Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (115 loc) · 14.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

152 lines (115 loc) · 14.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ipfs/go-ipfs

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Private Networks (Libp2p Private Networks)

Description:

  • Step 1: Generate a private key for your private network using go-ipfs tools or manual key generation. This key will be shared among authorized nodes.
  • Step 2: Configure each go-ipfs node to join the private network by setting the PrivateKey configuration option in config.toml or using command-line flags.
  • Step 3: Modify the Bootstrap and Swarm.RelayService configurations in go-ipfs to ensure nodes only connect to peers within the private network. This involves removing public bootstrap nodes and potentially disabling public relay services.
  • Step 4: Distribute the private network key securely to authorized go-ipfs nodes only.
  • Step 5: Restart go-ipfs daemons on all nodes for the configuration changes to take effect and to join the private network.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Unauthorized Access to Data - Severity: High (Public IPFS network is open. Private networks restrict access to nodes with the private key, mitigating unauthorized access from the public network.)
  • Exposure to Public DHT Attacks - Severity: Medium (Public DHT is a potential attack surface. Private networks isolate nodes from public DHT risks, reducing exposure to DHT-related attacks.)
  • Unwanted Content Injection from Public Network - Severity: Medium (In public networks, malicious actors can inject content. Private networks limit content sources to trusted nodes within the network.)

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Access to Data: High Reduction (Effectively isolates your IPFS network and data from the public IPFS network.)
  • Exposure to Public DHT Attacks: High Reduction (Nodes are isolated from the public DHT, significantly reducing exposure to DHT-based attacks.)
  • Unwanted Content Injection from Public Network: Medium Reduction (Limits content sources to the private network, but internal threats within the private network are still possible.)

Currently Implemented: go-ipfs has built-in support for private networks through libp2p private networks. Configuration options are available in config.toml and via command-line flags.

Missing Implementation: Simplified tools within go-ipfs for private key generation and distribution. More user-friendly configuration interfaces for setting up private networks. Potentially, automated network discovery within private networks could be improved while maintaining security.

Mitigation Strategy: Configure Resource Limits in go-ipfs

Description:

  • Step 1: Edit the go-ipfs configuration file (config.toml) or use command-line flags when starting the daemon.
  • Step 2: Set resource limits using configuration options such as:
    • Swarm.ResourceMgr.MaxMemory: Limits memory usage by the swarm subsystem.
    • Swarm.ResourceMgr.MaxFDs: Limits the number of file descriptors used by the swarm subsystem.
    • Swarm.ConnMgr.HighWater and Swarm.ConnMgr.LowWater: Control the number of connections the node maintains.
    • --routing-options: Options related to DHT resource usage (though less direct resource limits).
  • Step 3: Restart the go-ipfs daemon for the resource limit configurations to be applied.
  • Step 4: Monitor go-ipfs node resource usage using go-ipfs stats bw, system monitoring tools, or metrics endpoints to ensure limits are effective and appropriately set.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion - Severity: High (Uncontrolled resource usage can lead to node unresponsiveness. Resource limits in go-ipfs prevent excessive consumption.)
  • Resource Starvation - Severity: Medium (go-ipfs consuming excessive resources can starve other processes. Limits ensure fair resource sharing on the system.)
  • Cryptojacking (Resource Abuse) - Severity: Medium (If compromised, resource limits restrict the resources an attacker can abuse for cryptomining or other activities.)

Impact:

  • Denial of Service (DoS) - Resource Exhaustion: High Reduction (Limits prevent resource exhaustion, improving node stability and availability under load or attack.)
  • Resource Starvation: High Reduction (Ensures go-ipfs operates within defined resource boundaries, preventing starvation of other processes.)
  • Cryptojacking (Resource Abuse): Medium Reduction (Limits the resources available for abuse if a node is compromised, though doesn't prevent compromise itself.)

Currently Implemented: go-ipfs provides configuration options for resource limits within its config.toml and via command-line flags.

Missing Implementation: More granular resource control options within go-ipfs. Dynamic resource limit adjustment based on node load or detected threats. Default configurations with sensible resource limits for different deployment scenarios.

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Unnecessary go-ipfs Services and Features

Description:

  • Step 1: Review the go-ipfs configuration file (config.toml) to identify enabled services and features.
  • Step 2: Disable services that are not required for your application's functionality by setting their corresponding configuration options to false or removing their listening addresses. Examples include:
    • Web UI: Remove listening address for API.HTTPHeaders.Access-Control-Allow-Origin and ensure no UI port is configured.
    • Pubsub: Set Pubsub.Enabled = false.
    • MDNS discovery: Set Discovery.MDNS.Enabled = false.
    • Relay service: Set Swarm.RelayService.Enabled = false (if not needed).
    • Gateway: Remove listening address for Gateway.HTTPHeaders.Access-Control-Allow-Origin and ensure no Gateway port is configured.
  • Step 3: Restart the go-ipfs daemon for the changes to take effect.
  • Step 4: Verify that disabled services are no longer active by checking go-ipfs logs and network port usage.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Reduced Attack Surface - Severity: Medium (Disabling services reduces potential entry points for attackers and vulnerabilities associated with those services.)
  • Vulnerability Exploitation - Severity: Medium (Unused services might contain vulnerabilities. Disabling them eliminates the risk of exploiting those vulnerabilities.)
  • Resource Consumption - Severity: Low (Disabling services can slightly reduce resource consumption by the go-ipfs node.)

Impact:

  • Reduced Attack Surface: Medium Reduction (Decreases the number of potential attack vectors by removing unused services.)
  • Vulnerability Exploitation: Medium Reduction (Eliminates the risk of vulnerabilities in disabled services being exploited.)
  • Resource Consumption: Low Reduction (Minor improvement in resource efficiency.)

Currently Implemented: go-ipfs allows disabling services through configuration options in config.toml.

Missing Implementation: More intuitive configuration interface for service management. Profiles or presets for common use cases that automatically disable unnecessary services. Warnings or recommendations in documentation about disabling services for security hardening.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update go-ipfs and Dependencies

Description:

  • Step 1: Monitor go-ipfs releases and security advisories through official channels (GitHub releases, mailing lists, security announcements).
  • Step 2: When a new version of go-ipfs is released, especially security updates, plan for an update.
  • Step 3: Download the latest go-ipfs release binaries or update using package managers if applicable.
  • Step 4: Replace the existing go-ipfs binaries with the updated versions.
  • Step 5: Restart the go-ipfs daemon to run the updated version.
  • Step 6: Verify the update was successful by checking the go-ipfs version command output.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities - Severity: High (Outdated go-ipfs versions are vulnerable to known exploits. Updates patch these vulnerabilities.)
  • Zero-Day Exploits (Reduced Risk) - Severity: Medium (While updates don't prevent zero-day exploits, they ensure known vulnerabilities are addressed, reducing the overall attack surface.)
  • Software Bugs and Instability - Severity: Low (Updates often include bug fixes and stability improvements, indirectly contributing to security and reliability.)

Impact:

  • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: High Reduction (Patches eliminate known vulnerabilities, significantly reducing the risk of exploitation.)
  • Zero-Day Exploits (Reduced Risk): Medium Reduction (Proactive updates minimize the window of opportunity for attackers to exploit known weaknesses.)
  • Software Bugs and Instability: Low Reduction (Indirectly improves security by enhancing overall software quality.)

Currently Implemented: Software update process is generally external to go-ipfs, but go-ipfs provides version information via command-line.

Missing Implementation: Automated update mechanisms within go-ipfs itself. Built-in notifications or alerts for new releases and security advisories. Easier integration with package management systems for updates.

Mitigation Strategy: Monitor go-ipfs Node Activity and Logs

Description:

  • Step 1: Configure go-ipfs logging level in config.toml to capture relevant events (e.g., log.level = "info" or "debug" for more detailed logs).
  • Step 2: Review go-ipfs log output (typically to ~/.ipfs/logs/daemon.log or configurable via --log-output).
  • Step 3: Utilize go-ipfs stats bw to monitor bandwidth usage.
  • Step 4: Utilize go-ipfs stats repo to monitor repository size and storage usage.
  • Step 5: Utilize go-ipfs swarm peers and go-ipfs swarm addrs listen to monitor peer connections and listening addresses.
  • Step 6: Integrate go-ipfs metrics endpoints (if enabled and configured) with external monitoring systems like Prometheus to collect and visualize metrics over time.
  • Step 7: Set up alerts based on log patterns or metric thresholds that indicate suspicious activity or errors.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Security Incident Detection - Severity: High (Logs and monitoring help detect security breaches, attacks, and anomalies in go-ipfs node behavior.)
  • Anomaly Detection - Severity: Medium (Monitoring can identify unusual patterns that might indicate attacks or misconfigurations within go-ipfs.)
  • Performance Monitoring and Troubleshooting - Severity: Medium (Logs and metrics are essential for diagnosing performance issues and ensuring node stability.)
  • Forensics and Incident Investigation - Severity: Medium (Logs provide data for post-incident analysis and forensic investigations related to go-ipfs activity.)

Impact:

  • Security Incident Detection: High Reduction (Significantly improves the ability to detect and respond to security incidents affecting go-ipfs nodes.)
  • Anomaly Detection: Medium Reduction (Enables proactive identification of potential problems and security threats related to go-ipfs.)
  • Performance Monitoring and Troubleshooting: Medium Reduction (Facilitates performance optimization and issue resolution for go-ipfs nodes.)
  • Forensics and Incident Investigation: Medium Reduction (Provides data for effective incident analysis and response related to go-ipfs.)

Currently Implemented: go-ipfs has built-in logging and basic stats commands. Metrics endpoints can be enabled and configured.

Missing Implementation: More comprehensive built-in metrics and logging capabilities. Easier integration with common monitoring and logging tools. Pre-defined alerts or dashboards for common security and performance indicators within go-ipfs.

Mitigation Strategy: Be Aware of DHT Security Considerations

Description:

  • Step 1: Understand the different DHT routing types available in go-ipfs (dht, dhtclient, dhtserver) and their security implications.
  • Step 2: Configure the Routing.Type in config.toml based on your node's role and security requirements. Consider using dhtclient for nodes that primarily query the DHT and don't actively participate in routing to reduce DHT attack surface.
  • Step 3: Review and adjust other DHT-related configuration options in config.toml (under Routing and Swarm) to fine-tune DHT behavior and security.
  • Step 4: Monitor DHT-related metrics and logs for unusual activity that might indicate DHT attacks or routing issues.
  • Step 5: If DHT security is a major concern, consider alternative content routing mechanisms or rely more heavily on direct peer connections and private networks, minimizing DHT usage.

Threats Mitigated:

  • DHT Routing Attacks (Sybil, Poisoning, Eclipse) - Severity: Medium (Public DHTs are susceptible to attacks. Awareness and configuration can mitigate some risks, especially by using dhtclient mode.)
  • Information Disclosure via DHT - Severity: Low (DHT interactions could potentially leak metadata. Awareness of DHT traffic is important.)
  • DoS via DHT Overload - Severity: Low (DHT can be targeted for DoS. Understanding DHT resource usage and configuration helps mitigate overload risks.)

Impact:

  • DHT Routing Attacks (Sybil, Poisoning, Eclipse): Medium Reduction (Configuration and awareness can reduce some DHT attack risks, but public DHT inherently has security challenges.)
  • Information Disclosure via DHT: Low Reduction (Limited impact as DHT primarily stores routing info, but awareness is still important.)
  • DoS via DHT Overload: Low Reduction (DHT is designed to be resilient, but awareness of DoS risks is still relevant.)

Currently Implemented: go-ipfs provides different DHT routing types and configuration options related to DHT behavior.

Missing Implementation: More robust DHT security mechanisms within go-ipfs core. Clearer, more accessible documentation and guidance on DHT security best practices and configuration choices for different security needs. Potentially, alternative, more secure DHT implementations or routing protocols could be explored within go-ipfs.