Attack Surface: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Description: An attacker tricks the server into making requests to unintended locations, potentially accessing internal resources or external systems.
- How Lux Contributes:
lux
's core function is to fetch data from URLs provided by the user. It's designed to interact with a wide range of websites, making it a prime target for SSRF.lux
's handling of redirects and embedded URLs within fetched content is a key contributor. - Example:
- Attacker provides a URL like
https://www.example.com/video.mp4?url=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
(AWS metadata endpoint). Iflux
follows this redirect or embedded URL without proper validation, it could expose AWS credentials. - Attacker provides a URL like
https://legit-video-site.com/playlist.m3u8
, but theplaylist.m3u8
file contains a segment URL pointing tofile:///etc/passwd
.
- Attacker provides a URL like
- Impact: Access to internal services, sensitive data (credentials, configuration files), potential for remote code execution (RCE) if internal services are vulnerable.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Strict Allow-listing: Maintain a list of explicitly allowed domains and URL prefixes. Reject any URL that doesn't match the allow-list before passing it to
lux
. Do not rely onlux
's internal validation. - Network Segmentation: Run the application using
lux
in a network environment that restricts access to internal resources. Use firewalls and network policies to limit outbound connections. - Dedicated SSRF Prevention Library: Use a library specifically designed to prevent SSRF.
- Disable URL Redirection Following (If Possible): If redirects are not strictly required, configure
lux
(or the underlying HTTP client) to not follow them. - Input Validation: Validate every part of the URL (scheme, hostname, port, path, query parameters) using a robust URL parsing library. Reject unusual characters or patterns.
- Strict Allow-listing: Maintain a list of explicitly allowed domains and URL prefixes. Reject any URL that doesn't match the allow-list before passing it to
Attack Surface: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
- Description: An attacker provides input that triggers a computationally expensive regular expression, causing the application to become unresponsive.
- How Lux Contributes:
lux
uses regular expressions extensively within its site extractors to parse HTML, JSON, and other data formats. The vulnerability lies withinlux
's code. - Example: An attacker crafts a specially designed URL or modifies a legitimate website's content (if possible) to include a string that triggers catastrophic backtracking in one of
lux
's regular expressions. A regex like(a+)+$
with inputaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
can cause this. - Impact: Denial of service; the application becomes unavailable.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Review Regular Expressions: Carefully examine the regular expressions used in the
lux
extractors (especially for frequently used sites). Look for known ReDoS patterns. - Use a ReDoS Detection Tool: Employ static analysis tools to detect potentially vulnerable regular expressions.
- Implement Timeouts: Set strict timeouts for regular expression matching within your application's interaction with
lux
. Terminate long-running matches. - Input Length Limits: Impose reasonable limits on input string lengths processed by
lux
's regular expressions.
- Review Regular Expressions: Carefully examine the regular expressions used in the
Attack Surface: XML External Entity (XXE) Injection
- Description: An attacker injects malicious XML entities, potentially leading to file disclosure or SSRF.
- How Lux Contributes: If a site extractor within
lux
processes XML data and uses a vulnerable XML parser, XXE is possible. The vulnerability is withinlux
's handling of potentially untrusted XML from external sites. - Example: If a site provides metadata in XML, and
lux
's extractor for that site doesn't disable external entity resolution, an attacker could provide a URL to a page containing malicious XML. - Impact: Disclosure of local files, potential for SSRF.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Verify XML Parser Configuration: Confirm that any XML parser used within
lux
's relevant extractors has external entity resolution disabled. This is crucial; the application usinglux
might not have direct control over this. - Contribute to
lux
(if necessary): If you identify a vulnerable extractor, consider contributing a fix to thelux
project to disable external entities.
- Verify XML Parser Configuration: Confirm that any XML parser used within
Attack Surface: Infinite Playlist Loops/Resource Exhaustion (M3U8)
- Description: Maliciously crafted M3U8 playlists can cause
lux
to enter infinite loops or consume excessive resources.- How Lux Contributes:
lux
has specific logic for handling M3U8 playlists, and this logic is the direct source of the vulnerability. - Example: An attacker provides a URL to an M3U8 playlist where
#EXT-X-MEDIA-SEQUENCE
is manipulated, or segments reference each other cyclically, causinglux
to repeatedly download the same segments. - Impact: Denial of Service.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Limit Playlist Depth and Segment Count: Within your application's interaction with
lux
, set reasonable limits on playlist depth and segment count. - Timeouts: Implement timeouts for downloading segments and processing the playlist within your application's use of
lux
. - Resource Monitoring: Monitor resource usage to detect and prevent excessive consumption caused by
lux
.
- Limit Playlist Depth and Segment Count: Within your application's interaction with
- How Lux Contributes: