Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
263 lines (202 loc) · 27.2 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

263 lines (202 loc) · 27.2 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for caddyserver/caddy

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Caddyfile Linting and Validation

  • Description:

    1. Choose a Linter: Select a Caddyfile linter. Options include online linters, command-line tools, or IDE plugins. For command-line integration, consider using caddy fmt and potentially shell scripts with caddy validate.
    2. Integrate into Development Workflow: Run the linter locally before committing changes. Developers should incorporate linting into their pre-commit hooks or as part of their local testing process.
    3. Integrate into CI/CD Pipeline: Add a linting step to your CI/CD pipeline. This step should automatically run the linter on every code change pushed to the repository. The pipeline should fail if linting errors are found, preventing deployment of misconfigured Caddyfiles.
    4. Customize Validation (Optional): Develop custom scripts or rules to enforce organization-specific security policies beyond basic syntax checks. This could include checks for minimum TLS versions, allowed directives, or header configurations.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Configuration Errors (High Severity): Typos, incorrect directives, or logical errors in the Caddyfile can lead to service disruptions, security misconfigurations (e.g., open ports, incorrect routing), and unexpected behavior.
    • Deprecated Directives Usage (Medium Severity): Using deprecated directives might lead to unexpected behavior in future Caddy versions or indicate outdated configurations that might have security implications.
    • Security Misconfigurations (High Severity): Linting can help detect potential security misconfigurations like missing security headers, weak TLS settings, or insecure redirects.

  • Impact:

    • Configuration Errors: High risk reduction. Linting significantly reduces the chance of deploying Caddyfiles with syntax errors and basic configuration mistakes.
    • Deprecated Directives Usage: Medium risk reduction. Linting helps maintain configuration hygiene and reduces potential future issues.
    • Security Misconfigurations: Medium risk reduction. Linting can catch some common security misconfigurations, but it's not a replacement for comprehensive security reviews.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: caddy fmt is used by some developers locally for formatting. Basic syntax validation is implicitly done by Caddy during startup in staging and production.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Pre-commit hooks: Linting is not enforced before code commits.
    • CI/CD Pipeline Integration: No dedicated linting step in the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Custom Validation: No custom validation scripts or rules are in place to enforce organizational security policies.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Caddyfile Storage and Access Control

  • Description:

    1. Version Control: Store Caddyfiles in a version control system like Git. This enables tracking changes, rollback capabilities, and collaborative editing with code review.
    2. Access Control: Restrict access to the repository containing Caddyfiles to authorized personnel only. Use role-based access control (RBAC) within your version control system to manage permissions.
    3. Secrets Management: Avoid storing sensitive information (like API keys, database credentials, or TLS private keys) directly in Caddyfiles. Utilize environment variables, dedicated secrets management tools (like HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager), or configuration management systems to handle sensitive data.
    4. Code Review Process: Implement a mandatory code review process for all Caddyfile changes. Another developer or security expert should review and approve changes before they are merged and deployed.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Configuration (High Severity): If Caddyfiles are not properly secured, unauthorized individuals could modify them, leading to service disruption, security breaches, or data leaks.
    • Accidental Misconfiguration (Medium Severity): Without version control and code review, accidental errors or misconfigurations can be easily introduced and deployed, leading to service issues.
    • Exposure of Secrets (High Severity): Storing secrets directly in Caddyfiles can lead to credential compromise if the repository is exposed or accessed by unauthorized users.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to Configuration: High risk reduction. Version control and access control significantly limit unauthorized modifications.
    • Accidental Misconfiguration: Medium risk reduction. Code review and version history help catch and revert accidental errors.
    • Exposure of Secrets: High risk reduction. Secrets management practices prevent hardcoding sensitive information in configuration files.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented: Caddyfiles are stored in a private Git repository. Access to the repository is restricted to development and operations teams.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal Code Review Process: While changes are generally reviewed, there isn't a formal, documented code review process specifically for Caddyfile changes.
    • Secrets Management Integration: Some less sensitive environment variables are used, but a comprehensive secrets management solution is not fully integrated for all sensitive configurations.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Caddyfile Complexity and Utilize Modules

  • Description:

    1. Modular Design: Break down complex Caddy configurations into smaller, more manageable modules or separate Caddyfiles. Use includes or modular Caddyfile structures to organize configurations logically.
    2. Focus and Clarity: Keep each Caddyfile or module focused on a specific function or service. Avoid overly long and convoluted configurations that are difficult to understand and maintain.
    3. Module Pruning: Regularly review the list of used Caddy modules. Remove any modules that are no longer necessary or are not actively used.
    4. Leverage Abstraction: Utilize Caddy's features like named matchers, templates, and snippets to abstract common configurations and reduce repetition.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Configuration Errors (Medium Severity): Complex Caddyfiles are more prone to human errors and misconfigurations due to increased cognitive load and difficulty in understanding the overall configuration.
    • Maintenance Overhead (Medium Severity): Complex configurations are harder to maintain, debug, and update, increasing the risk of introducing errors during maintenance activities.
    • Increased Attack Surface (Low Severity): Using unnecessary modules increases the potential attack surface, although the direct risk is generally low unless a vulnerability is found in an unused module.

  • Impact:

    • Configuration Errors: Medium risk reduction. Simpler configurations are easier to understand and less prone to errors.
    • Maintenance Overhead: Medium risk reduction. Modular and clear configurations simplify maintenance and reduce the risk of introducing errors during updates.
    • Increased Attack Surface: Low risk reduction. Minimizing modules slightly reduces the attack surface, but the impact is generally less significant than other mitigation strategies.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Caddyfiles are somewhat modularized by service, but could be further simplified and broken down.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal Modularization Strategy: No formal strategy or guidelines for modularizing Caddyfiles.
    • Regular Module Review: No regular process to review and prune unused Caddy modules.

Mitigation Strategy: Harden TLS Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Specify Minimum TLS Version: Explicitly set a minimum TLS version in the Caddyfile using the tls_min_version directive (e.g., tls_min_version 1.2 or tls_min_version 1.3). Prioritize TLS 1.3 for enhanced security and performance.
    2. Select Strong Cipher Suites: Carefully choose cipher suites using the tls_cipher_suites directive. Prioritize modern and strong cipher suites, excluding weak or deprecated algorithms like RC4, DES, and MD5. Consult security best practices and tools like Mozilla SSL Configuration Generator for recommended cipher suites.
    3. Enable HSTS: Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) by adding the Strict-Transport-Security header using the header directive. Configure appropriate max-age, includeSubDomains, and preload directives based on your application's requirements.
    4. Disable TLS Fallback (Optional but Recommended): Consider disabling TLS fallback to older, less secure protocols if your clients primarily support modern browsers and protocols. This can be achieved by carefully selecting tls_min_version and cipher suites.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Downgrade Attacks (High Severity): Without a minimum TLS version, attackers can potentially force clients to downgrade to older, less secure TLS versions (like TLS 1.0 or 1.1) that have known vulnerabilities.
    • Weak Cipher Suites Exploitation (High Severity): Using weak or outdated cipher suites makes the TLS connection vulnerable to attacks like BEAST, POODLE, or SWEET32, potentially allowing attackers to decrypt traffic.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): Lack of HSTS allows for potential man-in-the-middle attacks where attackers can intercept initial HTTP requests and redirect users to malicious sites or downgrade to HTTP.

  • Impact:

    • Downgrade Attacks: High risk reduction. Enforcing a minimum TLS version effectively prevents downgrade attacks.
    • Weak Cipher Suites Exploitation: High risk reduction. Selecting strong cipher suites significantly reduces the risk of cipher suite-related attacks.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Medium risk reduction. HSTS provides strong protection against protocol downgrade and some types of man-in-the-middle attacks after the initial HSTS header is received by the client.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Caddy uses secure defaults for TLS, including a reasonable minimum TLS version and cipher suites. HSTS is enabled by default for HTTPS sites.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Explicit TLS Configuration: TLS settings are mostly relying on Caddy's defaults. Explicitly defining tls_min_version and tls_cipher_suites in the Caddyfile is missing for stricter control and documentation.
    • HSTS Preload: HSTS preload is not configured, which could offer additional protection for first-time visitors.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Automatic HTTPS (ACME) Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Understand ACME Rate Limits: Familiarize yourself with the rate limits of your chosen ACME provider (e.g., Let's Encrypt). Implement strategies to avoid hitting these limits, especially during testing and development.
    2. Staging Environment: Use a staging ACME environment (like Let's Encrypt's staging environment) for testing and development to avoid hitting production rate limits and potential account blocks.
    3. DNS Configuration Verification: Thoroughly verify DNS records are correctly configured and propagated before requesting certificates, especially for DNS-01 challenges. Use DNS lookup tools to confirm propagation.
    4. Certificate Monitoring and Renewal: Implement monitoring for certificate expiration dates. Set up automated alerts to proactively address certificate renewal failures before they cause service disruptions. Caddy handles automatic renewal, but monitoring is crucial for failure detection.
    5. Secure DNS Provider Credentials (DNS-01): If using DNS-01 challenges, securely store and manage DNS provider API credentials. Restrict access to these credentials to only necessary systems and personnel. Consider using dedicated secrets management for these credentials.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Service Disruption due to Rate Limits (Medium Severity): Hitting ACME rate limits can temporarily prevent certificate issuance or renewal, leading to service disruptions if certificates expire.
    • Certificate Issuance Failures (Medium Severity): Incorrect DNS configuration or propagation issues can cause ACME challenges to fail, preventing certificate issuance and potentially disrupting HTTPS service.
    • Credential Compromise (High Severity - DNS-01): If DNS provider credentials used for DNS-01 challenges are compromised, attackers could potentially issue certificates for your domains and perform man-in-the-middle attacks or domain hijacking.

  • Impact:

    • Service Disruption due to Rate Limits: Medium risk reduction. Using staging environments and understanding rate limits minimizes the risk of hitting production limits.
    • Certificate Issuance Failures: Medium risk reduction. DNS verification and monitoring help prevent and quickly resolve certificate issuance failures.
    • Credential Compromise (DNS-01): High risk reduction. Secure credential management significantly reduces the risk of DNS provider credential compromise.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Caddy's automatic HTTPS generally works well. Staging environment is used for some testing, but not consistently for ACME related tests.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal ACME Testing Strategy: No formal strategy for testing ACME configurations and rate limit handling.
    • Dedicated Staging ACME Environment Usage: Staging ACME environment is not consistently used for all ACME related testing.
    • DNS Provider Credential Security Review (DNS-01 if used): If DNS-01 is used, a formal review of DNS provider credential security and access control is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Carefully Select and Vet Caddy Plugins

  • Description:

    1. Official Sources First: Prioritize using plugins from official Caddy repositories or those maintained by the Caddy project or reputable community members.
    2. Documentation Review: Thoroughly read the documentation of any plugin before installation to understand its functionality, dependencies, and potential security implications.
    3. Code Review (If Possible): If using third-party plugins, review the plugin's source code (if available) to assess its security and code quality. Look for any obvious vulnerabilities or malicious code.
    4. Security Audits (For Critical Plugins): For plugins that handle sensitive data or are critical to application security, consider performing or commissioning a security audit of the plugin code.
    5. Community Reputation: Check the plugin's community reputation. Look for reviews, security reports, and discussions about the plugin's reliability and security.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Plugins (High Severity): Installing plugins from untrusted sources could introduce malicious code into your Caddy instance, potentially leading to data breaches, system compromise, or denial of service.
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Plugins, like any software, can have security vulnerabilities. Using plugins from unvetted sources or outdated plugins increases the risk of exploiting these vulnerabilities.
    • Unexpected Behavior (Medium Severity): Poorly written or incompatible plugins can cause unexpected behavior in Caddy, leading to service disruptions or security misconfigurations.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Plugins: High risk reduction. Careful plugin selection and vetting significantly reduces the risk of installing malicious plugins.
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Using trusted sources and reviewing plugin information helps minimize the risk of using vulnerable plugins.
    • Unexpected Behavior: Medium risk reduction. Documentation review and community reputation checks help reduce the risk of using plugins that cause unexpected behavior.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Developers generally use plugins from known sources, but there isn't a formal vetting process.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal Plugin Vetting Process: No documented process for vetting and approving Caddy plugins before they are used in projects.
    • Plugin Security Audit (For Critical Plugins): No security audits are performed on plugins, especially those handling sensitive data.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Plugins Updated

  • Description:

    1. Plugin Update Tracking: Maintain a list of all installed Caddy plugins and their versions.
    2. Regular Update Checks: Regularly check for updates to installed plugins. Monitor plugin repositories, release notes, or use plugin management tools (if available) to track updates.
    3. Automated Update Process (If Possible): Explore options for automating plugin updates, if feasible and safe for your environment. However, carefully consider testing implications before fully automating updates.
    4. Prompt Patching: When updates are available, especially security updates, apply them promptly. Prioritize security updates and schedule patching as soon as possible after release and testing.
    5. Testing After Updates: After updating plugins, thoroughly test your Caddy configuration and application to ensure compatibility and that the updates haven't introduced any regressions or issues.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Plugin Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated plugins are susceptible to known security vulnerabilities that have been patched in newer versions. Failing to update plugins leaves your system vulnerable to these exploits.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Plugin Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Regularly updating plugins is crucial for mitigating the risk of exploiting known vulnerabilities.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Missing Implementation: Plugin updates are not systematically tracked or applied. Updates are often done reactively when issues are encountered or during major maintenance windows, but not proactively for security patching.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Plugin Update Tracking System: No system to track installed plugins and their versions.
    • Regular Plugin Update Checks: No scheduled process for checking for plugin updates.
    • Automated or Streamlined Update Process: No automated or streamlined process for applying plugin updates.
    • Post-Update Testing Procedure: No formal procedure for testing after plugin updates.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Plugin Usage

  • Description:

    1. Need-Based Installation: Only install plugins that are strictly necessary for your application's required functionality. Avoid installing plugins "just in case" or for features that are not actively used.
    2. Functionality Review: Periodically review the list of installed plugins. Evaluate if each plugin is still required and if its functionality can be achieved through other means (e.g., built-in Caddy features or alternative approaches).
    3. Plugin Removal: Remove any plugins that are no longer needed or whose functionality is no longer required.
    4. Consider Alternatives: Before installing a new plugin, consider if the desired functionality can be achieved using built-in Caddy features, external services, or alternative architectural approaches that minimize plugin dependencies.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Increased Attack Surface (Low Severity): Each plugin adds to the overall attack surface of your Caddy instance. Unnecessary plugins increase the potential points of entry for attackers, although the risk from each individual plugin might be low.
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): While minimizing plugins doesn't directly prevent vulnerabilities in used plugins, it reduces the overall number of plugins that need to be maintained and secured, indirectly reducing the overall vulnerability risk.
    • Maintenance Complexity (Low Severity): Fewer plugins simplify maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, indirectly reducing the risk of configuration errors or security issues arising from complex plugin interactions.

  • Impact:

    • Increased Attack Surface: Low risk reduction. Minimizing plugins slightly reduces the attack surface.
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities: Medium risk reduction. Reducing the number of plugins simplifies security management and indirectly reduces vulnerability risk.
    • Maintenance Complexity: Low risk reduction. Fewer plugins simplify maintenance.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Developers generally try to use only necessary plugins, but there isn't a formal review process to minimize plugin usage.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal Plugin Minimization Policy: No documented policy or guidelines for minimizing plugin usage.
    • Regular Plugin Review Process: No scheduled process to review installed plugins and remove unnecessary ones.

Mitigation Strategy: Monitor Caddy Logs and Metrics

  • Description:

    1. Enable Comprehensive Logging: Configure Caddy to generate comprehensive logs, including access logs, error logs, and security-related events. Ensure logs include relevant information like timestamps, client IPs, requested URLs, HTTP status codes, and error messages.
    2. Centralized Log Management: Implement a centralized log management system to collect, store, and analyze Caddy logs. Use tools like ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana), Splunk, or cloud-based logging services.
    3. Security Monitoring and Alerting: Set up security monitoring and alerting rules based on log data. Define alerts for suspicious activity, such as:
      • Failed login attempts (if applicable through plugins)
      • Unusual access patterns
      • Error spikes
      • Security-related error messages
      • Requests from blacklisted IPs
    4. Performance Monitoring: Monitor key performance metrics of Caddy, such as request latency, error rates, CPU usage, and memory consumption. Use monitoring tools like Prometheus, Grafana, or cloud-based monitoring services.
    5. Log Analysis and Review: Regularly analyze and review Caddy logs to identify security incidents, troubleshoot issues, and gain insights into application usage and performance.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Security Incidents Detection (High Severity): Effective logging and monitoring are crucial for detecting security incidents in real-time or near real-time, allowing for timely response and mitigation.
    • Attack Detection and Prevention (Medium Severity): Log analysis can help identify ongoing attacks, such as brute-force attacks, DDoS attempts, or web application attacks, enabling proactive blocking or mitigation measures.
    • Performance Degradation Detection (Medium Severity): Performance monitoring helps detect performance degradation issues, which could be caused by attacks, misconfigurations, or resource exhaustion.
    • Troubleshooting and Debugging (Medium Severity): Logs are essential for troubleshooting errors, debugging configuration issues, and understanding application behavior.

  • Impact:

    • Security Incidents Detection: High risk reduction. Logging and monitoring are fundamental for security incident detection and response.
    • Attack Detection and Prevention: Medium risk reduction. Log analysis enables proactive attack detection and mitigation.
    • Performance Degradation Detection: Medium risk reduction. Performance monitoring helps maintain service availability and performance.
    • Troubleshooting and Debugging: Medium risk reduction (indirectly related to security by improving system stability).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially Implemented: Basic access logs and error logs are enabled in Caddy and are written to files.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Centralized Log Management: Logs are not centrally collected or managed.
    • Security Monitoring and Alerting: No security monitoring or alerting rules are configured based on Caddy logs.
    • Performance Monitoring Integration: No dedicated performance monitoring system is integrated with Caddy.
    • Regular Log Analysis: No regular process for analyzing and reviewing Caddy logs for security or performance issues.

Mitigation Strategy: Stay Updated with Caddy Security Advisories

  • Description:

    1. Subscribe to Security Mailing Lists: Subscribe to Caddy's official security mailing lists or announcement channels to receive notifications about security advisories and updates.
    2. Monitor Security Advisories Page: Regularly check Caddy's official website or GitHub repository for security advisories and announcements.
    3. Follow Caddy Community Channels: Follow Caddy's community forums, social media, or other communication channels where security information might be shared.
    4. Promptly Apply Security Patches: When security advisories are released and patches are available, apply them promptly. Prioritize security patches and schedule patching as soon as possible after release and testing.
    5. Stay Informed about Vulnerabilities: Stay informed about reported vulnerabilities in Caddy and related components. Understand the potential impact of vulnerabilities and recommended mitigations.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Caddy Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Failing to stay updated with security advisories and apply patches leaves your Caddy instance vulnerable to known exploits that are publicly disclosed and potentially actively exploited.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Caddy Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Staying updated and applying patches is essential for mitigating the risk of exploiting known Caddy vulnerabilities.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Missing Implementation: There is no formal process for monitoring Caddy security advisories or ensuring timely patching.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Security Advisory Monitoring Process: No process to actively monitor Caddy security advisories.
    • Patch Management Process: No formal process for applying Caddy security patches in a timely manner.
    • Communication Channel Subscription: Not subscribed to official Caddy security announcement channels.