Mitigation Strategy: Enforce HTTPS for all external go-kit
endpoints.
-
Description:
- Configure
go-kit
HTTP transport: When setting up your HTTP transport within yourgo-kit
service (usinghttptransport
package), ensure you are usinghttp.ListenAndServeTLS
instead ofhttp.ListenAndServe
. - Provide TLS Certificates: Load TLS certificates and private keys using
http.ListenAndServeTLS
. These certificates should be valid for the domain or hostname where yourgo-kit
service is exposed. - Apply to
go-kit
HTTP Server: This configuration is applied directly to thenet/http
server instance thatgo-kit
uses to serve its endpoints. Ensure all externally accessiblego-kit
services are configured this way. - Consider
httptransport.ServerOptions
: Utilizehttptransport.ServerOptions
in yourgo-kit
HTTP server setup to further customize TLS settings if needed, although basic TLS configuration is handled byhttp.ListenAndServeTLS
.
- Configure
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): Interception of communication between clients and
go-kit
services. - Data Eavesdropping (High Severity): Unauthorized access to data transmitted to and from
go-kit
services.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): Interception of communication between clients and
-
Impact:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: High risk reduction for external communication with
go-kit
services. - Data Eavesdropping: High risk reduction for data transmitted to and from external clients of
go-kit
services.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: High risk reduction for external communication with
-
Currently Implemented:
- HTTPS is implemented for the public API gateway, which acts as a reverse proxy in front of
go-kit
services. TLS termination happens at the gateway level (Nginx).
- HTTPS is implemented for the public API gateway, which acts as a reverse proxy in front of
-
Missing Implementation:
- Direct TLS termination within individual
go-kit
services is not implemented. Internal service-to-service communication via HTTP within the cluster is not encrypted at thego-kit
transport level.
- Direct TLS termination within individual
Mitigation Strategy: Secure gRPC connections with TLS in go-kit
services.
-
Description:
- Configure
go-kit
gRPC transport: When setting up your gRPC transport within yourgo-kit
service (usinggrpctransport
package), usegrpc.NewServer
withgrpc.Creds
option. - Load TLS Credentials for gRPC: Use
credentials.NewServerTLSFromFile
orcredentials.NewServerTLSFromCert
to load server certificates and keys for gRPC. - Configure
grpctransport.ServerOptions
: Utilizegrpctransport.ServerOptions
to pass the configuredgrpc.ServerOptions
including the TLS credentials to thego-kit
gRPC server. - Client-side TLS Configuration: When creating gRPC clients in other
go-kit
services (usinggrpctransport.NewClient
), usegrpc.WithTransportCredentials
withcredentials.NewClientTLSFromFile
orcredentials.NewClientTLSFromCert
to configure TLS for client connections.
- Configure
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on gRPC (High Severity): Interception of gRPC communication between
go-kit
services or between clients andgo-kit
gRPC services. - Data Eavesdropping on gRPC (High Severity): Unauthorized access to data transmitted via gRPC in
go-kit
applications.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on gRPC (High Severity): Interception of gRPC communication between
-
Impact:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on gRPC: High risk reduction for gRPC communication within
go-kit
applications. - Data Eavesdropping on gRPC: High risk reduction for data transmitted via gRPC in
go-kit
applications.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on gRPC: High risk reduction for gRPC communication within
-
Currently Implemented:
- gRPC is used for internal service-to-service communication in
go-kit
applications, but TLS is not currently enabled for these connections.
- gRPC is used for internal service-to-service communication in
-
Missing Implementation:
- TLS encryption for internal gRPC communication within
go-kit
services is missing. TLS for external gRPC endpoints (if any) is also missing.
- TLS encryption for internal gRPC communication within
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Input Validation Middleware in go-kit
.
-
Description:
- Create
go-kit
Middleware Function: Develop a middleware function that conforms to thego-kit
middleware signature (taking aendpoint.Endpoint
and returning aendpoint.Endpoint
). - Implement Validation Logic in Middleware: Within the middleware function, implement input validation logic. This can involve:
- Accessing request context (e.g., HTTP request via
httptransport.RequestContext
). - Extracting request parameters or body.
- Using validation libraries (like
go-playground/validator/v10
) or custom validation code to check input data against defined rules.
- Accessing request context (e.g., HTTP request via
- Return Error on Validation Failure: If validation fails, the middleware should return an error. In
go-kit
HTTP transport, this error will be translated into an HTTP error response by the transport layer. - Chain Middleware to
go-kit
Endpoints: Apply this input validation middleware to specificgo-kit
endpoints usingendpoint.Chain
or by wrapping endpoints with the middleware during service definition.
- Create
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Injection Attacks (High Severity): SQL injection, command injection, XSS, etc., targeting
go-kit
endpoints. - Data Integrity Issues (Medium to High Severity): Processing invalid data within
go-kit
services. - Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Exploiting vulnerabilities through malformed input to overload
go-kit
services.
- Injection Attacks (High Severity): SQL injection, command injection, XSS, etc., targeting
-
Impact:
- Injection Attacks: High risk reduction for
go-kit
endpoints. - Data Integrity Issues: High risk reduction for data processed by
go-kit
services. - Denial of Service (DoS): Medium risk reduction for input-related DoS attacks on
go-kit
services.
- Injection Attacks: High risk reduction for
-
Currently Implemented:
- Basic input validation exists in some endpoint handlers, but it's not consistently implemented as reusable
go-kit
middleware.
- Basic input validation exists in some endpoint handlers, but it's not consistently implemented as reusable
-
Missing Implementation:
- A dedicated, reusable input validation middleware component for
go-kit
is missing. Consistent application of input validation across all relevantgo-kit
endpoints via middleware is not implemented.
- A dedicated, reusable input validation middleware component for
Mitigation Strategy: Apply Authorization Middleware in go-kit
.
-
Description:
- Create
go-kit
Authorization Middleware: Develop a middleware function that conforms to thego-kit
middleware signature. - Implement Authorization Logic in Middleware: Within the middleware, implement authorization logic. This typically involves:
- Retrieving authentication information from the request context (e.g., JWT from headers, session cookies).
- Verifying authentication (e.g., JWT signature verification, session validation).
- Checking user roles or permissions against required roles/permissions for the endpoint.
- Return Unauthorized Error on Failure: If authorization fails, the middleware should return an error, typically an
http.StatusUnauthorized
orhttp.StatusForbidden
error in HTTP transport. - Chain Authorization Middleware: Apply this authorization middleware to
go-kit
endpoints that require access control usingendpoint.Chain
.
- Create
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Access to sensitive
go-kit
endpoints and functionalities by unauthorized users or services. - Privilege Escalation (Medium to High Severity): Unauthorized users gaining access to functionalities they should not have, potentially leading to privilege escalation.
- Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Access to sensitive
-
Impact:
- Unauthorized Access: High risk reduction for protected
go-kit
endpoints. - Privilege Escalation: Medium to High risk reduction by enforcing access control at the
go-kit
endpoint level.
- Unauthorized Access: High risk reduction for protected
-
Currently Implemented:
- Authorization checks are implemented in some endpoint handlers, but not consistently as reusable
go-kit
middleware. Basic role-based access control is in place for some endpoints.
- Authorization checks are implemented in some endpoint handlers, but not consistently as reusable
-
Missing Implementation:
- A dedicated, reusable authorization middleware component for
go-kit
is missing. Consistent application of authorization across all protectedgo-kit
endpoints via middleware is not fully implemented.
- A dedicated, reusable authorization middleware component for
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Custom go-kit
Middleware Components.
-
Description:
- Security Review of Custom Middleware Code: Thoroughly review the code of any custom
go-kit
middleware you develop for potential security vulnerabilities. Pay attention to:- Input handling and validation within the middleware itself.
- Error handling and logging in middleware.
- Potential for resource exhaustion or performance issues in middleware.
- Dependencies used by the middleware and their security status.
- Unit and Integration Testing with Security Focus: Write unit and integration tests for custom middleware, specifically focusing on security aspects. Test for:
- Proper handling of invalid or malicious input.
- Correct authorization enforcement (if applicable).
- Resistance to common middleware vulnerabilities (e.g., timing attacks, race conditions).
- Dependency Management for Middleware: Manage dependencies of custom middleware carefully. Keep dependencies updated and scan them for known vulnerabilities.
- Security Review of Custom Middleware Code: Thoroughly review the code of any custom
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Vulnerabilities Introduced by Custom Code (Variable Severity): Security flaws in custom
go-kit
middleware can introduce vulnerabilities that affect all endpoints using that middleware. - Bypass of Security Measures (Variable Severity): Poorly written middleware might inadvertently bypass other security measures or introduce new attack vectors.
- Vulnerabilities Introduced by Custom Code (Variable Severity): Security flaws in custom
-
Impact:
- Vulnerabilities Introduced by Custom Code: Variable risk reduction, depending on the severity of vulnerabilities in custom middleware and the effectiveness of security review and testing.
- Bypass of Security Measures: Variable risk reduction, depending on the nature of the middleware and the security measures it might affect.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Custom middleware is used for logging and request tracing in
go-kit
applications. Basic code reviews are performed, but dedicated security reviews and security-focused testing of middleware are not consistently performed.
- Custom middleware is used for logging and request tracing in
-
Missing Implementation:
- Formal security review process for custom
go-kit
middleware is missing. Security-focused unit and integration testing of middleware is not consistently implemented. Dependency scanning specifically targeting middleware dependencies is not in place.
- Formal security review process for custom
Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update go-kit
and Middleware Dependencies.
-
Description:
- Track
go-kit
Releases: Monitor releases and security advisories forgo-kit/kit
on GitHub and official channels. - Track Middleware Dependency Releases: Identify dependencies used by your
go-kit
middleware components (both custom and third-party). Monitor releases and security advisories for these dependencies. - Regular Update Cycle: Establish a regular cycle for updating
go-kit
and its dependencies. This should be part of your application maintenance process. - Test After Updates: After updating
go-kit
or middleware dependencies, run thorough tests (unit, integration, and potentially regression tests) to ensure compatibility and that updates haven't introduced regressions or broken existing functionality.
- Track
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Using outdated versions of
go-kit
or its dependencies with known security vulnerabilities exposes your application to exploitation.
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Using outdated versions of
-
Impact:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction by patching known vulnerabilities in
go-kit
and its dependencies.
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction by patching known vulnerabilities in
-
Currently Implemented:
go-kit
and dependencies are generally updated periodically, but not on a strict, regularly scheduled basis. Dependency updates are often triggered by feature work or bug fixes rather than proactive security maintenance.
-
Missing Implementation:
- A formal, scheduled process for regularly updating
go-kit
and middleware dependencies is missing. Proactive monitoring of security advisories forgo-kit
and its dependencies is not consistently performed.
- A formal, scheduled process for regularly updating
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Rate Limiting Middleware for go-kit
Endpoints.
-
Description:
- Choose Rate Limiting Algorithm/Library: Select a rate limiting algorithm (e.g., token bucket, leaky bucket, fixed window) and a suitable Go library for implementing rate limiting middleware (there are several available, or you can build custom middleware).
- Create
go-kit
Rate Limiting Middleware: Develop a middleware function that conforms to thego-kit
middleware signature. - Configure Rate Limits: Define appropriate rate limits for your
go-kit
endpoints based on expected traffic patterns and resource capacity. Configure these limits within your rate limiting middleware. - Apply Rate Limiting Middleware: Apply the rate limiting middleware to
go-kit
endpoints that are susceptible to abuse or DoS attacks usingendpoint.Chain
. - Handle Rate Limit Exceeded: When a request exceeds the rate limit, the middleware should return an appropriate HTTP error response (e.g., 429 Too Many Requests) to the client.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks (Medium to High Severity): Preventing attackers from overwhelming
go-kit
services with excessive requests. - Brute-Force Attacks (Medium Severity): Slowing down brute-force attacks against authentication endpoints or other sensitive endpoints in
go-kit
services. - Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Protecting
go-kit
services from resource exhaustion due to sudden spikes in traffic or malicious request floods.
- Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks (Medium to High Severity): Preventing attackers from overwhelming
-
Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks: Medium to High risk reduction, depending on the effectiveness of the rate limiting configuration and the nature of the DoS attack.
- Brute-Force Attacks: Medium risk reduction by making brute-force attacks slower and less effective.
- Resource Exhaustion: Medium risk reduction by controlling request rates and preventing resource overload.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Rate limiting is implemented at the API gateway level (Nginx) for public API endpoints.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Rate limiting middleware is not implemented directly within
go-kit
services. Internal endpoints and specific, resource-intensive endpoints withingo-kit
services are not protected by rate limiting at the application level.
- Rate limiting middleware is not implemented directly within
Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize Logs Generated by go-kit
Components and Middleware.
-
Description:
- Identify Sensitive Data in
go-kit
Logging: Review logs generated bygo-kit
's built-in components (e.g., transport logs, middleware logs) and your custom middleware. Identify any instances where sensitive data might be logged. - Implement Sanitization in Logging Middleware: If you are using custom logging middleware in
go-kit
, implement sanitization logic within this middleware. - Sanitize Before Logging: Ensure that any sensitive data is sanitized before it is passed to the logging system. Use techniques like masking, redaction, or tokenization.
- Review
go-kit
Logging Configuration: Review yourgo-kit
logging configuration to ensure that sensitive data is not inadvertently included in default log outputs.
- Identify Sensitive Data in
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure via Logs (High to Medium Severity): Exposure of sensitive data through logs generated by
go-kit
components and middleware. - Compliance Violations (Varies Severity): Logging sensitive data might violate data privacy regulations.
- Information Disclosure via Logs (High to Medium Severity): Exposure of sensitive data through logs generated by
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure via Logs: High to Medium risk reduction for sensitive data logged by
go-kit
components and middleware. - Compliance Violations: Medium to High risk reduction in terms of logging-related compliance issues.
- Information Disclosure via Logs: High to Medium risk reduction for sensitive data logged by
-
Currently Implemented:
- Basic log sanitization is implemented in some application code, but not specifically targeting logs generated by
go-kit
framework components or middleware.
- Basic log sanitization is implemented in some application code, but not specifically targeting logs generated by
-
Missing Implementation:
- Systematic log sanitization for logs originating from
go-kit
framework itself and custom middleware is missing. A dedicated logging middleware component for sanitization is not implemented.
- Systematic log sanitization for logs originating from