Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (111 loc) · 10 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

126 lines (111 loc) · 10 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for icewhaletech/casaos

Attack Surface: CasaOS Management API Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in the CasaOS API that allow unauthorized actions or access to sensitive data.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS exposes and implements the management API, making vulnerabilities in it a direct CasaOS responsibility.
  • Example: An authentication bypass vulnerability in the API allows an attacker to send requests without proper credentials, gaining administrative control over CasaOS.
  • Impact: Full system compromise, data breach, denial of service, unauthorized application deployment.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Implement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms for all API endpoints.
      • Conduct thorough security testing and code reviews of the API.
      • Follow secure API design principles (e.g., least privilege, input validation, output encoding).
      • Regularly update CasaOS and API dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Users:
      • Keep CasaOS updated to the latest version.
      • Monitor CasaOS logs for suspicious API activity.
      • Restrict network access to the CasaOS API if possible (e.g., using a firewall).

Attack Surface: Web UI Exploits (XSS, CSRF, Injection)

  • Description: Common web application vulnerabilities within the CasaOS web interface that can be exploited to compromise user accounts or the system.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS develops and maintains the web UI, making vulnerabilities within it a direct CasaOS responsibility.
  • Example: A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the application naming field allows an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes when an administrator views the application list, potentially leading to session hijacking.
  • Impact: Account takeover, data manipulation, defacement of the web interface, potentially leading to command execution on the server if combined with other vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Implement robust input validation and output encoding throughout the web interface.
      • Utilize frameworks and libraries that provide built-in protection against common web vulnerabilities.
      • Implement CSRF protection mechanisms.
      • Conduct regular security scanning and penetration testing of the web UI.
    • Users:
      • Use strong and unique passwords for CasaOS accounts.
      • Keep web browsers updated to the latest versions.
      • Be cautious about clicking on suspicious links within the CasaOS interface.

Attack Surface: Insecure Default Configurations

  • Description: CasaOS ships with default settings that are not secure, making it easier for attackers to exploit the system.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS defines and sets the default configurations, making insecure defaults a direct CasaOS issue.
  • Example: CasaOS uses a weak default administrator password that is easily guessable. An attacker can use this default password to gain initial access to the system.
  • Impact: Initial access point for attackers, leading to full system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Ensure strong default passwords are not used.
      • Implement a mandatory password change upon initial setup.
      • Disable or secure unnecessary services by default.
      • Provide clear guidance on secure initial configuration in documentation.
    • Users:
      • Immediately change default passwords upon initial CasaOS setup.
      • Review and harden default configurations based on security best practices and CasaOS documentation.
      • Disable or remove any unnecessary default applications or services.

Attack Surface: Insecure Application Installation (Malicious Container Images)

  • Description: CasaOS allows users to easily install applications, potentially from untrusted sources, leading to the installation of malicious software.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS simplifies and manages the application installation process, including the potential for installing malicious container images if safeguards are insufficient.
  • Example: A user installs an application from an unofficial repository through CasaOS. The container image contains malware that compromises the CasaOS host system.
  • Impact: Installation of malware, data theft, system compromise, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Implement mechanisms to verify the integrity and source of application images (e.g., using image signing and trusted registries).
      • Provide warnings to users when installing applications from untrusted sources.
      • Consider implementing application sandboxing or isolation features.
    • Users:
      • Only install applications from trusted and reputable sources.
      • Research applications before installing them, checking for reviews and security assessments.
      • Be cautious about installing applications from unofficial or unknown repositories.

Attack Surface: Privilege Escalation through Container Misconfiguration

  • Description: CasaOS allows users to configure containers in ways that grant excessive privileges, enabling container escape and host system compromise.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS's container management features and UI control the configuration options available to users, directly influencing the risk of misconfiguration.
  • Example: A user, through CasaOS interface, configures a container to run in privileged mode. A vulnerability within the application running in the container is exploited, allowing the attacker to escape the container and gain root access to the CasaOS host system.
  • Impact: Full system compromise, data breach, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Restrict the ability to create privileged containers by default.
      • Provide clear warnings and guidance about the security risks of privileged containers.
      • Implement security policies to limit container capabilities and resource access.
      • Encourage users to use minimal necessary privileges for containers.
    • Users:
      • Avoid using privileged containers unless absolutely necessary.
      • Carefully review container configurations and minimize granted privileges.
      • Use security tools to scan container configurations for potential vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Exposed Docker Socket (if applicable)

  • Description: If the Docker socket is exposed without proper access control, it provides a direct pathway to control the Docker daemon and potentially the host system.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS's design or configuration options might lead to unintentional or unnecessary exposure of the Docker socket, increasing the attack surface.
  • Example: The Docker socket is mounted into a container managed by CasaOS without proper access restrictions. An attacker compromises the application within the container and uses the exposed Docker socket to execute commands on the host system.
  • Impact: Full system compromise, container escape, data breach, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Avoid exposing the Docker socket to containers or the web interface unless absolutely necessary.
      • If exposure is required, implement strict access control mechanisms (e.g., using Docker socket proxy or authorization plugins).
      • Clearly document the risks of exposing the Docker socket and provide secure alternatives.
    • Users:
      • Avoid exposing the Docker socket if possible.
      • If exposure is necessary, implement strict access control using Docker's security features or third-party tools.
      • Regularly audit container configurations to ensure the Docker socket is not unintentionally exposed.

Attack Surface: Insecure Update Mechanism

  • Description: A flawed update process can be exploited to inject malicious code into CasaOS during updates.
  • CasaOS Contribution: CasaOS is responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining its update mechanism, making vulnerabilities in it a direct CasaOS responsibility.
  • Example: CasaOS uses an unencrypted HTTP channel for updates without proper integrity checks. An attacker performs a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack and injects a malicious update package, compromising the CasaOS system during the update process.
  • Impact: Full system compromise, installation of malware, backdoors.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Use HTTPS for update downloads to ensure confidentiality and integrity.
      • Implement digital signatures and verification for update packages to prevent tampering.
      • Provide a secure rollback mechanism in case of failed or malicious updates.
      • Regularly test and audit the update process for security vulnerabilities.
    • Users:
      • Ensure CasaOS is configured to use secure update channels (if configurable).
      • Monitor update processes for any anomalies or unexpected behavior.
      • Keep backups of the system before applying updates to facilitate rollback if necessary.