Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
81 lines (62 loc) · 12.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

81 lines (62 loc) · 12.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for fyne-io/fyne

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Fyne and Go Dependency Updates

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Track Fyne and Go Dependencies: Utilize Go Modules (go.mod and go.sum) to explicitly manage and track the versions of Fyne and all Go dependencies used in your project. This ensures reproducible builds and facilitates easier updates.
    • Step 2: Regularly Check for Fyne Updates: Monitor Fyne release notes and changelogs (available on the Fyne GitHub repository) for new versions and security patches.
    • Step 3: Update Fyne and Go Dependencies: Use go get -u fyne.io/fyne/v2@latest (adjust version as needed) and go get -u all to update Fyne and other Go dependencies to their latest stable versions.
    • Step 4: Test Fyne UI and Functionality: After updating, thoroughly test your Fyne application, paying close attention to UI elements, layout, and core functionalities to ensure compatibility and identify any regressions introduced by the updates.
    • Step 5: Integrate Dependency Scanning (Optional): Consider integrating dependency vulnerability scanning tools that can specifically identify known vulnerabilities in Fyne and its Go dependencies.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Known Vulnerabilities in Fyne Library (High Severity): Outdated Fyne versions may contain known security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers. Severity is high as it can directly compromise the application's UI and potentially underlying system access depending on the vulnerability.
    • Vulnerabilities in Go Dependencies Used by Fyne (Medium to High Severity): Fyne relies on various Go libraries. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can indirectly affect Fyne applications. Severity depends on the nature of the vulnerability and its potential impact within the Fyne context.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Fyne or Go Dependencies (Medium Severity): Although less direct, compromised Fyne or Go dependencies could introduce malicious code into your application during the build process. Severity depends on the nature and impact of the malicious code.

  • Impact:

    • Known Vulnerabilities in Fyne Library: High Reduction: Regularly updating Fyne directly patches known vulnerabilities within the UI toolkit itself, significantly reducing the risk of exploitation.
    • Vulnerabilities in Go Dependencies Used by Fyne: Medium to High Reduction: Updating Go dependencies indirectly used by Fyne addresses vulnerabilities in the underlying libraries, improving the overall security posture of the Fyne application.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Fyne or Go Dependencies: Medium Reduction: While updates don't prevent supply chain attacks, staying up-to-date can sometimes include fixes for newly discovered compromised dependencies or provide earlier access to security patches.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Yes, developers are instructed to update dependencies manually before major releases. Dependency versions are tracked in go.mod and go.sum.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated dependency vulnerability scanning specifically for Fyne and its Go dependencies is not implemented. No regular, scheduled Fyne update process is in place beyond manual checks before releases.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization in Fyne UI Elements

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify User Input Elements in Fyne UI: Locate all Fyne UI elements that accept user input, such as widget.Entry, widget.PasswordEntry, widget.Slider, widget.Select, and any custom widgets that handle user input.
    • Step 2: Implement Validation for Fyne Input Elements: Utilize Fyne's built-in validation features where available (e.g., widget.Entry.Validator). For more complex validation logic specific to Fyne UI interactions, implement custom validation functions that are triggered by user input events (e.g., OnChanged, OnSubmitted).
    • Step 3: Sanitize Data Displayed in Fyne UI Elements: When displaying user-provided data or data from external sources within Fyne UI elements like widget.Label, widget.TextGrid, or widget.RichText, sanitize the data to prevent potential injection attacks. Be particularly cautious with displaying content that could be interpreted as HTML or Markdown if using Fyne's rich text features. Escape special characters or use appropriate formatting functions provided by Fyne to render text safely.
    • Step 4: Provide Clear User Feedback in Fyne UI: Display validation errors directly within the Fyne UI, near the input element where the error occurred. Use Fyne UI elements like widget.Label or visual cues (e.g., changing the appearance of the input element) to clearly communicate validation failures to the user.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Fyne UI Display (Medium to High Severity): If user input or external data is displayed unsafely in Fyne UI elements, especially if using rich text features, it could potentially lead to XSS vulnerabilities if the Fyne application is rendered in a web context or interacts with web components. Severity depends on the rendering context and potential impact.
    • Injection Attacks via Fyne UI Input (Low to Medium Severity): While less direct in typical Fyne desktop applications, improper input handling through Fyne UI elements could lead to injection vulnerabilities if the application interacts with backend systems or databases based on user input. Severity depends on the application's backend interactions and how Fyne UI input is processed.
    • UI Redressing/Clickjacking (Low Severity): Although less common in desktop applications, if Fyne UI elements are not properly structured or handled, there's a theoretical risk of UI redressing attacks where malicious UI elements are overlaid on top of legitimate Fyne UI, potentially tricking users into unintended actions. Severity is generally low for typical Fyne desktop applications.
    • Data Integrity Issues due to Malformed Input via Fyne UI (Low to Medium Severity): Lack of validation in Fyne UI input fields can lead to incorrect or inconsistent data being processed by the application, potentially causing functional errors or data corruption within the Fyne application's logic. Severity depends on the criticality of the data and application functionality.

  • Impact:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Fyne UI Display: Medium Reduction: Sanitization of displayed data in Fyne UI elements reduces the risk of XSS by preventing malicious scripts from being interpreted as code within the UI rendering context.
    • Injection Attacks via Fyne UI Input: Medium Reduction: Input validation in Fyne UI elements reduces the likelihood of successful injection attacks by ensuring that input conforms to expected formats and preventing malicious payloads from being passed to backend systems.
    • UI Redressing/Clickjacking: Low Reduction: Proper Fyne UI design and structure can mitigate some basic UI redressing risks, but this is less of a primary concern for typical desktop Fyne applications.
    • Data Integrity Issues due to Malformed Input via Fyne UI: High Reduction: Validation in Fyne UI ensures data quality and consistency right at the user interface level, minimizing the risk of data integrity problems arising from user input.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially implemented. Basic validation is used for some Fyne input fields (e.g., email format validation in registration forms using custom validation logic). Sanitization of output data displayed in Fyne UI elements is not consistently applied, especially in areas displaying user-provided or external data.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to implement comprehensive input validation for all relevant Fyne UI input fields across the application. Systematic sanitization of output data displayed in Fyne UI elements is missing, particularly in areas where user-provided content or external data is displayed using Fyne UI elements like widget.Label or widget.RichText.

Mitigation Strategy: Platform-Specific Security Considerations for Fyne Applications

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify Target Platforms: Determine the target operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux, etc.) where your Fyne application will be deployed.
    • Step 2: Research Platform-Specific Security Features and Vulnerabilities: For each target platform, research platform-specific security features (e.g., Windows User Account Control, macOS Gatekeeper, Linux AppArmor/SELinux) and known platform-specific vulnerabilities that could affect Fyne applications.
    • Step 3: Adapt Fyne Application for Platform Security: Adjust your Fyne application's behavior and configuration to align with platform-specific security best practices. This might involve:
      • Requesting appropriate permissions at runtime based on the platform.
      • Utilizing platform-specific secure storage mechanisms if available (though Fyne itself doesn't directly provide platform-specific secure storage APIs, you might need to use Go libraries that interact with platform APIs).
      • Handling platform-specific file system access restrictions.
      • Being aware of platform-specific UI security considerations (though Fyne aims to abstract UI differences, underlying platform UI behaviors can still have security implications).
    • Step 4: Test Fyne Application on Each Target Platform: Thoroughly test your Fyne application on each target platform to identify and address platform-specific security issues. Pay attention to permission requests, file system interactions, and UI behavior differences across platforms.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Platform-Specific Privilege Escalation (Medium to High Severity): If a Fyne application is not designed with platform security in mind, vulnerabilities in the application or Fyne itself could potentially be exploited to escalate privileges on a specific operating system. Severity depends on the vulnerability and the platform's security model.
    • Platform-Specific Security Feature Bypass (Medium Severity): Poorly designed Fyne applications might inadvertently bypass platform-specific security features (e.g., by requesting excessive permissions or not adhering to platform security guidelines), increasing the attack surface. Severity depends on the bypassed security feature and its importance.
    • Platform-Specific Vulnerabilities Affecting Fyne Rendering or Functionality (Medium Severity): Underlying platform vulnerabilities in graphics drivers, windowing systems, or other platform components could potentially affect Fyne applications, leading to crashes, unexpected behavior, or even security exploits. Severity depends on the nature of the platform vulnerability and its impact on Fyne.

  • Impact:

    • Platform-Specific Privilege Escalation: Medium Reduction: Adapting the Fyne application to platform security best practices and minimizing required permissions reduces the risk of privilege escalation vulnerabilities.
    • Platform-Specific Security Feature Bypass: Medium Reduction: Adhering to platform security guidelines and properly utilizing platform security features helps prevent accidental bypasses and maintains the intended security posture of the operating system.
    • Platform-Specific Vulnerabilities Affecting Fyne Rendering or Functionality: Medium Reduction: While you cannot directly patch platform vulnerabilities, awareness of platform-specific issues and testing on each platform allows you to identify and potentially mitigate application-level impacts or workarounds for known platform issues affecting Fyne.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially implemented. Developers are generally aware of platform differences during development and testing, but platform-specific security considerations are not systematically addressed or documented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to formalize platform-specific security research and testing as part of the development process. Document platform-specific security considerations and best practices for Fyne application development. Investigate and potentially utilize platform-specific secure storage mechanisms or permission handling within the Fyne application where appropriate.