Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (67 loc) · 8.8 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (67 loc) · 8.8 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for go-martini/martini

Attack Surface: 1. Vulnerable Middleware Components

  • Description: Using third-party or custom middleware with security vulnerabilities, directly impacting Martini applications due to its middleware-centric architecture.
  • Martini Contribution: Martini's design relies heavily on middleware. Its less active ecosystem may lead to using middleware with unpatched or undiscovered vulnerabilities, directly exposing applications built on Martini.
  • Example: A vulnerable authentication middleware used in a Martini application allows attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution, information disclosure, denial of service, log poisoning.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rigorous security vetting and auditing of all middleware dependencies before integration.
    • Strictly maintain up-to-date middleware dependencies, applying security patches promptly.
    • Proactive monitoring of security advisories specifically for used middleware components.
    • Prioritize the use of well-established and actively maintained middleware libraries where possible.
    • Implement dedicated security testing focusing on middleware interactions and vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: 2. Middleware Configuration Issues

  • Description: Incorrect or insecure configuration of security-related middleware within Martini applications, weakening security defenses.
  • Martini Contribution: Martini's flexible middleware configuration, while powerful, can lead to misconfigurations, especially in custom middleware. This directly impacts the security posture of Martini applications if security middleware is improperly set up.
  • Example: CORS middleware in a Martini application is misconfigured to allow overly permissive origins (*), enabling Cross-Origin Resource Sharing attacks and potential data theft.
  • Impact: Cross-site scripting (XSS), unauthorized data access, CSRF bypass, authentication bypass if authentication middleware is misconfigured.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Adhere to established security best practices when configuring security middleware (e.g., CORS, security headers, authentication, authorization).
    • Apply the principle of least privilege when defining middleware permissions and configurations.
    • Implement regular reviews and thorough testing of middleware configurations to identify and rectify misconfigurations.
    • Utilize configuration management tools to enforce consistent and secure middleware settings across different environments.

Attack Surface: 3. Middleware Execution Order Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Security bypasses arising from an incorrect or insecure order of middleware execution in Martini applications.
  • Martini Contribution: Martini's middleware execution is strictly sequential based on the order of addition. Incorrect ordering, a direct consequence of Martini's design, can lead to critical security flaws if security middleware is bypassed.
  • Example: Authentication middleware is mistakenly placed after a middleware serving sensitive data in a Martini application. Attackers can bypass authentication by directly requesting sensitive resources before authentication is enforced.
  • Impact: Authentication bypass, authorization bypass, unauthorized access to sensitive resources and functionalities.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Meticulously plan and clearly document the intended middleware execution order, prioritizing security middleware.
    • Ensure that all security-critical middleware (authentication, authorization, input validation, etc.) is positioned at the beginning of the middleware chain to be executed first.
    • Conduct comprehensive testing of various request paths to rigorously verify the correct middleware execution order and consistent security enforcement.

Attack Surface: 4. Route Exposure and Misconfiguration

  • Description: Unintentional exposure of sensitive or administrative routes in Martini applications due to routing misconfigurations or lack of access control.
  • Martini Contribution: Martini's straightforward routing, while simple to use, can lead to oversights if not carefully managed. This simplicity can contribute to accidentally exposing sensitive routes without proper protection in Martini applications.
  • Example: An administrative route like /admin/users/delete in a Martini application is defined but lacks associated authentication or authorization middleware, allowing unauthorized users to potentially delete user accounts.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to administrative functions, data manipulation, privilege escalation, potential compromise of the entire application.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust authentication and authorization middleware specifically for all sensitive and administrative routes.
    • Thoroughly review all route definitions to ensure that only intended routes are publicly accessible and sensitive routes are protected.
    • Strictly adhere to the principle of least privilege when defining routes and associated access control policies.
    • Perform regular security audits of route configurations and access control mechanisms to identify and rectify any unintended exposures.

Attack Surface: 5. Template Injection

  • Description: Vulnerability arising from injecting malicious code into templates within Martini applications when user-supplied data is not properly escaped or sanitized during rendering.
  • Martini Contribution: If Martini's built-in rendering or a custom rendering engine is used, the framework itself does not enforce template security. Developers must be vigilant in sanitizing data, and failing to do so in Martini applications can lead to critical template injection vulnerabilities.
  • Example: User input is directly embedded into a template in a Martini application without proper escaping, allowing an attacker to inject server-side template injection (SSTI) payloads that can execute arbitrary code on the server.
  • Impact: Server-side template injection (SSTI), arbitrary code execution on the server, complete server compromise, sensitive data access.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory sanitization and escaping of all user-provided data before embedding it into templates to prevent code injection.
    • Utilize templating engines that offer automatic escaping by default to minimize the risk of overlooking manual escaping.
    • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) as a defense-in-depth measure to mitigate the potential impact of XSS and template injection attacks.
    • Conduct regular security audits of templates to proactively identify and remediate potential injection vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: 6. Outdated Framework and Community Support

  • Description: Risks associated with using an outdated and less actively maintained framework like Martini, leading to potential unpatched vulnerabilities.
  • Martini Contribution: Martini is no longer actively maintained. This directly implies that security vulnerabilities discovered in Martini itself are unlikely to be patched by the maintainers, leaving applications built on it vulnerable.
  • Example: A new critical security vulnerability is discovered within the Martini framework core, but no official patch is released due to the project's inactive status, leaving all Martini applications exposed.
  • Impact: Exploitation of known and future unpatched vulnerabilities within the Martini framework, increasing risk of various attacks, slower response to security incidents.
  • Risk Severity: High (increasing to Critical over time)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thoroughly evaluate and carefully consider the significant risks associated with using an outdated and unsupported framework for new projects.
    • Implement enhanced security measures and conduct extremely rigorous and frequent security audits to compensate for the lack of framework updates.
    • Proactively monitor for any reported vulnerabilities in Martini and attempt to develop and apply manual patches if feasible and safe.
    • Strongly consider migrating existing Martini applications to a more actively maintained and secure framework to ensure long-term security and support.