Objective: Compromise Application via Jaeger Exploitation (Focused on High-Risk Paths)
Root: Compromise Application via Jaeger Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
├── OR
│ ├── 1. Exploit Jaeger Client Vulnerabilities
│ │ ├── OR
│ │ │ ├── 1.1. Exploit Client Library Vulnerabilities (Code Injection, DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ ├── 2. Exploit Jaeger Agent Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ ├── OR
│ │ │ ├── 2.1. Exploit Agent Service Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 2.2. Malicious Span Injection via Agent's UDP/gRPC Endpoint [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ ├── 3. Exploit Jaeger Collector Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ ├── OR
│ │ │ ├── 3.1. Exploit Collector Service Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 3.2. Storage Backend Exploitation via Collector [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 3.3. Collector Configuration Exploitation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ ├── 4. Exploit Jaeger Query/UI Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│ │ ├── OR
│ │ │ ├── 4.1. Exploit Query Service Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS, SSRF) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 4.2. Exploit UI Vulnerabilities (XSS, CSRF) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 4.3. Information Disclosure via Query API [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ ├── 5. Exploit Insecure Jaeger Deployment & Configuration Practices [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ ├── OR
│ │ │ ├── 5.1. Insecure Network Configuration (Exposed Ports, Lack of Network Segmentation) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 5.2. Weak or Default Credentials (Storage Backend, Jaeger Components) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 5.3. Lack of Authentication and Authorization (Query UI/API, Collector API) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│ │ │ ├── 5.4. Unpatched Jaeger Components (Known Vulnerabilities) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
- Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in Jaeger client libraries (language-specific libraries).
- Details:
- Attackers identify and exploit publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in Jaeger client libraries.
- Vulnerabilities could include buffer overflows, injection flaws, or logic errors.
- Successful exploitation can lead to:
- Code Injection: Executing arbitrary code within the application's process, potentially gaining full control.
- Denial of Service (DoS): Crashing the application or making it unresponsive by sending crafted malicious data.
- Mitigation:
- Regularly update Jaeger client libraries: Apply security patches promptly.
- Vulnerability scanning: Periodically scan application dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
- Security code reviews: Review application code interacting with Jaeger clients.
-
Critical Node: Jaeger Agent is a core component responsible for receiving spans.
-
Attack Vector 2.1: Exploit Agent Service Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Jaeger Agent service itself.
- Examples: Network vulnerabilities, buffer overflows in UDP packet processing, or other service-level flaws.
- Impact:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Gaining control of the Agent server.
- Denial of Service (DoS): Crashing or overwhelming the Agent, disrupting tracing.
- Mitigation:
- Keep Jaeger Agent updated: Apply security patches.
- Network security: Firewall Agent ports, restrict access.
- Regular security audits and pen-testing: Identify and fix vulnerabilities.
-
Attack Vector 2.2: Malicious Span Injection via Agent's UDP/gRPC Endpoint [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Directly sending malicious spans to the Agent's exposed UDP or gRPC ports.
- Exploits: UDP is connectionless and easily spoofed. gRPC, while more secure, can still be targeted if not properly configured.
- Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the Agent with a flood of spans.
- Misleading Traces: Injecting false or misleading data into the tracing system.
- Resource Exhaustion: Consuming Agent resources, impacting performance.
- Mitigation:
- Use gRPC over UDP if possible: gRPC offers better security features.
- Network access controls: Restrict access to Agent ports.
- Rate limiting: Limit span ingestion at the Agent level.
- Anomaly detection: Monitor for unusual span traffic patterns.
-
Critical Node: Jaeger Collector is a core component responsible for processing and storing spans.
-
Attack Vector 3.1: Exploit Collector Service Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Jaeger Collector service itself.
- Examples: Input validation issues in span processing, database injection flaws (though less common with NoSQL backends, other injection types possible).
- Impact:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Gaining control of the Collector server.
- Denial of Service (DoS): Crashing or overwhelming the Collector.
- Storage Backend Compromise: Potentially using Collector as a pivot to attack the storage backend.
- Mitigation:
- Keep Jaeger Collector updated: Apply security patches.
- Robust input validation: Sanitize and validate span data.
- Regular security audits and pen-testing: Identify and fix vulnerabilities.
-
Attack Vector 3.2: Storage Backend Exploitation via Collector [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Leveraging the Collector's interaction with storage backends (Cassandra, Elasticsearch, Kafka) to exploit storage vulnerabilities.
- Exploits: Injection attacks, data corruption through Collector's interaction.
- Impact:
- Storage Backend Compromise: Gaining control of the storage backend.
- Data Breach: Accessing or exfiltrating sensitive trace data.
- Data Corruption: Modifying or deleting trace data.
- Mitigation:
- Secure the storage backend independently: Follow storage backend security best practices.
- Secure Collector-Storage interaction: Use parameterized queries, least privilege access.
- Regularly update and patch storage backend: Apply security patches.
-
Attack Vector 3.3: Collector Configuration Exploitation [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Compromising the Collector's configuration files.
- Exploits: Gaining access to the Collector server or misconfigurations allowing access to config files.
- Impact:
- Disruption of Tracing: Modifying configuration to stop span processing.
- Data Exfiltration: If configuration contains storage credentials, attackers can access the storage backend directly.
- Unauthorized Access: Potentially gaining access to other systems if configuration contains other sensitive information.
- Mitigation:
- Secure Collector configuration files: Restrict file system permissions.
- Access controls and monitoring: Monitor configuration changes.
- Secure secret management: Avoid storing sensitive information directly in config files.
Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Jaeger Query/UI Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]:
-
Critical Node: Jaeger Query/UI provides access to trace data and is often exposed to users.
-
Attack Vector 4.1: Exploit Query Service Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS, SSRF) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Jaeger Query service itself.
- Examples: API vulnerabilities, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), other web service flaws.
- Impact:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Gaining control of the Query server.
- Denial of Service (DoS): Crashing or overwhelming the Query service.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Accessing internal network resources from the Query server.
- Data Disclosure: Accessing sensitive trace data.
- Mitigation:
- Keep Jaeger Query updated: Apply security patches.
- Robust input validation: Sanitize API requests.
- Regular security audits and pen-testing: Focus on API endpoints.
-
Attack Vector 4.2: Exploit UI Vulnerabilities (XSS, CSRF) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Exploiting common web UI vulnerabilities in the Jaeger UI.
- Examples: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
- Impact:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Injecting malicious scripts that execute in user browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or UI defacement.
- Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Forcing users to perform unintended actions on the Jaeger UI.
- Mitigation:
- Input sanitization and output encoding: Prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
- CSRF protection: Implement CSRF tokens or other protection mechanisms.
- Regular security audits and pen-testing: Focus on UI components.
-
Attack Vector 4.3: Information Disclosure via Query API [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Exploiting insecure access controls or API vulnerabilities in the Query service to gain unauthorized access to trace data.
- Exploits: Missing authentication or authorization checks on API endpoints.
- Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Gaining unauthorized access to sensitive trace data, revealing application internals, performance data, and potentially security vulnerabilities.
- Mitigation:
- Strong authentication and authorization: Implement for Query API and UI.
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Restrict access based on user roles.
- Regularly review access control configurations: Ensure proper configuration.
Attack Tree Path: 5. Exploit Insecure Jaeger Deployment & Configuration Practices [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
-
Critical Node: Secure deployment and configuration are fundamental for overall Jaeger security.
-
Attack Vector 5.1: Insecure Network Configuration (Exposed Ports, Lack of Network Segmentation) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Exposing Jaeger components to the public internet or placing them in the same network segment as sensitive application components without proper segmentation.
- Exploits: Network scanning to identify exposed ports, direct access to Jaeger services from untrusted networks.
- Impact:
- Increased Attack Surface: Easier access for attackers to target Jaeger components.
- Lateral Movement: If Jaeger is in the same network as sensitive systems, compromise can lead to further attacks.
- Mitigation:
- Network segmentation: Isolate Jaeger components in a dedicated network segment.
- Firewalls: Restrict access to Jaeger ports.
- Principle of least privilege: Only expose necessary ports and services.
-
Attack Vector 5.2: Weak or Default Credentials (Storage Backend, Jaeger Components) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Using weak or default credentials for storage backends or Jaeger components.
- Exploits: Credential guessing, using lists of default credentials.
- Impact:
- Full Compromise: Easy access to Jaeger components and potentially the storage backend.
- Data Breach: Access to trace data and potentially other data in the storage backend.
- System Control: Gaining administrative access to Jaeger components.
- Mitigation:
- Enforce strong password policies: Use complex, unique passwords.
- Never use default credentials: Change default passwords immediately.
- Secure secret management: Use dedicated tools to manage and store credentials securely.
-
Attack Vector 5.3: Lack of Authentication and Authorization (Query UI/API, Collector API) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Failing to implement proper authentication and authorization for Jaeger components, especially Query and Collector.
- Exploits: Direct access to unprotected API endpoints and UI.
- Impact:
- Unauthorized Access: Anyone can access trace data and potentially control tracing pipeline.
- Data Manipulation: Attackers can inject or modify trace data.
- Information Disclosure: Sensitive application data revealed in traces.
- Mitigation:
- Implement strong authentication and authorization: For Query UI/API and Collector API.
- Integrate with existing authentication systems: Use SSO or other established methods.
-
Attack Vector 5.4: Unpatched Jaeger Components (Known Vulnerabilities) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
- Details: Running outdated and unpatched Jaeger components with known vulnerabilities.
- Exploits: Publicly available exploits for known vulnerabilities.
- Impact:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Leading to RCE, DoS, data breach, or other severe consequences depending on the vulnerability.
- Mitigation:
- Regular patching and updates: Establish a process for applying security patches promptly.
- Vulnerability scanning: Periodically scan Jaeger infrastructure for known vulnerabilities.
- Subscribe to security advisories: Stay informed about Jaeger security updates.