Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
212 lines (189 loc) · 24.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

212 lines (189 loc) · 24.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for etcd-io/etcd

Mitigation Strategy: Enable Client Certificate Authentication

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Generate a Certificate Authority (CA) key and certificate. This CA will be used to sign client certificates. Use strong key lengths and algorithms (e.g., RSA 4096 or ECDSA P-384).
    • Step 2: Generate client certificates for each client (application or user) that needs to access etcd. Ensure each client certificate has a unique Common Name (CN) or Subject Alternative Name (SAN) for identification. Sign these client certificates using the CA created in Step 1.
    • Step 3: Configure etcd to require client certificate authentication. This typically involves setting the --client-cert-auth flag to true and providing the path to the CA certificate file (--trusted-ca-file).
    • Step 4: Distribute client certificates and corresponding private keys securely to authorized clients. Ensure private keys are protected and not publicly accessible.
    • Step 5: Configure clients to present their client certificates when connecting to etcd. This usually involves specifying the certificate and key file paths in the client configuration.
    • Step 6: Regularly rotate client certificates and the CA certificate to limit the impact of compromised certificates. Implement a certificate revocation mechanism if necessary.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized clients from accessing etcd data and API, even if they know the etcd endpoint.
      • Credential Stuffing/Brute-Force Attacks (Medium Severity): Makes password-based attacks ineffective as client certificates are required for authentication.
      • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): While TLS encryption already mitigates this, client certificates provide an additional layer of authentication and verification of the client's identity.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized Access: High - Significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access by enforcing strong mutual authentication.
      • Credential Stuffing/Brute-Force Attacks: Medium - Eliminates the attack vector of weak or stolen passwords for etcd access.
      • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Low - Provides defense-in-depth, adding an extra layer of security beyond TLS.
    • Currently Implemented: No - Currently, the project relies on network segmentation and IP-based access control for etcd access.
    • Missing Implementation: Client certificate authentication is not configured on the etcd cluster or enforced for client applications. This needs to be implemented on all etcd servers and client applications connecting to etcd.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Define roles based on the principle of least privilege. Identify the different types of users and applications that interact with etcd and determine the minimum permissions required for each. Examples: read-only-config, config-manager, admin.
    • Step 2: Create users in etcd's RBAC system. These users can be associated with client certificates (if client certificate authentication is enabled) or username/password combinations (less secure, generally discouraged).
    • Step 3: Define roles in etcd's RBAC system. Each role should specify a set of permissions (read, write, create, delete) on specific etcd resources (keys or key prefixes).
    • Step 4: Grant roles to users. Assign the appropriate roles to each user based on their required level of access.
    • Step 5: Enforce RBAC by enabling the --auth-token flag and configuring appropriate authentication mechanisms (like client certificates).
    • Step 6: Regularly review and audit RBAC policies to ensure they are still appropriate and effective. Update roles and permissions as application requirements change.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Prevents users or applications from gaining access to resources or performing actions beyond their authorized scope.
      • Accidental Data Modification/Deletion (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unintended data corruption or loss due to overly permissive access.
      • Insider Threats (Medium Severity): Limits the potential damage from malicious insiders by restricting access based on roles.
    • Impact:
      • Privilege Escalation: High - Significantly reduces the risk by enforcing granular access control and limiting capabilities.
      • Accidental Data Modification/Deletion: Medium - Reduces the likelihood of accidental errors causing data integrity issues.
      • Insider Threats: Medium - Limits the scope of damage an insider can inflict by restricting their access.
    • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic username/password authentication is enabled for etcd, but RBAC roles and granular permissions are not fully configured.
    • Missing Implementation: RBAC roles need to be defined, users need to be created and assigned roles, and RBAC needs to be fully enforced across all etcd access points. Username/password authentication should be replaced with client certificate authentication for stronger security.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable Encryption in Transit (TLS)

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Generate server certificates for each etcd server in the cluster. These certificates should be signed by a trusted CA (can be the same CA as client certificates or a separate one). Ensure the certificates include the server's hostname or IP address in the Subject Alternative Name (SAN).
    • Step 2: Configure etcd servers to use TLS for both client-to-server and server-to-server communication. This involves setting flags like --cert-file, --key-file, --peer-cert-file, and --peer-key-file to point to the server certificate and key files.
    • Step 3: Configure clients to connect to etcd using TLS. This usually involves specifying the https:// scheme in the etcd endpoint URL and potentially providing the CA certificate to verify the server's certificate.
    • Step 4: Enforce TLS by disabling non-TLS ports if possible or using firewall rules to restrict access to only TLS-enabled ports.
    • Step 5: Regularly update TLS certificates and configurations to use strong ciphers and protocols and address known vulnerabilities.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Eavesdropping (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and reading sensitive data transmitted between clients and etcd servers, or between etcd servers themselves.
      • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and manipulating communication between clients and etcd servers, or between etcd servers.
    • Impact:
      • Eavesdropping: High - Effectively eliminates the risk of eavesdropping on etcd communication.
      • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High - Significantly reduces the risk of MITM attacks by encrypting and authenticating communication channels.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes - TLS is currently enabled for client-to-server and server-to-server communication in the etcd cluster.
    • Missing Implementation: While TLS is enabled, the cipher suites and TLS protocol versions should be reviewed and hardened to ensure they are using strong and up-to-date configurations. Regular certificate rotation processes should be formalized.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable Encryption at Rest

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Choose an encryption provider supported by etcd (e.g., aes-gcm).
    • Step 2: Generate an encryption key. Use a strong, randomly generated key.
    • Step 3: Configure etcd to enable encryption at rest using the chosen provider and encryption key. This is typically done by setting the --encryption-key-file and --encryption-key-rotation-period flags.
    • Step 4: Securely manage the encryption key. Store the key outside of the etcd data directory and protect it with strong access controls. Consider using a dedicated key management system (KMS) for enhanced security.
    • Step 5: Regularly rotate the encryption key to limit the impact of a potential key compromise.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Data Breach from Physical Disk Compromise (High Severity): Protects sensitive data if the physical disks containing etcd data are stolen or accessed by unauthorized individuals.
      • Data Breach from Unauthorized Access to Server Storage (Medium Severity): Prevents unauthorized access to etcd data files on the server's file system.
    • Impact:
      • Data Breach from Physical Disk Compromise: High - Significantly reduces the risk of data breaches in case of physical disk theft.
      • Data Breach from Unauthorized Access to Server Storage: Medium - Reduces the risk of data breaches from file system level access, but relies on the security of the encryption key management.
    • Currently Implemented: No - Encryption at rest is not currently enabled for the etcd cluster.
    • Missing Implementation: Encryption at rest needs to be configured on all etcd servers. A secure key management strategy needs to be implemented to protect the encryption keys.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Backups of etcd Data

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Implement a regular backup schedule for etcd data. Determine the appropriate backup frequency based on data change rate and recovery time objectives (RTO).
    • Step 2: Use etcd's built-in snapshot functionality (etcdctl snapshot save) to create consistent backups.
    • Step 3: Encrypt backups using strong encryption algorithms (e.g., AES-256) before storing them.
    • Step 4: Store backups in a secure location separate from the etcd cluster. This location should have strong access controls and be protected from unauthorized access and physical threats. Consider offsite backups for disaster recovery.
    • Step 5: Implement backup integrity checks to ensure backups are not corrupted or tampered with.
    • Step 6: Regularly test backup and restore procedures to verify their effectiveness and ensure data can be recovered in a timely manner.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Data Loss from Disaster or System Failure (High Severity): Ensures data can be recovered in case of hardware failures, software errors, or other disasters affecting the etcd cluster.
      • Data Breach from Backup Compromise (Medium Severity): Protects sensitive data stored in backups from unauthorized access if backups are compromised.
    • Impact:
      • Data Loss from Disaster or System Failure: High - Significantly reduces the risk of permanent data loss and ensures business continuity.
      • Data Breach from Backup Compromise: Medium - Reduces the risk of data breaches from compromised backups, depending on the strength of backup encryption and storage security.
    • Currently Implemented: Partial - Backups are taken periodically, but they are not encrypted and stored in the same infrastructure as the etcd cluster.
    • Missing Implementation: Backup encryption needs to be implemented. Backups should be stored in a separate, secure location with strong access controls. Backup integrity checks and regular restore testing should be implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Deploy etcd in a Clustered Configuration

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Deploy at least 3 (ideally 5 for higher fault tolerance) etcd servers to form a cluster.
    • Step 2: Configure each etcd server to be aware of the other servers in the cluster using the --initial-cluster and --listen-peer-urls flags.
    • Step 3: Ensure proper network connectivity between all etcd servers in the cluster.
    • Step 4: Monitor the health and status of the etcd cluster to detect and respond to node failures promptly.
    • Step 5: Implement automated failover mechanisms to ensure service continuity in case of node failures.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Service Downtime due to Single Node Failure (High Severity): Prevents service disruption if one etcd server fails, as the cluster can continue to operate with remaining nodes.
      • Data Loss due to Single Node Failure (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of data loss in case of node failure, as data is replicated across multiple nodes in the cluster.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Single Node Compromise (Medium Severity): Limits the impact of a single compromised node on the overall availability of the etcd service.
    • Impact:
      • Service Downtime due to Single Node Failure: High - Significantly reduces the risk of service downtime caused by single server failures.
      • Data Loss due to Single Node Failure: Medium - Reduces the risk of data loss, but data loss can still occur in more severe failure scenarios (e.g., losing quorum).
      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Single Node Compromise: Medium - Limits the impact of a single compromised node, but a coordinated attack on multiple nodes could still lead to DoS.
    • Currently Implemented: Yes - etcd is deployed in a 3-node cluster.
    • Missing Implementation: While clustered, the monitoring and automated failover mechanisms could be improved for faster response to node failures. Regular disaster recovery drills should be conducted to test cluster resilience.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Monitoring and Alerting for etcd Health

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Identify key etcd metrics to monitor, such as: leader status, follower status, raft index lag, disk sync duration, number of pending proposals, number of failed proposals, storage quota status, and resource utilization (CPU, memory, disk I/O).
    • Step 2: Deploy monitoring tools (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana, etcd exporter) to collect and visualize etcd metrics.
    • Step 3: Configure alerts for critical events and thresholds, such as: node down, leader election, high latency, low disk space, exceeding storage quota, and errors in logs.
    • Step 4: Integrate alerts with notification systems (e.g., email, Slack, PagerDuty) to ensure timely notification of operational issues.
    • Step 5: Establish procedures for responding to alerts and resolving etcd-related issues promptly.
    • Step 6: Regularly review and adjust monitoring and alerting configurations to ensure they are effective and relevant.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Service Downtime due to Unnoticed Issues (High Severity): Enables early detection and proactive resolution of issues before they lead to service disruptions.
      • Data Corruption due to Undetected Errors (Medium Severity): Helps identify potential data corruption or inconsistency issues early on.
      • Performance Degradation due to Resource Constraints (Medium Severity): Allows for timely identification and resolution of resource bottlenecks affecting etcd performance.
    • Impact:
      • Service Downtime due to Unnoticed Issues: High - Significantly reduces the risk of downtime by enabling proactive issue resolution.
      • Data Corruption due to Undetected Errors: Medium - Reduces the risk of data corruption by facilitating early detection of potential problems.
      • Performance Degradation due to Resource Constraints: Medium - Improves performance and stability by allowing for timely resource management.
    • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic monitoring of etcd server availability is in place, but comprehensive metric monitoring and alerting are not fully implemented.
    • Missing Implementation: Need to implement detailed metric monitoring using tools like Prometheus and Grafana, configure comprehensive alerts for various etcd health indicators, and integrate alerts with a proper notification system.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Quotas

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Determine appropriate resource limits for etcd processes based on expected workload and available resources. Consider CPU, memory, and disk I/O limits.
    • Step 2: Configure resource limits using operating system mechanisms (e.g., ulimit, cgroups) or containerization platforms (e.g., Kubernetes resource limits).
    • Step 3: Set storage quotas for etcd to prevent unbounded data growth. Configure the --quota-backend-bytes flag to limit the maximum size of the etcd database.
    • Step 4: Monitor resource utilization and quota usage to ensure limits are appropriate and adjust them as needed.
    • Step 5: Implement alerts for exceeding resource limits or approaching storage quotas to proactively address potential issues.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Prevents etcd from being overwhelmed by excessive resource consumption, ensuring service availability.
      • Performance Degradation due to Resource Contention (Medium Severity): Limits the impact of resource contention on etcd performance and stability.
      • Storage Exhaustion Leading to Data Loss (Medium Severity): Prevents uncontrolled data growth from filling up storage and potentially causing data loss or corruption.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Resource Exhaustion: High - Significantly reduces the risk of DoS attacks caused by resource exhaustion.
      • Performance Degradation due to Resource Contention: Medium - Improves performance and stability by managing resource usage.
      • Storage Exhaustion Leading to Data Loss: Medium - Reduces the risk of storage exhaustion and related data integrity issues.
    • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic resource limits are in place at the operating system level, but etcd-specific storage quotas are not configured.
    • Missing Implementation: Need to configure etcd storage quotas using --quota-backend-bytes. Resource limits should be reviewed and potentially refined based on performance testing and monitoring data.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update etcd to the Latest Version

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Subscribe to etcd security advisories and release announcements to stay informed about security patches and updates.
    • Step 2: Establish a process for regularly reviewing and applying etcd updates. Define a schedule for patching and upgrading etcd clusters.
    • Step 3: Before applying updates to production environments, thoroughly test them in a staging or development environment to identify and resolve any compatibility issues or regressions.
    • Step 4: Automate the update process as much as possible to reduce manual effort and ensure consistent patching across the etcd cluster.
    • Step 5: Document the update process and maintain a record of applied updates.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Protects against attacks that exploit publicly known security vulnerabilities in older versions of etcd.
      • Data Breach due to Unpatched Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of data breaches resulting from exploitable vulnerabilities in etcd.
      • Service Downtime due to Software Bugs (Medium Severity): Improves stability and reduces the risk of downtime caused by software bugs fixed in newer versions.
    • Impact:
      • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: High - Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation of known vulnerabilities.
      • Data Breach due to Unpatched Vulnerabilities: Medium - Reduces the risk of data breaches, but depends on the severity of vulnerabilities and the timeliness of updates.
      • Service Downtime due to Software Bugs: Medium - Improves stability and reduces the likelihood of downtime caused by software defects.
    • Currently Implemented: Partial - etcd updates are performed periodically, but a formal process and schedule are not strictly followed.
    • Missing Implementation: Need to establish a formal process for tracking etcd releases, testing updates in staging, and applying updates to production in a timely manner. Automation of the update process should be explored.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure etcd Configuration

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Review all etcd configuration parameters and flags. Ensure only necessary features and functionalities are enabled.
    • Step 2: Disable insecure or unnecessary features, such as anonymous authentication if RBAC is enabled.
    • Step 3: Harden TLS configurations by using strong ciphers and disabling weak protocols.
    • Step 4: Securely store etcd configuration files. Protect them from unauthorized access and modifications.
    • Step 5: Implement configuration management tools to ensure consistent and secure configuration across all etcd servers.
    • Step 6: Regularly audit etcd configurations to identify and address any misconfigurations or security weaknesses.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Prevents vulnerabilities arising from insecure or default configurations of etcd.
      • Unauthorized Access due to Weak Configuration (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unauthorized access due to misconfigured authentication or authorization settings.
      • Information Disclosure due to Verbose Logging (Low Severity): Minimizes the risk of sensitive information being exposed through overly verbose logging configurations.
    • Impact:
      • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities: Medium - Reduces the risk of vulnerabilities caused by misconfigurations.
      • Unauthorized Access due to Weak Configuration: Medium - Reduces the risk of unauthorized access, but depends on the specific misconfigurations.
      • Information Disclosure due to Verbose Logging: Low - Minimizes the risk of information disclosure through logs.
    • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic configuration is reviewed during initial setup, but a systematic and ongoing configuration hardening process is not in place.
    • Missing Implementation: Need to conduct a comprehensive security review of etcd configurations, implement configuration management for consistency, and establish a process for regular configuration audits.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Auditing and Logging

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Enable etcd audit logging by configuring the --experimental-audit-log-path flag.
    • Step 2: Configure audit log settings to capture relevant events, such as API requests, authentication attempts, configuration changes, and errors.
    • Step 3: Centralize etcd logs by forwarding them to a central logging system (e.g., Elasticsearch, Splunk, ELK stack).
    • Step 4: Integrate etcd logs with a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system for security monitoring and incident response.
    • Step 5: Configure alerts in the SIEM system for suspicious activities or security events detected in etcd logs.
    • Step 6: Regularly review audit logs to detect and investigate potential security breaches or policy violations.
    • Step 7: Securely store and archive audit logs for compliance and forensic purposes.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Security Breach Detection (High Severity): Enables detection of security breaches and unauthorized activities within the etcd cluster.
      • Incident Response and Forensics (Medium Severity): Provides valuable information for incident response and forensic investigations in case of security incidents.
      • Compliance and Audit Requirements (Medium Severity): Meets compliance requirements for audit logging and security monitoring.
    • Impact:
      • Security Breach Detection: High - Significantly improves the ability to detect security breaches and respond effectively.
      • Incident Response and Forensics: Medium - Provides crucial data for incident analysis and post-incident activities.
      • Compliance and Audit Requirements: Medium - Ensures compliance with relevant security and audit regulations.
    • Currently Implemented: No - Audit logging is not currently enabled for the etcd cluster. Basic operational logs are collected but not specifically for security auditing.
    • Missing Implementation: Need to enable etcd audit logging, configure log forwarding to a central logging system, integrate with a SIEM, and establish procedures for log review and incident response based on audit logs.