Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
194 lines (139 loc) · 17.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

194 lines (139 loc) · 17.3 KB

Deep Security Analysis of golang-migrate/migrate

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep security analysis is to thoroughly examine the golang-migrate/migrate project, identify potential security vulnerabilities, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on key components, including:

  • Core Library: The Go library that handles migration file parsing, version tracking, and driver interaction.
  • CLI Tool: The command-line interface for interacting with the library.
  • Database Drivers: The implementations that connect to and interact with specific database systems (e.g., Postgres, MySQL).
  • Migration Files: The SQL (or database-specific) scripts that define the database schema changes.
  • Interaction with external systems: How migrate interacts with databases and file systems.

Scope:

This analysis covers the security aspects of the golang-migrate/migrate project itself, including its code, dependencies, and interactions with external systems (databases, filesystems). It also considers the security implications of how the tool is used and deployed. It does not cover the security of the target database systems themselves, beyond the interactions initiated by migrate. It assumes the underlying database is configured securely, but focuses on how migrate could be misused to compromise that security.

Methodology:

  1. Code Review: Analyze the source code (available on GitHub) to identify potential vulnerabilities, focusing on areas like input validation, error handling, and interaction with external systems. This is a static analysis.
  2. Dependency Analysis: Examine the project's dependencies (declared in go.mod and go.sum) to identify known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
  3. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the codebase, documentation, and C4 diagrams provided, infer the architecture, components, and data flow to understand how different parts of the system interact and where vulnerabilities might exist.
  4. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the project's design, functionality, and deployment scenarios.
  5. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities and threats. These recommendations will be tailored to the migrate project and its intended use.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

This section breaks down the security implications of each key component identified in the objective.

2.1 Core Library:

  • Input Validation (Migration Files): The library reads and parses migration files. Insufficient validation of file content (beyond basic SQL syntax checking) could lead to:

    • SQL Injection: If the migration file content is concatenated directly into SQL queries without proper escaping or parameterization, an attacker could inject malicious SQL code. This is a high risk, especially if migration files are sourced from untrusted locations.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): A maliciously crafted migration file could contain extremely long or complex queries that consume excessive database resources, leading to a denial of service.
    • Logic Errors: While not strictly a security vulnerability, poorly written migrations could lead to data corruption or unintended schema changes.

  • Input Validation (Database Connection Strings): The library accepts database connection strings as input. Insufficient validation could lead to:

    • Connection String Injection: An attacker might inject parameters into the connection string to alter the connection behavior, potentially bypassing security controls or gaining unauthorized access. For example, adding parameters to disable SSL/TLS or change the authentication method.
    • Information Disclosure: Poorly handled connection string errors could leak sensitive information about the database server.

  • Version Tracking: The library tracks applied migrations. Errors in this logic could lead to:

    • Incorrect Migration Application: Migrations might be applied out of order, skipped, or applied multiple times, leading to data inconsistencies or corruption.
    • Rollback Failures: Rollbacks might not function correctly, making it difficult to recover from failed migrations.

  • Error Handling: Improper error handling throughout the library could lead to:

    • Information Leakage: Error messages might reveal sensitive information about the database schema, configuration, or internal workings of the library.
    • Unexpected Behavior: Unhandled errors could lead to crashes or unpredictable behavior, potentially leaving the database in an inconsistent state.

  • Dependency Management:

    • Supply Chain Attacks: Vulnerabilities in the dependencies could be exploited.

2.2 CLI Tool:

  • Command-Line Argument Parsing: The CLI parses command-line arguments. Insufficient validation could lead to:

    • Option Injection: An attacker might inject unexpected options or flags to alter the behavior of the CLI, potentially bypassing security checks or executing unintended commands.
    • Path Traversal: If the CLI accepts file paths as arguments (e.g., for migration files), insufficient validation could allow an attacker to access files outside the intended directory.

  • Interaction with the Library: The CLI acts as a wrapper around the core library. Any vulnerabilities in the library are also exposed through the CLI.

2.3 Database Drivers:

  • Driver-Specific Vulnerabilities: Each database driver is responsible for connecting to and interacting with a specific database system. Vulnerabilities in a driver could:

    • Bypass Security Controls: A vulnerable driver might allow an attacker to bypass database authentication or authorization mechanisms.
    • Execute Arbitrary Code: In the worst case, a driver vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the database server.
    • Data Exfiltration: An attacker could use a compromised driver to steal data from the database.

  • Secure Connection Handling: Drivers should use secure protocols (e.g., TLS/SSL) to connect to the database and protect data in transit. Failure to do so could expose sensitive data to eavesdropping.

  • Parameterization/Escaping: Drivers must use parameterized queries or proper escaping mechanisms to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities. This is a critical responsibility of the driver.

2.4 Migration Files:

  • Source Control and Access Control: Migration files should be treated as code and stored in a secure location (e.g., a version control system) with appropriate access controls. Unauthorized modification of migration files could lead to all the vulnerabilities described above (SQL injection, DoS, etc.).

  • Content Review: Migration files should be reviewed for potential security issues before being applied. This includes checking for SQL injection vulnerabilities, overly complex queries, and potential logic errors.

  • Sensitive Data: Migration files should not contain hardcoded sensitive data, such as passwords or API keys.

2.5 Interaction with External Systems:

  • Filesystem: The library interacts with the filesystem to read migration files. Path traversal vulnerabilities are a key concern here.
  • Database: The library interacts with the database to apply migrations. SQL injection, connection string injection, and driver-specific vulnerabilities are the primary concerns.
  • Network: If the database is on a remote server, the network connection between the migrate tool and the database must be secured (e.g., using TLS/SSL).

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the provided C4 diagrams and the nature of the project, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: The migrate tool follows a layered architecture, with the CLI at the top, the core library in the middle, and database drivers at the bottom. This separation of concerns is generally good for security, as it allows for modularity and easier auditing.
  • Components: The key components are the CLI, the core library, the driver interface, and the concrete driver implementations.
  • Data Flow:
    1. The user interacts with the CLI, providing commands and arguments.
    2. The CLI parses the arguments and calls the appropriate functions in the core library.
    3. The core library reads migration files from the filesystem.
    4. The core library uses the selected database driver to connect to the database.
    5. The core library sends SQL commands (from the migration files) to the database through the driver.
    6. The driver executes the commands on the database.
    7. The core library updates its internal tracking of applied migrations.

4. Specific Security Considerations (Tailored to Migrate)

Given the inferred architecture and the nature of database migrations, the following security considerations are particularly relevant:

  • SQL Injection is the Highest Risk: Because migrate executes arbitrary SQL code from migration files, SQL injection is the most significant threat. If an attacker can control the content of a migration file, they can likely gain full control of the database.
  • Connection String Security is Crucial: The connection string is the gateway to the database. Protecting it and validating it are essential.
  • Driver Security is Paramount: The security of the entire process relies heavily on the security of the chosen database driver. Using well-maintained and reputable drivers is critical.
  • Migration File Management is Key: Treating migration files as code, with proper version control, access control, and review processes, is essential to prevent unauthorized modifications.
  • Least Privilege Principle: The database user account used by migrate should have only the necessary privileges to execute migrations (e.g., CREATE TABLE, ALTER TABLE, DROP TABLE, etc.). It should not have full administrative privileges.
  • Idempotency: Migrations should ideally be idempotent, meaning they can be run multiple times without causing unintended side effects. This helps to prevent errors and inconsistencies if a migration is interrupted or partially applied.
  • Data Sensitivity: Consider the sensitivity of data. If PII is present, consider data masking or other techniques.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

The following mitigation strategies are tailored to the golang-migrate/migrate project:

5.1 Core Library Mitigations:

  • Robust Input Validation (Migration Files):

    • Parsing and Validation Library: Instead of directly concatenating migration file content into SQL queries, use a dedicated SQL parsing and validation library. This library should:
      • Parse the SQL into an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST).
      • Validate the AST against a whitelist of allowed SQL statements (e.g., CREATE TABLE, ALTER TABLE, DROP TABLE, but not DROP DATABASE or EXECUTE).
      • Identify and reject any potentially dangerous constructs (e.g., dynamic SQL, user-defined functions).
      • Provide a mechanism for parameterizing values within the SQL.
    • Regular Expression Checks (Limited): As a supplementary measure, use regular expressions to check for common SQL injection patterns. However, this should not be the primary defense, as regular expressions are easily bypassed.
    • File Size Limits: Impose reasonable limits on the size of migration files to mitigate DoS attacks.
    • File Name Validation: Validate migration file names to prevent path traversal vulnerabilities (see below).

  • Robust Input Validation (Connection Strings):

    • Connection String Parser: Use a dedicated connection string parser for the specific database being used. This parser should:
      • Validate the syntax of the connection string.
      • Extract individual parameters.
      • Check for known dangerous parameters (e.g., options that disable security features).
      • Reject invalid or suspicious connection strings.
    • Whitelist Allowed Parameters: Maintain a whitelist of allowed connection string parameters and reject any others.

  • Improved Version Tracking:

    • Atomic Operations: Use atomic database operations (e.g., transactions) to ensure that migration tracking updates are consistent and reliable.
    • Checksums/Hashes: Store checksums or hashes of applied migration files to detect any unauthorized modifications.

  • Secure Error Handling:

    • Generic Error Messages: Return generic error messages to the user that do not reveal sensitive information.
    • Detailed Logging: Log detailed error information (including stack traces) to a secure location for debugging purposes.
    • Error Handling Strategy: Define a clear error handling strategy that ensures errors are handled consistently and do not lead to unexpected behavior.

  • Dependency Management:

    • Regular Updates: Regularly update dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Use a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., go list -m -u all combined with a vulnerability database) to identify and address vulnerable dependencies.
    • Dependency Pinning: Pin dependencies to specific versions (using go.mod) to ensure reproducible builds and prevent unexpected changes.

5.2 CLI Tool Mitigations:

  • Secure Argument Parsing:

    • Argument Parser Library: Use a reputable argument parsing library that provides built-in validation and security features.
    • Whitelist Allowed Options: Define a whitelist of allowed command-line options and reject any others.
    • Input Sanitization: Sanitize all user-provided input before passing it to the core library.

  • Path Traversal Prevention:

    • Absolute Paths: Use absolute paths whenever possible.
    • Path Sanitization: If relative paths are necessary, sanitize them to remove any potentially dangerous characters or sequences (e.g., .., /, \).
    • Chroot/Jail: Consider running the CLI in a chroot or jail environment to restrict its access to the filesystem.

5.3 Database Driver Mitigations:

  • Use Reputable Drivers: Use well-maintained and reputable database drivers that are actively developed and have a good security track record.
  • Parameterized Queries: Always use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. Never concatenate user-provided data directly into SQL queries.
  • Secure Connection: Enforce the use of TLS/SSL for all database connections.
  • Regular Updates: Keep drivers updated to the latest versions to patch any security vulnerabilities.
  • Driver Auditing: If possible, conduct security audits of the drivers being used.

5.4 Migration File Mitigations:

  • Version Control: Store migration files in a version control system (e.g., Git) with appropriate access controls.
  • Code Review: Require code reviews for all migration files before they are merged into the main branch.
  • Automated Scanning: Integrate automated SQL injection scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to detect potential vulnerabilities in migration files.
  • Secrets Management: Do not store sensitive data (e.g., passwords, API keys) in migration files. Use a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, environment variables) to store and retrieve sensitive information.
  • Least Privilege: Ensure that the database user account used to apply migrations has only the minimum necessary privileges.

5.5 Deployment Mitigations (Docker Container Example):

  • Minimal Base Image: Use a minimal base image for the Docker container (e.g., Alpine Linux) to reduce the attack surface.
  • Non-Root User: Run the migrate container as a non-root user.
  • Read-Only Filesystem: Mount the container's filesystem as read-only, except for any directories that require write access (e.g., for temporary files).
  • Network Security: Use a firewall to restrict network access to the database server. Only allow connections from the migrate container.
  • Vulnerability Scanning: Regularly scan the Docker image for vulnerabilities.
  • Secrets Management: Use a secure mechanism for injecting secrets into the container (e.g., Docker secrets, environment variables).

5.6 Build Mitigations:

  • Static Analysis: Integrate static analysis tools (e.g., linters, security scanners) into the build process to identify potential vulnerabilities and code quality issues. Examples include go vet, staticcheck, gosec.
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Use SCA tools to identify and manage vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies.
  • Reproducible Builds: Ensure that builds are reproducible by pinning dependencies and using a consistent build environment.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the golang-migrate/migrate project can significantly improve its security posture and reduce the risk of data breaches, data corruption, and other security incidents. The most critical areas to focus on are preventing SQL injection, securing database connections, and managing migration files securely.