Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
100 lines (83 loc) · 7.92 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

100 lines (83 loc) · 7.92 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for gin-gonic/gin

Attack Surface: Path Parameter Injection

  • Description: Manipulation of path parameters in URLs to bypass security checks or access unauthorized resources.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin's routing mechanism uses path parameters (e.g., /users/:id) and provides c.Param() to access them directly without built-in sanitization.
    • Example: A route /items/:item_id used in a database query SELECT * FROM items WHERE id = :item_id. An attacker injects SQL via /items/1 OR 1=1 --.
    • Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized access, data manipulation, server-side execution.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Input Validation: Strictly validate and sanitize path parameters before use.
      • Prepared Statements/Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries for database interactions.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant minimal access based on validated parameters.

Attack Surface: Query Parameter Injection

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities by injecting malicious code or data through query parameters.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin provides c.Query() and c.DefaultQuery() for accessing query parameters without automatic sanitization.
    • Example: Search functionality reflecting c.Query("q") into HTML. Attacker injects JavaScript via /search?q=<script>alert('XSS')</script>.
    • Impact: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), account compromise, session hijacking.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Output Encoding: Properly encode output when reflecting query parameters in HTML (HTML escaping).
      • Input Validation: Validate and sanitize query parameters before processing.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP to mitigate XSS impact.

Attack Surface: Request Body Parsing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Issues from parsing request bodies (JSON, XML, etc.), leading to unintended data handling or denial of service.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin's c.Bind() family automatically binds request bodies to Go structs, which can be vulnerable if not handled carefully.
    • Example: Sending a large JSON payload to an endpoint using c.BindJSON() without request size limits, causing DoS. Sending unexpected JSON fields leading to unintended data binding.
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), data corruption, unintended data modification.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Request Size Limits: Implement limits on request body sizes.
      • Input Validation: Validate bound data after c.Bind() against expected schema.
      • Schema Validation: Use schema validation libraries before binding.
      • Precise Struct Definition: Define Go structs for binding accurately.

Attack Surface: Incorrect Route Definition & Overly Broad Matching

  • Description: Poorly defined routes in Gin leading to unintended access to resources.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin's flexible routing, especially with wildcards (*filepath), can be misused if routes are not precisely defined.
    • Example: Route /files/*filepath to serve files from /static/files/. Misconfiguration allows access outside /static/files/ via /files/../../sensitive_config.yaml.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to resources, information disclosure.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Specific Route Definitions: Define routes as specifically as possible, avoid broad wildcards.
      • Input Validation in Handlers: Strictly validate path parameters in wildcard route handlers to prevent directory traversal.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Restrict access based on intended functionality.

Attack Surface: Insecure or Vulnerable Middleware

  • Description: Using vulnerable or insecurely configured middleware in Gin applications.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin's middleware mechanism is core. Custom or third-party middleware can introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Example: Using outdated authentication middleware with known bypasses. Custom logging middleware logging sensitive data in plain text.
    • Impact: Authentication bypass, authorization bypass, information disclosure.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Middleware Vetting: Carefully vet and audit all middleware, especially third-party.
      • Keep Middleware Updated: Regularly update middleware to patch vulnerabilities.
      • Secure Middleware Configuration: Configure middleware securely, following best practices.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Use only necessary middleware with minimal permissions.

Attack Surface: Middleware Ordering Issues

  • Description: Incorrect order of middleware application leading to security bypasses.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin's Use() function defines middleware order. Incorrect order can create vulnerabilities.
    • Example: Logging middleware applied before authentication. Sensitive info logged for unauthenticated requests. Authorization middleware before authentication.
    • Impact: Authentication bypass, authorization bypass, information disclosure.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Careful Middleware Ordering: Order middleware logically, security-critical middleware first.
      • Testing Middleware Chains: Thoroughly test middleware chains for intended function.
      • Documentation: Document intended middleware order and reasoning.

Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Unsafe Output

  • Description: Reflecting user data in HTML without encoding, leading to XSS.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin provides response rendering methods, but output encoding is developer responsibility. No automatic XSS prevention in all cases.
    • Example: Displaying user.Name from database using c.String("Hello, " + user.Name). Malicious user.Name executes JavaScript.
    • Impact: Account compromise, session hijacking, website defacement.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Output Encoding: Always encode output when reflecting untrusted data in HTML (HTML escaping).
      • Templating Engines with Auto-Escaping: Use templating engines with automatic escaping.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP to mitigate XSS.

Attack Surface: Static File Serving Misconfiguration

  • Description: Misconfiguring static file serving in Gin, leading to directory traversal or unauthorized file access.
    • Gin Contribution: Gin's r.Static() and r.StaticFS() for static files can be misconfigured.
    • Example: r.StaticFS("/static", http.Dir("./")) allows access to entire application directory, including sensitive files.
    • Impact: Information disclosure, access to sensitive files.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Restrict Static File Paths: Define static file paths precisely, limiting to intended directories.
      • Use http.Dir Correctly: Use http.Dir to restrict access and prevent traversal.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Only serve necessary static files, avoid serving sensitive files statically.