Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
73 lines (60 loc) · 7.24 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

73 lines (60 loc) · 7.24 KB

Threat Model Analysis for evanw/esbuild

Threat: Malicious Plugin Execution

  • Threat: Malicious Plugin Execution

    • Description: An attacker publishes a malicious esbuild plugin to a public registry (e.g., npm) or compromises a legitimate plugin. When a developer installs and uses this plugin, the attacker's code executes within the esbuild build process. The attacker's code could inject malicious JavaScript or CSS into the bundled output, steal environment variables, modify build settings, or exfiltrate source code during the build.
    • Impact:
      • Compromise of the application built with esbuild (e.g., XSS, data theft, defacement).
      • Exposure of sensitive information (API keys, credentials) from the build environment.
      • Modification of the build process, leading to further vulnerabilities.
      • Potential lateral movement within the build infrastructure if the build process has elevated privileges.
    • Affected Component: esbuild plugin API (onResolve, onLoad, onStart, onEnd hooks), plugin loading mechanism. This is directly within esbuild's control.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Plugin Vetting: Thoroughly review the source code (if available) of all plugins before installation. Check the author's reputation, download statistics, and any reported security issues.
      • Dependency Pinning: Use package-lock.json or yarn.lock to lock down plugin versions to known-good releases.
      • Private Registry/Proxy: Use a private npm registry or proxy to control the source and versions of plugins.
      • Regular Audits: Periodically audit all dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
      • SCA Tools: Employ Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to automatically identify vulnerable dependencies.
      • Least Privilege: Run the build process (and therefore esbuild and its plugins) with the least necessary privileges.
      • Sandboxing (Advanced): Explore sandboxing techniques to isolate plugin execution (e.g., using WebAssembly or other sandboxing technologies). This is a more complex but potentially very effective mitigation.

Threat: Compromised Upstream Dependency

  • Threat: Compromised Upstream Dependency

    • Description: A legitimate dependency of esbuild itself, or a dependency of an esbuild plugin, is compromised at the source. This is a supply chain attack. The attacker modifies the dependency to include malicious code, which is then pulled in during the esbuild build process. This is distinct from a general build environment compromise because the vulnerability is within a package that esbuild directly uses or that a plugin directly uses.
    • Impact: Similar to "Malicious Plugin Execution," but the attack vector is through a transitive dependency. This can be harder to detect. The malicious code executes as part of esbuild's or its plugin's operation.
    • Affected Component: esbuild's dependency resolution mechanism, any part of esbuild or its plugins that relies on the compromised dependency. This is a direct consequence of how esbuild and its plugins are built and packaged.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Same mitigations as "Malicious Plugin Execution."
      • Dependency Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases for reports related to esbuild and all of its transitive dependencies.
      • Dependency Freezing (Advanced): Consider using techniques like npm shrinkwrap (though it has limitations) or other methods to create a completely locked-down dependency tree. This is a trade-off between security and maintainability.

Threat: esbuild Configuration Tampering

  • Threat: esbuild Configuration Tampering

    • Description: An attacker gains access to the build environment and modifies the esbuild configuration (e.g., esbuild.config.js, command-line flags). The attacker could disable source maps, disable minification, change output paths to include malicious files, or inject arbitrary code via configuration options (e.g., using the define option to inject malicious JavaScript) directly into the build process controlled by esbuild.
    • Impact:
      • Introduction of vulnerabilities into the built application.
      • Exposure of source code (if source maps are enabled and deployed).
      • Reduced performance (if minification is disabled).
      • Potential for code execution within the context of the esbuild process.
    • Affected Component: esbuild configuration file parsing, command-line argument parsing, build process execution. These are all core esbuild components.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Configuration Storage: Store esbuild configuration files in a secure, version-controlled repository (e.g., Git).
      • Access Control: Implement strict access controls on the build environment and configuration files.
      • Configuration Auditing: Regularly audit build configurations for unauthorized changes.
      • Configuration Management: Use a configuration management system (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet) to enforce desired configurations and detect drift.
      • Code Signing: Sign build artifacts to ensure their integrity and detect tampering. This helps detect if the output of esbuild has been altered after the build.

Threat: Tampering with esbuild Binary

  • Threat: Tampering with esbuild Binary

    • Description: An attacker replaces the legitimate esbuild binary with a modified version that introduces malicious behavior. This could happen through a compromised download, a supply chain attack on the package manager, or direct access to the build environment. The key is that the esbuild tool itself is compromised.
    • Impact:
      • Complete compromise of the build process.
      • Injection of arbitrary malicious code into built applications.
      • Exfiltration of sensitive data.
    • Affected Component: The esbuild executable itself.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Trusted Sources: Install esbuild only from trusted sources (e.g., the official npm registry).
      • Checksum Verification: If available, verify the integrity of the downloaded esbuild binary using checksums (e.g., SHA-256 sums) provided by the esbuild developers.
      • Package Manager Integrity Checks: Use a package manager that performs integrity checks (e.g., npm with package-lock.json or yarn with yarn.lock). These files contain hashes of the downloaded packages.
      • Binary Signing (Ideal, but not common for esbuild): Ideally, esbuild would be digitally signed, allowing verification of its authenticity. However, this is not a standard practice for Node.js packages.
      • File Integrity Monitoring (FIM): Use a File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) system to detect unauthorized changes to the esbuild binary.