Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (101 loc) · 9.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

126 lines (101 loc) · 9.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for flutter/packages

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous Package Selection and Vetting

  • Description:

    1. Establish Criteria: Define clear criteria for acceptable packages. This includes:
      • Source (prefer flutter/packages and well-known publishers).
      • Popularity (downloads, likes, pub points).
      • Maintenance activity (recent commits, issue resolution).
      • License compatibility (MIT, BSD, etc.).
      • Documentation quality.
    2. Initial Screening: Before adding any new package, perform a quick initial screening against the criteria. Reject packages that clearly fail.
    3. Deeper Review (Critical Packages): For packages handling sensitive data, security functions, or having a large impact:
      • Manual Code Review: Examine the package's source code for common vulnerabilities (input validation, data storage, hardcoded credentials, deprecated APIs, DoS potential).
      • Maintainer Investigation: Research the package maintainer's reputation and responsiveness.
      • Alternative Search: Actively look for alternative packages that might be more secure or better maintained.
    4. Document Decisions: Keep a record of why each package was chosen (or rejected), including the review findings.
    5. Regular Re-evaluation: Periodically (e.g., every 3-6 months) re-evaluate existing packages against the criteria, especially if there are updates or security advisories.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Packages (High Severity): Packages intentionally designed to steal data, install malware, or disrupt the application.
    • Vulnerable Packages (High to Medium Severity): Packages with unintentional security flaws that can be exploited.
    • Abandoned Packages (Medium Severity): Packages that are no longer maintained, increasing the risk of unpatched vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (High Severity): Attacks where a legitimate package is compromised at the source. (This mitigation helps reduce the risk, but doesn't eliminate it entirely).
    • License Violations (Low to Medium Severity): Using a package with a license that is incompatible with your project.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Packages: Significantly reduces the risk of introducing malicious code from packages.
    • Vulnerable Packages: Reduces the likelihood of using packages with known or easily discoverable vulnerabilities.
    • Abandoned Packages: Reduces the risk of relying on unmaintained package code.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Provides some level of defense by favoring well-maintained and reputable packages.
    • License Violations: Prevents legal issues related to improper package usage.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • [Example: We have a basic checklist for package selection, but no formal code review process for critical packages. Checklist is in the docs/package_selection.md file.]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • [Example: We need to implement a formal code review process specifically for critical packages. We also need to establish a regular schedule for re-evaluating existing packages.]

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Analysis and Vulnerability Scanning

  • Description:

    1. Choose a Tool: Select a vulnerability scanning tool that specifically targets Dart/Flutter packages (e.g., dart pub outdated --mode=security, Snyk, Dependabot).
    2. Integrate into CI/CD: Add the package scanning tool to your continuous integration/continuous delivery pipeline.
    3. Configure Scanning: Set up the tool to scan for vulnerabilities in both direct and transitive dependencies (packages).
    4. Automated Alerts: Configure alerts for when package vulnerabilities are found.
    5. Triage Vulnerabilities: When a package vulnerability is detected:
      • Assess Severity: Determine the severity.
      • Investigate Impact: Understand how the package vulnerability could affect your application.
      • Prioritize Remediation: Address high-severity package vulnerabilities immediately.
    6. Remediation:
      • Update Package: If a patched version of the package is available, update.
      • Alternative Package: If no patch is available, consider switching to a different package.
      • Fork and Fix (Last Resort): If necessary, fork the package and apply the fix.
    7. Regular Manual Checks: Periodically run dart pub outdated --mode=security manually.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Vulnerable Packages (High to Medium Severity): Packages with known security flaws.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (High Severity): Helps detect if a previously safe package has been compromised.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities (Low Probability, High Severity): Scanning tools can quickly identify package vulnerabilities once they become known.

  • Impact:

    • Vulnerable Packages: Significantly reduces the risk of using packages with known vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Provides a crucial early warning system for compromised packages.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Improves the speed of response when new package vulnerabilities are disclosed.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • [Example: We have Dependabot enabled on our GitHub repository. We also run dart pub outdated --mode=security manually before each release.]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • [Example: We need to integrate dart pub outdated --mode=security into our CI/CD pipeline to run on every build. We should also explore Snyk for more comprehensive package scanning.]

Mitigation Strategy: Package Pinning and Version Control

  • Description:

    1. Precise Versioning: In your pubspec.yaml file, specify exact package versions (e.g., my_package: 1.2.3), not version ranges.
    2. pubspec.lock: Always commit the pubspec.lock file. This locks down the exact versions of all dependencies (packages).
    3. Controlled Updates: When updating packages:
      • Review Changelogs: Carefully read the changelog for the new package version.
      • Test Thoroughly: Run tests after updating packages.
      • Staged Rollouts (If Possible): Consider a staged rollout.
    4. Avoid pub get in Production: Do not run pub get on production servers. Use pre-built artifacts.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unexpected Breaking Changes (Medium Severity): Prevents package updates that introduce incompatible changes.
    • Vulnerable Packages (Medium Severity): Prevents accidental upgrades to a vulnerable package version.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces the window of opportunity for a compromised package to be introduced.
    • Inconsistent Builds (Medium Severity): Ensures builds are reproducible.

  • Impact:

    • Unexpected Breaking Changes: Eliminates breakages due to automatic package updates.
    • Vulnerable Packages: Reduces the risk of introducing vulnerabilities through package updates.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Provides a layer of defense by requiring explicit package updates.
    • Inconsistent Builds: Guarantees consistent builds.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • [Example: We always commit our pubspec.lock file. We use precise version numbers in pubspec.yaml.]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • [Example: We need to implement a more rigorous process for reviewing changelogs and testing before updating packages.]

Mitigation Strategy: Forking and Maintaining (Last Resort)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Critical, Unmaintained Packages: Identify packages that are essential but unmaintained.
    2. Assess Vulnerabilities: Determine if the package has vulnerabilities.
    3. Fork the Repository: Create a fork of the package's repository.
    4. Apply Security Fixes: Apply security patches to your forked version of the package.
    5. Maintain the Fork: Regularly update your fork and address new vulnerabilities in the package.
    6. Consider Upstreaming: Contribute fixes back to the original package project (if possible).
    7. Update pubspec.yaml: Point your pubspec.yaml to your forked package repository.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Abandoned Packages (Medium Severity): Allows continued use of a critical package while addressing vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerable Packages (High to Medium Severity): Provides a way to fix vulnerabilities in the package when the maintainer is unresponsive.

  • Impact:

    • Abandoned Packages: Eliminates the risk of relying on unmaintained package code with known vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerable Packages: Allows you to directly address security issues within the package.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • [Example: We have not forked any packages yet.]

  • Missing Implementation:

    • [Example: We need to identify any critical, unmaintained packages that might require forking in the future.]