Attack Surface: Dependency-Related Attacks
- Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the package dependency chain (direct and transitive dependencies).
- How Packages Contribute: Flutter packages rely on other packages. A vulnerability in any dependency is exploitable.
- Example: A package uses an outdated version of a networking library with a known Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability.
- Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), data breaches, denial of service, application compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the specific vulnerability).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Regular Updates: Consistently run
flutter pub outdated
andflutter pub upgrade
. - Vulnerability Scanning: Use tools like Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check, or Dependabot.
- Dependency Pinning: Use precise versions in
pubspec.yaml
and reviewpubspec.lock
. - Dependency Auditing: Regularly review the dependency tree (
flutter pub deps
). - Private Package Repository (for internal dependencies): Use a private repository with strict access controls.
- Regular Updates: Consistently run
Attack Surface: Supply Chain Compromise
- Description: Malicious code injected into a package by compromising the maintainer's account or repository.
- How Packages Contribute: All packages are susceptible. A compromised maintainer could push a malicious update.
- Example: A popular package's maintainer account is hacked; a new version is released with a backdoor.
- Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), data breaches, complete application compromise, loss of trust.
- Risk Severity: Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Monitor Package Repositories: Observe for unusual activity.
- Code Review (for critical packages): Fork and review updates before integrating.
- Security Scanning Tools: Analyze package code for suspicious patterns.
- Delayed Updates (for non-critical packages): Allow time for community issue identification (trade-off).
- Use signed packages (if available): Prioritize packages with cryptographic signatures.
Attack Surface: Native Code Vulnerabilities (Platform-Specific Packages)
- Description: Vulnerabilities in the native (Java/Kotlin, Objective-C/Swift) code of platform-specific packages.
- How Packages Contribute: Packages like
camera
,webview_flutter
use native code for platform interaction. - Example: A vulnerability in
camera
's Android implementation allows bypassing permission checks. - Impact: Varies; privilege escalation, RCE within the native code context.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical (depends on vulnerability and platform).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Keep Packages Updated: Native code vulnerabilities are often patched in updates.
- Security Audits (for critical applications): Audit native code of critical packages.
- Use Well-Vetted Packages: Prioritize packages with strong security and maintenance.
- Monitor Security Advisories: Stay informed about platform and library advisories.
Attack Surface: WebView-Related Attacks
- Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in
webview_flutter
or loaded web content. - How Packages Contribute:
webview_flutter
can have vulnerabilities and is a conduit for web content attacks. - Example: XSS in a website loaded in a webview steals data or interacts with the native app via a JavaScript bridge.
- Impact: XSS, data theft, privilege escalation (with JavaScript bridge), phishing.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Load Only Trusted Content: Avoid untrusted or user-generated content.
- Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP in web content.
- Secure JavaScript Bridge: Validate and sanitize data; minimize bridge functionality.
- HTTPS Only: Ensure webview loads only HTTPS content.
- Input Validation: Sanitize user input displayed in the webview.
- Consider Alternatives: If possible, avoid webviews; use native implementation.