Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
155 lines (135 loc) · 16.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

155 lines (135 loc) · 16.6 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the Fiber web framework based on the provided design review.

Deep Security Analysis of Fiber (github.com/gofiber/fiber)

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Fiber web framework, focusing on its key components, architecture, and data flow. The goal is to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose actionable mitigation strategies. This analysis will specifically target the core Fiber framework itself, not general web application security best practices (though those are relevant to applications built with Fiber). We aim to identify weaknesses within Fiber that could be exploited, regardless of how well a developer uses it.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the core components of the Fiber framework as described in the design review and inferred from the GitHub repository (https://github.com/gofiber/fiber). This includes:

    • Routing mechanisms
    • Context handling (Ctx)
    • Middleware support
    • Request/Response handling
    • Error handling
    • Dependency management
    • Template rendering (if applicable, needs investigation in the codebase)
    • Static file serving (if applicable, needs investigation in the codebase)
    • Any built-in security features (e.g., CSRF protection, if present)

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review: We will examine the Fiber source code on GitHub, focusing on areas identified in the scope. We'll look for common web application vulnerabilities and Go-specific security issues.
    2. Documentation Review: We will analyze the official Fiber documentation to understand the intended usage of its features and identify any security-related guidance.
    3. Dependency Analysis: We will examine Fiber's dependencies (listed in go.mod) for known vulnerabilities and potential supply chain risks.
    4. Threat Modeling: We will use the provided design document and C4 diagrams to identify potential threats and attack vectors.
    5. Inference: We will infer architectural details and data flows based on the codebase and documentation.
    6. Vulnerability Assessment: We will identify potential vulnerabilities and categorize them based on their severity and exploitability.
    7. Mitigation Recommendations: We will provide specific, actionable recommendations to address the identified vulnerabilities.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, drawing inferences from the codebase and documentation:

  • Routing (router.go, app.go):

    • Inference: Fiber uses a radix tree (or similar) for efficient routing. The router maps incoming request paths to specific handler functions.
    • Security Implications:
      • Path Traversal: If the router doesn't properly sanitize or validate request paths, it could be vulnerable to path traversal attacks (e.g., ../../etc/passwd). This is critical to check in the code. We need to see how Fiber handles URL decoding and normalization.
      • Route Hijacking: If the router allows for ambiguous or overlapping routes, an attacker might be able to hijack requests intended for a different handler. This is less likely with a radix tree, but still needs verification.
      • HTTP Method Confusion: Does Fiber strictly enforce HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.)? If not, an attacker might be able to bypass security controls by using an unexpected method.
      • Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS): If Fiber uses regular expressions in its routing logic (e.g., for parameterized routes), it could be vulnerable to ReDoS attacks. We need to examine the regular expression patterns used and their complexity.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Path Sanitization: Implement robust path sanitization and validation to prevent path traversal. Use Go's filepath.Clean and ensure it's applied before routing. Reject any paths containing suspicious characters (e.g., .., //).
      • Unambiguous Route Definitions: Enforce strict route definitions to prevent route hijacking. The router should throw an error or panic if ambiguous routes are defined.
      • Strict HTTP Method Enforcement: The router should explicitly check the HTTP method and reject requests with unexpected methods.
      • ReDoS Prevention: Carefully review and test any regular expressions used in routing. Avoid complex or nested quantifiers. Consider using a ReDoS detection tool. Use timeouts for regular expression matching.
      • Input Validation on Route Parameters: Validate any parameters extracted from the route (e.g., /users/:id) to ensure they conform to expected types and formats.

  • Context Handling (context.go):

    • Inference: The Ctx object provides access to request and response data, as well as methods for manipulating them. It's the primary interface for developers to interact with the request lifecycle.
    • Security Implications:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If the Ctx object doesn't provide safe methods for rendering data in responses (e.g., HTML escaping), it could be vulnerable to XSS attacks. We need to examine how Fiber handles output encoding.
      • HTTP Response Splitting: If the Ctx object doesn't properly sanitize header values, it could be vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks.
      • Data Leakage: If the Ctx object exposes sensitive information (e.g., internal server errors, stack traces) in responses, it could aid attackers.
      • Mass Assignment: If Ctx allows binding request data directly to structs without proper validation, it could be vulnerable to mass assignment attacks.
      • Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards: If Ctx provides methods for redirects and forwards, these must validate the target URL to prevent open redirect vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Automatic HTML Escaping: Provide a template engine integration (or built-in functionality) that automatically escapes HTML output by default. Offer clear guidance on how to handle different output contexts (e.g., HTML, JavaScript, CSS).
      • Header Sanitization: Sanitize all header values before setting them in the response. Reject or escape any characters that could be used for HTTP response splitting (e.g., CR, LF).
      • Secure Error Handling: Implement a global error handler that prevents sensitive information from being leaked in error responses. Log detailed errors internally, but return generic error messages to the client.
      • Input Validation and Whitelisting: Provide clear guidance and helper functions for validating and whitelisting input data before binding it to structs. Encourage the use of struct tags for validation.
      • Validated Redirects: Validate all redirect URLs against a whitelist of allowed destinations. Avoid using user-supplied input directly in redirect URLs.

  • Middleware Support (middleware.go, app.go):

    • Inference: Fiber's middleware architecture allows developers to add custom logic to the request handling pipeline. Middleware functions can be chained together and executed in a specific order.
    • Security Implications:
      • Middleware Ordering: The order in which middleware is executed is crucial for security. For example, authentication middleware should be executed before authorization middleware. Incorrect ordering can lead to vulnerabilities.
      • Middleware Bypass: If there are flaws in the middleware execution logic, an attacker might be able to bypass security controls implemented in middleware.
      • Error Handling in Middleware: Middleware functions need to handle errors properly and prevent them from propagating in unexpected ways.
      • Side Effects: Middleware can have side effects, and these need to be carefully considered. For example, a middleware that modifies the request body could interfere with subsequent middleware.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Clear Documentation on Middleware Ordering: Provide clear and comprehensive documentation on the recommended order for security-related middleware.
      • Robust Middleware Execution Logic: Ensure that the middleware execution logic is robust and prevents bypasses. Thoroughly test the middleware chaining mechanism.
      • Error Handling Best Practices: Provide guidance on how to handle errors within middleware functions. Encourage the use of next(err) to propagate errors to the global error handler.
      • Middleware Testing: Encourage developers to write unit and integration tests for their middleware to ensure they function correctly and don't introduce vulnerabilities.

  • Request/Response Handling (request.go, response.go):

    • Inference: These components handle the parsing of incoming requests and the formatting of outgoing responses.
    • Security Implications:
      • Request Smuggling: If Fiber doesn't properly handle HTTP request parsing, it could be vulnerable to request smuggling attacks, especially when used behind a reverse proxy.
      • Large Request Handling: How does Fiber handle very large requests (e.g., file uploads)? It needs to have limits to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Content-Type Handling: Does Fiber correctly validate the Content-Type header and handle different content types securely? Incorrect handling can lead to vulnerabilities.
      • Cookie Handling: Does Fiber provide secure defaults for cookie handling (e.g., HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite attributes)?
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Robust HTTP Parsing: Use a well-tested and secure HTTP parser. Ensure it complies with relevant RFCs and handles edge cases correctly.
      • Request Size Limits: Implement configurable limits on request body size, header size, and the number of headers.
      • Content-Type Validation: Validate the Content-Type header and reject requests with unexpected or invalid content types. Provide secure defaults for handling different content types.
      • Secure Cookie Defaults: Set secure defaults for cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite). Provide clear guidance on how to configure cookie security.

  • Error Handling (app.go, context.go):

    • Inference: Fiber needs a mechanism for handling errors that occur during request processing.
    • Security Implications: (Covered in Context Handling - Data Leakage)
    • Mitigation Strategies: (Covered in Context Handling - Secure Error Handling)

  • Dependency Management (go.mod):

    • Inference: Fiber uses Go modules to manage its dependencies.
    • Security Implications:
      • Vulnerable Dependencies: Fiber's dependencies might contain known vulnerabilities.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: An attacker might compromise one of Fiber's dependencies and inject malicious code.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regular Dependency Scanning: Use tools like go list -m -u all, dependabot, or snyk to scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Update dependencies regularly.
      • Dependency Pinning: Pin dependencies to specific versions to prevent unexpected updates that might introduce vulnerabilities or break compatibility.
      • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM): Generate an SBOM to track all dependencies and their versions.

  • Template Rendering (investigate):

    • Inference: If Fiber includes a built-in template engine or integrates with one, it needs to be analyzed for security vulnerabilities.
    • Security Implications:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): (Covered in Context Handling)
      • Template Injection: If user input is used to construct template names or paths, it could be vulnerable to template injection attacks.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Automatic HTML Escaping: (Covered in Context Handling)
      • Template Sandboxing: Consider using a template engine that provides sandboxing capabilities to limit the potential damage from template injection attacks.
      • Input Validation: Validate any user input used to construct template names or paths.

  • Static File Serving (investigate):

    • Inference: If Fiber provides functionality for serving static files (e.g., CSS, JavaScript, images), it needs to be analyzed.
    • Security Implications:
      • Path Traversal: (Covered in Routing)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Path Sanitization: (Covered in Routing)
      • Dedicated Static File Directory: Serve static files from a dedicated directory that is separate from the application code.

  • Built-in Security Features (investigate):

    • Inference: Check if Fiber has any built-in security features like CSRF protection, rate limiting, etc.
    • Security Implications:
      • CSRF Protection: If present, ensure it's robust and correctly implemented.
      • Rate Limiting: If present, ensure it's configurable and effective in preventing abuse.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Review and Test: Thoroughly review and test any built-in security features to ensure they function as expected.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary)

The following is a consolidated list of actionable mitigation strategies, tailored to Fiber:

  1. Path Traversal Prevention: Implement strict path sanitization and validation in the routing and static file serving components. Use filepath.Clean and reject any paths containing suspicious characters.
  2. ReDoS Prevention: Carefully review and test any regular expressions used in routing. Avoid complex or nested quantifiers. Use timeouts.
  3. XSS Prevention: Implement automatic HTML escaping in the template engine (if applicable) and provide clear guidance on output encoding.
  4. HTTP Response Splitting Prevention: Sanitize all header values before setting them in the response.
  5. Secure Error Handling: Implement a global error handler that prevents sensitive information leakage.
  6. Input Validation and Whitelisting: Provide clear guidance and helper functions for validating and whitelisting input data.
  7. Validated Redirects: Validate all redirect URLs against a whitelist.
  8. Middleware Ordering and Security: Provide clear documentation on the recommended order for security-related middleware.
  9. Request Smuggling Prevention: Use a well-tested and secure HTTP parser.
  10. Request Size Limits: Implement configurable limits on request body size, header size, and the number of headers.
  11. Content-Type Validation: Validate the Content-Type header and reject requests with unexpected or invalid content types.
  12. Secure Cookie Defaults: Set secure defaults for cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite).
  13. Regular Dependency Scanning: Use tools to scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Update dependencies regularly.
  14. Dependency Pinning: Pin dependencies to specific versions.
  15. Template Injection Prevention: (If applicable) Validate any user input used to construct template names or paths. Use template sandboxing if possible.
  16. Review and Test Built-in Security Features: Thoroughly review and test any built-in security features (CSRF protection, rate limiting, etc.).
  17. Supply Chain Security: Implement measures to ensure the integrity of the Fiber supply chain, such as using signed commits and verifying releases.
  18. Security Audits: Conduct regular internal and external security audits of the Fiber codebase.
  19. Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Establish a clear process for reporting and addressing security vulnerabilities.
  20. Security-Focused Documentation: Provide comprehensive documentation and examples on how to use Fiber securely.
  21. Automated Security Testing: Integrate security testing tools (SAST, DAST, IAST) into the development pipeline.

This deep analysis provides a strong foundation for improving the security posture of the Fiber web framework. By addressing the identified vulnerabilities and implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the Fiber team can significantly reduce the risk of security incidents and build a more secure and trustworthy framework. Remember to prioritize based on the severity and exploitability of each vulnerability. Continuous security testing and monitoring are essential for maintaining a strong security posture.