Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (42 loc) · 5.19 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

51 lines (42 loc) · 5.19 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ethereum/go-ethereum

Attack Surface: Unsecured Public RPC/API Endpoints

  • Description: Exposing go-ethereum's RPC or API endpoints (HTTP, WebSocket) to the public internet without proper security measures.
  • How go-ethereum contributes to attack surface: go-ethereum provides built-in RPC and API functionalities for node interaction, which can be enabled and exposed on network interfaces.
  • Example: Running a go-ethereum node with default configuration, exposing the RPC port (e.g., 8545) to the internet without authentication or network restrictions, allowing unauthorized access.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to node information, transaction manipulation, potential node control, information disclosure, and denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Disable Public Exposure: Bind RPC/API endpoints to localhost or specific private network interfaces only.
    • Authentication and Authorization: Implement strong authentication (e.g., API keys, JWT) and authorization for all RPC/API endpoints.
    • Network Restrictions (Firewall): Use firewalls to restrict access to RPC/API ports to trusted IP addresses or networks.
    • Disable Unnecessary APIs: Disable any RPC/API methods not required for application functionality.

Attack Surface: Malicious Peer Exploitation (P2P Layer)

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in go-ethereum's P2P networking protocol implementation by sending crafted messages from malicious peers.
  • How go-ethereum contributes to attack surface: go-ethereum actively participates in the Ethereum P2P network, processing messages from potentially untrusted peers for blockchain synchronization and transaction propagation.
  • Example: A malicious peer sends a crafted GetBlockHeaders message that exploits a buffer overflow in go-ethereum's message parsing, leading to node crash or remote code execution.
  • Impact: Node crashes, denial of service, information disclosure, potential remote code execution, network disruption.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on vulnerability severity)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep go-ethereum Updated: Regularly update go-ethereum to the latest version to patch known P2P protocol vulnerabilities.
    • Network Monitoring and Filtering: Implement network monitoring to detect and filter suspicious P2P traffic.
    • Peer Reputation and Blacklisting: Implement mechanisms to track peer reputation and blacklist malicious peers.

Attack Surface: Insecure Key Storage (Default Keystore)

  • Description: Relying on the default go-ethereum keystore for storing private keys without implementing robust security measures.
  • How go-ethereum contributes to attack surface: go-ethereum provides a default keystore for private key management, which applications might use directly if not configured otherwise.
  • Example: An application uses the default go-ethereum keystore with weak password encryption. An attacker gains file system access and brute-forces the keystore password to extract private keys.
  • Impact: Compromise of private keys, unauthorized access to associated accounts and funds, financial loss.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong Password Practices: Enforce strong password policies for keystore encryption if using the default keystore.
    • Alternative Key Management Solutions: Use more secure key management solutions like hardware wallets or dedicated key management systems.
    • Secure File System Permissions: Ensure proper file system permissions on the keystore directory to restrict access.

Attack Surface: API Method Vulnerabilities (Injection, Logic Flaws)

  • Description: Vulnerabilities within specific go-ethereum RPC/API methods, such as injection flaws or logic errors, that can be exploited through crafted API requests.
  • How go-ethereum contributes to attack surface: go-ethereum's codebase implements various RPC/API methods. Bugs or oversights in their implementation can introduce vulnerabilities.
  • Example: A vulnerability in a custom RPC method (or even built-in method) allows command injection through unsanitized input parameters in an API request.
  • Impact: Information disclosure, denial of service, potentially remote code execution, depending on the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: High (potential for critical impact depending on vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct security audits and code reviews of go-ethereum integrations and custom RPC methods.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all input parameters to RPC/API methods.
    • Fuzzing and Security Testing: Employ fuzzing and security testing to identify vulnerabilities in API method implementations.