Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
396 lines (304 loc) · 36.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

396 lines (304 loc) · 36.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for hashicorp/consul

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Consul Access Control Lists (ACLs)

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Consul Access Control Lists (ACLs)

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Enable the ACL system within Consul server configuration by setting acl.enabled = true.
    • Step 2: Bootstrap the ACL system during initial Consul server setup to create a root ACL token with global-management privileges.
    • Step 3: Define Consul ACL policies that specify permissions for different resources like services, KV store paths, nodes, and prepared queries. Policies should adhere to the principle of least privilege.
    • Step 4: Create Consul ACL roles and associate them with defined policies. Roles represent sets of permissions for different users or application components.
    • Step 5: Generate Consul ACL tokens and assign appropriate roles to them. Tokens are used by applications and users to authenticate with Consul and access resources based on their assigned roles.
    • Step 6: Securely distribute and manage Consul ACL tokens. Avoid embedding tokens directly in code; use environment variables or secure secret stores.
    • Step 7: Regularly audit and review Consul ACL policies and token usage to ensure they remain effective and aligned with security needs.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Consul UI/API - Severity: High
    • Data Breaches through Unrestricted KV Store Access - Severity: High
    • Service Registration Spoofing - Severity: Medium
    • Service Discovery Manipulation - Severity: Medium
    • Privilege Escalation within Consul - Severity: High

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to Consul UI/API: High reduction - ACLs are the primary control for Consul access.
    • Data Breaches through Unrestricted KV Store Access: High reduction - ACLs provide granular control over KV store operations.
    • Service Registration Spoofing: Medium reduction - ACLs can restrict service registration permissions.
    • Service Discovery Manipulation: Medium reduction - ACLs can limit access to service discovery information.
    • Privilege Escalation within Consul: High reduction - ACLs prevent unauthorized privilege elevation within Consul itself.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - ACLs are enabled on Consul servers in staging. Bootstrap token exists. Basic policies for service registration and discovery are in place.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • ACLs are not fully enabled in production.
    • Granular ACL policies for KV store access are not comprehensively defined and applied across all applications.
    • Role-based access control using Consul ACLs is not fully implemented for all teams and applications.
    • A formal process for regular ACL policy review and auditing is lacking.
    • Secure Consul token management practices are not consistently enforced across all applications interacting with Consul.

Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS Encryption for Consul UI and API

Mitigation Strategy: Enable TLS Encryption for Consul UI and API

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Generate TLS certificates and private keys specifically for Consul servers. Use a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) or an internal CA.
    • Step 2: Configure Consul server to enable TLS for the HTTP API and UI by setting ports.http = -1 (disable plain HTTP) and configuring ports.https = 8501 (or desired HTTPS port).
    • Step 3: Specify the paths to the TLS certificate and private key files in the Consul server configuration using tls_cert_file and tls_key_file configuration options.
    • Step 4: Ensure all clients (browsers, applications) are configured to communicate with Consul over HTTPS using the configured HTTPS port.
    • Step 5: Enforce HTTPS-only access to the Consul UI and API, potentially using firewall rules to block plain HTTP traffic to Consul ports.
    • Step 6: Implement a process for regular TLS certificate rotation for Consul servers before certificate expiry.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Consul UI/API Communication - Severity: High
    • Eavesdropping on Sensitive Data Transmitted to/from Consul UI/API - Severity: High
    • Credential Theft through Unencrypted Communication with Consul - Severity: High

  • Impact:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Consul UI/API Communication: High reduction - TLS encryption prevents interception and tampering.
    • Eavesdropping on Sensitive Data Transmitted to/from Consul UI/API: High reduction - Encrypts all data in transit to and from Consul UI/API.
    • Credential Theft through Unencrypted Communication with Consul: High reduction - Protects credentials during authentication with Consul.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes - TLS is enabled for Consul UI and API in both staging and production environments. Valid certificates from a private CA are used. HTTPS is enforced.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated TLS certificate rotation for Consul UI/API is not fully implemented. Manual rotation is currently performed.
    • Monitoring for Consul certificate expiry and renewal failures is not fully integrated into the monitoring system.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Consul Agent Communication with TLS

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Consul Agent Communication with TLS

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Generate TLS certificates and private keys for Consul agents and servers. These can be the same as UI/API certificates or separate ones.
    • Step 2: Configure Consul server and agent configurations to enable TLS for agent communication. Set encrypt to a shared secret key for gossip encryption. Configure verify_incoming = true and verify_outgoing = true to enforce TLS for RPC communication between agents and servers.
    • Step 3: Specify the paths to the TLS certificate and private key files for agents and servers using tls_cert_file and tls_key_file in their respective configurations.
    • Step 4: Securely distribute the shared secret key for gossip encryption and TLS certificates to all Consul agents and servers.
    • Step 5: Verify that all Consul agents and servers are configured to use TLS for communication by checking Consul logs and configurations.
    • Step 6: Establish a process for regular rotation of the gossip encryption key and TLS certificates used for agent communication.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Agent-Server Communication - Severity: High
    • Eavesdropping on Sensitive Data Transmitted Between Agents and Servers - Severity: High
    • Gossip Protocol Eavesdropping and Manipulation - Severity: Medium
    • Unauthorized Agent Joining the Consul Cluster - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Agent-Server Communication: High reduction - TLS encryption secures agent-server communication channels.
    • Eavesdropping on Sensitive Data Transmitted Between Agents and Servers: High reduction - Encrypts all data exchanged between agents and servers.
    • Gossip Protocol Eavesdropping and Manipulation: Medium reduction - Gossip encryption protects cluster membership information and reduces manipulation risks.
    • Unauthorized Agent Joining the Consul Cluster: Medium reduction - TLS and gossip encryption make it significantly harder for unauthorized agents to join.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes - TLS is enabled for agent communication in both staging and production. Gossip encryption and RPC encryption are configured. Certificates are used.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated rotation of the gossip encryption shared secret key is not implemented.
    • Automated TLS certificate rotation for agent communication is not fully implemented.
    • Comprehensive monitoring for TLS communication failures between Consul agents and servers is not yet in place.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Strong Authentication for Consul UI and API Access

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Strong Authentication for Consul UI and API Access

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Choose a strong authentication method for Consul UI and API access. Options include Consul's built-in username/password authentication, or integration with external identity providers like LDAP, Active Directory, or OIDC.
    • Step 2: Configure Consul server to enable the chosen authentication method. For built-in auth, configure auth_methods in the server configuration. For external providers, configure the relevant integration details.
    • Step 3: Create user accounts within Consul (if using built-in auth) or manage user accounts in the integrated identity provider.
    • Step 4: Enforce strong password policies for Consul user accounts if using built-in authentication.
    • Step 5: Consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative access to the Consul UI and API for enhanced security.
    • Step 6: Regularly review and manage Consul user accounts and authentication configurations, disabling or removing accounts as needed.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Consul UI/API by Brute-Force Attacks - Severity: Medium
    • Compromised Default Consul Credentials - Severity: High (if defaults are used)
    • Weak Password Usage for Consul Access - Severity: Medium
    • Account Takeover of Consul Administrative Accounts - Severity: High

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to Consul UI/API by Brute-Force Attacks: Medium reduction - Strong passwords and MFA increase resistance to brute-force attempts.
    • Compromised Default Consul Credentials: High reduction - Eliminates risk if default credentials are changed and strong authentication is enforced.
    • Weak Password Usage for Consul Access: Medium reduction - Enforcing strong password policies improves password security.
    • Account Takeover of Consul Administrative Accounts: High reduction - MFA significantly reduces the risk of account takeover.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Username/password authentication is enabled for Consul UI and API in staging and production. A basic password policy is partially enforced.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is not implemented for administrative access to Consul.
    • Integration with an external identity provider (LDAP/AD/OIDC) is not implemented; currently using Consul's built-in username/password auth.
    • Password complexity requirements for Consul users are not strictly enforced.
    • Account lockout policies after multiple failed login attempts to Consul are not configured.

Mitigation Strategy: Encrypt Sensitive Data in Consul KV Store

Mitigation Strategy: Encrypt Sensitive Data in Consul KV Store

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify sensitive data that applications intend to store in the Consul KV store.
    • Step 2: Implement application-level encryption for sensitive data before storing it in Consul KV. Use strong encryption algorithms (e.g., AES-256) and established encryption libraries.
    • Step 3: Securely manage encryption keys used for application-level encryption. Avoid storing keys in application code or directly in Consul KV. Utilize HashiCorp Vault or other dedicated secret management solutions for key storage and access.
    • Step 4: Implement decryption logic within applications to retrieve and decrypt sensitive data from Consul KV when needed.
    • Step 5: Regularly review and update encryption algorithms and key management practices to maintain security best practices.
    • Step 6: Consider using Consul Enterprise's Encryption at Rest feature for an additional layer of security for the KV store on disk (if applicable).

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Breaches due to Unencrypted Sensitive Data in Consul KV Store - Severity: High
    • Exposure of Sensitive Data in Consul Backups - Severity: High
    • Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data by Users with Consul KV Store Access - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Data Breaches due to Unencrypted Sensitive Data in Consul KV Store: High reduction - Encryption protects data at rest within Consul KV.
    • Exposure of Sensitive Data in Consul Backups: High reduction - Encrypted data remains protected even in Consul backups.
    • Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data by Users with Consul KV Store Access: Medium reduction - Reduces risk for users with general KV store read access but without encryption keys.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Application-level encryption is implemented for some sensitive data stored in Consul KV, specifically database passwords for certain services.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Application-level encryption is not consistently applied to all sensitive data stored in Consul KV across all applications.
    • HashiCorp Vault is not fully integrated for managing encryption keys. Keys are sometimes managed via less secure methods like environment variables.
    • Formal guidelines and developer training on encrypting sensitive data before storing it in Consul KV are not fully established.
    • Consul Enterprise Encryption at Rest is not currently utilized.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Service Registration Information in Consul

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Service Registration Information in Consul

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Review service registration definitions for all services registering with Consul. Identify any potentially sensitive information being included in service metadata, tags, or check definitions.
    • Step 2: Remove sensitive data from service registration definitions. Avoid including API keys, passwords, internal URLs that should not be broadly exposed, or other confidential information.
    • Step 3: If sensitive data is required for service communication, utilize secure alternatives to service registration for exchanging this data. Consider using Consul Connect's intentions for secure service-to-service communication or HashiCorp Vault for dynamic secret retrieval.
    • Step 4: Leverage Consul Connect for service-to-service authorization and authentication instead of relying on potentially sensitive information within service registration for access control.
    • Step 5: Regularly review service registration configurations to ensure no sensitive data is inadvertently exposed through Consul's service catalog.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exposure of Sensitive Data through Publicly Accessible Consul Service Catalog - Severity: Medium
    • Information Disclosure through Consul Service Discovery - Severity: Medium
    • Unauthorized Access to Internal Resources based on Exposed Service Information - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Exposure of Sensitive Data through Publicly Accessible Consul Service Catalog: Medium reduction - Prevents direct exposure of sensitive data in Consul's service catalog.
    • Information Disclosure through Consul Service Discovery: Medium reduction - Reduces the risk of leaking internal details through Consul service discovery queries.
    • Unauthorized Access to Internal Resources based on Exposed Service Information: Medium reduction - Limits the potential for attackers to leverage exposed information for unauthorized access.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Service registration definitions have been reviewed, and some sensitive data has been removed. Consul Connect is being piloted for some services.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consul Connect is not fully implemented across all services for secure service-to-service communication, which could reduce reliance on potentially sensitive data in registration.
    • Dynamic secret management using HashiCorp Vault is not fully integrated for services that require secrets, leading to potential reliance on less secure methods.
    • Automated checks or linters to prevent accidental inclusion of sensitive data in Consul service registration are not implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Consul Connect for Secure Service-to-Service Communication

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Consul Connect for Secure Service-to-Service Communication

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Enable Consul Connect within your Consul cluster.
    • Step 2: Modify service definitions to enable Connect integration for services that require secure communication with other services.
    • Step 3: Define Consul Connect intentions to explicitly control which services are authorized to communicate with each other and the allowed actions (e.g., allow service A to connect to service B on port 8080).
    • Step 4: Configure services to utilize Consul Connect proxies (Envoy proxies) for establishing secure, mutually authenticated, and encrypted connections.
    • Step 5: Leverage Consul Connect's automatic certificate management for TLS certificate provisioning and rotation for Connect proxies.
    • Step 6: Enforce Consul Connect intentions to ensure that only authorized service-to-service communication is permitted.
    • Step 7: Implement monitoring for Consul Connect proxy health, connection metrics, and intention violations.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Service-to-Service Communication within Consul - Severity: High
    • Eavesdropping on Sensitive Data Transmitted Between Services Managed by Consul - Severity: High
    • Unauthorized Service-to-Service Communication within Consul - Severity: High
    • Service Impersonation within the Consul Service Mesh - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks on Service-to-Service Communication within Consul: High reduction - Connect provides mutual TLS encryption for all service-to-service traffic.
    • Eavesdropping on Sensitive Data Transmitted Between Services Managed by Consul: High reduction - Encrypts all service-to-service communication within the Connect mesh.
    • Unauthorized Service-to-Service Communication within Consul: High reduction - Intentions enforce strict authorization policies for service communication.
    • Service Impersonation within the Consul Service Mesh: Medium reduction - Mutual TLS and identity verification within Connect reduce service impersonation risks.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Consul Connect is enabled in staging and production. Pilot implementation for a few critical services is underway. Intentions are defined for these pilot services.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consul Connect is not yet fully rolled out to all services within the infrastructure.
    • Comprehensive Consul Connect intention policies covering all necessary service communication paths are not fully defined and implemented.
    • Monitoring and alerting for Consul Connect proxy issues and intention violations are not fully implemented.
    • Integration of Consul Connect proxy monitoring with existing application monitoring and logging systems is still in progress.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Service Segmentation and Network Policies around Consul

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Service Segmentation and Network Policies around Consul

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Segment your network to isolate Consul servers and agents into dedicated network segments (VLANs, subnets). This limits the blast radius if Consul infrastructure is compromised.
    • Step 2: Implement network firewalls or security groups to strictly control network access to Consul ports (e.g., 8500, 8501, 8300, 8301, 8302). Restrict access only to authorized sources, such as application servers, monitoring systems, and administrative workstations.
    • Step 3: Apply network policies within your infrastructure (e.g., Kubernetes Network Policies, cloud provider security groups) to further control network traffic to and from Consul agents. This can limit the services that can communicate with Consul agents.
    • Step 4: Deny all unnecessary inbound and outbound network traffic to and from Consul servers and agents at the network firewall level.
    • Step 5: Regularly review and update network segmentation and firewall rules related to Consul to adapt to changes in application architecture and security requirements.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Network Access to Consul Servers and Agents - Severity: High
    • Lateral Movement within the Network targeting Consul after a Breach - Severity: Medium
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks Targeting Consul Infrastructure - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Network Access to Consul Servers and Agents: High reduction - Firewalls and security groups are the primary network access control mechanism.
    • Lateral Movement within the Network targeting Consul after a Breach: Medium reduction - Segmentation limits the impact of a breach in another part of the network on Consul.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks Targeting Consul Infrastructure: Medium reduction - Network access controls can mitigate some network-based DoS attacks against Consul.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Network segmentation is implemented to isolate Consul servers and agents in separate VLANs. Basic firewall rules are in place to restrict access to core Consul ports.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Granular network policies within Kubernetes or cloud environments are not fully implemented to control service-to-Consul agent traffic at a service level.
    • Intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) are not fully integrated to monitor network traffic specifically to and from Consul infrastructure.
    • Regular vulnerability scanning and penetration testing of the network infrastructure surrounding Consul is not consistently performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Service Identity during Consul Registration and Discovery

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Service Identity during Consul Registration and Discovery

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Implement mechanisms to verify the identity of services attempting to register with Consul. This can involve using pre-shared secrets, certificates, or integration with an identity provider before allowing registration.
    • Step 2: Utilize Consul ACLs to control which services are permitted to register and with what service names. This acts as an authorization step after identity verification.
    • Step 3: Leverage Consul Connect's identity features for services participating in the Connect mesh. Connect automatically handles service identity verification through mutual TLS and intentions.
    • Step 4: Implement monitoring of Consul service registration events. Set up alerts for unexpected or unauthorized service registrations to detect potential service spoofing attempts.
    • Step 5: Regularly review and update service identity validation mechanisms and Consul ACL policies related to service registration.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Service Spoofing and Impersonation within Consul - Severity: High
    • Unauthorized Service Registration in Consul - Severity: Medium
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks during Service Discovery if discovery process is not secured - Severity: Medium (Consul Connect mitigates this)

  • Impact:

    • Service Spoofing and Impersonation within Consul: High reduction - Identity validation and Consul Connect's mutual TLS significantly reduce impersonation risks.
    • Unauthorized Service Registration in Consul: Medium reduction - ACLs and identity checks limit unauthorized service registrations.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks during Service Discovery if discovery process is not secured: Medium reduction - Consul Connect and TLS encryption for API/agent communication secure the discovery process.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic Consul ACLs are in place to control service registration. Consul Connect pilot implementation includes identity verification for participating services.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal service identity validation process beyond basic ACLs is not fully defined and implemented for all services registering with Consul.
    • Comprehensive monitoring and alerting for unauthorized service registration attempts in Consul are not fully implemented.
    • Integration with a centralized identity provider for service identity management specifically for Consul registration is not yet explored.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Patch and Update Consul

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Patch and Update Consul

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Establish a process for regularly monitoring for new Consul releases and security advisories specifically from HashiCorp.
    • Step 2: Subscribe to HashiCorp's security advisory channels (mailing lists, RSS feeds) to receive timely notifications of Consul security vulnerabilities.
    • Step 3: Develop a dedicated testing and deployment pipeline for Consul updates. This should include thorough testing of updates in a non-production Consul environment (staging) before deploying to production Consul clusters.
    • Step 4: Prioritize security updates for Consul and apply them promptly to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
    • Step 5: Automate the Consul update process where feasible to ensure timely patching and reduce manual effort.
    • Step 6: Maintain a clear inventory of Consul server and agent versions across all environments to track patching status and identify outdated instances.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Consul Vulnerabilities - Severity: High
    • Zero-Day Exploits against Consul (reduced likelihood by staying up-to-date) - Severity: Variable, can be High
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks exploiting vulnerabilities in Consul - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Consul Vulnerabilities: High reduction - Patching directly addresses and eliminates known Consul vulnerabilities.
    • Zero-Day Exploits against Consul: Medium reduction - Staying updated reduces the window of exposure to potential zero-day exploits targeting Consul.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks exploiting vulnerabilities in Consul: Medium reduction - Patches can fix DoS vulnerabilities within Consul itself.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - A process for monitoring Consul releases is in place. Staging environment is used for testing Consul updates. Production Consul updates are performed manually but not always promptly.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A fully automated Consul update pipeline is not implemented.
    • A formal Service Level Agreement (SLA) for applying security patches to Consul is not defined.
    • A comprehensive and actively maintained inventory of Consul versions across all environments is lacking.
    • Automated vulnerability scanning specifically for Consul instances is not integrated into the security pipeline.

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Unnecessary Consul Features and Modules

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Unnecessary Consul Features and Modules

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Review the default Consul server and agent configurations and identify any Consul features or modules that are not actively used by your applications or infrastructure.
    • Step 2: Disable these unnecessary Consul features and modules in the Consul server and agent configuration files. Examples include disabling the legacy UI if not in use, or disabling WAN federation features if not required.
    • Step 3: Minimize the number of exposed network ports and services for Consul. Disable any unnecessary listeners or APIs within Consul configuration.
    • Step 4: Regularly review the enabled Consul features and modules as application requirements evolve and disable any features that become obsolete.
    • Step 5: Document all disabled Consul features and modules for future reference, maintenance, and troubleshooting.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Increased Attack Surface of Consul due to Unnecessary Features - Severity: Medium
    • Exploitation of Vulnerabilities in Unused Consul Features - Severity: Medium
    • Resource Consumption by Unnecessary Consul Modules - Severity: Low (Security impact is indirect)

  • Impact:

    • Increased Attack Surface of Consul due to Unnecessary Features: Medium reduction - Reduces the number of potential attack vectors against Consul.
    • Exploitation of Vulnerabilities in Unused Consul Features: Medium reduction - Eliminates the risk of vulnerabilities in disabled Consul features being exploited.
    • Resource Consumption by Unnecessary Consul Modules: Low reduction - Primarily improves Consul performance and stability, indirectly contributing to overall security.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Some unnecessary Consul features like the legacy UI have been disabled. A basic configuration review has been performed.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A comprehensive review of all Consul features and modules to identify and disable unnecessary ones is not fully completed.
    • Formal guidelines for disabling unnecessary Consul features are not documented and consistently applied.
    • Automated checks to identify and flag potentially unnecessary enabled Consul features are not implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Monitoring and Logging for Consul

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Monitoring and Logging for Consul

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Configure Consul servers and agents to generate comprehensive logs, including audit logs, access logs, and detailed error logs. Ensure logging captures security-relevant events within Consul.
    • Step 2: Centralize Consul logs using a dedicated log management system (e.g., ELK stack, Splunk, Graylog) for efficient analysis and retention.
    • Step 3: Implement monitoring specifically for Consul server and agent health metrics (CPU, memory, disk usage, network latency, Raft leadership status, etc.). Focus on metrics that can indicate security or operational issues within Consul.
    • Step 4: Set up alerts for critical Consul events, such as server failures, agent disconnects, ACL policy violations, unauthorized access attempts to Consul, and performance degradation of Consul itself.
    • Step 5: Integrate Consul monitoring and logging data with your existing Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system for security incident detection, correlation, and response.
    • Step 6: Establish a process for regularly reviewing Consul logs and monitoring data to proactively identify suspicious activity, security incidents, and potential misconfigurations within Consul.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Delayed Detection of Security Incidents within Consul - Severity: High
    • Insufficient Visibility into Consul Operations - Severity: Medium
    • Lack of Audit Trails for Security Investigations related to Consul - Severity: Medium
    • Denial of Service (DoS) and Performance Issues affecting Consul - Severity: Medium (Monitoring helps detect and mitigate)

  • Impact:

    • Delayed Detection of Security Incidents within Consul: High reduction - Monitoring and logging enable faster detection of security incidents affecting Consul.
    • Insufficient Visibility into Consul Operations: Medium reduction - Provides better insights into the health and operational status of Consul infrastructure.
    • Lack of Audit Trails for Security Investigations related to Consul: Medium reduction - Logs provide essential audit trails for investigating security events involving Consul.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) and Performance Issues affecting Consul: Medium reduction - Monitoring helps identify and address performance issues that could lead to DoS or instability of Consul.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - Basic monitoring for Consul server health is in place. Logs are collected centrally, but comprehensive Consul-specific logging and alerting are not fully implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive logging configuration for Consul agents and servers is not fully implemented (e.g., detailed audit logs, access logs).
    • Advanced alerting rules specifically for security-relevant events within Consul (ACL violations, unauthorized access attempts) are not fully configured.
    • Full integration with the SIEM system for security event correlation and analysis of Consul events is still in progress.
    • Regular review and analysis of Consul logs and monitoring data for security purposes are not consistently performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Consul Agent Configuration Files

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Consul Agent Configuration Files

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Protect Consul agent configuration files from unauthorized access. Set restrictive file system permissions to limit read and write access to only the Consul agent user account and authorized administrators.
    • Step 2: Avoid storing sensitive information directly within Consul agent configuration files (e.g., ACL tokens, encryption keys, passwords).
    • Step 3: Utilize environment variables or secure secret management solutions (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) to manage sensitive configurations for Consul agents instead of embedding them in configuration files.
    • Step 4: Implement configuration management tools (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet) to manage and deploy Consul agent configurations securely and consistently across all agents.
    • Step 5: Regularly audit and review Consul agent configuration files for any misconfigurations, security vulnerabilities, or accidental inclusion of sensitive data.
    • Step 6: Use version control for Consul agent configuration files to track changes, facilitate rollback to previous configurations if needed, and maintain an audit trail of configuration modifications.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exposure of Sensitive Information Stored in Consul Agent Configuration Files - Severity: High
    • Unauthorized Modification of Consul Agent Configuration - Severity: Medium
    • Configuration Drift and Inconsistency across Consul agents - Severity: Low (Security impact is indirect)

  • Impact:

    • Exposure of Sensitive Information Stored in Consul Agent Configuration Files: High reduction - Prevents direct exposure of secrets and sensitive data in agent config files.
    • Unauthorized Modification of Consul Agent Configuration: Medium reduction - File permissions and configuration management tools limit unauthorized changes to agent configurations.
    • Configuration Drift and Inconsistency across Consul agents: Low reduction - Configuration management ensures consistency, indirectly improving the overall security posture of the Consul deployment.

  • Currently Implemented: Partial - File permissions are set to restrict access to Consul agent configuration files. Environment variables are used for some sensitive configurations.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consistent use of environment variables or Vault for all sensitive configurations within Consul agent configurations is not fully enforced.
    • Configuration management tools are not fully utilized for managing Consul agent configurations across all environments.
    • Automated checks to detect sensitive data inadvertently included in Consul agent configuration files are not implemented.
    • Regular audits of Consul agent configuration files specifically for security misconfigurations are not routinely performed.