Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
131 lines (106 loc) · 15.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

131 lines (106 loc) · 15.3 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of go-chi/chi based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective: The objective of this deep analysis is to thoroughly examine the go-chi/chi router's security posture, identify potential vulnerabilities, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. This includes a detailed analysis of key components like routing mechanisms, middleware handling, context usage, and interaction with external systems, focusing on how these components might be exploited or misconfigured. We aim to identify weaknesses specific to chi's design and usage, not general web application security principles.

Scope: This analysis focuses on the go-chi/chi router itself, as described in the provided documentation and inferred from its codebase (though we don't have direct access to the code, we'll use the GitHub repository's public information). We will consider:

  • Core routing logic and parameter handling.
  • Middleware implementation and chaining.
  • Context usage and data propagation.
  • Interactions with external systems (databases, external APIs, internal services) as facilitated by chi.
  • Deployment and build process security considerations related to chi.
  • Assumptions and questions raised in the design review.

We will not cover:

  • Security of external services or databases themselves (that's the responsibility of those systems' configurations).
  • Generic web application vulnerabilities (like XSS, SQLi) that are the responsibility of the application logic using chi, except where chi's design might exacerbate them.
  • Detailed code-level vulnerability analysis (without direct code access).

Methodology:

  1. Component Breakdown: We'll analyze each key component of chi (router, middleware, context, etc.) based on the C4 diagrams and element lists.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each component, we'll consider potential threats based on common attack vectors and chi's specific functionality. We'll use the STRIDE model (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) as a guide.
  3. Inference and Documentation Review: We'll infer architectural details and data flows from the provided documentation, C4 diagrams, and publicly available information about chi.
  4. Mitigation Strategies: For each identified threat, we'll propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to chi's features and recommended usage patterns.
  5. Prioritization: We'll implicitly prioritize threats based on their likelihood and potential impact.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component:

  • Chi Router (Core):

    • Function: Handles request routing, parameter extraction, and middleware dispatch.
    • Threats:
      • Routing Manipulation: If chi's routing logic has vulnerabilities, attackers might be able to bypass intended routes or access unintended handlers. This could lead to unauthorized access or information disclosure. For example, subtle bugs in how path parameters are parsed or how wildcards are handled could be exploited. Specifically, look for issues related to URL normalization (e.g., handling of ../, /./, multiple slashes) and how these might interact with routing rules.
      • Parameter Pollution: While chi doesn't automatically parse query parameters or request bodies, it provides mechanisms to access them. If the application logic using chi doesn't properly validate and sanitize these parameters, it's vulnerable to typical injection attacks (XSS, SQLi, command injection). chi's role here is to not make assumptions about the parameters and to provide a clean way for the application to access them.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Extremely complex or deeply nested routing structures could potentially lead to performance issues or even crashes if the routing algorithm has unexpected complexity in edge cases. This is less likely with chi's design, but still worth considering. Resource exhaustion attacks targeting specific routes are also a possibility.
      • HTTP Verb Tampering: Ensure that chi correctly handles and enforces HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.). An attacker might try to use an unexpected verb to bypass security checks.
    • Mitigation:
      • Fuzz Testing: Implement fuzz testing of the routing logic with a wide variety of malformed and unexpected URLs to identify potential parsing or routing errors. This is crucial for a router.
      • Strict Input Validation (in Application Logic): Emphasize (in documentation and examples) the absolute necessity of validating and sanitizing all user-supplied data, including path parameters, query parameters, and request bodies, within the application's handlers or middleware. chi should not do this automatically.
      • Rate Limiting (Middleware): Use rate-limiting middleware to mitigate DoS attacks targeting specific routes or the application as a whole.
      • Explicit Verb Handling: Ensure that routes are defined with explicit HTTP methods, and that unexpected methods are rejected with a 405 Method Not Allowed response (this should be chi's default behavior).
      • Regular Expression Review: If regular expressions are used in routing (e.g., for parameter constraints), carefully review them for potential ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerabilities. Avoid overly complex or nested regular expressions.

  • Middleware:

    • Function: Intercepts and processes HTTP requests before they reach the handlers. Crucial for security.
    • Threats:
      • Middleware Bypass: If middleware is not correctly chained or if there are errors in the middleware ordering, attackers might be able to bypass security controls (authentication, authorization, etc.).
      • Incorrect Middleware Configuration: Misconfigured middleware (e.g., overly permissive CORS settings, weak authentication schemes) can create significant vulnerabilities.
      • Middleware-Specific Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in third-party middleware can expose the application to attacks. This is a major concern, as chi relies heavily on middleware for security.
      • Timing Attacks: Middleware that performs security-sensitive operations (e.g., password comparisons) might be vulnerable to timing attacks if not implemented carefully.
      • Data Leakage in Middleware: Middleware that logs request data or modifies the response could inadvertently expose sensitive information.
    • Mitigation:
      • Middleware Ordering Enforcement: Provide clear guidance and potentially helper functions to ensure that middleware is applied in the correct order (e.g., authentication before authorization). Consider a mechanism to enforce a specific order if critical security middleware is present.
      • Secure Middleware Defaults: If chi provides any built-in middleware, ensure that it uses secure defaults (e.g., restrictive CORS settings).
      • Third-Party Middleware Auditing: Encourage users to carefully audit any third-party middleware they use, and to keep it up-to-date. Consider providing a list of "recommended" or "vetted" middleware for common security tasks.
      • Constant-Time Operations: Use constant-time comparison functions for security-sensitive operations in middleware (e.g., comparing authentication tokens).
      • Sensitive Data Handling: Provide clear guidelines on how to handle sensitive data in middleware (e.g., avoiding logging of passwords or API keys). Consider providing helper functions for securely logging or redacting sensitive information.
      • Fail-Closed Behavior: Ensure that if a security-critical middleware fails (e.g., authentication fails), the request is rejected rather than proceeding.

  • Context:

    • Function: Used to pass data (including security-related information) through the request lifecycle.
    • Threats:
      • Context Key Collisions: If different middleware components use the same context keys, they might overwrite each other's data, leading to unexpected behavior or security issues.
      • Sensitive Data in Context: Storing sensitive data directly in the context without proper encryption or access controls could expose it to other middleware or handlers.
      • Context Mutation Issues: If context is mutated in unexpected place, it can lead to race conditions.
    • Mitigation:
      • Unique Context Keys: Strongly recommend (and document) the use of unique, unexported context keys to prevent collisions. Provide helper functions or guidelines for creating these keys.
      • Context Data Encryption: If sensitive data must be stored in the context, provide mechanisms or recommendations for encrypting it.
      • Immutable Context (if possible): Consider whether the context can be made immutable (or at least provide an immutable view) to prevent accidental modification by middleware. This might be difficult in Go, but it's worth exploring.
      • Clear Documentation: Clearly document how the context is used and how to safely add and retrieve data from it.

  • Interactions with External Systems (Database, External APIs, Internal Services):

    • Function: chi facilitates these interactions by routing requests to handlers that perform these operations.
    • Threats: chi itself doesn't directly interact with these systems, but the handlers it routes to do. Therefore, the threats are primarily related to how the application logic handles these interactions:
      • Injection Attacks (SQLi, etc.): If handlers don't properly sanitize data before using it in database queries or API calls, they're vulnerable to injection attacks.
      • Authentication and Authorization Issues: Handlers need to properly authenticate and authorize requests to external services.
      • Data Leakage: Handlers might inadvertently expose sensitive data from external services in responses.
    • Mitigation:
      • Input Validation (again): Reinforce the importance of input validation in handlers before interacting with external systems.
      • Secure API Clients: Encourage the use of secure API clients and libraries for interacting with external services.
      • Output Encoding: Ensure that data received from external services is properly encoded before being included in responses to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
      • Least Privilege: Handlers should use the principle of least privilege when accessing external resources (e.g., database users with minimal permissions).

  • Deployment and Build Process:

    • Threats:
      • Vulnerable Dependencies: Outdated or vulnerable dependencies (including chi itself) can expose the application to attacks.
      • Insecure Container Images: The base image used for the Docker container might contain vulnerabilities.
      • Compromised CI/CD Pipeline: Attackers might compromise the CI/CD pipeline to inject malicious code or steal secrets.
    • Mitigation:
      • Dependency Scanning: Use tools like dependabot or snyk to automatically scan for and update vulnerable dependencies.
      • Container Image Scanning: Use container image scanning tools (e.g., Trivy, Clair) to identify vulnerabilities in the base image and application dependencies.
      • Secure CI/CD Practices: Implement strong security controls for the CI/CD pipeline, including:
        • Least privilege access for CI/CD jobs.
        • Multi-factor authentication for access to the CI/CD system.
        • Code signing.
        • Regular security audits of the CI/CD pipeline.
      • Kubernetes Security Best Practices: Follow Kubernetes security best practices, including:
        • Using network policies to restrict traffic between pods.
        • Using pod security policies or admission controllers to enforce security constraints.
        • Regularly updating Kubernetes and its components.
        • Using RBAC to control access to Kubernetes resources.
        • Using a secure container registry.

3. Addressing Assumptions and Questions

  • Compliance Requirements: If applications using chi must adhere to specific compliance requirements (PCI DSS, HIPAA), this significantly increases the security burden. chi itself won't be directly responsible for compliance, but it needs to facilitate it. This means providing clear guidance and potentially helper functions or middleware for implementing the necessary controls (e.g., encryption, audit logging, etc.).
  • Traffic Volume and Performance: High traffic volume increases the risk of DoS attacks. Rate limiting and other performance-related security measures become more critical.
  • Existing Security Policies: The existing security policies and procedures of the development team and infrastructure will influence how chi is used and secured. It's important to integrate chi into these existing processes.
  • External Services: The types of external services used will determine the specific security risks and mitigation strategies needed. For example, interactions with payment gateways require much stricter security controls than interactions with a simple logging service.
  • Developer Expertise: The level of expertise of the developers using chi is crucial. If developers are not familiar with web security best practices, they are more likely to introduce vulnerabilities. Clear documentation, examples, and security guidelines are essential.

4. Prioritized Recommendations (Summary)

  1. Fuzz Testing: Prioritize rigorous fuzz testing of the chi router's core logic. This is the most critical chi-specific recommendation.
  2. Middleware Security: Emphasize secure middleware usage and provide clear guidance on ordering, configuration, and auditing of third-party middleware. This is where most of the application-level security will reside.
  3. Input Validation (Documentation): Heavily emphasize (in documentation and examples) the need for strict input validation within application logic. chi should not attempt to do this automatically.
  4. Context Key Management: Provide clear guidelines and helper functions for managing context keys to prevent collisions.
  5. Dependency and Container Scanning: Integrate automated dependency and container image scanning into the build process.
  6. Security Hardening Guidelines: Create a dedicated section in the documentation with specific security hardening recommendations for chi and common middleware.
  7. Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of chi and applications using it.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for go-chi/chi. By addressing these recommendations, the chi project can significantly improve its security posture and provide a more secure foundation for Go web applications. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and continuous monitoring, testing, and updates are essential.