Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (95 loc) · 184 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

126 lines (95 loc) · 184 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Asynq

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the Asynq library (https://github.com/hibiken/asynq), focusing on its key components, data flows, and interactions with Redis. The analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Asynq's architecture and intended use. We will pay particular attention to the following:

  • Task Data Security: Protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data within task payloads.
  • Redis Interaction Security: Analyzing the security implications of Asynq's reliance on Redis.
  • Code Injection Risks: Identifying and mitigating potential code injection vulnerabilities.
  • Denial-of-Service (DoS) Resilience: Assessing Asynq's ability to withstand DoS attacks.
  • Supply Chain Security: Evaluating the security of Asynq's dependencies.

Scope:

This analysis covers the Asynq library itself, its interaction with Redis, and the recommended Kubernetes deployment model. It does not cover the security of applications using Asynq, except where those applications directly interact with Asynq's API or handle task data. The security of the underlying operating system, network infrastructure, and Kubernetes cluster (beyond Asynq-specific configurations) are also out of scope.

Methodology:

  1. Code Review: We will examine the Asynq codebase on GitHub, focusing on areas relevant to security, such as data handling, Redis interaction, error handling, and concurrency management.
  2. Documentation Review: We will analyze the official Asynq documentation and any available design documents.
  3. Architecture Inference: Based on the code and documentation, we will infer the detailed architecture, data flows, and component interactions.
  4. Threat Modeling: We will apply threat modeling principles (STRIDE, DREAD) to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities.
  5. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified threat, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the provided design review and the Asynq codebase, the key components and their security implications are:

2.1 Asynq Client/Producer:

  • Responsibilities: Creates and enqueues tasks.
  • Security Implications:
    • Input Validation (Critical): The primary responsibility for input validation lies with the client application. Failure to properly validate task data before enqueuing it can lead to code injection, data corruption, and other vulnerabilities. Asynq itself provides minimal input validation.
    • Authentication/Authorization (Critical): The client application must implement authentication and authorization to control who can enqueue tasks and what types of tasks they can enqueue. Asynq does not provide these mechanisms.
    • Data Encryption (Important): If task payloads contain sensitive data, the client application must encrypt this data before enqueuing it. Asynq does not provide built-in encryption.
    • Rate Limiting (Important): The client application should implement rate limiting to prevent malicious actors from overwhelming the queue with a flood of tasks (DoS).

2.2 Asynq (Core Library):

  • Responsibilities: Manages task queues in Redis, schedules tasks, handles retries/failures.
  • Security Implications:
    • Redis Interaction (Critical): Asynq's security is fundamentally tied to the security of the Redis instance. All communication with Redis should use secure connections (TLS). Redis authentication must be enabled.
    • Atomic Operations (Positive): Asynq uses Redis's atomic operations (e.g., LMOVE, SADD) to prevent race conditions and ensure data consistency. This is a good security practice.
    • Error Handling (Positive): Asynq has robust error handling, which helps prevent crashes and data loss. However, error handling should be reviewed to ensure it doesn't leak sensitive information.
    • Task Serialization (Important): Asynq uses encoding/json by default for task serialization. While generally safe, custom Marshaler and Unmarshaler implementations could introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) (Important): Tasks that repeatedly fail are moved to a DLQ. The contents of the DLQ should be monitored and investigated, as they may indicate attacks or vulnerabilities.

2.3 Asynq Worker/Consumer:

  • Responsibilities: Retrieves and executes tasks.
  • Security Implications:
    • Input Validation (Critical): The worker application must re-validate task data after retrieving it from the queue. This is a crucial defense-in-depth measure, even if the client application performs validation. This is the last line of defense against code injection.
    • Authentication/Authorization (Important): If tasks require specific permissions (e.g., accessing external resources), the worker application should implement appropriate authorization checks.
    • Secure Task Handling (Critical): The worker application must handle task results securely. This includes securely storing data, logging events appropriately, and avoiding vulnerabilities like SQL injection or command injection if interacting with other systems.
    • Data Decryption (Important): If task payloads are encrypted, the worker application must decrypt them securely, using proper key management.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Important): Workers should be designed to handle resource constraints gracefully and avoid consuming excessive memory, CPU, or other resources, which could lead to DoS.

2.4 Redis:

  • Responsibilities: Stores task data and provides atomic operations.
  • Security Implications:
    • Authentication (Critical): Redis authentication must be enabled. A strong password or, preferably, key-based authentication should be used.
    • Network Access Control (Critical): Access to the Redis instance should be restricted to only the necessary hosts (Asynq workers and clients). Firewall rules and network policies should be used to enforce this.
    • TLS Encryption (Critical): All communication with Redis should use TLS encryption to protect data in transit.
    • Data Encryption at Rest (Important): If sensitive data is stored in task payloads, consider using Redis's data-at-rest encryption features (if available) or encrypting the data before storing it in Redis.
    • Regular Security Updates (Critical): The Redis instance should be kept up-to-date with the latest security patches.
    • Monitoring and Auditing (Important): Redis should be monitored for suspicious activity, and audit logs should be enabled (if available).
    • redis-cli Access (Important): Restrict access to the redis-cli utility to authorized personnel only. Unauthorized access could allow attackers to manipulate the queue directly.

2.5 Monitoring Tools:

  • Security Implications:
    • Secure Access (Important): Access to monitoring data should be secured with authentication and authorization.
    • Data Sensitivity (Important): Monitoring data may contain sensitive information (e.g., task payloads in error logs). This data should be protected appropriately.

2.6 Kubernetes Deployment:

  • Security Implications:
    • RBAC (Important): Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) should be used to restrict access to Asynq and Redis resources within the cluster.
    • Network Policies (Important): Network policies should be used to isolate the Asynq namespace and restrict network traffic to only the necessary pods and services.
    • Pod Security Policies (Important): Pod security policies (or their successor, Pod Security Admission) should be used to enforce security best practices for Asynq worker and Redis pods (e.g., running as non-root, limiting capabilities).
    • Resource Quotas (Important): Resource quotas should be used to limit the resources that Asynq workers and Redis can consume, preventing resource exhaustion attacks.
    • Secrets Management (Critical): Redis credentials and any other sensitive configuration data should be stored securely using Kubernetes Secrets (or a dedicated secrets management solution). Never hardcode credentials in configuration files or environment variables.
    • Image Security (Important): Use minimal base images for Asynq workers and Redis. Scan container images for vulnerabilities before deployment.

2.7 Build Process (GitHub Actions):

  • Security Implications:
    • Dependency Management (Positive): Go modules provide good dependency management, allowing for vulnerability scanning.
    • Linting/Testing (Positive): Linters and tests help identify potential vulnerabilities.
    • SAST/SCA Integration (Recommended): Integrating Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools into the build pipeline is crucial for identifying vulnerabilities in the Asynq codebase and its dependencies.
    • Code Signing (Recommended): Code signing for releases helps ensure the integrity of the distributed code.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

The C4 diagrams provided in the design review give a good overview. Here's a more detailed breakdown of the data flow:

  1. Task Creation:

    • The Client Application creates a task, including a payload (which may contain sensitive data).
    • The Client Application should validate and potentially encrypt the payload.
    • The Client Application uses the Asynq Client Library to enqueue the task.
    • The Asynq Client Library serializes the task (typically using JSON).
    • The Asynq Client Library sends a command to Redis (e.g., RPUSH) to add the task to the appropriate queue.

  2. Task Processing:

    • An Asynq Worker continuously polls Redis for new tasks (e.g., using BLMOVE).
    • When a task is found, Redis atomically moves the task from the pending queue to the processing queue.
    • The Asynq Worker Library deserializes the task.
    • The Worker Application must re-validate the task payload.
    • The Worker Application executes the task logic.
    • The Worker Application may interact with other systems (databases, APIs, etc.).
    • The Worker Application reports the task result (success, failure, retry) to Asynq.
    • Asynq updates the task status in Redis.
    • If the task fails and retries are configured, Asynq re-queues the task.
    • If the task exceeds its retry limit, Asynq moves it to the Dead Letter Queue (DLQ).

  3. Redis Interaction:

    • All communication between Asynq (Client and Worker) and Redis should use a secure connection (TLS).
    • Redis authentication must be used.
    • Asynq relies on Redis's atomic operations for queue management.

4. Specific Security Considerations and Mitigation Strategies

| Threat | Description | Mitigation Strategies