Mitigation Strategy: Regular Permission Audits (Gitea-Specific)
-
Description:
- Schedule: Establish a recurring schedule (e.g., monthly, quarterly) for permission reviews within Gitea.
- Access Gitea Admin Panel: Log in to Gitea with an administrator account.
- Review Organizations: Navigate to the "Organizations" section and review each organization:
- Check team memberships and roles (Owner, Admin, Member, custom).
- Verify team members have appropriate access levels.
- Review repository access for each team (Read, Write, Admin).
- Review Users: Navigate to the "Users" section:
- Check for users with direct repository access (outside of teams).
- Verify individual user permissions.
- Focus on users with administrative privileges.
- Review Repository Settings: For each repository, check:
- "Collaborators" section for individual access.
- "Branches" section for branch protection rules.
- Document Findings: Record discrepancies or potential issues.
- Remediate Issues: Adjust permissions, remove access, or update team memberships.
- Automate (Optional): Use Gitea's API to automate parts of the audit (e.g., generating permission reports).
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Unauthorized Access to Private Repositories (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized access due to misconfigured Gitea permissions.
- Data Breaches (High Severity): Reduces risk of data exposure from unauthorized Gitea access.
- Insider Threats (Medium Severity): Limits damage from malicious insiders by restricting Gitea access.
- Accidental Data Exposure (Medium Severity): Prevents accidental public exposure due to incorrect Gitea visibility settings.
-
Impact:
- Unauthorized Access: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Data Breaches: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Insider Threats: Moderately reduces the risk.
- Accidental Data Exposure: Significantly reduces the risk.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example) Manual reviews quarterly; no automation; inconsistent branch protection.
-
Missing Implementation: (Example)
- Automated reporting via Gitea API.
- Consistent branch protection rules.
- Formal audit documentation.
- Integration with centralized access management (if applicable).
Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) (Gitea-Specific)
-
Description:
- Access Gitea Admin Panel: Log in to Gitea as an administrator.
- Navigate to Site Administration: Go to "Site Administration."
- Authentication Settings: Find authentication settings (e.g., "Authentication" or "Security").
- Enable 2FA: Enable 2FA (TOTP, WebAuthn).
- Require 2FA: Require 2FA for all users, or at least for those with write/admin access within Gitea.
- Communicate to Users: Inform users about the 2FA requirement and provide setup instructions.
- Monitor 2FA Adoption: Track users who have enabled 2FA; follow up with those who haven't.
- Backup Codes: Ensure users understand how to generate and securely store backup codes.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Compromised Credentials (High Severity): Prevents access even with stolen Gitea credentials.
- Account Takeover (High Severity): Makes Gitea account takeover much harder.
- Brute-Force Attacks (Medium Severity): Renders brute-force attacks against Gitea passwords ineffective.
- Phishing Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces success of phishing for Gitea credentials.
-
Impact:
- Compromised Credentials: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Account Takeover: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Brute-Force Attacks: Eliminates the risk.
- Phishing Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example) 2FA enabled, but not enforced.
-
Missing Implementation: (Example)
- Enforcement of 2FA for all/privileged Gitea users.
- Monitoring of 2FA adoption.
- User training on 2FA setup and use.
Mitigation Strategy: Stay Up-to-Date (Gitea Updates)
-
Description:
- Monitor for Updates: Regularly check Gitea's website, GitHub releases, and blog for new releases and security updates.
- Review Release Notes: Read release notes, focusing on security fixes.
- Test in Staging: Always test updates in a staging environment mirroring production before applying to production.
- Backup: Before updating, back up the Gitea data directory and database.
- Apply Update: Follow Gitea's official upgrade instructions.
- Verify Functionality: Thoroughly test Gitea after the update.
- Automate (Optional): Use tools to streamline updates, but always include testing and backups.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Addresses publicly disclosed and patched Gitea vulnerabilities.
- Remote Code Execution (RCE) (High Severity): Prevents exploitation of known Gitea RCE vulnerabilities.
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Medium Severity): Prevents exploitation of known Gitea XSS vulnerabilities.
- SQL Injection (High Severity): Prevents exploitation of known Gitea SQL injection vulnerabilities.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Addresses Gitea vulnerabilities leading to DoS.
- Zero-day Exploit (High): Reduces time window for zero-day exploit.
-
Impact:
- Known Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces the risk.
- RCE, XSS, SQL Injection, DoS: Significantly reduces the risk (depending on the specific vulnerabilities).
-
Currently Implemented: (Example) Manual updates with delays; no staging environment.
-
Missing Implementation: (Example)
- Staging environment for testing.
- Automated monitoring for new releases.
- Documented update process.
- Faster response to security updates.
Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting (Gitea-Specific)
-
Description:
- Access Configuration: Open Gitea's
app.ini
file. - Locate Rate Limiting Section: Find the section for rate limiting (e.g.,
[api]
or[rate_limiting]
). - Enable Rate Limiting: Ensure rate limiting is enabled.
- Configure Limits: Set limits for:
- API requests per time period.
- Repository cloning.
- Issue creation.
- User login attempts.
- Consider different limits for authenticated/unauthenticated users.
- Test Limits: Test to ensure they work and don't impact legitimate users.
- Monitor Usage: Monitor rate limiting logs for abuse or misconfigurations.
- Adjust as Needed: Adjust limits based on observations.
- Access Configuration: Open Gitea's
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks (Medium Severity): Prevents overwhelming Gitea with requests.
- Brute-Force Attacks (Medium Severity): Limits Gitea login attempts.
- Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevents excessive Gitea resource consumption.
- API Abuse (Low Severity): Prevents Gitea API abuse.
-
Impact:
- DoS Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Brute-Force Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Resource Exhaustion: Moderately reduces the risk.
- API Abuse: Significantly reduces the risk.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example) Basic rate limiting enabled; high limits; not reviewed recently.
-
Missing Implementation: (Example)
- Fine-grained limits for specific Gitea actions.
- Different limits for authenticated/unauthenticated users.
- Monitoring of rate limiting logs.
- Regular review and adjustment.
Mitigation Strategy: Secure app.ini
Configuration (Gitea-Specific)
-
Description:
- Locate
app.ini
: Find theapp.ini
file. - Restrict File Permissions: Set strict file permissions (e.g.,
chmod 600 app.ini
). Only the Gitea user should have access. - Review Security Settings: Examine each setting, especially:
SECRET_KEY
: Long, random string.JWT_SECRET
: Long, random string (if using JWT).- Database settings: Strong passwords; restricted access.
RUN_MODE
:prod
for production.ENABLE_ গেলেন_SIGNUP
/DISABLE_REGISTRATION
: Disable open registration if not needed.- Authentication sources: Disable unused providers.
- Mailer settings: Configure securely.
- Webhook settings: Use secret tokens and HTTPS.
- Store Outside Web Root:
app.ini
must not be in the web root. - Avoid Committing to Git: Never commit
app.ini
to Git. - Regularly Review: Periodically review
app.ini
.
- Locate
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Credential Exposure (High Severity): Protects Gitea's secrets (database, keys, tokens).
- Configuration-Based Attacks (High Severity): Prevents exploiting Gitea misconfigurations.
- Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Restricts access to the Gitea configuration.
- Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Prevents Gitea config information leaks.
-
Impact:
- Credential Exposure: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Configuration-Based Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Unauthorized Access: Significantly reduces the risk.
- Information Disclosure: Significantly reduces the risk.
-
Currently Implemented: (Example)
app.ini
outside web root; restricted permissions; some settings not recently reviewed. -
Missing Implementation: (Example)
- Regular review of all
app.ini
settings. - Use of environment variables for sensitive settings.
- Documentation of settings.
- Regular review of all
Mitigation Strategy: Webhook Security (Gitea-Specific)
-
Description:
- Access Webhook Settings: In Gitea, navigate to the repository or organization settings where webhooks are configured.
- Use HTTPS: Ensure all webhook URLs use
https://
to encrypt communication. - Set Secret Token: Generate a strong, random secret token for each webhook.
- Verify Signatures (Code Change): In the application receiving webhook requests, implement code to verify the
X-Gitea-Signature
header using the secret token. This confirms the request originated from your Gitea instance. Gitea provides documentation and examples for this. - Restrict Source IPs (If Possible): If your webhook receiver has a static IP address, configure Gitea (if possible) or your firewall to only allow webhook requests from the Gitea server's IP address.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): HTTPS prevents eavesdropping on webhook data.
- Forged Webhook Requests (High Severity): Signature verification prevents attackers from sending fake webhook requests to trigger actions in your application.
- Replay Attacks (Medium Severity): While signature verification helps, consider adding timestamp checks or nonce handling in your webhook receiver to further mitigate replay attacks.
-
Impact:
- MitM Attacks: Significantly reduces risk (with HTTPS).
- Forged Webhook Requests: Eliminates risk (with signature verification).
- Replay Attacks: Moderately reduces risk (with additional measures).
-
Currently Implemented: (Example) HTTPS is used, but secret tokens are not consistently set, and signature verification is not implemented in the receiving application.
-
Missing Implementation: (Example)
- Consistent use of secret tokens for all webhooks.
- Implementation of signature verification in the webhook receiver application.
- IP address restrictions (if feasible).