Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
247 lines (214 loc) · 30.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

247 lines (214 loc) · 30.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Authentication - Change Default Credentials

  • Description: 1. Access the RabbitMQ Management UI (usually at http://your-rabbitmq-server:15672) or use the command-line tool rabbitmqctl. 2. Navigate to the "Users" section in the Management UI or use rabbitmqctl list_users to identify the default guest user. 3. Change the password for the guest user to a strong, unique password using the Management UI or rabbitmqctl change_password guest <new_strong_password>. 4. Alternatively, and preferably in production environments, consider disabling the guest user entirely using rabbitmqctl delete_user guest.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Attackers exploiting default credentials to gain immediate access to the RabbitMQ server, potentially leading to data breaches, service disruption, and malicious message manipulation.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized Access: High reduction. Eliminates the most common and easily exploitable vulnerability.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, default guest password was changed during the initial RabbitMQ server setup as part of the infrastructure provisioning script. Documented in the infrastructure setup guide.
    • Missing Implementation: Disabling the guest user entirely in production environments is still pending. This is planned for the next infrastructure update.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Authentication - Utilize Strong Passwords

  • Description: 1. Define a strong password policy for all RabbitMQ users. This policy should include requirements for password length, complexity (mix of uppercase, lowercase, numbers, and symbols), and prohibit the use of easily guessable passwords. 2. Educate administrators about the importance of strong passwords and encourage the use of password managers. 3. During user creation (via Management UI or rabbitmqctl add_user), enforce adherence to the strong password policy. While RabbitMQ doesn't inherently enforce complexity, manual checks and user training are crucial. 4. Consider periodic password rotation policies for service accounts accessing RabbitMQ.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Brute-Force Attacks (Medium Severity): Attackers attempting to guess passwords through automated brute-force attacks. Strong passwords significantly increase the time and resources required for successful brute-force attempts.
      • Dictionary Attacks (Medium Severity): Attackers using lists of common passwords to gain unauthorized access. Strong passwords, especially those with complexity, are less likely to be found in dictionary lists.
      • Credential Stuffing (Medium Severity): Attackers using compromised credentials from other services to attempt login to RabbitMQ. Strong, unique passwords reduce the effectiveness of credential stuffing.
    • Impact:
      • Brute-Force Attacks: Medium reduction. Makes brute-force attacks significantly more difficult and time-consuming.
      • Dictionary Attacks: Medium reduction. Reduces the likelihood of passwords being easily guessed from common password lists.
      • Credential Stuffing: Medium reduction. If users reuse passwords across services, this mitigation is less effective, highlighting the need for unique passwords.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Strong password guidelines are documented in the security policy document. User training on password security has been conducted.
    • Missing Implementation: Automated password complexity enforcement within RabbitMQ user creation process is missing. Password rotation policy for service accounts is not yet implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Fine-Grained Authorization - Define User Permissions

  • Description: 1. For each user or service account that needs to interact with RabbitMQ, define the minimum necessary permissions. 2. Utilize RabbitMQ's permission system (using Management UI or rabbitmqctl set_permissions) to grant specific access rights to virtual hosts, exchanges, queues, and bindings. 3. Apply the principle of least privilege: grant only the permissions required for the user or service to perform its intended function. Avoid granting wildcard permissions (".*") unless absolutely necessary and well-justified. 4. Regularly review and audit user permissions to ensure they remain appropriate and aligned with current access needs.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Privilege Escalation (Medium to High Severity): Compromised accounts with overly broad permissions could be used to perform actions beyond their intended scope, leading to data breaches, service disruption, or unauthorized modifications.
      • Lateral Movement (Medium Severity): In case of a breach, limiting user permissions restricts the attacker's ability to move laterally within the RabbitMQ system and access sensitive resources.
      • Accidental Misconfiguration (Low to Medium Severity): Restricting permissions reduces the risk of accidental misconfigurations or unintended actions by users with excessive privileges.
    • Impact:
      • Privilege Escalation: High reduction. Significantly limits the potential damage from compromised accounts by restricting their capabilities.
      • Lateral Movement: Medium reduction. Hinders attacker's ability to explore and exploit other parts of the RabbitMQ system after initial compromise.
      • Accidental Misconfiguration: Low to Medium reduction. Reduces the scope of potential damage from accidental errors.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, fine-grained permissions are configured for all service accounts accessing RabbitMQ. Permissions are defined in infrastructure-as-code and applied during deployment.
    • Missing Implementation: Regular automated audits of user permissions are not yet in place. Manual reviews are conducted periodically but could be improved with automation.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS/SSL for Communication - Encrypt Client-Server Communication

  • Description: 1. Generate or obtain TLS/SSL certificates for the RabbitMQ server and clients. Use certificates signed by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) for production environments. 2. Configure RabbitMQ to enable TLS/SSL listeners on the appropriate ports (e.g., 5671 for AMQP over TLS, 15671 for Management UI over TLS). Specify the paths to the server certificate, private key, and CA certificate (if applicable) in the RabbitMQ configuration file (rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config). 3. Configure client applications to connect to RabbitMQ using TLS/SSL. This typically involves specifying the amqps:// protocol in connection URLs and providing client-side certificates if mutual TLS authentication is required. 4. Disable or restrict access to non-TLS listeners (e.g., plain AMQP on port 5672) to enforce encrypted communication.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Eavesdropping (High Severity): Attackers intercepting network traffic to read sensitive message content, credentials, or other confidential information transmitted between clients and the RabbitMQ server.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): Attackers intercepting and potentially manipulating communication between clients and the RabbitMQ server, leading to data breaches, message tampering, or unauthorized actions.
    • Impact:
      • Eavesdropping: High reduction. Encrypts communication, making it extremely difficult for attackers to passively intercept and understand message content.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: High reduction. TLS/SSL provides authentication and encryption, making it significantly harder for attackers to impersonate the server or client and intercept/manipulate communication.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, TLS/SSL is enabled for all client-server communication in production and staging environments. Certificates are managed by our internal certificate management system.
    • Missing Implementation: TLS/SSL is not consistently enforced in development environments. Enforcement in development needs to be improved to mirror production security posture.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas - Memory Alarms

  • Description: 1. Configure memory alarms in RabbitMQ to trigger when memory usage exceeds a defined threshold (e.g., 80% of available RAM). 2. Set the vm_memory_high_watermark configuration parameter in rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config. This parameter defines the memory usage limit. 3. When the memory alarm is triggered, RabbitMQ will block publishers from sending new messages to prevent further memory consumption and potential server crashes. 4. Monitor memory usage and alarm status regularly using the Management UI or monitoring tools. Investigate and resolve the root cause of high memory usage when alarms are triggered.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Memory Exhaustion (High Severity): Attackers or misbehaving applications can flood RabbitMQ with messages, leading to excessive memory consumption and server crashes, disrupting service availability.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Memory Exhaustion: High reduction. Prevents memory exhaustion by blocking publishers when memory usage reaches critical levels, maintaining server stability.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, memory alarms are configured in production and staging environments with a threshold of 85%. Alerts are set up to notify operations team when memory alarms are triggered.
    • Missing Implementation: Memory alarm thresholds are not consistently configured across all environments (development, testing). Standardization is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas - Disk Alarms

  • Description: 1. Configure disk alarms in RabbitMQ to trigger when free disk space falls below a defined threshold. 2. Set the disk_free_limit configuration parameter in rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config. This parameter defines the minimum free disk space. 3. When the disk alarm is triggered, RabbitMQ will block publishers from sending persistent messages to prevent disk space exhaustion and potential data loss or service disruption. 4. Monitor disk space and alarm status regularly. Ensure sufficient disk space is available for RabbitMQ operation and message persistence.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Disk Space Exhaustion (High Severity): Attackers or excessive message persistence can lead to disk space exhaustion, causing RabbitMQ to become unresponsive or crash, disrupting service availability and potentially leading to data loss if persistence is critical.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Disk Space Exhaustion: High reduction. Prevents disk space exhaustion by blocking persistent publishers when disk space is low, maintaining server stability and data integrity.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, disk alarms are configured in production and staging environments with a threshold of 1GB free space. Alerts are set up to notify operations team when disk alarms are triggered.
    • Missing Implementation: Disk alarm thresholds are not consistently configured across all environments. Standardization is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas - Connection Limits

  • Description: 1. Set limits on the maximum number of concurrent connections allowed to the RabbitMQ server. 2. Configure connection limits globally or per virtual host using the connection_max configuration parameter in rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config. 3. When the connection limit is reached, RabbitMQ will reject new connection attempts, preventing connection exhaustion attacks. 4. Monitor connection counts and adjust limits as needed based on application requirements and server capacity.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Connection Exhaustion (Medium to High Severity): Attackers can attempt to exhaust RabbitMQ's connection resources by opening a large number of connections, preventing legitimate clients from connecting and disrupting service availability.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Connection Exhaustion: Medium to High reduction. Prevents connection exhaustion by limiting the number of concurrent connections, ensuring resources are available for legitimate clients.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, global connection limits are configured in production and staging environments.
    • Missing Implementation: Connection limits are not yet configured per virtual host. Per-vhost limits could provide more granular control and isolation.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas - Channel Limits

  • Description: 1. Set limits on the maximum number of channels allowed per connection. 2. Configure channel limits using the channel_max connection parameter in client connection strings or server-side connection properties. 3. When the channel limit per connection is reached, RabbitMQ will reject attempts to open new channels on that connection, preventing channel exhaustion attacks. 4. Educate developers about efficient channel management and encourage channel reuse to minimize channel consumption.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Channel Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Attackers or inefficiently coded applications can exhaust RabbitMQ's channel resources by opening a large number of channels per connection, impacting server performance and potentially disrupting service for other clients.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Channel Exhaustion: Medium reduction. Prevents channel exhaustion by limiting the number of channels per connection, improving server stability and resource utilization.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, channel limits are configured in production and staging environments. Client libraries are configured with reasonable channel limits.
    • Missing Implementation: Proactive monitoring of channel usage per connection is not yet implemented. Alerting on unusually high channel usage could help identify potential issues.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas - Queue Length Limits

  • Description: 1. Implement queue length limits to prevent queues from growing indefinitely and consuming excessive resources. 2. Set queue length limits using queue policies or queue arguments during queue declaration. 3. Configure a dead-letter exchange (DLX) for queues with length limits to handle messages that exceed the limit. Messages exceeding the limit can be routed to the DLX for further processing or discarding. 4. Monitor queue lengths and DLX activity to identify queues approaching limits and investigate potential message backlog issues.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Resource Exhaustion - Queue Bloat (Medium Severity): Unbounded queue growth can lead to excessive memory and disk usage, impacting RabbitMQ server performance and potentially causing instability or crashes.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Queue Congestion (Medium Severity): Extremely long queues can lead to message processing delays and consumer overload, impacting application performance and potentially causing service disruption.
    • Impact:
      • Resource Exhaustion - Queue Bloat: Medium reduction. Prevents uncontrolled queue growth and resource exhaustion by limiting queue lengths.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Queue Congestion: Medium reduction. Mitigates queue congestion by limiting queue lengths and providing a mechanism to handle excess messages.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Queue length limits are configured for some critical queues. Dead-letter exchanges are used for handling messages exceeding limits in these queues.
    • Missing Implementation: Consistent queue length limit configuration across all queues is missing. A comprehensive queue management strategy with appropriate limits and DLX configuration for all queues is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas - Message Size Limits

  • Description: 1. Enforce message size limits to prevent the publication of excessively large messages that could consume excessive resources or cause performance issues. 2. Configure message size limits using policies or plugins. RabbitMQ itself doesn't have a built-in message size limit, but plugins or policies can be used to enforce this. 3. Reject messages exceeding the size limit at the publisher or broker level. 4. Educate developers about message size considerations and encourage efficient message design to minimize message sizes.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Resource Exhaustion - Large Message Handling (Medium Severity): Processing excessively large messages can consume significant CPU, memory, and network bandwidth on the RabbitMQ server and consumers, impacting performance and potentially causing instability.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Large Message Floods (Medium Severity): Attackers can attempt to flood RabbitMQ with extremely large messages to overwhelm server resources and cause denial of service.
    • Impact:
      • Resource Exhaustion - Large Message Handling: Medium reduction. Prevents resource exhaustion caused by processing excessively large messages.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Large Message Floods: Medium reduction. Mitigates DoS attacks using large messages by rejecting messages exceeding size limits.
    • Currently Implemented: No, message size limits are not currently enforced at the RabbitMQ server level.
    • Missing Implementation: Implementation of message size limits using a plugin or policy is missing. This needs to be evaluated and implemented to protect against large message related issues.

Mitigation Strategy: Management UI/API Security - Rate Limiting Management API Requests

  • Description: 1. Implement rate limiting on requests to the RabbitMQ Management API to prevent DoS attacks targeting the management interface. 2. Use a reverse proxy or API gateway in front of the RabbitMQ Management UI/API to implement rate limiting. 3. Configure rate limits based on expected management API usage and server capacity. 4. Monitor Management API request rates and adjust rate limits as needed.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Management API Overload (Medium Severity): Attackers can attempt to overload the RabbitMQ Management API with excessive requests, making it unresponsive and potentially impacting management and monitoring capabilities.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Management API Overload: Medium reduction. Prevents Management API overload by limiting request rates, ensuring the management interface remains available for legitimate administrators.
    • Currently Implemented: No, rate limiting for the Management API is not currently implemented.
    • Missing Implementation: Implementation of rate limiting for the Management API using a reverse proxy or API gateway is missing. This should be considered to enhance the security of the management interface.

Mitigation Strategy: Management UI/API Security - Authentication and Authorization for Management UI/API

  • Description: 1. Restrict access to the RabbitMQ Management UI and HTTP API to authorized personnel and networks only. 2. Enforce strong authentication for access to the Management UI/API. Utilize RabbitMQ's user authentication or integrate with external authentication providers. 3. Implement fine-grained authorization for Management UI/API access. Grant users the least privilege necessary to perform their management tasks. 4. Use network firewalls and access control lists to restrict access to the Management UI/API based on IP addresses or network segments. Consider disabling the Management UI in production environments if not actively required for monitoring and administration.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized Access to Management Interface (High Severity): Attackers gaining unauthorized access to the Management UI/API can perform administrative actions, potentially leading to service disruption, data breaches, or malicious configuration changes.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized Access to Management Interface: High reduction. Prevents unauthorized access to the management interface by enforcing authentication, authorization, and network access controls.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, access to the Management UI/API is restricted to authorized networks via firewall rules. Strong authentication is enforced using RabbitMQ's user authentication.
    • Missing Implementation: Disabling the Management UI in production environments when not actively needed is not yet implemented. This could further reduce the attack surface.

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Hardening and Vulnerability Management - Regular Security Audits and Configuration Reviews

  • Description: 1. Conduct regular security audits of your RabbitMQ deployment, including configuration reviews, vulnerability scanning, and penetration testing. 2. Establish and maintain secure configuration baselines for RabbitMQ servers and regularly review configurations against these baselines. 3. Use automated configuration scanning tools to identify deviations from security baselines and potential misconfigurations. 4. Document security audit findings and implement remediation plans to address identified vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Misconfigurations (Medium to High Severity): Security misconfigurations in RabbitMQ can create vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit to gain unauthorized access or disrupt service.
      • Undetected Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Without regular security audits, vulnerabilities in RabbitMQ or its configuration may go undetected, leaving the system exposed to exploitation.
    • Impact:
      • Misconfigurations: Medium to High reduction. Regular audits and configuration reviews help identify and remediate misconfigurations, reducing the attack surface.
      • Undetected Vulnerabilities: Medium to High reduction. Security audits and vulnerability scanning help identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Periodic manual security configuration reviews are conducted.
    • Missing Implementation: Automated security configuration scanning and regular penetration testing for RabbitMQ are not yet implemented. A more structured and automated security audit process is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Hardening and Vulnerability Management - Keep RabbitMQ Server and Plugins Updated - Patch Management

  • Description: 1. Establish a regular patch management process for RabbitMQ server and Erlang/OTP. 2. Subscribe to RabbitMQ security mailing lists and security advisories to stay informed about new vulnerabilities and security updates. 3. Regularly check for and apply security patches and updates released by RabbitMQ and Erlang/OTP. 4. Test patches in a non-production environment before deploying them to production to ensure compatibility and avoid unintended disruptions. 5. Automate the patch management process as much as possible using configuration management tools or package management systems.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Unpatched vulnerabilities in RabbitMQ server or Erlang/OTP can be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access, execute arbitrary code, or cause denial of service.
    • Impact:
      • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: High reduction. Patching eliminates known vulnerabilities, preventing attackers from exploiting them.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. RabbitMQ server and Erlang/OTP are updated periodically, but the process is largely manual and not fully automated.
    • Missing Implementation: Automated patch management pipeline for RabbitMQ and Erlang/OTP is missing. A more proactive and automated approach to patch management is needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Hardening and Vulnerability Management - Disable Unnecessary Features and Plugins

  • Description: 1. Minimize the attack surface of the RabbitMQ server by disabling any features or plugins that are not strictly required for your application's functionality. 2. Review the list of enabled plugins in RabbitMQ and disable any unnecessary plugins using rabbitmq-plugins disable <plugin-name>. 3. Carefully consider the default plugins enabled in RabbitMQ and disable any that are not essential. 4. Regularly review the enabled plugins and features to ensure they are still necessary and remove any that are no longer needed.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Vulnerability in Unused Components (Low to Medium Severity): Unnecessary features or plugins may contain vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers, even if those features are not actively used. Disabling them reduces the attack surface.
      • Complexity and Misconfiguration Risk (Low Severity): Unnecessary features and plugins can increase the complexity of the RabbitMQ deployment and potentially increase the risk of misconfigurations.
    • Impact:
      • Vulnerability in Unused Components: Low to Medium reduction. Reduces the attack surface by removing potentially vulnerable and unnecessary components.
      • Complexity and Misconfiguration Risk: Low reduction. Simplifies the RabbitMQ deployment and reduces the potential for misconfigurations.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Unnecessary plugins were reviewed and disabled during initial setup.
    • Missing Implementation: Regular reviews of enabled plugins and features are not consistently performed. Automated checks for unnecessary plugins could be implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Logging and Monitoring - Enable Comprehensive Logging

  • Description: 1. Configure RabbitMQ to log relevant security events, including authentication attempts (successful and failed), authorization failures, connection events, configuration changes, and errors. 2. Review RabbitMQ log configuration (rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config) and ensure appropriate logging levels are set to capture security-relevant information. 3. Centralize RabbitMQ logs by forwarding them to a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system or a centralized logging platform for analysis and correlation. 4. Regularly review and analyze RabbitMQ logs to identify suspicious activity, anomalies, and potential security incidents.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Delayed Incident Detection (Medium to High Severity): Insufficient logging can hinder the ability to detect security incidents in a timely manner, allowing attackers to operate undetected for longer periods and potentially cause more damage.
      • Limited Forensic Analysis (Medium Severity): Lack of comprehensive logs can make it difficult to perform thorough forensic analysis after a security incident, hindering incident response and recovery efforts.
    • Impact:
      • Delayed Incident Detection: Medium to High reduction. Comprehensive logging enables faster detection of security incidents and suspicious activities.
      • Limited Forensic Analysis: Medium reduction. Detailed logs provide valuable information for forensic analysis and incident response.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes, RabbitMQ is configured to log authentication events and errors. Logs are forwarded to our centralized logging system.
    • Missing Implementation: Logging of authorization failures and configuration changes is not fully enabled. Log analysis and alerting rules specifically for RabbitMQ security events need to be implemented in the SIEM system.