Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
103 lines (91 loc) · 12.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

103 lines (91 loc) · 12.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for gin-gonic/gin

Objective: Compromise Application Using Gin-Gonic Framework

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Gin-Gonic Application **[CRITICAL NODE - Root Goal]**
├───[1.2] Exploit Gin's Default Behavior/Configurations **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Default Config Exploitation]**
│   └───[1.2.1] Information Disclosure via Default Error Pages **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Info Disclosure]**
│       └───[1.2.1.1] Trigger Application Errors to Observe Default Error Responses
│       └───[1.2.1.2] Analyze Error Pages for Stack Traces, Internal Paths, Configuration Details
├───[1.3] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Gin's Middleware Ecosystem **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Middleware Exploitation]**
│   ├───[1.3.1] Vulnerabilities in Popular/Common Gin Middleware **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   └───[1.3.1.3] Exploit Identified Middleware Vulnerabilities **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   └───[1.3.2] Misconfiguration of Middleware Leading to Vulnerabilities **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│       └───[1.3.2.2] Bypass or Exploit Misconfigured Middleware (e.g., Authentication Bypass) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Auth Bypass]**
├───[2.0] Exploit Misuse of Gin Features by Developers **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Developer Misuse]**
│   ├───[2.1] Insecure Handling of Request Data (Body, Query, Headers) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Input Handling]**
│   │   └───[2.1.1] Improper Input Validation and Sanitization **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Input Validation]**
│   │       └───[2.1.1.2] Test Input Fields with Malicious Payloads (Injection Attacks - XSS, Command Injection, etc.) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Injection Attacks]**
│   ├───[2.2] Insecure Session Management (If Implemented Manually or with Vulnerable Libraries) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Session Management]**
│   │   ├───[2.2.1] Weak Session Token Generation or Handling **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   │   └───[2.2.1.2] Attempt to Predict, Brute-Force, or Steal Session Tokens **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Session Hijacking]**
│   │   ├───[2.2.2] Lack of Proper Session Expiration or Invalidation **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   │   └───[2.2.2.2] Exploit Long-Lived Sessions or Inability to Invalidate Sessions **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Session Persistence]**
│   ├───[2.3] Insecure Error Handling in Application Code (Beyond Gin Defaults) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Custom Error Handling]**
│   │   └───[2.3.1] Verbose Error Messages Leaking Sensitive Information **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Info Leakage via Errors]**
│   │       └───[2.3.1.1] Trigger Application Errors to Observe Custom Error Responses
│   │       └───[2.3.1.2] Analyze Custom Error Pages for Sensitive Data (Internal Paths, Database Credentials, etc.)
│   ├───[2.4] Insecure File Handling/Serving (If Implemented with Gin) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - File Handling]**
│   │   └───[2.4.1] Path Traversal Vulnerabilities in File Serving Routes **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Path Traversal]**
│   │       └───[2.4.1.2] Attempt Path Traversal Attacks to Access Files Outside Intended Directories **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   └───[2.4.2] Inadequate File Type Validation or Sanitization **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │       └───[2.4.2.2] Exploit Insecure File Handling to Achieve Code Execution or Data Exfiltration **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - File Upload Exploitation]**
└───[3.0] Indirect Exploitation via Dependencies (Less Gin-Specific, but Relevant) **[HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Dependency Vulnerabilities]**
    └───[3.1] Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Gin or Application **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
        └───[3.1.3] Exploit Vulnerable Dependencies (e.g., vulnerable JSON parser, template engine) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**

Attack Tree Path: 1.2 Exploit Gin's Default Behavior/Configurations [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Default Config Exploitation]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Information Disclosure via Default Error Pages [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Info Disclosure]:
      • Technique: Intentionally trigger application errors (e.g., by providing invalid input, accessing non-existent resources).
      • Example: Send a request to a non-existent route or with malformed data to force an error. Observe the HTTP response body for detailed error messages, stack traces, internal paths, or configuration details exposed by Gin's default error handling.
      • Impact: Leakage of sensitive information that can aid further attacks, reveal application architecture, or expose internal vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3 Exploit Vulnerabilities in Gin's Middleware Ecosystem [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Middleware Exploitation]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploit Identified Middleware Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Technique: Research known vulnerabilities (CVEs, security advisories) in middleware libraries commonly used with Gin (e.g., authentication middleware, rate limiting middleware, CORS middleware).
      • Example: If the application uses an outdated version of a JWT authentication middleware with a known signature bypass vulnerability, craft a malicious JWT to bypass authentication.
      • Impact: Varies depending on the middleware vulnerability. Can range from information disclosure to authentication bypass, access control breaches, or even remote code execution.
    • Bypass or Exploit Misconfigured Middleware (e.g., Authentication Bypass) [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Auth Bypass]:
      • Technique: Analyze the configuration of middleware used in the application for insecure settings or logical flaws.
      • Example: If an authentication middleware is incorrectly configured to only check for authentication on certain routes but not others, access unprotected routes to bypass authentication. Or, if a CORS middleware is misconfigured to allow overly permissive origins, exploit cross-origin vulnerabilities.
      • Impact: Authentication bypass leading to unauthorized access to protected resources and functionalities.

Attack Tree Path: 2.0 Exploit Misuse of Gin Features by Developers [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Developer Misuse]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Improper Input Validation and Sanitization [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Input Validation]:
      • Injection Attacks (XSS, Command Injection, SQL Injection, etc.) [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Injection Attacks]:
        • Technique: Inject malicious payloads into input fields (query parameters, request body, headers) that are not properly validated or sanitized by the application code.
        • Examples:
          • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Inject JavaScript code into input fields that are reflected in the response without proper encoding, leading to script execution in the victim's browser.
          • Command Injection: Inject operating system commands into input fields that are passed to system commands without proper sanitization, leading to command execution on the server.
          • SQL Injection: Inject SQL code into input fields that are used in database queries without proper parameterization, leading to database manipulation or data exfiltration.
        • Impact: Ranges from client-side attacks (XSS) to server-side compromise (Command Injection, SQL Injection), potentially leading to data breaches, account takeover, or full system compromise.
    • Insecure Session Management [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Session Management]:
      • Session Hijacking [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Session Hijacking]:
        • Technique: Obtain a valid session token of another user through various methods.
        • Examples:
          • Session Token Prediction/Brute-Forcing: If session tokens are weakly generated or predictable, attempt to guess or brute-force valid tokens.
          • Session Token Stealing (e.g., XSS, Network Sniffing): Use XSS vulnerabilities to steal session tokens from cookies or local storage. Intercept network traffic to sniff session tokens transmitted over insecure connections (though HTTPS mitigates network sniffing).
        • Impact: Account takeover, unauthorized access to user data and functionalities.
      • Exploit Long-Lived Sessions or Inability to Invalidate Sessions [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Session Persistence]:
        • Technique: Exploit the lack of proper session expiration or session invalidation mechanisms.
        • Example: If sessions do not timeout or users cannot properly log out, a stolen session token can be used for an extended period, even after the legitimate user has finished their session.
        • Impact: Persistent unauthorized access, increased window of opportunity for attackers to exploit compromised sessions.
    • Verbose Error Messages Leaking Sensitive Information [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Info Leakage via Errors]:
      • Technique: Similar to exploiting default error pages, but focusing on custom error handling implemented by developers that might inadvertently expose sensitive information.
      • Example: Application code might log detailed error messages or display them to users in development mode, revealing database connection strings, internal file paths, or API keys. If these error messages are not properly handled in production, attackers can exploit them.
      • Impact: Leakage of sensitive information that can aid further attacks, reveal application architecture, or expose credentials.
    • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities in File Serving Routes [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Path Traversal]:
      • Technique: Manipulate file paths in requests to access files outside the intended directory when the application serves static files or user-uploaded files.
      • Example: If a route /files/{filename} is intended to serve files from a specific directory, craft a request like /files/../../../../etc/passwd to attempt to access the /etc/passwd file on the server.
      • Impact: Access to sensitive files, including configuration files, source code, or user data, potentially leading to information disclosure or further compromise.
    • Exploit Insecure File Handling to Achieve Code Execution or Data Exfiltration [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - File Upload Exploitation]:
      • Technique: Upload malicious files to the application if file upload functionality is present and lacks proper validation and sanitization.
      • Example: Upload a PHP script disguised as an image file if the application does not properly validate file types and allows execution of uploaded files. Or, upload a file containing malicious data that is processed by a vulnerable file parser on the server.
      • Impact: Remote code execution on the server, data exfiltration, or denial of service, depending on the type of malicious file and the application's handling of uploaded files.

Attack Tree Path: 3.0 Indirect Exploitation via Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE - Dependency Vulnerabilities]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploit Vulnerable Dependencies (e.g., vulnerable JSON parser, template engine) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Technique: Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries (dependencies) used by the Gin-Gonic application or by Gin itself.
      • Example: If the application uses an outdated version of a JSON parsing library with a known buffer overflow vulnerability, send specially crafted JSON data to trigger the vulnerability and potentially achieve remote code execution. Or, if a template engine has an XSS vulnerability, inject malicious code through templates.
      • Impact: Varies depending on the vulnerable dependency and the nature of the vulnerability. Can range from denial of service to information disclosure, XSS, or remote code execution.