Attack Surface: Insecure define
Replacements
- Description: Substitution of global identifiers with constant expressions, potentially exposing sensitive data.
- esbuild Contribution:
esbuild
'sdefine
feature provides the mechanism for this substitution. This is a direct feature ofesbuild
. - Example:
This embeds the API key directly into the bundled JavaScript.
// esbuild config { define: { 'process.env.SECRET_API_KEY': '"YOUR_ACTUAL_API_KEY"' // INSECURE! } }
- Impact: Information Disclosure (API keys, secrets, internal feature flags), Potential Privilege Escalation.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Never hardcode secrets in
define
. - Use environment variables loaded securely at runtime.
define
should only reference the variable name, not its value:define: { 'process.env.API_KEY': 'process.env.API_KEY' }
. - Employ a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault).
- Implement code reviews and automated static analysis to detect hardcoded secrets.
- Never hardcode secrets in
Attack Surface: Malicious or Vulnerable Plugins
- Description: Third-party
esbuild
plugins that contain malicious code or known vulnerabilities. - esbuild Contribution:
esbuild
's plugin API allows for extensibility, but also introduces a vector for untrusted code. This is a direct feature ofesbuild
. - Example: A plugin claiming to optimize images but actually exfiltrates build artifacts or injects a backdoor. Or, a legitimate plugin with a known vulnerability in one of its dependencies.
- Impact: Code Injection, Supply Chain Attack, Data Exfiltration, Denial of Service.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use only plugins from trusted, reputable sources.
- Thoroughly vet plugin source code before use.
- Pin plugin versions to specific, audited releases.
- Regularly update plugins and their dependencies to patch vulnerabilities.
- Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to identify vulnerable dependencies.
- Implement a strict plugin approval process.
Attack Surface: Misconfigured external
Dependencies
- Description: Incorrectly marking modules as
external
, leading to runtime loading from potentially untrusted sources. - esbuild Contribution: The
external
option inesbuild
's configuration controls which modules are bundled. This is a direct feature ofesbuild
. - Example:
If
// esbuild config { external: ['my-internal-security-module'] // Incorrect! }
my-internal-security-module
is not a truly external dependency (e.g., a Node.js built-in), it might be loaded from an attacker-controlled location at runtime. - Impact: Code Injection, Supply Chain Attack.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Carefully review and validate the
external
configuration. Ensure only truly external dependencies are listed. - Use a lockfile (
package-lock.json
,yarn.lock
) for consistent dependency resolution. - If loading external modules at runtime, use a CDN with Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible.
- Carefully review and validate the
Attack Surface: Loader Misconfiguration or Vulnerable Custom Loaders
- Description: Incorrectly configured loaders or the use of custom loaders with security flaws.
- esbuild Contribution: esbuild's loader system determines how different file types are processed. This is a direct feature of esbuild.
- Example: A custom loader designed to handle a specific file format but contains a vulnerability that allows an attacker to inject arbitrary code when processing a maliciously crafted file. Or, misconfiguring the
text
loader to execute arbitrary code embedded within a text file. - Impact: Code Injection, Data Exfiltration, Denial of Service.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Thoroughly review and validate loader configurations.
- Avoid using custom loaders from untrusted sources.
- If using custom loaders, rigorously audit their code for security vulnerabilities.
- Ensure loaders are correctly configured for the intended file types.
- Regularly update loaders to their latest versions.