Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
68 lines (56 loc) · 8.67 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

68 lines (56 loc) · 8.67 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for cloudwego/kitex

Attack Surface: 1. RPC Protocol Handling Vulnerabilities

  • 1. RPC Protocol Handling Vulnerabilities

    • Description: Flaws in Kitex's implementation of supported RPC protocols (Thrift, gRPC, Kitex Protobuf) or their underlying libraries, leading to potential exploitation. This is distinct from vulnerabilities in the protocol specifications themselves.
    • How Kitex Contributes: Kitex directly handles the serialization, deserialization, and transport of data using these protocols. Its implementation choices and the libraries it uses are crucial. This is entirely within Kitex's control.
    • Example: A buffer overflow vulnerability in Kitex's Thrift deserialization logic allows an attacker to send a crafted request, causing a crash or potentially remote code execution (RCE).
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Remote Code Execution (RCE), Data Corruption, Information Disclosure.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the specific vulnerability and protocol).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Update Regularly: Keep Kitex and all its dependencies (protocol libraries, network libraries like Netpoll) updated to the latest patched versions. This is the most critical mitigation.
      • Fuzz Testing: Conduct thorough fuzz testing with malformed inputs for each supported protocol to identify potential vulnerabilities before attackers do. This should target Kitex's implementation directly.
      • Protocol-Specific WAF/API Gateway: If the service is externally exposed, use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or API gateway with rules tailored to the specific RPC protocol(s) in use. This is a secondary defense.
      • Input Validation: Implement strict input validation after deserialization, based on the expected data types and ranges defined in the IDL. Don't rely solely on the protocol's built-in validation. This validation logic is often part of the Kitex-generated code.
      • Least Privilege: Run the Kitex service with the minimum necessary privileges.
      • Protocol Selection: If possible, choose a simpler protocol if the full complexity of a more feature-rich protocol (like gRPC) is not required. This reduces the attack surface within Kitex.

Attack Surface: 2. Custom Middleware and Extension Abuse

  • 2. Custom Middleware and Extension Abuse

    • Description: Vulnerabilities introduced by custom Kitex middleware or third-party extensions, either through coding errors or malicious intent. This focuses on code integrated directly into the Kitex processing pipeline.
    • How Kitex Contributes: Kitex's extensibility allows developers to add custom logic directly within the request/response handling path. This code executes within the Kitex process and has direct access to Kitex internals.
    • Example: A custom authentication middleware has a flaw that allows attackers to bypass authentication by sending a specially crafted header. This middleware is part of the Kitex pipeline.
    • Impact: Authentication Bypass, Authorization Bypass, Information Disclosure, DoS, RCE (depending on the middleware's functionality).
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (highly dependent on the specific middleware and its role).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices when developing custom middleware. Avoid common vulnerabilities like injection flaws, improper error handling, and insecure data storage. This is paramount for code running within Kitex.
      • Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews of all custom middleware, focusing on security aspects. This is crucial for any code extending Kitex.
      • Testing: Perform rigorous security testing of custom middleware, including penetration testing and fuzzing. This testing should target the middleware's integration with Kitex.
      • Least Privilege (Middleware): Grant middleware only the minimum necessary permissions to perform its function. This limits the damage potential within the Kitex process.
      • Vetting Third-Party Extensions: Carefully vet any third-party extensions before using them. Prefer well-maintained, widely used, and security-audited extensions. Remember, these extensions run within the Kitex process.
      • Sandboxing (if possible): Explore options for sandboxing or isolating middleware to limit the impact of potential vulnerabilities. This is often difficult to achieve within the Kitex framework itself.

Attack Surface: 3. IDL and Data Handling Flaws (Kitex-Generated Code)

  • 3. IDL and Data Handling Flaws (Kitex-Generated Code)

    • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from how the Interface Definition Language (IDL) is defined and how the Kitex-generated code handles data, potentially leading to injection or other data-related attacks. This focuses on the code generated by Kitex from the IDL.
    • How Kitex Contributes: Kitex uses IDLs (Thrift, Protobuf) and generates code to handle serialization, deserialization, and data validation. Vulnerabilities in this generated code are directly attributable to Kitex.
    • Example: Using a string type in the IDL without any length restrictions, and the Kitex-generated code failing to properly validate this length, allows an attacker to send a very large string, potentially causing a buffer overflow or DoS.
    • Impact: Injection Attacks, Data Corruption, DoS, Information Disclosure.
    • Risk Severity: High.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Restrictive Data Types: Use the most restrictive data types possible in the IDL (e.g., int32 instead of string where appropriate, specify maximum string lengths). This directly influences the Kitex-generated code.
      • Input Validation (Post-Deserialization): Implement thorough input validation after deserialization, based on the expected data types, ranges, and formats. This may involve modifying or extending the Kitex-generated code, or adding validation in custom middleware.
      • IDL Linters: Use IDL linters to enforce best practices and identify potential issues in the IDL definition, which will then be reflected in the generated code.
      • Generated Code Review: Review the code generated by the Kitex compiler for potential vulnerabilities, especially if using custom code generation options. This is a direct examination of Kitex's output.
      • Safe Handling of Untrusted Data: Treat all data received from clients or other services as untrusted and handle it accordingly. This principle applies to how the generated code handles data.

Attack Surface: 4. Misconfiguration (Kitex-Specific Settings)

  • 4. Misconfiguration (Kitex-Specific Settings)
    • Description: Incorrect or insecure Kitex-specific configuration settings leading to vulnerabilities. This focuses on settings within Kitex's control.
    • How Kitex Contributes: Kitex provides numerous configuration options that directly affect its security posture. Incorrect settings within Kitex's configuration are directly attributable to how Kitex is used.
    • Example: Disabling TLS encryption for communication between services using Kitex's configuration options, exposing data to eavesdropping. Or, configuring Kitex to use weak cipher suites.
    • Impact: Varies widely depending on the misconfiguration, ranging from DoS to data breaches.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the specific misconfiguration).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Defaults: Start with secure default settings provided by Kitex whenever possible.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Configure Kitex with the minimum necessary privileges and features enabled.
      • Configuration Management: Use configuration management tools to ensure consistent and secure Kitex configurations across all instances.
      • Regular Audits: Regularly review and audit the Kitex configuration files to identify and correct any misconfigurations.
      • Documentation Review: Thoroughly review the Kitex documentation to understand the security implications of each Kitex-specific configuration option.
      • Hardening Guides: Follow any available security hardening guides specifically for Kitex.