Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
170 lines (144 loc) · 19.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

170 lines (144 loc) · 19.3 KB

Okay, here's a deep dive security analysis of Caddy, based on the provided security design review and incorporating best practices for a cybersecurity expert review:

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: The primary objective is to conduct a thorough security analysis of the Caddy web server, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and deployment methods. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess existing security controls, and provide actionable recommendations to enhance Caddy's security posture. The analysis will specifically consider the implications of Caddy's design choices, such as automatic HTTPS and its plugin architecture.

  • Scope: The scope of this analysis includes:

    • The core Caddy web server codebase (as available on GitHub).
    • The documented configuration mechanisms (primarily the Caddyfile).
    • The official Caddy Docker image and its deployment practices.
    • Common Caddy modules/plugins (though not an exhaustive analysis of every plugin).
    • The interaction of Caddy with external systems like ACME providers and DNS providers.
    • The build process and associated security controls.

    This analysis excludes:

    • Specific backend applications served by Caddy (these are the responsibility of the application developers).
    • In-depth code reviews of every third-party Go module dependency (though supply chain risks are considered).
    • Network-level security configurations outside of Caddy's direct control (e.g., firewall rules on the host machine).

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and documentation to understand Caddy's architecture, components, and how data flows through the system. Infer missing details from the codebase and documentation where necessary.
    2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the architecture, data flow, and business risks. Consider common attack vectors against web servers and specific threats related to Caddy's features (e.g., ACME, plugins).
    3. Security Control Assessment: Evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls (identified in the "Security Posture" section) against the identified threats.
    4. Vulnerability Analysis: Identify potential vulnerabilities based on the architecture, threat model, and known weaknesses in web server technologies. Focus on areas where Caddy's design choices might introduce unique risks.
    5. Recommendation Generation: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to mitigate identified vulnerabilities and improve Caddy's overall security posture. Prioritize recommendations based on their impact and feasibility.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of the key components identified in the C4 Container diagram:

  • Request Handler:

    • Security Implications: This is the most critical component from a security perspective. It's the entry point for all external requests. Vulnerabilities here can lead to a wide range of attacks.
    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks (XSS, Command Injection, etc.): If the Request Handler doesn't properly sanitize input, attackers could inject malicious code. This is especially relevant if Caddy is used as a reverse proxy and passes unsanitized data to backend applications.
      • HTTP Request Smuggling: Ambiguities in how Caddy parses HTTP requests could allow attackers to bypass security controls or poison the web cache.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Malformed requests or resource exhaustion attacks could overwhelm the Request Handler, making the server unavailable.
      • Header Manipulation Attacks: Attackers could manipulate HTTP headers to bypass security controls, access unauthorized resources, or exploit vulnerabilities in backend applications.
    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy):
      • Strict Input Validation: Enforce strict validation of all request components (headers, body, query parameters) using a whitelist approach (allow only known-good characters and patterns). Leverage Go's standard library functions for parsing and validation where possible.
      • Request Smuggling Protection: Ensure Caddy adheres strictly to HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 specifications. Consider using a dedicated HTTP parsing library that is known to be resistant to request smuggling attacks.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting (using Caddy's rate_limit directive or a similar module) to mitigate DoS attacks. Configure rate limits based on IP address, request path, or other relevant criteria.
      • Header Security: Use Caddy's header directive to set security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, etc.) and to remove or rewrite potentially dangerous headers.
      • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Consider integrating a WAF module (if available) or deploying a separate WAF in front of Caddy for additional protection against common web attacks.

  • TLS Manager:

    • Security Implications: This component is responsible for the security of HTTPS connections. Vulnerabilities here could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of data in transit.
    • Threats:
      • Weak Ciphers/Protocols: Using outdated or weak cryptographic algorithms could allow attackers to decrypt traffic.
      • Improper Certificate Validation: Failure to properly validate certificates from ACME providers or backend servers could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks.
      • Key Compromise: If the private keys associated with TLS certificates are compromised, attackers can impersonate the server.
      • ACME Protocol Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the ACME protocol itself or in Caddy's implementation could allow attackers to obtain unauthorized certificates.
      • OCSP Stapling Issues: Incorrect or missing OCSP stapling could allow attackers to use revoked certificates.
    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy):
      • TLS 1.3 Only: Configure Caddy to use TLS 1.3 only, disabling older versions (TLS 1.2, TLS 1.1, SSLv3). This is generally the default, but it's crucial to verify.
      • Strong Cipher Suites: Specify a list of strong cipher suites, prioritizing those that offer forward secrecy. Use Caddy's tls directive to configure this.
      • Regular Key Rotation: Automate the rotation of TLS certificates and private keys. Caddy's automatic HTTPS feature handles this, but ensure it's working correctly.
      • Secure Key Storage: Store private keys securely, using appropriate file system permissions and access controls. If using Docker, use Docker secrets or a secure volume.
      • ACME Challenge Validation: Ensure Caddy properly validates ACME challenges (HTTP-01 or DNS-01) to prevent attackers from obtaining certificates for domains they don't control. This is handled by Caddy, but it's important to understand the process.
      • OCSP Stapling: Enable OCSP stapling to improve performance and privacy. Caddy should handle this automatically, but verify its configuration.
      • Monitor Certificate Transparency Logs: Monitor Certificate Transparency (CT) logs for unauthorized certificates issued for your domains.

  • Modules (Plugins):

    • Security Implications: Modules extend Caddy's functionality, but they also introduce a significant potential attack surface. Each module must be carefully vetted for security vulnerabilities.
    • Threats:
      • Vulnerabilities in Module Code: Modules can contain bugs or vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers.
      • Improper Input Handling: Modules that handle user input must perform thorough validation and sanitization.
      • Privilege Escalation: A compromised module could potentially gain access to Caddy's core functionality or to the underlying system.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: If a module is compromised at its source (e.g., the developer's GitHub repository), attackers could distribute malicious versions of the module.
    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy):
      • Use Only Trusted Modules: Only use modules from reputable sources, preferably those maintained by the Caddy project or well-known community members.
      • Review Module Code: If possible, review the source code of any modules you use, looking for potential security issues.
      • Keep Modules Updated: Regularly update modules to the latest versions to patch any known vulnerabilities.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Configure modules with the minimum necessary permissions. Avoid granting modules unnecessary access to system resources.
      • Sandboxing (Future Consideration): Explore the possibility of sandboxing modules to limit their impact if they are compromised. This might involve running modules in separate processes or using containerization technologies.
      • Caddy Security Policies for Modules: Advocate for and contribute to the development of clear security guidelines and best practices for Caddy module developers.

  • Config Adapter:

    • Security Implications: This component is responsible for parsing and applying configuration. Vulnerabilities here could allow attackers to inject malicious configuration or bypass security controls.
    • Threats:
      • Configuration Injection: If the Config Adapter doesn't properly validate configuration input, attackers could inject malicious directives.
      • Denial of Service: Malformed configuration files could cause Caddy to crash or become unresponsive.
      • Information Disclosure: Errors in configuration parsing could leak sensitive information.
    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy):
      • Strict Configuration Validation: The Config Adapter should perform strict validation of all configuration directives, ensuring they conform to the expected format and values.
      • Secure Parsing Libraries: Use secure parsing libraries that are resistant to common parsing vulnerabilities.
      • Input Sanitization: Sanitize any user-provided input that is used in configuration files (e.g., environment variables).
      • Regular Expression Security: If regular expressions are used in configuration, ensure they are carefully crafted to avoid ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerabilities.

  • Admin API Endpoint:

    • Security Implications: This component provides an interface for administering Caddy. It must be properly secured to prevent unauthorized access.
    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Attackers could gain access to the Admin API and reconfigure Caddy, potentially disabling security features or exposing sensitive data.
      • Brute-Force Attacks: Attackers could attempt to guess credentials to gain access to the API.
      • CSRF/XSRF: If the API doesn't properly protect against Cross-Site Request Forgery, attackers could trick administrators into performing unintended actions.
    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy):
      • Strong Authentication: Require strong authentication for access to the Admin API. Use strong passwords or, preferably, API keys.
      • Authorization: Implement authorization controls to restrict access to specific API functions based on user roles.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent brute-force attacks.
      • CSRF Protection: Use standard CSRF protection mechanisms (e.g., tokens) to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
      • Network Segmentation: Restrict access to the Admin API to trusted networks or IP addresses. Consider using a VPN or other secure connection for remote administration.
      • Disable if Unnecessary: If the Admin API is not needed, disable it entirely.

3. Deployment (Docker) Security Considerations

The Docker deployment model introduces specific security considerations:

  • Threats:
    • Container Breakout: A vulnerability in Caddy or a misconfiguration could allow an attacker to escape the container and gain access to the host system.
    • Image Vulnerabilities: The base image used for the Caddy Docker image could contain vulnerabilities.
    • Insecure Volume Mounts: Improperly configured volume mounts could expose sensitive data on the host system.
    • Network Exposure: Exposing unnecessary ports on the Caddy container could increase the attack surface.
  • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy and Docker):
    • Use Official Caddy Image: Use the official Caddy Docker image from Docker Hub. This image is regularly updated with security patches.
    • Minimal Base Image: Ensure the official Caddy image uses a minimal base image (e.g., Alpine Linux) to reduce the attack surface.
    • Run as Non-Root User: Configure the Caddy container to run as a non-root user. The official Caddy image should already do this, but verify.
    • Read-Only Root Filesystem: Mount the container's root filesystem as read-only to prevent attackers from modifying system files.
    • Secure Volume Mounts: Use read-only volume mounts where possible. Ensure that volume mounts are only accessible to the Caddy container.
    • Network Segmentation: Use Docker networks to isolate the Caddy container from other containers and from the host network. Only expose the necessary ports (80 and 443).
    • Docker Security Scanning: Use Docker security scanning tools (e.g., Docker Bench for Security, Clair, Trivy) to identify vulnerabilities in the Caddy image and its dependencies.
    • Seccomp and AppArmor: Use Seccomp and AppArmor profiles to restrict the system calls that the Caddy container can make.
    • Resource Limits: Set resource limits (CPU, memory) on the Caddy container to prevent DoS attacks.

4. Build Process Security Considerations

The build process is crucial for ensuring the integrity of the Caddy binaries and Docker images:

  • Threats:
    • Compromised Build Server: An attacker could compromise the build server (GitHub Actions) and inject malicious code into the Caddy binaries or Docker images.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in Caddy's dependencies could be incorporated into the build.
    • Unsigned Releases: If releases are not signed, attackers could distribute modified versions of Caddy.
  • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Caddy):
    • SAST and SCA: Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools into the GitHub Actions workflow. Use tools like go vet, golangci-lint, and dedicated SCA tools (e.g., Snyk, Dependabot).
    • Fuzzing: Integrate fuzzing into the build process to proactively discover vulnerabilities. Go has built-in fuzzing support.
    • Signed Releases: Sign all Caddy releases using a secure key management system (e.g., GPG).
    • Reproducible Builds: Strive for reproducible builds, which allow anyone to verify that the released binaries were built from the published source code.
    • Harden GitHub Actions: Secure the GitHub Actions workflow by following best practices (e.g., using least privilege, regularly auditing workflows).

5. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

  • Specific SAST and SCA tools: This needs to be confirmed by the Caddy development team. The analysis recommends specific tools (see above), but the actual tools used should be documented.
  • Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP): A formal VDP is essential. Caddy should have a clear process for security researchers to report vulnerabilities responsibly. This should be publicly documented.
  • Penetration Tests: Regular penetration tests, conducted by external security experts, are highly recommended. The frequency and scope of these tests should be determined based on risk.
  • Incident Response Procedures: Caddy should have documented incident response procedures that outline how to handle security incidents, including vulnerability reports, data breaches, and DoS attacks.
  • ACME Protocol Vulnerabilities: The Caddy team should actively monitor for any developments or vulnerabilities related to the ACME protocol and its implementations. They should have a plan for updating Caddy to address any such vulnerabilities.
  • Compliance Requirements: This depends on the specific use case of Caddy. If Caddy is used to process sensitive data (e.g., credit card information), it may need to comply with PCI DSS. If it handles personal data of EU citizens, it may need to comply with GDPR. Caddy itself may not be directly responsible for compliance, but it should provide the necessary features and documentation to allow users to deploy it in a compliant manner.

6. Risk Assessment Summary

The risk assessment highlights several critical areas:

  • TLS Certificate and Key Management: This is the highest priority risk. Compromise of private keys or unauthorized certificate issuance would have severe consequences.
  • Module Security: The plugin architecture introduces a significant attack surface. Careful vetting and management of modules are essential.
  • Input Validation: Robust input validation is crucial for preventing a wide range of attacks, especially in the Request Handler.
  • Dependency Management: Vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies are a constant threat. SCA and regular updates are essential.
  • Docker Security: If Caddy is deployed using Docker, container security best practices must be followed.

7. Overall Recommendations (Prioritized)

  1. Implement/Strengthen VDP: Establish a clear and publicly documented vulnerability disclosure program.
  2. Enhance Input Validation: Implement rigorous input validation throughout Caddy, especially in the Request Handler and in any modules that handle user input.
  3. Module Security Guidelines: Develop and enforce security guidelines for Caddy module developers. Consider a module review process.
  4. SAST/SCA Integration: Integrate SAST and SCA tools into the build process and run them regularly.
  5. Regular Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration tests by external security experts.
  6. Fuzzing: Integrate fuzzing into the development and testing process.
  7. Docker Security Hardening: Follow Docker security best practices, including using minimal base images, running as non-root, and using security profiles.
  8. Document Security Procedures: Document incident response procedures and security best practices for Caddy users.
  9. Monitor for ACME Vulnerabilities: Stay informed about any vulnerabilities related to the ACME protocol.
  10. Admin API Security: Ensure the Admin API is secured with strong authentication, authorization, and rate limiting. Disable if not needed.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of Caddy's security posture and offers actionable recommendations for improvement. The Caddy team should prioritize these recommendations based on their risk assessment and available resources. Continuous security monitoring and improvement are essential for maintaining a secure web server.