Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
94 lines (78 loc) · 8.97 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

94 lines (78 loc) · 8.97 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for charmbracelet/bubbletea

Objective: Compromise application using Bubble Tea by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within Bubble Tea or its usage.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Bubble Tea Application [CRITICAL NODE] └───(OR)─ Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(AND)─ Malicious Input Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├───(OR)─ Command Injection (if application uses input to execute commands) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └─── Inject shell commands via input fields or prompts [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Input Validation Bypass [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └─── Craft input to bypass input validation logic and inject unexpected data [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(AND)─ Terminal Escape Sequences Injection └─── Inject malicious terminal escape sequences via input fields to: └───(OR)─ Execute arbitrary commands on the user's terminal (if terminal emulator is vulnerable) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] └───(OR)─ Exploit Dependencies Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(AND)─ Vulnerable Bubble Tea Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH] └─── Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in Bubble Tea's dependencies (e.g., github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss, github.com/muesli/termenv, etc.) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] └─── Check for CVEs in dependencies and exploit them if present and applicable to the application's usage [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(OR)─ Exploit Application Logic Vulnerabilities (Developer Errors in Bubble Tea Usage) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(AND)─ Insecure Data Handling [HIGH-RISK PATH] └─── Exploit vulnerabilities in how the application handles data within the Bubble Tea framework: [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Storing sensitive data in application state without proper encryption (if state is persisted) [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Logging sensitive data to terminal or logs unintentionally [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(OR)─ Mishandling user credentials or API keys within the application logic [CRITICAL NODE] └───(AND)─ Business Logic Flaws [HIGH-RISK PATH] └─── Exploit flaws in the application's business logic implemented using Bubble Tea to: [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───(OR)─ Bypass intended workflows or access controls [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(OR)─ Manipulate application behavior for malicious purposes [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───(OR)─ Social Engineering & Physical Access (Outside Bubble Tea's Scope but relevant for terminal applications) └───(AND)─ Physical Access [CRITICAL NODE] └─── Gain physical access to the machine running the application to directly interact with it and potentially bypass security measures (relevant for terminal applications running locally) [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Vectors:

  • Malicious Input Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Injecting crafted input to manipulate application behavior.

    • Command Injection [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Injecting shell commands via input fields or prompts when the application uses input to execute system commands.
    • Input Validation Bypass [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Crafting input to circumvent input validation and inject unexpected or malicious data.
    • Terminal Escape Sequences Injection - Execute arbitrary commands [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Injecting terminal escape sequences to execute commands on the user's terminal (if vulnerable terminal emulator).

  • Likelihood: Medium to High (depending on application design and input handling implementation).

  • Impact: Medium to Critical (ranging from logic bypass and data manipulation to full system compromise).

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Strict Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement robust validation and sanitization on all user inputs. Use allow-lists and escape special characters.
    • Avoid Executing Shell Commands Based on User Input: Minimize or eliminate the need to execute shell commands based on user input. If necessary, use parameterized commands and careful sanitization.
    • Secure Terminal Handling: Be aware of terminal escape sequence risks. Sanitize terminal output if displaying data from untrusted sources.
    • Fuzz Testing: Conduct fuzz testing to identify unexpected behavior and crashes related to input handling.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Dependencies Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Vectors:

  • Vulnerable Bubble Tea Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in Bubble Tea's dependencies (e.g., lipgloss, termenv).

    • Check for CVEs in dependencies and exploit them [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Identifying and exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in dependencies.

  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (dependencies can have vulnerabilities, but are often patched).

  • Impact: Medium to Critical (depending on the specific vulnerability and affected dependency).

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Dependency Scanning and Management: Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities using tools like govulncheck or snyk. Use dependency management tools to track and update dependencies.
    • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM): Consider generating and maintaining an SBOM to track dependencies.
    • Verify Dependency Integrity: Use checksums or signatures to verify the integrity of downloaded dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Application Logic Vulnerabilities (Developer Errors in Bubble Tea Usage) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Vectors:

  • Insecure Data Handling [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Vulnerabilities arising from how the application handles data within the Bubble Tea framework.

    • Storing sensitive data in application state without proper encryption [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Storing sensitive data unencrypted in application state, especially if state is persisted.
    • Logging sensitive data to terminal or logs unintentionally [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Unintentionally logging sensitive data to the terminal or application logs.
    • Mishandling user credentials or API keys [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Improperly handling or storing user credentials or API keys within the application logic.

  • Business Logic Flaws [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting flaws in the application's business logic implemented using Bubble Tea.

    • Bypass intended workflows or access controls [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Circumventing intended application workflows or access control mechanisms.
    • Manipulate application behavior for malicious purposes [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting logic flaws to manipulate application behavior for unintended and malicious outcomes.

  • Likelihood: Medium (common developer oversights and logic flaws).

  • Impact: Medium to High (ranging from information disclosure and data breaches to unauthorized access and manipulation).

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices, especially for data handling, authentication, and authorization.
    • Code Reviews and Security Testing: Conduct regular code reviews and security testing (static and dynamic analysis) to identify and fix vulnerabilities.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege in application design and user permissions.
    • Security Awareness Training: Train developers on secure coding practices and common vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Physical Access [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Vector:

  • Gain physical access to the machine running the application [CRITICAL NODE]: Obtaining physical access to the system running the Bubble Tea application.

  • Likelihood: Low (depends on physical security measures).

  • Impact: Critical (full system compromise and data access).

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Physical Security Measures: Implement appropriate physical security measures to protect systems running the application, especially if handling sensitive data.
    • System Hardening: Harden the operating system and system configurations to limit the impact of physical access.
    • Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data at rest to protect it even if physical access is gained.