develop and enforce secure configuration templates and best practices for commonly used packages within the organization.
    • Security Code Reviews of Package Integration: Conduct security-focused code reviews specifically examining how packages are integrated and configured within the application, ensuring secure usage.
    • Penetration Testing Focused on Package Integration: Include penetration testing scenarios that specifically target potential vulnerabilities arising from package misuse and misconfiguration.