Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
306 lines (256 loc) · 33.1 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

306 lines (256 loc) · 33.1 KB

Okay, I understand the task. I will perform a deep security analysis of AdGuard Home based on the provided design review document.

Here's the deep analysis:

Deep Security Analysis of AdGuard Home

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The primary objective of this deep security analysis is to identify and evaluate potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with AdGuard Home, based on its design and architecture as described in the provided project design document. This analysis aims to provide actionable and specific security recommendations to the development team to enhance the security posture of AdGuard Home. The analysis will focus on key components, data flows, and technologies employed by AdGuard Home to identify potential weaknesses and suggest tailored mitigation strategies.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following aspects of AdGuard Home, as defined in the design document:

  • System Architecture: Analysis of the overall system architecture, including components and their interactions.
  • Component-Level Security: Detailed examination of individual components (DNS Server, HTTP Proxy, Web UI, Configuration Storage, Filtering Engine, DNS Resolver, Upstream DNS Servers, Blocklist Sources) and their inherent security implications.
  • Data Flow Security: Assessment of data flow pathways and potential vulnerabilities associated with data transmission and processing between components.
  • Technology Stack: Review of the underlying technologies and protocols used by AdGuard Home and their security characteristics.
  • Deployment Models: Consideration of different deployment models and their specific security concerns.
  • Identified Security Considerations: Deep dive into the security considerations outlined in section 7 of the design document, expanding on threats and mitigations.

The analysis is limited to the information provided in the design document and inferences drawn from it. A full code audit and penetration testing are outside the scope of this analysis but are recommended as follow-up activities.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided AdGuard Home Project Design Document to understand the system's architecture, components, data flow, technology stack, and initial security considerations.
  2. Component-Based Analysis: Break down the system into its key components as described in the design document. For each component, we will:
    • Infer potential security vulnerabilities based on its functionality and interactions with other components.
    • Analyze the data it processes and stores for potential security risks.
    • Evaluate the technologies it uses for known vulnerabilities and security best practices.
  3. Threat Modeling (Implicit): While not explicitly creating a formal threat model in this document, the analysis will implicitly perform threat modeling by considering potential threat actors, attack vectors, and vulnerabilities within each component and data flow. We will leverage the provided "Security Considerations" section as a starting point for threat identification.
  4. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified security implication and potential threat, we will develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to AdGuard Home. These strategies will be practical and consider the project's nature and goals.
  5. Output Generation: Document the findings in a structured format, including:
    • Breakdown of security implications per component.
    • Specific threats and vulnerabilities.
    • Tailored and actionable mitigation strategies.

This methodology will ensure a systematic and comprehensive security analysis of AdGuard Home based on the provided design document.

2. Security Implications Breakdown by Component

3.1. Client Devices

  • Security Implication: Client devices themselves can be compromised (malware, vulnerabilities). If a client device is compromised, it could bypass AdGuard Home by using a different DNS server or proxy, or by directly accessing blocked domains via IP address.
  • Specific Threat: Malware on client devices could generate malicious traffic that AdGuard Home is intended to block. If the client is compromised, attackers might be able to exfiltrate data even if AdGuard Home is blocking external connections.
  • Tailored Recommendation: While AdGuard Home cannot directly secure client devices, recommend users to practice good security hygiene on their devices:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Advise users in documentation and setup guides to maintain up-to-date operating systems and security software (antivirus, firewall) on their client devices.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Include a section in the documentation about the limitations of network-level ad blocking and the importance of endpoint security.

3.2. AdGuard Home Instance

3.2.1. DNS Server
  • Security Implication: As the primary entry point for DNS queries, the DNS Server component is a critical target for attacks. Vulnerabilities in the DNS server implementation could lead to DNS spoofing, cache poisoning, or denial-of-service attacks. Misconfiguration can also weaken security.
  • Specific Threat: DNS Spoofing/Cache Poisoning (as detailed in 7.1). Attackers could manipulate DNS responses to redirect users to malicious sites, even if the domain is on blocklists.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Strengthen DNSSEC Implementation:
    • Ensure DNSSEC validation is enabled by default and rigorously enforced.
    • Implement robust error handling for DNSSEC validation failures, logging and potentially alerting administrators.
    • Regularly review and update the DNSSEC implementation to address any newly discovered vulnerabilities in DNSSEC protocols or libraries.
  • Specific Threat: DNS Amplification Attacks (as detailed in 7.1). AdGuard Home could be exploited to participate in DDoS attacks.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Implement Rate Limiting and Response Size Limits:
    • Implement configurable rate limiting for incoming DNS queries, allowing administrators to set thresholds based on their network capacity.
    • Implement limits on the size of DNS responses to prevent excessive amplification.
    • Consider adding options to disable recursion for public-facing deployments if not strictly necessary.
  • Specific Threat: Privacy Leakage via Upstream DNS (as detailed in 7.1). Unencrypted DNS queries to upstream servers expose user browsing habits.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Promote and Default to Encrypted DNS:
    • Make DoH/DoT the recommended and ideally default upstream DNS protocol in the setup process.
    • Provide clear and easy-to-understand documentation and UI options for configuring DoH/DoT with reputable providers.
    • Consider including pre-configured profiles for privacy-focused DoH/DoT providers for ease of use.
  • Specific Threat: Vulnerabilities in DNS protocol parsing and handling. Exploitable bugs in the DNS server implementation could lead to crashes or remote code execution.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Fuzzing and Security Audits of DNS Server Code:
    • Implement regular fuzzing of the DNS server component using tools like go-fuzz or similar to identify potential parsing vulnerabilities.
    • Conduct periodic security audits of the DNS server codebase, focusing on DNS protocol handling and memory safety.
3.2.2. HTTP Proxy (and HTTPS Proxy)
  • Security Implication: The HTTP Proxy handles web traffic and is susceptible to vulnerabilities related to proxy functionality, traffic interception, and content filtering. HTTPS proxying, especially with TLS interception, introduces significant security and privacy considerations.
  • Specific Threat: Open Proxy Vulnerability. If not properly configured, the HTTP proxy could be misused as an open proxy, allowing unauthorized users to route traffic through it.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Default to Local Access Only and Secure Configuration:
    • By default, configure the HTTP proxy to listen only on the loopback interface (127.0.0.1) or local network interface, preventing external access.
    • Clearly document the risks of exposing the HTTP proxy to the public internet and provide secure configuration guidelines if users choose to do so (e.g., authentication, IP whitelisting).
  • Specific Threat: Bypass of HTTP/HTTPS Filtering. Attackers might find ways to craft requests that bypass the proxy's filtering rules, delivering ads or malicious content.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Regularly Update Filtering Rules and Test for Bypasses:
    • Ensure the filtering engine and its rule processing logic are regularly updated to address new bypass techniques.
    • Implement automated testing to check for common HTTP/HTTPS filtering bypasses.
    • Encourage community reporting of filtering bypasses and have a process for quickly addressing them.
  • Specific Threat: Vulnerabilities in HTTP/HTTPS protocol handling. Bugs in the proxy's HTTP/HTTPS parsing or processing could be exploited.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Security Audits and Fuzzing of HTTP Proxy Code:
    • Conduct security audits of the HTTP proxy codebase, focusing on HTTP/HTTPS protocol handling, especially edge cases and error conditions.
    • Implement fuzzing of the HTTP proxy component to identify potential parsing and processing vulnerabilities.
  • Specific Threat: Privacy Risks of HTTPS Filtering (SNI-based). While SNI-based filtering is less intrusive, it still involves inspecting the domain name in HTTPS traffic.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Transparency and User Control over HTTPS Filtering:
    • Clearly document the SNI-based HTTPS filtering mechanism and its privacy implications.
    • Provide users with granular control over HTTPS filtering, allowing them to disable it entirely or configure specific exceptions.
    • Avoid implementing full TLS interception by default due to significant privacy and performance overhead, unless explicitly requested and configured by advanced users with clear warnings and guidance.
3.2.3. Web UI (User Interface)
  • Security Implication: The Web UI is the primary management interface and a high-value target for attackers. Vulnerabilities in the Web UI could lead to unauthorized configuration changes, data breaches, or complete system compromise.
  • Specific Threat: Authentication Bypass / Weak Authentication (as detailed in 7.2). Unauthorized access to the Web UI allows full control over AdGuard Home.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Enforce Strong Authentication and Implement MFA:
    • Implement a strong password policy, enforcing minimum password length, complexity, and preventing common passwords.
    • Mandatory Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) should be strongly considered, especially for deployments accessible from outside the local network. If not mandatory, make it prominently featured and easy to enable.
    • Implement rate limiting on login attempts to mitigate brute-force attacks.
  • Specific Threat: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (as detailed in 7.2). XSS vulnerabilities could allow attackers to execute malicious scripts in the context of administrator sessions.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Robust Input Sanitization, Output Encoding, and CSP:
    • Implement rigorous input sanitization for all user-provided data in the Web UI, both on the client-side and server-side.
    • Use proper output encoding to prevent interpretation of user-provided data as executable code in HTML, JavaScript, etc.
    • Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to limit the sources from which the Web UI can load resources, significantly reducing the impact of XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Regularly scan the Web UI for XSS vulnerabilities using automated tools and manual penetration testing.
  • Specific Threat: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (as detailed in 7.2). CSRF could allow attackers to perform actions on behalf of authenticated administrators without their consent.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Implement CSRF Tokens and SameSite Cookies:
    • Implement CSRF tokens (anti-CSRF tokens) for all state-changing requests in the Web UI.
    • Set the SameSite attribute to Strict or Lax for session cookies to further mitigate CSRF risks.
  • Specific Threat: Session Hijacking (as detailed in 7.2). Compromised session IDs could grant persistent unauthorized access.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Secure Session Management Practices:
    • Enforce HTTPS: Mandate HTTPS for all Web UI communication. Redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS.
    • HTTP-Only and Secure Cookies: Set HttpOnly and Secure flags on session cookies.
    • Session Timeout: Implement reasonable session timeouts.
    • Session Regeneration: Regenerate session IDs after login and for sensitive actions.
  • Specific Threat: Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) (as detailed in 7.2). IDOR vulnerabilities could allow unauthorized access to configuration data or other resources.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Authorization Checks and Indirect Object References:
    • Implement thorough authorization checks on the backend for all Web UI requests, ensuring users can only access resources they are permitted to.
    • Consider using indirect object references (e.g., UUIDs) instead of sequential IDs in URLs and APIs to make it harder to guess valid object references.
  • Specific Threat: Vulnerabilities in Web UI Framework and Dependencies. The chosen Go web framework (Gin/Echo) and other frontend dependencies might have known vulnerabilities.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Regularly Update Web UI Framework and Dependencies:
    • Keep the Web UI framework (Gin/Echo or similar) and all frontend dependencies (JavaScript libraries, CSS frameworks) up-to-date with the latest security patches.
    • Monitor security advisories for the used frameworks and dependencies and promptly apply updates.
3.2.4. Configuration Storage
  • Security Implication: Configuration storage holds sensitive settings, blocklists, and rules. Unauthorized access or tampering with configuration can severely compromise AdGuard Home's security and functionality.
  • Specific Threat: Unauthorized Access to Configuration Files (as detailed in 7.3). Attackers gaining access to the server's filesystem could read or modify configuration files.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Restrict File System Permissions and OS Hardening:
    • Set strict file system permissions on configuration files, allowing read/write access only to the AdGuard Home process user and authorized administrators.
    • Follow operating system hardening best practices to minimize the risk of unauthorized file system access.
    • If possible, run AdGuard Home under a dedicated user account with minimal privileges.
  • Specific Threat: Configuration Tampering (as detailed in 7.3). Malicious modification of configuration files could disable filtering or introduce malicious rules.
  • Actionable Mitigation: File Integrity Monitoring and Configuration Backups:
    • Implement file integrity monitoring (e.g., using tools like AIDE or Tripwire) to detect unauthorized changes to configuration files.
    • Implement automated regular backups of the configuration data to allow for quick restoration in case of tampering or corruption.
    • Consider adding a feature to digitally sign configuration files to verify their integrity upon loading.
  • Specific Threat: Exposure of Sensitive Data in Configuration (as detailed in 7.3). Configuration files might inadvertently store sensitive information.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Secrets Management and Encryption:
    • Avoid storing sensitive secrets (API keys, passwords) directly in configuration files. Use environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution if secrets are absolutely necessary.
    • If sensitive data must be stored in configuration files, consider encrypting those sections. Investigate Go libraries for encryption and secure key management.
    • Minimize the amount of sensitive data stored in configuration by design.
3.2.5. Filtering Engine
  • Security Implication: The Filtering Engine is the core of AdGuard Home's blocking functionality. Vulnerabilities or inefficiencies in the engine can lead to filtering bypasses, performance degradation, or false positives.
  • Specific Threat: Filtering Bypass Vulnerabilities (as detailed in 7.4). Attackers might discover techniques to circumvent filtering rules.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Continuous Blocklist Updates, Comprehensive Rules, and Testing:
    • Maintain a process for regularly updating blocklists from reputable sources.
    • Utilize a combination of different types of filtering rules (domain lists, URL lists, syntax-based rules) for comprehensive coverage.
    • Implement automated testing to verify the effectiveness of filtering rules and detect potential bypasses.
    • Actively engage with the community to receive feedback on filtering bypasses and false positives.
  • Specific Threat: Performance Degradation due to Complex Rules (as detailed in 7.4). Inefficient rules can slow down DNS resolution and web browsing.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Rule Optimization and Performance Monitoring:
    • Optimize filtering rule syntax and data structures for performance. Use efficient algorithms for matching and lookups (tries, bloom filters as mentioned in the design document).
    • Provide tools or guidance for users to optimize their custom filtering rules.
    • Implement performance monitoring for DNS query latency and resource usage to identify potential bottlenecks related to filtering rules.
    • Consider rule profiling tools to identify and optimize inefficient rules.
  • Specific Threat: False Positives (Blocking Legitimate Content) (as detailed in 7.4). Overly aggressive blocking can disrupt user experience.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Robust Whitelist Management and Blocklist Selection:
    • Provide a user-friendly and easily accessible whitelist management interface in the Web UI.
    • Offer clear guidance on how to whitelist domains or URLs.
    • Carefully select default blocklists, balancing comprehensiveness with the risk of false positives.
    • Implement user feedback mechanisms to report false positives and request whitelist additions.
3.2.6. DNS Resolver (Optional, Internal)
  • Security Implication: If AdGuard Home uses its internal recursive resolver, vulnerabilities in this resolver could expose it to DNS-related attacks, similar to those affecting the DNS Server component, but potentially with broader impact as it handles recursive resolution.
  • Specific Threat: Vulnerabilities in Recursive Resolution Logic. Bugs in the resolver's recursive resolution implementation could lead to crashes, denial of service, or even remote code execution.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Security Audits and Fuzzing of Internal Resolver Code:
    • If an internal recursive resolver is implemented, conduct thorough security audits of its codebase, focusing on DNS protocol handling, recursion logic, and memory safety.
    • Implement fuzzing of the internal resolver component to identify potential parsing and processing vulnerabilities.
    • Consider using well-vetted and security-focused DNS resolver libraries if possible, rather than implementing a resolver from scratch.
  • Specific Threat: Resource Exhaustion during Recursive Resolution. Malicious queries or misconfigurations could lead to excessive resource consumption by the internal resolver.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Resource Limits and Rate Limiting for Internal Resolver:
    • Implement resource limits (CPU, memory, open files) for the internal resolver to prevent resource exhaustion.
    • Implement rate limiting for recursive queries processed by the internal resolver.

3.3. Upstream DNS Servers

  • Security Implication: While not directly part of AdGuard Home's codebase, the choice of upstream DNS servers significantly impacts privacy and security. Using untrusted or compromised upstream servers can negate the privacy benefits of AdGuard Home and potentially expose users to malicious DNS responses.
  • Specific Threat: Man-in-the-Middle Attacks on Unencrypted Upstream DNS. If using plain DNS (not DoH/DoT) to upstream servers, traffic can be intercepted and manipulated.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Strongly Recommend and Default to Encrypted Upstream DNS:
    • As mentioned before, prioritize and default to DoH/DoT for upstream DNS communication.
    • Warn users against using plain DNS to upstream servers, especially over untrusted networks.
  • Specific Threat: Logging and Data Collection by Upstream DNS Providers. Even with encrypted DNS, upstream providers might log DNS queries.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Recommend Privacy-Focused Upstream DNS Providers:
    • Recommend reputable and privacy-focused upstream DNS providers in documentation and setup guides.
    • Provide information about the privacy policies of different upstream DNS providers to help users make informed choices.

3.4. Blocklist Sources

  • Security Implication: The integrity and trustworthiness of blocklist sources are crucial. Compromised blocklist sources can lead to ineffective filtering or even the blocking of legitimate domains, or conversely, allowing malicious domains.
  • Specific Threat: Compromised Blocklist Sources (as detailed in 7.5). Malicious actors could compromise blocklist sources to inject malicious entries or remove legitimate blocking rules.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Trusted Blocklist Sources and Integrity Verification:
    • Use blocklists from reputable and trustworthy sources with a proven track record.
    • If possible, implement mechanisms to verify the integrity of downloaded blocklists (e.g., digital signatures, checksums provided by the source).
    • Consider using a diverse set of blocklist sources to reduce reliance on any single source and mitigate the impact of a compromised source.
    • Regularly review and evaluate the trustworthiness of blocklist sources.
  • Specific Threat: Blocklist Availability Issues (as detailed in 7.5). Blocklist sources might become unavailable, temporarily or permanently.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Caching and Redundant Blocklist Sources:
    • Implement local caching of downloaded blocklists to ensure continued filtering even if blocklist sources are temporarily unavailable.
    • Allow users to configure redundant blocklist sources to provide backup in case of source outages.
    • Consider bundling a basic set of blocklists directly within AdGuard Home for initial filtering even without external source access.

7.6. Update Mechanism Security

  • Security Implication: A compromised update mechanism could allow attackers to distribute malicious updates, completely compromising AdGuard Home instances.
  • Specific Threat: Insecure Update Channel (as detailed in 7.6). Using unencrypted HTTP for updates is highly risky.
  • Actionable Mitigation: HTTPS and Signed Updates (Mandatory):
    • Mandatory HTTPS: Enforce HTTPS for all update downloads.
    • Signed Updates: Implement digital signatures for update packages. Verify the signature before applying any update. Use a robust and well-established signing process.
    • Clearly document the update process and the security measures in place.
  • Specific Threat: Rollback Vulnerabilities (as detailed in 7.6). A flawed rollback mechanism could be exploited to downgrade to vulnerable versions.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Secure Rollback Mechanism and Version Control:
    • Ensure the update rollback mechanism is secure and cannot be easily abused to downgrade to older, vulnerable versions.
    • Maintain proper version control of AdGuard Home and its components to facilitate secure updates and rollbacks.
    • Test the rollback mechanism thoroughly to ensure its security and reliability.

7.7. Network Security

  • Security Implication: Improper network configuration can expose AdGuard Home services to unauthorized access, increasing the attack surface.
  • Specific Threat: Unauthorized Network Access (as detailed in 7.7). Exposing services to the public internet without proper access controls.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Firewall Rules and Access Control Lists (ACLs):
    • Firewall by Default: Recommend and ideally configure default firewall rules to restrict access to AdGuard Home services (DNS, Web UI, HTTP Proxy) to the local network only.
    • Document Firewall Configuration: Provide clear documentation and examples on how to configure firewalls to securely expose AdGuard Home services if needed (e.g., for remote access to the Web UI via VPN).
    • Implement ACLs: If feasible, implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) within AdGuard Home itself to allow administrators to further restrict access based on source IP addresses or network ranges.
  • Specific Threat: Port Exposure (as detailed in 7.7). Unnecessary ports left open increase the attack surface.
  • Actionable Mitigation: Minimize Port Exposure and Disable Unused Services:
    • Minimize Default Ports: Only open the necessary ports by default (DNS port 53, Web UI port, HTTP proxy port if enabled).
    • Disable Unused Features: Allow users to easily disable unused features and services (e.g., HTTP proxy if only DNS filtering is needed) to reduce the attack surface.
    • Clearly document the purpose of each exposed port and the security implications.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the design document, AdGuard Home's architecture is centered around the "AdGuard Home Instance," which acts as a central filtering point for network traffic within a home or small network.

Inferred Architecture and Data Flow for Security Analysis:

  1. Client Devices initiate requests: Clients send DNS queries and HTTP/HTTPS requests.
  2. DNS Queries are intercepted by the DNS Server: The DNS Server is the first line of defense. It checks against the Filtering Engine and Cache.
  3. HTTP/HTTPS Requests are intercepted by the HTTP Proxy (if enabled): The HTTP Proxy filters web traffic based on rules and blocklists.
  4. Filtering Engine makes decisions: The Filtering Engine is the core logic, using Configuration Storage for rules and blocklists. It decides whether to block or allow requests.
  5. Configuration Storage holds persistent data: Configuration Storage is crucial for security as it contains all settings, rules, and blocklists. Secure access and integrity are paramount.
  6. Web UI provides management interface: The Web UI is the administrative control panel. Its security directly impacts the overall security of AdGuard Home.
  7. Upstream DNS Servers are used for resolution: Upstream DNS servers are external dependencies that impact privacy and DNS security (DNSSEC).
  8. Blocklist Sources provide filtering data: Blocklist Sources are external dependencies that must be trusted and handled securely.

Security Inference based on Architecture:

  • Centralized Security: AdGuard Home's architecture provides a centralized point of security control for the network. However, this also means that the "AdGuard Home Instance" becomes a single point of failure and a high-value target. Securing this instance is critical.
  • Dependency on External Sources: AdGuard Home relies on external Upstream DNS Servers and Blocklist Sources. The security and reliability of these external dependencies must be considered and mitigated.
  • Web UI as a Critical Component: The Web UI provides administrative access and is a potential attack vector. Robust Web UI security is essential to prevent unauthorized configuration changes and system compromise.
  • Configuration Storage as Sensitive Data Repository: Configuration Storage holds all security-relevant settings. Protecting its integrity and confidentiality is paramount.
  • Filtering Engine Performance Impact: The Filtering Engine's performance is crucial for user experience. Security measures should not significantly degrade performance.

4. Specific and Tailored Recommendations for AdGuard Home

Based on the analysis, here are specific and tailored recommendations for the AdGuard Home development team:

  1. Prioritize Web UI Security: Invest heavily in securing the Web UI. Implement mandatory MFA, robust input sanitization, output encoding, CSP, CSRF protection, secure session management, and regular security audits. The Web UI is the most exposed and critical component for administrative control.
  2. Strengthen DNS Security: Ensure DNSSEC validation is rigorously implemented and enabled by default. Implement rate limiting and response size limits for the DNS server. Promote and default to encrypted DNS (DoH/DoT) for upstream communication.
  3. Secure Update Mechanism: Mandate HTTPS for updates and implement signed updates to prevent malicious updates. Thoroughly test the update and rollback mechanisms for security vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance Configuration Storage Security: Implement file integrity monitoring for configuration files. Provide options for configuration backups and potentially encryption of sensitive configuration sections. Restrict file system permissions.
  5. Focus on Filtering Engine Performance and Accuracy: Continuously optimize the Filtering Engine for performance and accuracy. Implement automated testing for filtering bypasses and false positives. Engage with the community for feedback and improvements.
  6. Default to Secure Configurations: Default configurations should be secure by design. For example, the HTTP proxy should default to local access only, and encrypted DNS should be the preferred upstream protocol.
  7. Provide Clear Security Documentation and Guidance: Create comprehensive security documentation for users, including best practices for secure deployment, configuration, and usage of AdGuard Home. Clearly document the security features and limitations.
  8. Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of AdGuard Home, focusing on all components, especially the Web UI, DNS Server, and Filtering Engine. Engage external security experts for independent assessments.
  9. Implement Security Development Lifecycle (SDL): Integrate security considerations into the entire development lifecycle, from design to deployment. Conduct threat modeling, security code reviews, and security testing throughout the development process.
  10. Community Engagement for Security: Encourage community participation in security efforts. Establish a clear process for reporting security vulnerabilities and responding to security issues promptly. Publicly acknowledge security contributions from the community.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

The actionable mitigation strategies are already embedded within section 3.2 (Component Breakdown) and section 4 (Specific and Tailored Recommendations). To summarize and highlight the most critical actionable steps:

  • For Web UI Security:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Web UI login.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) for the Web UI.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement CSRF tokens for all state-changing Web UI requests.
  • For DNS Security:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Ensure DNSSEC validation is enabled and enforced by default.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement rate limiting for incoming DNS queries.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Default to DoH/DoT for upstream DNS communication.
  • For Update Security:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Enforce HTTPS for all update downloads.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement digital signatures for update packages and verify them before installation.
  • For Configuration Security:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement file integrity monitoring for configuration files.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Provide automated configuration backup functionality.
  • For Filtering Engine:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Establish a process for continuous blocklist updates.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Implement automated testing for filtering bypasses and false positives.
  • For Network Security:
    • Actionable Mitigation: Default firewall rules to restrict access to AdGuard Home services to the local network.
    • Actionable Mitigation: Provide clear documentation on secure network configuration and firewall setup.

These actionable mitigation strategies are tailored to AdGuard Home and address the identified threats and vulnerabilities. Implementing these recommendations will significantly enhance the security posture of AdGuard Home and provide a more secure experience for its users. It is recommended to prioritize these mitigations based on risk and feasibility, starting with the most critical areas like Web UI and Update Mechanism security.